Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness Study of Intranasal Insulin Glulisine on Cognitive and Memory in Mild-Mod AD Patients.

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Single Dose Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Glulisine on Cognitive Function and Memory in Individuals Diagnosed With Probable Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease/Intranasal Insulin Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01436045
Enrollment
12
Registered
2011-09-19
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2015-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

Memory, Insulin glulisine, Alzheimer's Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the rapidly acting intranasal insulin derivative (glulisine) on memory and cognition in 12 patients suffering from mild-moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) using a double-blind placebo-controlled single dose study. This study will further assess safety of insulin glulisine as well as the effects of this drug on olfaction.

Detailed description

A single center, phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of intranasally (IN) delivered insulin glulisine versus placebo in patients aged 65-85 with mild-moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Twelve AD subjects (six female and six male) will be randomized to receive a single dose of either 20 IU/IN insulin glulisine or placebo using the MAD 300 device.

Interventions

DRUGInsulin glulisine

Single treatment, 20 IU/Intranasal (.1ml/10 units Intranasally in each nostril)

DRUGSaline

Single treatment,(saline) 20 IU/Intranasal (.1ml/10units intranasally in each nostril)

Sponsors

HealthPartners Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subject with a clinical diagnosis of probable AD in accordance with National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria and Dementia Rating Scale (McKhann 1984). * Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 18-26. * Hachinski Ischemia Score \< 4. * Age is \> 65 and \<85 years * Females must be \> 2 years post-menopausal or surgically sterile. * Must be able to speak, read and understand English in order to comply with testing of cognitive function, memory and physiology. * Must have a dedicated family member /caregiver, able to attend all visits and report on subject's status. * Subject and family member/caregiver have both provided fully informed written consent prior to participation. In the event that subject is legally unable to provide informed written consent due to deterioration in cognitive abilities, fully informed written consent must be provided by a legally authorized representative. * On a stable dose (≥ 1 months) of a prescribed acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (e.g. donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) and/or memantine. * A brain CT or MRI in the last 2 years compatible with the diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's Disease. * A Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ranging from 1 to 2.

Exclusion criteria

* Medical history and/or clinically determined evidence of other central nervous system (CNS) disorders including brain tumor, active subdural hematoma, seizure disorder, multiple sclerosis dementia with Lewy bodies, vascular dementia, corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy, frontotemporal dementia, normal pressure hydrocephalus, Huntington's disease, or Jakob-Creutzfeldt disease presenting as dementia. * Personal medical history and/or clinically determined disorders: current B12 deficiency, positive syphilis serology, chronic sinusitis or any untreated thyroid disease, significant head trauma, or history of difficulty with smell and/or taste prior to AD diagnosis. * Diagnosis with any form of diabetes mellitus, actively takes insulin, or has HbA1c \> 6.1 % at screening. * Personal history of any of the following: moderate to severe pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, significant cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular events in previous 6 months, condition known to affect absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs such as any hepatic, renal or gastrointestinal disease or any other clinically relevant abnormality that inclusion would pose a safety risk to the subject as determined by Investigator. * Heavy smoker (defined as smoking half a pack or more per day in the last 10 years prior to entry in the study). * Personal history of any psychiatric illness, except major depressive disorder (according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV TR) currently in remission or stable with treatment for \> 2 years, or any other psychiatric condition that inclusion would pose a safety risk to the subject as determined by Investigator. Patients with active depression (Geriatric Depression Score\>9) are excluded from the study. * Currently taking any medications, herbals and food supplements that are determined by Investigator to interfere with procedural testing of cognitive function as well as ensure study safety. * Recent change (\< 1 months) in prescribed acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (e.g. donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) or memantine. * Current or recent drug or alcohol abuse or dependence defined by DSM-IV TR. * Systolic blood pressure \> 160 or \< 90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \> 100 or \< 60 mmHg at Screening. * Screening laboratory results that are medically relevant and which would pose a safety risk to the subject as determined by Investigator. * Participation in any other research study at least 3 months prior to this study. * Insulin allergy. * History of significant traumatic brain injury * History of acute and chronic rhinitis and/or sinusitis. * Legally unable to provide informed written consent due to deterioration in cognitive abilities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Performance20 minutes post-intranasal administrationThe results are presented as a mean number of correct responses for each cognitive assessment. For each of these, a lower number correct is indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Ranges are as follows: RBANS List Learning (0-40), RBANS Story Memory (0-24), RBANS Figure Copy (0-20), RBANSLine Orientation (0-20), RBANS Semantic Fluency (0-unlimited), RBANS List Recall (0-10), RBANS List Recognition (0-20), RBANS Story Recall (0-12), RBANS Figure Recall (0-20), Digit Span Forward (0-16), Digit Span Backward (0-16), Boston Naming (0-15).
Trails B - Seconds20 minutes post-intranasal administrationThe results are presented as the number of seconds to complete Trails B. For each of these, a higher number of seconds is indicative of a higher cognitive deficit.
Trails B - Errors20 minutes post-intranasal administrationThe results are presented as the mean sum of the errors during the Trails B assessment For each of these, a higher number of errors is indicative of a higher cognitive deficit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Olfactory Function60 minute post intranasal administrationThe Sniff Magnitude Test (SMT) measures olfactory function not influenced by cognitive problems (minimal dependence on language, cognitive ability, memory, and odor naming ability). Sniff magnitude ratios are calculated as a ratio of sniff magnitudes (area under the sniff curve). Lower sniff magnitude ratios indicate more impairment. \[average sniff magnitude of malodor/average sniff magnitude to a null odor\]

