Kidney Transplantation, Renal Transplantation
Conditions
Keywords
immunosuppressive (IS) regimens, long-term graft function, CNI (calcineurin Inhibitor )-free IS regimen, CNI (calcineurin Inhibitor ) IS regimen, corticosteroids
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to assess whether a new drug, Nulojix® (belatacept), would minimize serious long term side effects associated with anti-rejection medications while still protecting the new kidney from damage. The researchers also wanted to learn more about the safety of this treatment and long term health of the transplanted kidney.
Detailed description
Dialysis or kidney transplant are the two ways to treat kidney failure. Transplant recipients have to take anti-rejection medications to prevent their immune system (the body's natural defense system against illness) from rejecting their new kidney. Most patients who undergo a kidney transplant must take these anti-rejection medications for the rest of their lives. Taking standard anti-rejection medications for a long time can cause serious side effects, including kidney damage. There would be a benefit to finding new anti-rejection medications that work just as well, but don't damage the kidney.
Interventions
Induction therapy. Group 1 and 2 study therapy regimens include induction with alemtuzumab, administered as a single intravenous dose intra-operatively over a period of 2 hours.
All treatment groups (e.g., Group 1, 2 and 3): Administered at a target dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice daily beginning on the day of surgery or post operative day 1 and adjusted as clinically warranted. Note: Myfortic® (mycophenolate sodium) may be used as a replacement for MMF, at a dose of 720 mg taken by mouth twice daily.
Induction therapy. Group 3 study therapy regimen includes induction with basiliximab, administered in two doses: 1 dose administered within 2 hours prior to transplantation surgery and the 2nd dose 4 days after transplantation (unless held due to contraindication\[s\])
Short-term (3 months)
maintenance
maintenance
All study treatment groups: administration started on the day of transplant and tapered over a 4 day course.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or Female, 18-65 years of age at the time of enrollment; * Ability to understand and provide written informed consent; * Candidate for primary renal allograft from either a living or deceased-donor; * No known contraindications to study therapy using NULOJIX® (belatacept); * Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test upon study entry; * Female and male participants with reproductive potential must agree to use FDA approved methods of birth control during participation in the study and for 4 months following completion of the study; * Flow-based PRA within last 12 months (in absence of a sensitizing event) of \< 30% as determined by each participating study center. If the subject experienced a sensitizing event after the PRA test date, then the PRA must be repeated and confirmed \<30%; * Negative crossmatch or a PRA of 0% on historic and admission sera as determined by each participating study center. * A documented negative TB test within the 12 months prior to transplant. If documentation is not present at the time of transplantation, and the subject does not have any risk factors for TB, a TB-specific interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) may be performed.
Exclusion criteria
* Need for multi-organ transplant; * Recipient of previous organ transplant; * EBV sero-negative (or unknown) recipients; * Active infection including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV; * Individuals who have required treatment with prednisone or other immunosuppressive drugs within 1 year prior to transplant; * Individuals undergoing transplant using organs from extended criteria donor (ECD) or donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors; * HLA identical living donors; * Individuals at significant risk of early recurrence of the primary renal disease including FSGS and MPGN type 2 or any other disease that in the opinion of the investigator is at increased likelihood of recurrence and which may result in rapid decline in renal function; * Individuals previously treated with NULOJIX® (belatacept); * Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study requirements; * Use of investigational drugs within 4 weeks of enrollment; * Known hypersensitivity to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or any of the drug's components; * Administration of live attenuated vaccine(s) within 8 weeks of enrollment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52 | Week 52 | GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156 | GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. This measure specifically looked at participants with scores less than 60. |
| Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156 | The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below: Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if GFR value is ≥60 and \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤GFR \< 30;l Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A and 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure. |
| Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156 | The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below. Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤ GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR \< 30; Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure. |
| Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156 | The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. |
| The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156 | The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it can be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function. Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function. |
| Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant | Any time within the first week post-transplant | Delayed graft function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function |
| An Increase of One or More Grades of CAN/IFTA When Comparing the Implantation and Subsequent Protocol Biopsies | Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156 | CAN/IFTA grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue. The aim of this measure was to compare central lab reviewed pre-implantation biopsies to post-transplant biopsies, as pre-specified per protocol; however, the central lab had an inadequate set of biopsies to proceed with evaluation. |
| Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | CAN/IFTA grades were determined per local pathology interpretations of biopsy tissue. These grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue. |
| Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. |
| Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Transplantation through Week 52 | Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Originally, this endpoint was worded as The severity of first and highest acute cellular rejection within the first 52 weeks. But since the highest grade for each subject coincided with the first ACR episode for each subject, only a summary of severity of the first episode is presented here. |
| Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury. |
| Type of Treatment of Rejection | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of biopsy findings and corresponding treatment are presented here for each instance of treatment for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined below. ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy Chr. AMR=Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection Gd.=Grade IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy. Only 'for cause' biopsies were performed post-transplant; thus, it is possible for a participant to be included in the analysis population and not have a biopsy for this outcome measure. |
| Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52 | Week 52 | The presence of antibodies reactive to Histocompatibility Antigen (HLA) molecules expressed on the renal allograft have been associated with both acute and chronic injury to the transplanted kidney. The development of de novo anti- donor HLA antibodies may mean a person is more likely to reject the graft. |
| Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO | Week 52 | New onset diabetes is the development of diabetes post-kidney transplant. It was identified by the clinical sites caring for each participant and reported directly in the clinical database. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a determination made by referencing glucose measurements obtained from a standard chemistry panel. Any fasting glucose measure that is between 110 and 125 mg/dL is classified as IFG. Acronyms: American Diabetes Association (ADA); World Health Organization (WHO). |
| Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as histologic evidence of borderline or higher cellular rejection per local pathologist. |
| HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156 | Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control. A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels, 6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes. |
| Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 | Week 52 | A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart. Systolic measures of \<120 and diastolic measures of \<80 are considered normal. Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension). Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high. |
| Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52 | Week 52 | Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stoke and myocardial infarction. |
| Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156 | A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are detailed below. Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease LDL cholesterol: \<70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; \<100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; \<130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease Triglycerides: \<150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease |
| Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156 | Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood |
| Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156 | This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day |
| Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | This measure counts deaths and graft loss occurring at any point post transplantation. Graft loss is defined as need for dialysis for greater than 30 days duration, allograft nephrectomy, or retransplantation. |
| Count of Participants With Rejection | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection of the transplanted kidney regardless of the presence of a biopsy. |
| Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Enrollment through last study visit (up to week 156) | Adverse events were collected systematically from enrollment through last study visit. Displayed below are counts of all adverse events per treatment group (including both serious and non-serious adverse events). Separately counts of all adverse events determined to be serious are displayed per treatment group. More detail about adverse events for this trial is displayed in the 'Adverse Event' section. |
| Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | Infections of certain types (i.e., excluding those identified in the protocol as occurring commonly in this study population) were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization of prolongation of a current hospitalization. |
| Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | Viral infections following renal transplantation is significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronyms: BK Polyoma Virus (BKV); Cytomegalovirus (CMV). |
| Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events | Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156) | Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronym: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) |
| Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure | 24 hours after transplantation | Temperature of \>39 degrees Celsius would be an indication of fever most often in response to an infection or illness. Systolic blood pressure \<90mm Hg would be an indication of low blood pressure. |
| Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52 | Day 14 to Week 52 | Treated diabetes is defined as the receipt of oral medication or insulin for \>14 days between 14 days and 52 weeks post-transplant |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Three sites in the United States enrolled a total of 19 participants in the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus Induction: Alemtuzumab was administered in a single intravenous dose of 30 mg intra-operatively over a period of 2 hours.
Maintenance: Starting on the day of surgery or post-operative day one, participants underwent maintenance therapy.
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given at a dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice a day of which was adjusted as clinically warranted. Mycophenolate sodium could be used to replace MMF at a dose 720 mg by mouth twice a day.
