Skip to content

Optimization of NULOJIX® Usage As A Means of Avoiding CNI and Steroids in Renal Transplantation

Optimization of NULOJIX® (Belatacept) Usage as a Means of Avoiding CNI and Steroids in Renal Transplantation (CTOT-10)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01436305
Enrollment
19
Registered
2011-09-19
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplantation, Renal Transplantation

Keywords

immunosuppressive (IS) regimens, long-term graft function, CNI (calcineurin Inhibitor )-free IS regimen, CNI (calcineurin Inhibitor ) IS regimen, corticosteroids

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess whether a new drug, Nulojix® (belatacept), would minimize serious long term side effects associated with anti-rejection medications while still protecting the new kidney from damage. The researchers also wanted to learn more about the safety of this treatment and long term health of the transplanted kidney.

Detailed description

Dialysis or kidney transplant are the two ways to treat kidney failure. Transplant recipients have to take anti-rejection medications to prevent their immune system (the body's natural defense system against illness) from rejecting their new kidney. Most patients who undergo a kidney transplant must take these anti-rejection medications for the rest of their lives. Taking standard anti-rejection medications for a long time can cause serious side effects, including kidney damage. There would be a benefit to finding new anti-rejection medications that work just as well, but don't damage the kidney.

Interventions

DRUGAlemtuzumab

Induction therapy. Group 1 and 2 study therapy regimens include induction with alemtuzumab, administered as a single intravenous dose intra-operatively over a period of 2 hours.

DRUGMMF

All treatment groups (e.g., Group 1, 2 and 3): Administered at a target dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice daily beginning on the day of surgery or post operative day 1 and adjusted as clinically warranted. Note: Myfortic® (mycophenolate sodium) may be used as a replacement for MMF, at a dose of 720 mg taken by mouth twice daily.

BIOLOGICALBasiliximab

Induction therapy. Group 3 study therapy regimen includes induction with basiliximab, administered in two doses: 1 dose administered within 2 hours prior to transplantation surgery and the 2nd dose 4 days after transplantation (unless held due to contraindication\[s\])

DRUGShort-term Tac

Short-term (3 months)

DRUGtacrolimus

maintenance

BIOLOGICALBelatacept

maintenance

DRUGmethylprednisolone

All study treatment groups: administration started on the day of transplant and tapered over a 4 day course.

Sponsors

Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or Female, 18-65 years of age at the time of enrollment; * Ability to understand and provide written informed consent; * Candidate for primary renal allograft from either a living or deceased-donor; * No known contraindications to study therapy using NULOJIX® (belatacept); * Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test upon study entry; * Female and male participants with reproductive potential must agree to use FDA approved methods of birth control during participation in the study and for 4 months following completion of the study; * Flow-based PRA within last 12 months (in absence of a sensitizing event) of \< 30% as determined by each participating study center. If the subject experienced a sensitizing event after the PRA test date, then the PRA must be repeated and confirmed \<30%; * Negative crossmatch or a PRA of 0% on historic and admission sera as determined by each participating study center. * A documented negative TB test within the 12 months prior to transplant. If documentation is not present at the time of transplantation, and the subject does not have any risk factors for TB, a TB-specific interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) may be performed.

