Skip to content

Nasal Provocation Testing in Occupational Rhinitis

Nasal Provocation Testing With Nasal Lavage in Allergic and Non-allergic Occupational Rhinitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01436851
Acronym
NPT
Enrollment
17
Registered
2011-09-20
Start date
2010-11-24
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis (Disorder)

Keywords

rhinitis, allergy, occupational, storage mites, nasal lavage, challenge test, ECP, alfa2Macroglobuline

Brief summary

In a previous study the investigators found that many bakery workers were sensitized to storage mites, and many had rhinitis symptoms. The role of storage mites as an occupational allergen with clinical relevance has been questioned, and the investigators wanted to investigate whether a nasal provocation with a storage mite extract would trigger symptoms and objective signs of rhinitis in bakery workers and a control group.

Detailed description

The investigations include allergy testing with skin prick testing, and measuring of specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) in sera, answering a questionnaire, and symptom scoring before and after provocations. The participants will be investigated one day with a placebo, and another day with the allergen extract of either Acarus Siro or Lepidoglyphus Destructor. As a measurement of nasal patency we use the nasal peak inspiratory flow meter, but also clinical scoring of nasal secretion and blockage. Indices of inflammation (ECP and alfa-Macroglobulin) will be monitored in nasal lavage.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALStorage mite allergen extracts

Nasal provocation with increasing doses of storage mite allergen extracts

Sponsors

Haukeland University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The participants were challenged on two occasions, one with placebo extract, and the other with storage mite extract, but in random order, and without the participants knowing when they received allergen or placebo

Intervention model description

Participants with storage mite sensitization were challenged with placebo extract and storage mite extract in the nose.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* bakery workers * \> 18 years * sensitized to a storage mite (A.Siro or L. Destructor)

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant or breast-feeding * infection in upper or lower airways the last month * nasal polyposis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurements of indices of inflammation in nasal lavage after specific nasal provocation with storage mite allergenChange from baseline to 10 minutes after nasal provocationIndices of inflammation (alfa2-macroglobulin, eosinophil cationic protein) in nasal lavage after specific nasal provocation with storage mite allergen (Acarus Siro or Lepidoglyphus Destructor) twice, the second provocation with doubled allergen concentration

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rhinitis symptoms after specific nasal provocation with storage mite allergen glyphus Destructor)Change from baseline to 10 minutes after provocationRhinitis symptoms measured by symptoms score and visual analog scale, before and after specific nasal provocation with storage mite allergen (Acarus Siro, Lepidoglyphus Destructor) twice, the second time with doubled concentration of allergen
Reduction in nasal patency measured by peak nasal inspiratory flow meter after specific nasal provocation with storage mite allergenChange from baseline to 10 minutes after provocationReduction in nasal patency measured by peak nasal inspiratory flow meter before and after specific nasal provocation with storage mite allergen (Acarus Siro, Lepidoglyphus Destructor) twice, the second time with doubled concentration of allergen
Objective signs of rhinitis assessed by rhinoscopy after specific nasal provocation with storage mite allergenChange from baseline to 10 minutes after provocationObjective signs of rhinitis assessed by anterior rhinoscopy, and notified as a clinical score before and after specific nasal provocation with storage mite allergen (Acarus Siro, Lepidoglyphus Destructor) twice, second time with the doubled allergen concentration

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026