Methylprednisone was administered at a dose of 500 mg on the day of transplant, and tapered to 250 mg day 1 post-transplant, 125 mg day 2 post-transplant, 60 mg day 3 post-transplant, 30 mg day 4 post-transplant.
Tacrolimus was given at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg twice a day by mouth, which was adjusted to target trough levels of 8-12 ng/ml during the first 24 weeks post-transplant, then adjusted to target trough levels of 5-8 ng/ml thereafter. | 6 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept Induction: Alemtuzumab was administered in a single intravenous dose of 30 mg intra-operatively over a period of 2 hours.
Maintenance: Starting on the day of surgery or post-operative day one, participants underwent maintenance therapy.
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given at a dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice a day of which was adjusted as clinically warranted. Mycophenolate sodium could be used to replace MMF at a dose 720 mg by mouth twice a day.
Methylprednisone was administered at a dose of 500 mg on the day of transplant, and tapered to 250 mg day 1 post-transplant, 125 mg day 2 post-transplant, 60 mg day 3 post-transplant, 30 mg day 4 post-transplant.
Belatacept was given at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 0, then at days 4, 14, 28, 56 and 84. After Day 84, participants received 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks. | 6 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac Induction: Basiliximab was administered in 2 doses of 20 mg each, 2 hours prior to surgery and 4 days post-transplantation.
Maintenance: Starting on the day of surgery or post-operative day one, participants underwent maintenance therapy.
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given at a dose of 1000 mg by mouth twice a day of which was adjusted as clinically warranted. Mycophenolate sodium could be used to replace MMF at a dose 720 mg by mouth twice a day.
Methylprednisone was given at a dose of 500 mg on Day 0, and tapered to 250 mg day 1 post-transplant, 125 mg day 2 post-transplant, 60 mg day 3 post-transplant, 30 mg day 4 post-transplant.
Belatacept was given at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Day 0, then at days 4, 14, 28, 56 and 84. After Day 84, participants received 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
Tacrolimus was given at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg twice a day by mouth, then adjusted to target trough levels: 8-12 ng/ml by Day 29, 5-8 ng/ml by Day 57, 3-5 ng/ml by Day 85 then stopped. | 7 |
| Total | 19 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Total | Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 46.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 | 46.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | 49.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 43.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants | 16 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 4 Participants | 10 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 6 participants | 19 participants | 7 participants | 6 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 13 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 7 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 6 / 6 | 4 / 6 | 7 / 7 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 6 | 5 / 6 | 5 / 7 |
Outcome results
Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52
GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥ 90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Intent-to-treat population with measurable data at Week 52
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52 | 55.9 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52 | 51.6 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Mean Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Calculated for Each Treatment Group Using the CKD-EPI Equation at Wk 52 | 58.3 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
An Increase of One or More Grades of CAN/IFTA When Comparing the Implantation and Subsequent Protocol Biopsies
CAN/IFTA grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue. The aim of this measure was to compare central lab reviewed pre-implantation biopsies to post-transplant biopsies, as pre-specified per protocol; however, the central lab had an inadequate set of biopsies to proceed with evaluation.
Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Population: There was an insufficient number of biopsies collected for the summarized data to be reliable.
Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant
The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below: Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if GFR value is ≥60 and \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤GFR \< 30;l Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A and 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.
Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 1 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 3A | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 1 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 2 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 2 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 4 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 3A | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 3A | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 3B | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 3B | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 4 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 1 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 4 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 3B | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 2 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 2 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 1 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 2 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 3A | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 3B | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 4 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 1 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 2 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 3A | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 3B | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 4 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 1 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 3A | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 3B | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 4 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 1 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 3B | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 1 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 4 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 3B | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 2 | 5 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 3A | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 1 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 3A | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 3A | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 52 - Stage 2 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 3B | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 2 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 156 - Stage 4 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage Post-Transplant | Week 104 - Stage 4 | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52
Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Originally, this endpoint was worded as The severity of first and highest acute cellular rejection within the first 52 weeks. But since the highest grade for each subject coincided with the first ACR episode for each subject, only a summary of severity of the first episode is presented here.
