Skip to content

The Effect Of Tafamidis For The Transthyretin Amyloid Polyneuropathy Patients With V30M Or Non-V30M Transthyretin

The Effect On Transthyretin Stabilization, Safety, Tolerablity, Efficacy And Pharmacokinetics Of Orally Administered Tafamidis In Transthyretin Amyloid Polyneuropathy Patients With V30m Or Non-v30m Transthyretin: A Phase Iii, Open-label Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01435655
Enrollment
10
Registered
2011-09-16
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2015-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Transthyretin Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

Brief summary

Tafamidis has been developed as an oral specific stabilizer of transthyretin tetramer.

Interventions

DRUGtafamidis

tafamidis meglumine 20 mg QD

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy with V30M or non-V30M transthyretin mutation. * Subject had amyloid documented by biopsy in accordance with institutional site standard of care.

Exclusion criteria

* Primary amyloidosis and secondary amyloidosis. * History of liver transplant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization at Week 8 Compared With Baseline as Measured by a Validated Immunoturbidimetric Assay8 weeksTTR tetramer level for each plasma sample was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay before and after urea denaturation. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) tetramer concentration is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer average concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI. A patient who has the TTR stabilization is defined as the patient whose percent stabilization is equal to or more than 32%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78The NIS provides a total body single score of neuropathic deficits (score range: 0-122, higher score = more deficit), comprising subset scores for cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, and sensation (based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period; each item scored separately for left and right). The NIS-LL is a subscale that provides a score for the lower limbs functions (muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation in great toe) and has a score range of 0-44 (higher score = more deficit). The NIS-UL is a subscale that provides a score for the upper body functions (muscle weakness \[including cranial nerves\], reflexes and sensation in finger) and has a score range of 0-78 (higher score = more deficit). The components for cranial nerves and muscle weakness are scored from 0 (Normal) to 4 (Paralysis), and those for reflexes and sensation from 0 (Normal) to 2 (Absent). For all items, higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Change From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire. It consists of 5 domains: Physical Functioning/Large Fiber \[score range: -4 - 56\] , Activities of Daily Living (ADL) \[0 - 20\], Symptoms \[0 - 32\], Small Fiber \[0 - 16\] and Autonomic \[0 - 12\]. Total of quality of life (TQOL) score is the sum of all five domains with a range of -4 to 136 (Pfizer Data Standards). Higher scores on each item of the Norfolk QOL-DN TQOL indicate worse quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Summated 7 Nerve Tests Normal Deviate Score (∑ 7 NTs Nds) as Measured by Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS), Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78The Σ7 NTs nds measures primarily large-fiber function. It is a composite score derived from five NCS attributes (peroneal nerve distal motor latency, peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity, tibial nerve distal motor latency, and sural nerve sensory nerve action potential amplitude) along with VDT obtained in great toes by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), and HRDB value. It is defined as 7 times the mean of non-missing values of, the five normal deviates of NCS, HRDB, and average normal deviate for VDT of toes. Score was determined through reference to normal values for age, sex, height and abnormalities scored. Total score range is approximately -26 to 26, where higher score=worse nerve function.
Change From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and End of StudyBaseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, End of StudyThe mBMI was calculated by multiplying the BMI (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) by serum albumin level (gram/liter). Change in mBMI was calculated as the mBMI at the given week minus the Baseline mBMI.
Change From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78Ambulatory status was evaluated using walking ability scale in polyneuropathy disability score. The ambulatory status was evaluated as: 0=Good, 1=Sensory disturbances in the feet but able to walk without difficulty, 2=Some difficulties with walking but can walk without aid, 3a=Able to walk with 1 stick or crutch, 3b=Able to walk with 2 sticks or crutches, 4=Not ambulatory, confined to a wheelchair or bedridden.
Number of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78 Compared With Baseline as Measured by a Validated Immunoturbidimetric AssayBaseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The TTR tetramer level for each plasma sample was measured before and after urea denaturation. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) tetramer concentration is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI. A patient who has the TTR stabilization is defined as the patient whose percent stabilization is equal to or more than 32%.
Change From Baseline in Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviate Score (∑ 3 NTSF Nds) as Measured by Cooling and Heat Pain Thresholds by QST and HRDB at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78The Σ3 NTSF nds measures small-fiber function. It is a composite score defined as 3 times the mean of non-missing values of normal deviates of cooling threshold for lower limbs, heat pain intermediate response for lower limbs, and HRDB. The total score range is approximately -11.2 to 11.2, with a higher score demonstrating worse nerve function.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma Concentration of Tafamidis at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78Mean plasma concentration of tafamidis at 3 hours after administration

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tafamidis 20 mg
Participants (V30m and non-V30m transthyretin mutation) received tafamidis 20 mg soft gelatin capsules orally once daily for up to 78 weeks
10
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyOther1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTafamidis 20 mg
Age, Continuous60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization at Week 8 Compared With Baseline as Measured by a Validated Immunoturbidimetric Assay