Exclusion criteria

* Need for multi-organ transplant; * Recipient of previous organ transplant; * EBV sero-negative (or unknown) recipients; * Active infection including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV; * Individuals who have required treatment with prednisone or other immunosuppressive drugs within 1 year prior to transplant; * Individuals undergoing transplant using organs from extended criteria donor (ECD) or donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors; * HLA identical living donors; * Individuals at significant risk of early recurrence of the primary renal disease including FSGS and MPGN type 2 or any other disease that in the opinion of the investigator is at increased likelihood of recurrence and which may result in rapid decline in renal function; * Individuals previously treated with NULOJIX® (belatacept); * Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study requirements; * Use of investigational drugs within 4 weeks of enrollment; * Known hypersensitivity to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or any of the drug's components; * Administration of live attenuated vaccine(s) within 8 weeks of enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52Week 52GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 52, Week 104, and Week 156GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. This measure specifically looked at participants with scores less than 60.
Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52, Week 104, and Week 156The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below: Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if GFR value is ≥60 and \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤GFR \< 30;l Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A and 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.
Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below. Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤ GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR \< 30; Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.
Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 52, Week 104, and Week 156The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.
The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 52, Week 104, and Week 156The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it can be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function. Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function.
Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-TransplantAny time within the first week post-transplantDelayed graft function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function
An Increase of One or More Grades of CAN/IFTA When Comparing the Implantation and Subsequent Protocol BiopsiesWeek 52, Week 104, and Week 156CAN/IFTA grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue. The aim of this measure was to compare central lab reviewed pre-implantation biopsies to post-transplant biopsies, as pre-specified per protocol; however, the central lab had an inadequate set of biopsies to proceed with evaluation.
Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplantTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)CAN/IFTA grades were determined per local pathology interpretations of biopsy tissue. These grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue.
Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 CriteriaTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria.
Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Transplantation through Week 52Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Originally, this endpoint was worded as The severity of first and highest acute cellular rejection within the first 52 weeks. But since the highest grade for each subject coincided with the first ACR episode for each subject, only a summary of severity of the first episode is presented here.
Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated RejectionTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.
Type of Treatment of RejectionTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of biopsy findings and corresponding treatment are presented here for each instance of treatment for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined below. ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy Chr. AMR=Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection Gd.=Grade IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy. Only 'for cause' biopsies were performed post-transplant; thus, it is possible for a participant to be included in the analysis population and not have a biopsy for this outcome measure.
Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52Week 52The presence of antibodies reactive to Histocompatibility Antigen (HLA) molecules expressed on the renal allograft have been associated with both acute and chronic injury to the transplanted kidney. The development of de novo anti- donor HLA antibodies may mean a person is more likely to reject the graft.
Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHOWeek 52New onset diabetes is the development of diabetes post-kidney transplant. It was identified by the clinical sites caring for each participant and reported directly in the clinical database. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a determination made by referencing glucose measurements obtained from a standard chemistry panel. Any fasting glucose measure that is between 110 and 125 mg/dL is classified as IFG. Acronyms: American Diabetes Association (ADA); World Health Organization (WHO).
Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-TransplantTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as histologic evidence of borderline or higher cellular rejection per local pathologist.
HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control. A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels, 6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes.
Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52Week 52A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart. Systolic measures of \<120 and diastolic measures of \<80 are considered normal. Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension). Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high.
Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52Week 52Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stoke and myocardial infarction.
Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are detailed below. Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease LDL cholesterol: \<70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; \<100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; \<130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease Triglycerides: \<150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease
Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood
Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day
Number of Events of Death or Graft LossTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)This measure counts deaths and graft loss occurring at any point post transplantation. Graft loss is defined as need for dialysis for greater than 30 days duration, allograft nephrectomy, or retransplantation.
Count of Participants With RejectionTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection of the transplanted kidney regardless of the presence of a biopsy.
Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Enrollment through last study visit (up to week 156)Adverse events were collected systematically from enrollment through last study visit. Displayed below are counts of all adverse events per treatment group (including both serious and non-serious adverse events). Separately counts of all adverse events determined to be serious are displayed per treatment group. More detail about adverse events for this trial is displayed in the 'Adverse Event' section.
Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse EventsTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)Infections of certain types (i.e., excluding those identified in the protocol as occurring commonly in this study population) were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization of prolongation of a current hospitalization.
Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse EventsTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)Viral infections following renal transplantation is significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronyms: BK Polyoma Virus (BKV); Cytomegalovirus (CMV).
Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse EventsTransplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronym: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure24 hours after transplantationTemperature of \>39 degrees Celsius would be an indication of fever most often in response to an infection or illness. Systolic blood pressure \<90mm Hg would be an indication of low blood pressure.
Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52Day 14 to Week 52Treated diabetes is defined as the receipt of oral medication or insulin for \>14 days between 14 days and 52 weeks post-transplant