Time frame: Transplantation through Week 52
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IB | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IA | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IIB | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IIA | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IA | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IIB | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IB | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IIA | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IIA | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IB | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IIB | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade IA | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants by Severity of First Acute Cellular Rejection by Wk 52 | Grade III | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria
Acute cellular rejection is when lesions at the site of the graft characteristically are infiltrated with large numbers of lymphocytes and macrophages that cause tissue damage. Acute cellular rejection for this endpoint is defined as a grade ≥ IA by Banff 2007 criteria.
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Acute Cellular Rejection Grade Equal to or Greater Than IA, by the Banff 2007 Criteria | 4 Participants |
Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection
Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is defined as diffusely positive staining for C4d, presence of circulating anti-donor antibodies and morphologic evidence of acute tissue injury.
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Antibody Mediated Rejection | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant
Biopsy proven acute rejection was defined as histologic evidence of borderline or higher cellular rejection per local pathologist.
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection at Any Time Post-Transplant | 5 Participants |
Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events
Viral infections following renal transplantation is significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronyms: BK Polyoma Virus (BKV); Cytomegalovirus (CMV).
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events | BKV | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events | CMV | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events | BKV | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events | CMV | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events | BKV | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With BKV and CMV Viremia (Local Center Monitoring) Reported as Adverse Events | CMV | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant
CAN/IFTA grades were determined per local pathology interpretations of biopsy tissue. These grades reflect the severity of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present in the tissue obtained during a kidney biopsy. Higher grades indicate greater severity in interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy present the kidney biopsy tissue.
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With CAN/IFTA Grade I, II or III at Any Time Post-transplant | 5 Participants |
Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5
The stages of Chronic Kidney Disease are defined using the participant's GFR value as indicated below. Stage 1 if GFR value is ≥90; Stage 2 if 60 ≤ GFR \< 90; Stage 3A if 45 ≤ GFR \< 60; Stage 3B if 30 ≤ GFR \< 45; Stage 4 if 15 ≤ GFR \< 30; Stage 5 if GFR \< 15. Stage 1 means kidney function is normal. Stage 2 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Stages 3A abd 3B indicate moderately reduced kidney function. Stage 4 indicates severely reduced kidney function. Stage 5 indicates very severe or end stage kidney failure.
Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 104 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 52 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 156 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 104 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 52 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 156 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 52 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 156 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With CKD Stage 4 or 5 | Week 104 | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant
Delayed graft function is defined as dialysis in the first week on one or more occasions for any indication other than the treatment of acute hyperkalemia in the setting of otherwise acceptable renal function
Time frame: Any time within the first week post-transplant
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Delayed Graft Function Post-Transplant | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52
The presence of antibodies reactive to Histocompatibility Antigen (HLA) molecules expressed on the renal allograft have been associated with both acute and chronic injury to the transplanted kidney. The development of de novo anti- donor HLA antibodies may mean a person is more likely to reject the graft.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With de Novo Anti-donor HLA Antibodies at Wk 52 | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events
Viral infections following renal transplantation is a significant source of recipient morbidity and mortality, and a significant cause of allograft dysfunction and loss. Specific viruses were monitored during this study using participant blood samples. Acronym: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With EBV Infection as Reported on the Case Report Form as Adverse Events | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO
New onset diabetes is the development of diabetes post-kidney transplant. It was identified by the clinical sites caring for each participant and reported directly in the clinical database. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a determination made by referencing glucose measurements obtained from a standard chemistry panel. Any fasting glucose measure that is between 110 and 125 mg/dL is classified as IFG. Acronyms: American Diabetes Association (ADA); World Health Organization (WHO).
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO | New onset diabetes during first 52 weeks | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO | Impaired fasting glucose at week 52 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO | New onset diabetes during first 52 weeks | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO | Impaired fasting glucose at week 52 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO | New onset diabetes during first 52 weeks | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Either New Onset Diabetes After Transplant (NODAT) or Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) at Wk 52 Based on Criteria Specified by the ADA and WHO | Impaired fasting glucose at week 52 | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI
GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. This measure specifically looked at participants with scores less than 60.
Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at Weeks 52, 104 and 156.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 104 | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 52 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 156 | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 104 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 52 | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 156 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 52 | 4 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 156 | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < 60 mL/Min/1.73 m^2 by CKD EPI | Week 104 | 3 Participants |
Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure
Temperature of \>39 degrees Celsius would be an indication of fever most often in response to an infection or illness. Systolic blood pressure \<90mm Hg would be an indication of low blood pressure.
Time frame: 24 hours after transplantation
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure | Fever >39 degrees | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure | Systolic BP <90 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure | Fever >39 degrees | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure | Systolic BP <90 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure | Fever >39 degrees | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Fever > 39 Degrees Celsius and Blood Pressure < 90mm Hg Within 24 Hours of Onset of Transplant Procedure | Systolic BP <90 | 0 Participants |
Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events
Infections of certain types (i.e., excluding those identified in the protocol as occurring commonly in this study population) were required to be reported as a serious adverse event if they required either inpatient hospitalization of prolongation of a current hospitalization.
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Infections Requiring Hospitalization or Systemic Therapy Reported as Serious Adverse Events | 1 Participants |
Count of Participants With Rejection
The number of participants who were treated by their local physician for any type of rejection including, but not limited to cellular rejection and antibody- mediated rejection of the transplanted kidney regardless of the presence of a biopsy.
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Rejection | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Rejection | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Rejection | 5 Participants |
Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52
Treated diabetes is defined as the receipt of oral medication or insulin for \>14 days between 14 days and 52 weeks post-transplant
Time frame: Day 14 to Week 52
Population: Intent-to-treat with available data
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52 | 0 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Treated Diabetes Between Day 14 and Wk 52 | 1 Participants |
Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52
Anti-hypertensive medications are a class of drugs that are used to treat hypertension. The medications seek to prevent the complications of high blood pressure, such as stoke and myocardial infarction.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Intent-to-treat with available data at Week 52
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Use of Anti-hypertensive Medications at Wk 52 | 7 Participants |
Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156
Lipid lowering medications are used in the treatment of high levels of fats (lipids), such as cholesterol in blood
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Baseline | 5 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 4 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Baseline | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 1 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 3 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 2 Participants |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Count of Participants With Use of Lipid Lowering Medications at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 2 Participants |
Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156
A fasting lipid profiles measures total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These measurements are used in assessing one's risk of cardiovascular disease. Target ranges for each of these measures are detailed below. Total cholesterol: 75-169 mg/dL if age ≤ 20; 100-199 mg/dL if age ≥ 21; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease LDL cholesterol: \<70 mg/dL for people with documented cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome; \<100 mg/dL for people considered high risk for cardiovascular disease; \<130 mg/dL for people considered low risk for cardiovascular disease; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease HDL cholesterol: 40mg/dL and higher; high values indicate reduced risk of cardiovascular disease Non-HDL cholesterol: 30 mg/dL above the target value for LDL cholesterol; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease Triglycerides: \<150 mg/dL; high values indicate risk of cardiovascular disease
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 52, Week 104, Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W104 | 170.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W24 | 43.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W156 | 138.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W156 | 115.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. Baseline | 141.2 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 28.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL Baseline | 76.7 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W24 | 161.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 53.9 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL Baseline | 33.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W24 | 76.7 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W156 | 183.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W156 | 116.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W52 | 69.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 38 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W104 | 146.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W104 | 100.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. Baseline | 158.7 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 92.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL Baseline | 108.2 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W52 | 156.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 30.7 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W156 | 45.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W24 | 128.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 38 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W24 | 171.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 44 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W104 | 41.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W52 | 117.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 23.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W52 | 319.3 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 294 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W52 | 38.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W104 | 129.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL Baseline | 41.3 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 22.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. Baseline | 160.2 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 37.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W24 | 159.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W52 | 187.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W104 | 142.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W156 | 133.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL Baseline | 118.8 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 19 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W24 | 129.3 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W52 | 151.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W104 | 110.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W156 | 102.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL Baseline | 86.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W24 | 86.