TTR tetramer level for each plasma sample was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay before and after urea denaturation. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) tetramer concentration is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer average concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI. A patient who has the TTR stabilization is defined as the patient whose percent stabilization is equal to or more than 32%.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tafamidis 20 mgNumber of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization at Week 8 Compared With Baseline as Measured by a Validated Immunoturbidimetric Assay10 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78

Ambulatory status was evaluated using walking ability scale in polyneuropathy disability score. The ambulatory status was evaluated as: 0=Good, 1=Sensory disturbances in the feet but able to walk without difficulty, 2=Some difficulties with walking but can walk without aid, 3a=Able to walk with 1 stick or crutch, 3b=Able to walk with 2 sticks or crutches, 4=Not ambulatory, confined to a wheelchair or bedridden.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline (n=10): Status 00 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline (n=10): Status 13 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline (n=10): Status 24 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline (n=10): Status 3a2 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline (n=10): Status 3b1 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline (n=10): Status 40 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 26 (n=10): Status 01 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 26 (n=10): Status 23 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 26 (n=10): Status 3a2 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 26 (n=10): Status 3b2 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 26 (n=10): Status 40 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 52 (n=10): Status 01 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 52 (n=10): Status 11 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 52 (n=10): Status 24 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 52 (n=10): Status 3a2 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 52 (n=10): Status 3b2 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 52 (n=10): Status 40 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 78 (n=8): Status 01 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 78 (n=8): Status 11 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 78 (n=8): Status 22 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 78 (n=8): Status 3a2 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 78 (n=8): Status 3b2 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 78 (n=8): Status 40 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Ambulatory Status at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 26 (n=10): Status 12 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and End of Study

The mBMI was calculated by multiplying the BMI (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) by serum albumin level (gram/liter). Change in mBMI was calculated as the mBMI at the given week minus the Baseline mBMI.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, End of Study

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and End of StudyBaseline (n=10)805.70 (kilogram/square meter)*(gram/liter)Standard Deviation 193.378
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and End of StudyChange at Week 8 (n=10)74.86 (kilogram/square meter)*(gram/liter)Standard Deviation 88.706
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and End of StudyChange at Week 26 (n=10)26.61 (kilogram/square meter)*(gram/liter)Standard Deviation 61.862
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and End of StudyChange at Week 52 (n=10)64.86 (kilogram/square meter)*(gram/liter)Standard Deviation 80.016
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and End of StudyEnd of Study (n=7)53.65 (kilogram/square meter)*(gram/liter)Standard Deviation 81.386
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78

The NIS provides a total body single score of neuropathic deficits (score range: 0-122, higher score = more deficit), comprising subset scores for cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, and sensation (based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period; each item scored separately for left and right). The NIS-LL is a subscale that provides a score for the lower limbs functions (muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation in great toe) and has a score range of 0-44 (higher score = more deficit). The NIS-UL is a subscale that provides a score for the upper body functions (muscle weakness \[including cranial nerves\], reflexes and sensation in finger) and has a score range of 0-78 (higher score = more deficit). The components for cranial nerves and muscle weakness are scored from 0 (Normal) to 4 (Paralysis), and those for reflexes and sensation from 0 (Normal) to 2 (Absent). For all items, higher scores indicate greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-Total: Change at Week 26 (n=10)4.37 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.408
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-Total: Change at Week 52 (n=10)8.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.326
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-Total: Change at Week 78 (n=8)9.90 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.584
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-LL: Change at Week 78 (n=8)3.30 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.739
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-UL: Change at Week 26 (n=10)2.31 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.066
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-UL: Change at Week 52 (n=10)4.68 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.103
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-UL: Change at Week 78 (n=8)6.59 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.724
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-Total: Baseline (n=10)31.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.26
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-LL: Baseline (n=10)16.99 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.143
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-LL: Change at Week 26 (n=10)2.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.565
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-LL: Change at Week 52 (n=10)3.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.374
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS); NIS (Total), NIS-LL (Lower Limb) and NIS-UL (Upper Limb) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78NIS-UL: Baseline (n=10)14.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.716
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.

Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire. It consists of 5 domains: Physical Functioning/Large Fiber \[score range: -4 - 56\] , Activities of Daily Living (ADL) \[0 - 20\], Symptoms \[0 - 32\], Small Fiber \[0 - 16\] and Autonomic \[0 - 12\]. Total of quality of life (TQOL) score is the sum of all five domains with a range of -4 to 136 (Pfizer Data Standards). Higher scores on each item of the Norfolk QOL-DN TQOL indicate worse quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.TQOL: Baseline (n=10)52.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.76
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.TQOL: Change at Week 26 (n=10)11.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.01
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.TQOL: Change at Week 52 (n=10)9.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.49
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.TQOL: Change at Week 78 (n=8)10.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Physical Functioning: Baseline (n=10)25.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.28
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Physical Functioning: Change at Week 26 (n=10)4.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.02
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Physical Functioning: Change at Week 52 (n=10)2.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.87
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Physical Functioning: Change at Week 78 (n=8)4.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.83
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.ADL: Baseline (n=10)8.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.63
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.ADL: Change at Week 26 (n=10)1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.61
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.ADL: Change at Week 52 (n=10)0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.52
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.ADL: Change at Week 78 (n=8)0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Symptoms: Baseline (n=10)8.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.34
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Symptoms: Change at Week 26 (n=10)2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.47
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Symptoms: Change at Week 52 (n=10)4.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.73
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Symptoms: Change at Week 78 (n=8)3.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.94
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Small Fiber: Baseline (n=10)6.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.31
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Small Fiber: Change at Week 26 (n=10)1.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Small Fiber: Change at Week 52 (n=10)1.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Small Fiber: Change at Week 78 (n=8)2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.76
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Autonomic: Baseline (n=10)4.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Autonomic: Change at Week 26 (n=10)1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Autonomic: Change at Week 52 (n=10)0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Scores of the Total Quality of Life (TQOL) and 5 Domains as Measured by the Norfolk QOL - Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78.Autonomic: Change at Week 78 (n=8)0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviate Score (∑ 3 NTSF Nds) as Measured by Cooling and Heat Pain Thresholds by QST and HRDB at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78

The Σ3 NTSF nds measures small-fiber function. It is a composite score defined as 3 times the mean of non-missing values of normal deviates of cooling threshold for lower limbs, heat pain intermediate response for lower limbs, and HRDB. The total score range is approximately -11.2 to 11.2, with a higher score demonstrating worse nerve function.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviate Score (∑ 3 NTSF Nds) as Measured by Cooling and Heat Pain Thresholds by QST and HRDB at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Baseline (n=10)6.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviate Score (∑ 3 NTSF Nds) as Measured by Cooling and Heat Pain Thresholds by QST and HRDB at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Change at Week 26 (n=10)0.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.619
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviate Score (∑ 3 NTSF Nds) as Measured by Cooling and Heat Pain Thresholds by QST and HRDB at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Change at Week 52 (n=10)-0.13 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.334
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviate Score (∑ 3 NTSF Nds) as Measured by Cooling and Heat Pain Thresholds by QST and HRDB at Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Change at Week 78 (n=8)0.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.985
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Summated 7 Nerve Tests Normal Deviate Score (∑ 7 NTs Nds) as Measured by Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS), Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78

The Σ7 NTs nds measures primarily large-fiber function. It is a composite score derived from five NCS attributes (peroneal nerve distal motor latency, peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity, tibial nerve distal motor latency, and sural nerve sensory nerve action potential amplitude) along with VDT obtained in great toes by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), and HRDB value. It is defined as 7 times the mean of non-missing values of, the five normal deviates of NCS, HRDB, and average normal deviate for VDT of toes. Score was determined through reference to normal values for age, sex, height and abnormalities scored. Total score range is approximately -26 to 26, where higher score=worse nerve function.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Summated 7 Nerve Tests Normal Deviate Score (∑ 7 NTs Nds) as Measured by Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS), Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78Baseline (n=10)8.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.574
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Summated 7 Nerve Tests Normal Deviate Score (∑ 7 NTs Nds) as Measured by Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS), Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78Change at Week 26 (n=10)0.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.657
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Summated 7 Nerve Tests Normal Deviate Score (∑ 7 NTs Nds) as Measured by Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS), Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78Change at Week 78 (n=8)1.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.129
Tafamidis 20 mgChange From Baseline in Summated 7 Nerve Tests Normal Deviate Score (∑ 7 NTs Nds) as Measured by Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS), Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78Change at Week 52 (n-=10)1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.992
Secondary

Number of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78 Compared With Baseline as Measured by a Validated Immunoturbidimetric Assay

TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The TTR tetramer level for each plasma sample was measured before and after urea denaturation. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) tetramer concentration is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI. A patient who has the TTR stabilization is defined as the patient whose percent stabilization is equal to or more than 32%.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tafamidis 20 mgNumber of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78 Compared With Baseline as Measured by a Validated Immunoturbidimetric AssayWeek 2610 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgNumber of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78 Compared With Baseline as Measured by a Validated Immunoturbidimetric AssayWeek 529 Participants
Tafamidis 20 mgNumber of Participants With Transthyretin (TTR) Stabilization at Week 26, Week 52, and Week 78 Compared With Baseline as Measured by a Validated Immunoturbidimetric AssayWeek 788 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Plasma Concentration of Tafamidis at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78

Mean plasma concentration of tafamidis at 3 hours after administration

Time frame: Week 8, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78

Population: The PK Analysis Set included all participants treated who had at least 1 quantifiable plasma tafamidis concentration.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tafamidis 20 mgPlasma Concentration of Tafamidis at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 8 (n=10)2773.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1777.71
Tafamidis 20 mgPlasma Concentration of Tafamidis at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 26 (n=10)2739.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1893.25
Tafamidis 20 mgPlasma Concentration of Tafamidis at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 52 (n=10)2829.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2315.58
Tafamidis 20 mgPlasma Concentration of Tafamidis at Week 8, Week 26, Week 52 and Week 78Week 78 (n=8)3655.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2268.08

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026