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Three sites in the United States enrolled a total of 19 participants in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus
Induction: Alemtuzumab was administered in a single intravenous dose of 30 mg intra-operatively over a period of 2 hours. Maintenance: Starting on the day of surgery or post-operative day one, participants underwent maintenance therapy. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given at a dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice a day of which was adjusted as clinically warranted. Mycophenolate sodium could be used to replace MMF at a dose 720 mg by mouth twice a day. Methylprednisone was administered at a dose of 500 mg on the day of transplant, and tapered to 250 mg day 1 post-transplant, 125 mg day 2 post-transplant, 60 mg day 3 post-transplant, 30 mg day 4 post-transplant. Tacrolimus was given at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg twice a day by mouth, which was adjusted to target trough levels of 8-12 ng/ml during the first 24 weeks post-transplant, then adjusted to target trough levels of 5-8 ng/ml thereafter.
6
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept
Induction: Alemtuzumab was administered in a single intravenous dose of 30 mg intra-operatively over a period of 2 hours. Maintenance: Starting on the day of surgery or post-operative day one, participants underwent maintenance therapy. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given at a dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice a day of which was adjusted as clinically warranted. Mycophenolate sodium could be used to replace MMF at a dose 720 mg by mouth twice a day. Methylprednisone was administered at a dose of 500 mg on the day of transplant, and tapered to 250 mg day 1 post-transplant, 125 mg day 2 post-transplant, 60 mg day 3 post-transplant, 30 mg day 4 post-transplant. Belatacept was given at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 0, then at days 4, 14, 28, 56 and 84. After Day 84, participants received 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac
Induction: Basiliximab was administered in 2 doses of 20 mg each, 2 hours prior to surgery and 4 days post-transplantation. Maintenance: Starting on the day of surgery or post-operative day one, participants underwent maintenance therapy. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given at a dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice a day of which was adjusted as clinically warranted. Mycophenolate sodium could be used to replace MMF at a dose 720 mg by mouth twice a day. Methylprednisone was given at a dose of 500 mg on Day 0, and tapered to 250 mg day 1 post-transplant, 125 mg day 2 post-transplant, 60 mg day 3 post-transplant, 30 mg day 4 post-transplant. Belatacept was given at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 0, then at days 4, 14, 28, 56 and 84. After Day 84, participants received 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Tacrolimus was given at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg twice a day by mouth, then adjusted to target trough levels: 8-12 ng/ml by Day 29, 5-8 ng/ml by Day 57, 3-5 ng/ml by Day 85 then stopped.
7
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject130

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusTotalInduction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacInduction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept
Age, Continuous46.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants16 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants8 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants10 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants19 participants7 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants6 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants13 Participants6 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 60 / 60 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 64 / 67 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 65 / 65 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat population with measurable data at Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusMean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 5255.9 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 8.9
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptMean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 5251.6 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 23.5
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacMean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 5258.3 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

An Increase of One or More Grades of CAN/IFTA When Comparing the Implantation and Subsequent Protocol Biopsies

CAN/IFTA grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue. The aim of this measure was to compare central lab reviewed pre-implantation biopsies to post-transplant biopsies, as pre-specified per protocol; however, the central lab had an inadequate set of biopsies to proceed with evaluation.

Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

Population: There was an insufficient number of biopsies collected for the summarized data to be reliable.

Secondary

Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant

The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below: Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if GFR value is ≥60 and \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤GFR \< 30;l Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A and 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.

Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at Weeks 52, 104 and 156

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 10 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 3A3 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 10 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 21 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 21 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 40 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 3A1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 3A1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 3B1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 3B0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 40 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 10 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 40 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 3B1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 21 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 21 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 10 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 21 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 3A1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 3B0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 41 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 11 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 20 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 3A1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 3B0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 40 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 10 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 3A1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 3B0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 40 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 11 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 3B1 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 10 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 40 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 3B1 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 25 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 3A3 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 10 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 3A1 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 3A2 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 52 - Stage 23 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 3B1 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 23 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 156 - Stage 40 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-TransplantWeek 104 - Stage 40 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52

Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Originally, this endpoint was worded as The severity of first and highest acute cellular rejection within the first 52 weeks. But since the highest grade for each subject coincided with the first ACR episode for each subject, only a summary of severity of the first episode is presented here.

Time frame: Transplantation through Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IB0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IA0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IIB0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade III0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IIA0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IA1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IIB1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade III0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IB0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IIA0 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IIA2 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IB0 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IIB1 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade IA1 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52Grade III0 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria

Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria.

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria2 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria4 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection1 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection0 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant

Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as histologic evidence of borderline or higher cellular rejection per local pathologist.

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant3 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant2 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant5 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events

Viral infections following renal transplantation is significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronyms: BK Polyoma Virus (BKV); Cytomegalovirus (CMV).

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse EventsBKV0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse EventsCMV1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse EventsBKV0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse EventsCMV0 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse EventsBKV2 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse EventsCMV0 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant

CAN/IFTA grades were determined per local pathology interpretations of biopsy tissue. These grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue.

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant3 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant5 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5

The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below. Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤ GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR \< 30; Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.

Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at Weeks 52, 104 and 156

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 1040 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 520 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 1560 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 1040 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 521 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 1560 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 520 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 1560 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5Week 1040 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant

Delayed graft function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function

Time frame: Any time within the first week post-transplant

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant2 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant0 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52

The presence of antibodies reactive to Histocompatibility Antigen (HLA) molecules expressed on the renal allograft have been associated with both acute and chronic injury to the transplanted kidney. The development of de novo anti- donor HLA antibodies may mean a person is more likely to reject the graft.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 520 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 520 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 520 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events

Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronym: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events0 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events0 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO

New onset diabetes is the development of diabetes post-kidney transplant. It was identified by the clinical sites caring for each participant and reported directly in the clinical database. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a determination made by referencing glucose measurements obtained from a standard chemistry panel. Any fasting glucose measure that is between 110 and 125 mg/dL is classified as IFG. Acronyms: American Diabetes Association (ADA); World Health Organization (WHO).

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHONew onset diabetes during first 52 weeks0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHOImpaired fasting glucose at week 521 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHONew onset diabetes during first 52 weeks0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHOImpaired fasting glucose at week 520 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHONew onset diabetes during first 52 weeks0 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHOImpaired fasting glucose at week 520 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI

GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. This measure specifically looked at participants with scores less than 60.

Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at Weeks 52, 104 and 156.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 1042 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 523 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 1562 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 1041 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 522 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 1561 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 524 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 1562 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPIWeek 1043 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure

Temperature of \>39 degrees Celsius would be an indication of fever most often in response to an infection or illness. Systolic blood pressure \<90mm Hg would be an indication of low blood pressure.

Time frame: 24 hours after transplantation

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant ProcedureFever >39 degrees0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant ProcedureSystolic BP <900 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant ProcedureFever >39 degrees0 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant ProcedureSystolic BP <901 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant ProcedureFever >39 degrees0 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant ProcedureSystolic BP <900 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events

Infections of certain types (i.e., excluding those identified in the protocol as occurring commonly in this study population) were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization of prolongation of a current hospitalization.

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events2 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events2 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events1 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Rejection

The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection of the transplanted kidney regardless of the presence of a biopsy.