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 29.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W52 | 114.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W104 | 58.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W156 | 55.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 19.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W24 | 29.7 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W52 | 36.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W104 | 32.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W156 | 31.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. Baseline | 307.8 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 350.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W24 | 249.7 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 172.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W52 | 187.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W104 | 220.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 168.3 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W156 | 228.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 93.3 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W24 | 56.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W52 | 61.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. Baseline | 165.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 37.4 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W52 | 59.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W24 | 129.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 35.3 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W52 | 58.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W104 | 53.4 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL Baseline | 122.3 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 44.9 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W24 | 185.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 40.1 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL W156 | 45.7 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W156 | 181.7 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 60.6 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W156 | 156.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 75.6 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. Baseline | 206.9 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 148.5 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W104 | 189.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 49.9 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W52 | 49.0 mg/dL | — |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W104 | 172.8 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 130 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W104 | 101.4 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 42.3 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W24 | 83.4 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 41.4 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Triglyc. W24 | 115.9 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 68.1 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL W156 | 106.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 46.3 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | LDL Baseline | 83.4 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 41.4 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W156 | 136.0 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 58 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | HDL Baseline | 43.3 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Non-HDL W104 | 135.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 42.4 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Fasting Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Non-HDL Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and Triglyceride) at Baseline and Wks 24, 52, 104 and 156 | Tot. Chol. W52 | 157.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 53 |
HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measures the average blood glucose levels over 8-12 weeks, thus acting as a useful long-term gauge of blood glucose control. A value below 6.0% reflects normal levels, 6.0% to 6.4% reflects prediabetes, and a value of ≥ 6.5% reflects diabetes.
Time frame: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat with available data
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 28 | 5.3 percent | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 84 | 5.7 percent | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 36 | 6.7 percent | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 5.7 percent | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 5.6 percent | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 7.0 percent | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 6.9 percent | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 4.8 percent | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 5.2 percent | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 5.1 percent | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 5.2 percent | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 36 | 5.3 percent | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 84 | 5.0 percent | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 28 | 5.1 percent | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 7.8 percent | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 28 | 5.8 percent | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 84 | 5.9 percent | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 6.5 percent | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 36 | 7.2 percent | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 7.6 percent | — |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 72 | 8.1 percent | — |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | HbA1c Measured at Days 28 & 84, and Weeks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 6.6 percent | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model
The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure.
Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat population with available data at Weeks 52, 104 and 156
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 156 | 49.0 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 104 | 54.2 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 13.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 52 | 52.4 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 104 | 69.3 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 52 | 47.8 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 22.3 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 156 | 65.5 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 20.2 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 52 | 55.7 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 156 | 61.5 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Mean Calculated eGFR Using MDRD 4 Variable Model | Week 104 | 60.4 mL/min/1.73m^2 | Standard Deviation 16.8 |
Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Adverse events were collected systematically from enrollment through last study visit. Displayed below are counts of all adverse events per treatment group (including both serious and non-serious adverse events). Separately counts of all adverse events determined to be serious are displayed per treatment group. More detail about adverse events for this trial is displayed in the 'Adverse Event' section.
Time frame: Enrollment through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | All Adverse Events | 21 Events |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Serious Adverse Events | 6 Events |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | All Adverse Events | 25 Events |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Serious Adverse Events | 11 Events |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | All Adverse Events | 40 Events |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Number of All Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Serious Adverse Events | 7 Events |
Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss
This measure counts deaths and graft loss occurring at any point post transplantation. Graft loss is defined as need for dialysis for greater than 30 days duration, allograft nephrectomy, or retransplantation.