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Partipants
Participants who received either intranasal glulisine (0.10 milliliter (mL) in each nostril, 20 IU total) or placebo (0.10 mL in each nostril) at the 2nd or 3rd study visit.
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Partipants
Age, Continuous72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)22.17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.62
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
University of Pennsylvania Smell Inventory Test (UPSIT)11.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Cognitive Performance

The results are presented as a mean number of correct responses for each cognitive assessment. For each of these, a lower number correct is indicative of a higher cognitive deficit. Ranges are as follows: RBANS List Learning (0-40), RBANS Story Memory (0-24), RBANS Figure Copy (0-20), RBANSLine Orientation (0-20), RBANS Semantic Fluency (0-unlimited), RBANS List Recall (0-10), RBANS List Recognition (0-20), RBANS Story Recall (0-12), RBANS Figure Recall (0-20), Digit Span Forward (0-16), Digit Span Backward (0-16), Boston Naming (0-15).

Time frame: 20 minutes post-intranasal administration

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceBoston Naming Test11.75 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.05
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS Semantic Fluency12.25 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.38
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS Figure Copy16.58 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.98
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS List Recall0.83 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.42
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS List Recognition14.92 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.69
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS List Learning15.92 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.32
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS Story Recall2.12 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.96
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS Figure Recall4.83 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.84
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS Story Memory8.58 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.17
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceDigit Span Forward9.42 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.5
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceRBANS Line Orientation14.25 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.97
Post-Insulin GlulisineCognitive PerformanceDigit Span Backward5.58 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.45
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS Line Orientation12.25 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.38
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS Figure Copy16.92 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 3.42
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceBoston Naming Test11.75 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.1
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceDigit Span Backward5.75 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.49
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS List Learning16.67 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 2.02
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS Story Memory8.41 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.55
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS Semantic Fluency12.5 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.75
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS List Recall1.0 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.51
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS List Recognition14.75 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.97
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS Story Recall2.33 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.9
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceRBANS Figure Recall4.92 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 1.59
Post-PlaceboCognitive PerformanceDigit Span Forward9.0 mean total correct responsesStandard Error 0.44
Comparison: Response to intranasal Insulin Gluiline \[(result post-insulin - result post-placebo)/(result post-placebo)\] x 100%p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Trails B - Errors

The results are presented as the mean sum of the errors during the Trails B assessment For each of these, a higher number of errors is indicative of a higher cognitive deficit.

Time frame: 20 minutes post-intranasal administration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Post-Insulin GlulisineTrails B - Errors1.17 mean number of errorsStandard Error 0.27
Post-PlaceboTrails B - Errors2.08 mean number of errorsStandard Error 0.31
Comparison: Difference in errors \[result post-insulin - result post-placebo\]p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Trails B - Seconds

The results are presented as the number of seconds to complete Trails B. For each of these, a higher number of seconds is indicative of a higher cognitive deficit.

Time frame: 20 minutes post-intranasal administration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Post-Insulin GlulisineTrails B - Seconds166.83 mean secondsStandard Error 20.82
Post-PlaceboTrails B - Seconds177.25 mean secondsStandard Error 21.65
Secondary

Olfactory Function

The Sniff Magnitude Test (SMT) measures olfactory function not influenced by cognitive problems (minimal dependence on language, cognitive ability, memory, and odor naming ability). Sniff magnitude ratios are calculated as a ratio of sniff magnitudes (area under the sniff curve). Lower sniff magnitude ratios indicate more impairment. \[average sniff magnitude of malodor/average sniff magnitude to a null odor\]

Time frame: 60 minute post intranasal administration

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Post-Insulin GlulisineOlfactory Function2.5 ratio of area under the sniff curveStandard Error 0.15
Post-PlaceboOlfactory Function2.33 ratio of area under the sniff curveStandard Error 0.19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026