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Rejection1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Rejection3 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Rejection5 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52

Treated diabetes is defined as the receipt of oral medication or insulin for \>14 days between 14 days and 52 weeks post-transplant

Time frame: Day 14 to Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat with available data

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 521 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 520 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 521 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52

Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stoke and myocardial infarction.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat with available data at Week 52

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 523 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 523 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 527 Participants
Secondary

Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156

Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 1043 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 523 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Baseline5 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 244 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 1563 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 521 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Baseline1 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 241 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 1041 Participants
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 1561 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 1563 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 1043 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Baseline2 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 522 Participants
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacCount of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Week 242 Participants
Secondary

Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156

A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are detailed below. Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease LDL cholesterol: \<70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; \<100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; \<130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease Triglycerides: \<150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W104170.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W2443.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.2
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W156138.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W156115.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.2
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. Baseline141.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 28.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL Baseline76.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W24161.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 53.9
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL Baseline33.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W2476.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W156183.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 3.5
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W156116.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W5269.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 38
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W104146.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W104100.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.7
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. Baseline158.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 92.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL Baseline108.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W52156.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 30.7
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W15645.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W24128.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 38
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W24171.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 44
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W10441.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W52117.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W52319.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 294
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W5238.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W104129.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.7
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL Baseline41.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. Baseline160.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W24159.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 11.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W52187.0 mg/dL
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W104142.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 3.5
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W156133.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL Baseline118.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W24129.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W52151.0 mg/dL
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W104110.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 3.5
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W156102.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL Baseline86.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 29.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W2486.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 29.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W52114.0 mg/dL
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W10458.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 18.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W15655.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W2429.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 2.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W5236.0 mg/dL
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W10432.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W15631.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.7
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. Baseline307.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 350.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W24249.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 172.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W52187.0 mg/dL
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W104220.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 168.3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W156228.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 93.3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W2456.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W5261.0 mg/dL
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. Baseline165.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.4
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W5259.0 mg/dL
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W24129.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35.3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W5258.0 mg/dL
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W10453.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 16.6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL Baseline122.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 44.9
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W24185.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 40.1
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL W15645.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 14.6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W156181.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 60.6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W156156.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 75.6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. Baseline206.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 148.5
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W104189.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 49.9
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W5249.0 mg/dL
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W104172.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 130
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W104101.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42.3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W2483.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41.4
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Triglyc. W24115.9 mg/dLStandard Deviation 68.1
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL W156106.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 46.3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156LDL Baseline83.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41.4
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W156136.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 58
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156HDL Baseline43.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.7
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Non-HDL W104135.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 42.4
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacFasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156Tot. Chol. W52157.5 mg/dLStandard Deviation 53
Secondary

HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control. A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels, 6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes.

Time frame: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 285.3 percentStandard Deviation 1.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 845.7 percentStandard Deviation 1.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 366.7 percentStandard Deviation 1.5
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 1045.7 percentStandard Deviation 0.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 1565.6 percentStandard Deviation 0.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 527.0 percentStandard Deviation 2.9
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 246.9 percentStandard Deviation 1.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 524.8 percentStandard Deviation 0.7
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 1045.2 percentStandard Deviation 0.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 245.1 percentStandard Deviation 0.3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 1565.2 percentStandard Deviation 0.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 365.3 percentStandard Deviation 0.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 845.0 percentStandard Deviation 0.6
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 285.1 percentStandard Deviation 0.5
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 1567.8 percentStandard Deviation 2.5
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 285.8 percentStandard Deviation 0.2
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 845.9 percentStandard Deviation 0.8
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 246.5 percentStandard Deviation 1
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 367.2 percentStandard Deviation 2.6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 527.6 percent
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 728.1 percent
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacHbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 1046.6 percentStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model

The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.

Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at Weeks 52, 104 and 156

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 15649.0 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 16.3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 10454.2 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 13.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 5252.4 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 8.3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 10469.3 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 27.3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 5247.8 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 22.3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 15665.5 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 20.2
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 5255.7 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 11
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 15661.5 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 13.9
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacMean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable ModelWeek 10460.4 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 16.8
Secondary

Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Adverse events were collected systematically from enrollment through last study visit. Displayed below are counts of all adverse events per treatment group (including both serious and non-serious adverse events). Separately counts of all adverse events determined to be serious are displayed per treatment group. More detail about adverse events for this trial is displayed in the 'Adverse Event' section.

Time frame: Enrollment through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusNumber of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)All Adverse Events21 Events
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusNumber of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events6 Events
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptNumber of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)All Adverse Events25 Events
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptNumber of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events11 Events
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacNumber of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)All Adverse Events40 Events
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacNumber of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events7 Events
Secondary

Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss

This measure counts deaths and graft loss occurring at any point post transplantation. Graft loss is defined as need for dialysis for greater than 30 days duration, allograft nephrectomy, or retransplantation.

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusNumber of Events of Death or Graft Loss2 Events
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptNumber of Events of Death or Graft Loss3 Events
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacNumber of Events of Death or Graft Loss0 Events
Secondary

Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52

A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart. Systolic measures of \<120 and diastolic measures of \<80 are considered normal. Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension). Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Intent-to-treat with available data at Week 52

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusStandardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52147.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 18.7
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusStandardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 5280.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptStandardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 5292.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptStandardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52146.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.1
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacStandardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52139.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 18.1
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacStandardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 5279.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.5
Secondary

The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine

The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it can be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function. Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function.

Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 1041.27 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 1.86
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 521.29 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 1.85
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 1561.33 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 1.82
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 1040.62 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 1.18
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 520.62 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 0.99
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 1560.69 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 1.14
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 521.07 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 1.16
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 1560.48 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 0.48
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacThe Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum CreatinineWeek 1040.68 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by monthStandard Deviation 0.83
Secondary

Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156

This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day

Time frame: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156

Population: Intent-to-treat with available data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 2828.8 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 12.3
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 8422.2 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 6.6
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 3613.0 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 2
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 10415.3 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 5.7
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 15614.0 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 6.2
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 5214.6 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 5
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 2414.8 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 3.8
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 5214.3 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 1.5
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 10415.5 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 2.1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 248.3 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 15615.0 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 1.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 3614.0 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 1
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 8413.5 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 4.4
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 2815.8 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 6.3
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 15612.7 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 6.2
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 2827.3 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 7.6
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Day 8421.3 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 7.5
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 2416.6 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 5.7
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 3617.0 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 5.1
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 5217.8 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 3.5
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 7216.0 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 4.4
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacTotal Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156Week 10414.8 Number of pillsStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Type of Treatment of Rejection

Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of biopsy findings and corresponding treatment are presented here for each instance of treatment for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined below. ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy Chr. AMR=Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection Gd.=Grade IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy. Only 'for cause' biopsies were performed post-transplant; thus, it is possible for a participant to be included in the analysis population and not have a biopsy for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)

Population: Intent-to-treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIB; ATG and Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIB + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionBorderline + IFTA Gd. I; with Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionBorderline rejection; IVIG and plasmapheresis1 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIA + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. II; Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + Chr. AMR + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + TacrolimusType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIA; Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionBorderline + IFTA Gd. I; with Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionBorderline rejection; IVIG and plasmapheresis0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + Chr. AMR + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids1 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. II; Pulse Steroids1 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIB; ATG and Pulse Steroids1 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIA; Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIA + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + BelataceptType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIB + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. II; Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionBorderline rejection; IVIG and plasmapheresis0 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIA; Pulse Steroids1 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + Chr. AMR + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIB + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids1 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionBorderline + IFTA Gd. I; with Pulse Steroids1 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIB; ATG and Pulse Steroids0 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IIA + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids2 Biopsy
Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + TacType of Treatment of RejectionACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids1 Biopsy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026