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss | 2 Events |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss | 3 Events |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Number of Events of Death or Graft Loss | 0 Events |
Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52
A blood pressure measurement consists of two numbers: the systolic and diastolic pressures. Systolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels when the heart beats. Diastolic pressure measures the pressure in blood vessels between beats of the heart. Systolic measures of \<120 and diastolic measures of \<80 are considered normal. Systolic measures of 120-139 and diastolic measures of 80-89 are considered at risk (or pre-hypertension). Systolic measures of ≥140 and diastolic measures of ≥90 are considered high.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: Intent-to-treat with available data at Week 52
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 | Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 | 147.5 mmHg | Standard Deviation 18.7 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 | Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 | 80.8 mmHg | Standard Deviation 12.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 | Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 | 92.7 mmHg | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 | Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 | 146.7 mmHg | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 | Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 | 139.9 mmHg | Standard Deviation 18.1 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Standardized Blood Pressure Measurement at Wk 52 | Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 | 79.3 mmHg | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine
The estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI). A score of ≥90 means kidney function is normal. A score between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Scores between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Scores between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Scores below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. An estimate of the slope, or change over time, in eGFR was produced using standard statistical linear modeling procedures. The estimate was then re-scaled so that it can be interpreted as a change in eGFR per month. Positive numbers indicate increasing kidney function. Larger numbers indicate greater change in kidney function.
Time frame: Week 52, Week 104, and Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat with available data
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 104 | 1.27 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 1.86 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 52 | 1.29 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 1.85 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 156 | 1.33 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 1.82 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 104 | 0.62 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 52 | 0.62 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 156 | 0.69 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 52 | 1.07 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 1.16 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 156 | 0.48 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | The Slope of eGFR by CKD-EPI Over Time Based on Serum Creatinine | Week 104 | 0.68 Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m^2) by month | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156
This is a measure of the total number of pills a participant was prescribed on a given day
Time frame: Day 28, Day 84, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52, Week 72, Week 104, Week 156
Population: Intent-to-treat with available data
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 28 | 28.8 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 84 | 22.2 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 36 | 13.0 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 15.3 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 14.0 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 14.6 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 5 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 14.8 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 14.3 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 15.5 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 8.3 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 15.0 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 36 | 14.0 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 84 | 13.5 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 28 | 15.8 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 156 | 12.7 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 6.2 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 28 | 27.3 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Day 84 | 21.3 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 24 | 16.6 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 36 | 17.0 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 52 | 17.8 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 72 | 16.0 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Total Daily Prescribed Pill Number at Days 28 and 84, and Wks 24, 36, 52, 72, 104 and 156 | Week 104 | 14.8 Number of pills | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
Type of Treatment of Rejection
Upon having a biopsy performed, persons often receive treatment for rejection based on the results of the biopsy, which may or may not have shown signs of rejection. Details of biopsy findings and corresponding treatment are presented here for each instance of treatment for rejection. Acronyms and abbreviations are defined below. ACR=Acute Cellular Rejection ATG=Anti-thymocyte globulin therapy Chr. AMR=Chronic Antibody Mediated Rejection Gd.=Grade IFTA=Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy IVIG=Intravenous Immunoglobulin therapy. Only 'for cause' biopsies were performed post-transplant; thus, it is possible for a participant to be included in the analysis population and not have a biopsy for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Transplantation through last study visit (up to week 156)
Population: Intent-to-treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIB; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIB + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | Borderline + IFTA Gd. I; with Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | Borderline rejection; IVIG and plasmapheresis | 1 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIA + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. II; Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + Chr. AMR + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Tacrolimus | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIA; Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | Borderline + IFTA Gd. I; with Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | Borderline rejection; IVIG and plasmapheresis | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + Chr. AMR + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids | 1 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. II; Pulse Steroids | 1 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIB; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 1 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIA; Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIA + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Alemtuzumab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIB + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. II; Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | Borderline rejection; IVIG and plasmapheresis | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIA; Pulse Steroids | 1 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + Chr. AMR + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIB + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 1 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | Borderline + IFTA Gd. I; with Pulse Steroids | 1 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIB; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 0 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IIA + IFTA Gd. I; ATG and Pulse Steroids | 2 Biopsy |
| Induction: Basiliximab, Maintenance: MMF + Belatacept + Tac | Type of Treatment of Rejection | ACR Gd. IA + IFTA Gd. I; Pulse Steroids | 1 Biopsy |