Skip to content

Endocervical Evaluation With the Curette Versus Cytobrush for the Diagnosis of Dysplasia of the Uterine Cervix

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01435590
Enrollment
180
Registered
2011-09-16
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2015-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Dysplasia

Brief summary

OBJECTIVE: to compare endocervical brushing with endocervical curettage with respect to diagnostic and patient discomfort. METHOD: women referred to colposcopy because of abnormal Papanicolaou tests will be randomized to endocervical sampling with either a metal curette (endocervical curettage -ECC) or and endocervical brush. All samples will be submitted for histological study.

Interventions

PROCEDURECurette v/s endocervical brush

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* French-speaking * 21 years or older * Attending our colposcopy clinic * Need for endocervical evaluation * Full autonomy or capacity to understand the procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Absence of uterus * History of DES exposure in utero

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specimen adequacy09/2011 - 05/2012 (1 year)Cytological and histological interpretation of the endocervical brush specimens will then be performed, while for the endocervical currete specimens only histological interpretation will be done. The adequacy of the specimens will be based on the quantity of endocervical cells present (\< or ≥ 20 endocervical cells), the quantity of histological material (\< or ≥ 3 epithelial stripes) and the quality of histological material (absence or presence of lamina propia).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient discomfort09/2011 to 05/2012 (8 months)To evaluate the degree of patient discomfort, patients will be requested to complete a questionnaire once the exam has been completed. The main acceptance variables will be degree of helplessness, pain (on visual analog scales), willingness to undergo the test again, and overall satisfaction. Once the exam has been completed, the doctor performing the sampling will answer a questionnaire indicating his/her perception of the exam (patient's pain, technical difficulty performing the exam, doctors acceptability of the exam).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026