Skip to content

EXPERT CTO: Evaluation of the XIENCE PRIME™ LL and XIENCE Nano™ Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent Coronary Stents, Performance, and Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions

Evaluation of the XIENCE PRIME™ LL and XIENCE Nano™ Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent Coronary Stents, Performance, and Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01435031
Acronym
EXPERT CTO
Enrollment
250
Registered
2011-09-15
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO), Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

Keywords

Angioplasty, Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO), Chronic total coronary occlusions, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Coronary artery stenosis, Total coronary occlusion

Brief summary

A prospective, multi-center, single-arm study to establish the safety and effectiveness of the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent, XIENCE nano™ Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent, XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent, HT PROGRESS and HT PILOT Coronary Guide Wires, and MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in patients undergoing elective percutaneous revascularization of native chronic total coronary occlusions

Interventions

DEVICECTO Treatment Device

Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO: * XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent * HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization * MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at the time of consent. 2. Subject is experiencing clinical symptoms considered suggestive of ischemic heart disease (e.g., chest pain or discomfort, heart failure, etc.) or has evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., abnormal functional study) attributed to the CTO target vessel and is scheduled for clinically indicated percutaneous revascularization. 3. Subject is eligible and consents to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI procedure). 4. Subject is an acceptable candidate for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), stenting, and emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). 5. Subject is willing and able to sign an informed consent form (ICF) approved by a local Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee and to follow the protocol with up to 5-year follow up. 6. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative qualitative or quantitative pregnancy test within 7 days before enrollment and effective birth control must be used up to 1 year following the index procedure. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria 1. A maximum of one de novo lesion with at least one target segment in a native coronary vessel meeting definition of chronic total occlusion. A chronic total occlusion is any non-acute total coronary occlusion fulfilling the following angiographic characteristics and estimated in duration at least 3 months by clinical history and/or comparison with antecedent angiogram or electrocardiogram: * High-grade native coronary stenosis * TIMI 0 or 1 antegrade flow 2. Occluded segment suitable for placement of coronary stents: * Segment without severe tortuosity (angulation ≥ 45º) * Segment not located in an excessively distal location General

Exclusion criteria

Candidates will be excluded from the study if any of the following conditions are present: 1. Patients with any history of allergy to iodinated contrast that cannot be effectively managed medically, or any known allergy to clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix®), aspirin, heparin, stainless steel, or everolimus 2. Evidence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 72 hours of the intended treatment (defined as: Q-wave or non-Q-wave MI having creatine kinase (CK) enzymes 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) with the presence of a creatine kinase myocardial-band isoenzyme (CK-MB) above the Institution's ULN, or troponin (I or T) above the Institution's ULN) 3. Previous coronary interventional procedure of any kind within the 30 days prior to the procedure in the target vessel 4. Planned interventional treatment of either the target or any non-target vessel within 30 days post-procedure 5. Planned interventional treatment of either the target or any non-target vessel within 6 months post-procedure with any alternative drug eluting stent (DES) (e.g., CYPHER Sirolimus-Eluting stent, TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting stent or Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor stent) 6. Any contraindication to cardiac catheterization or to any of the standard concomitant therapies used during routine cardiac catheterization and PCI (e.g., aspirin, clopidogrel, unfractionated heparin) 7. Target lesion requires treatment with a device after successful crossing other than PTCA prior to stent placement (including, but not limited to directional or rotational coronary atherectomy, excimer laser, thrombectomy, etc.). Note: Use of alternative technologies to conventional guide wires that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for CTO revascularization (e.g., Asahi Tornus and Corsair catheters, IntraLuminal Therapeutics Safe Cross guide wire, Flowcardia CROSSER system) is permitted and will be collected in the case report form. 8. Patients with history of clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings including: * Neutropenia (\<1000 neutrophils/mm3) within the previous 2 weeks, or * Thrombocytopenia (\<100,000 platelets/mm3), or * Aspartate Transaminase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, or bilirubin \> 1.5 × ULN, or * Serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dL 9. Patients with evidence of ongoing or active clinical instability including the following: * Sustained systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg or cardiogenic shock * Acute pulmonary edema or severe congestive heart failure * Suspected acute myocarditis, pericarditis, endocarditis, or cardiac tamponade * Suspected dissecting aortic aneurysm * Hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, or congenital heart disease 10. Target lesion involves a bifurcation including a diseased side branch ≥2.25 mm in diameter that would require treatment 11. Target vessel with a patent bypass graft from prior coronary bypass surgery 12. Proximal coronary stenting of target lesion 13. History of stroke or transient ischemic attack within the prior 6 months 14. Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the prior 6 months 15. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or refusal of blood transfusions 16. Patients with any other pathology such as cancer, mental illness, etc., which in the opinion of the Investigator, might put the patient at risk, preclude follow-up, or in any way confound the results of the study. 17. Known previous medical condition yielding expected survival less than 1 year. 18. Patients who are unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol or not expected to complete the study period, including its follow-up requirements. 19. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints; or requires coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), or other coronary artery imaging procedures Angiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Stent-related: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Per ITT Set)1 yearThe primary stent-related endpoint is MACE, defined as death, MI, or clinically-driven TLR at 1 year post-procedure among all enrolled patients, for whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion are completed and the study stent(s) (XIENCE V and/or XIENCE PRIME) is inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.
Number of Participants With Stent-related: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Per Protocol Set)1 yearThe primary stent-related endpoint is MACE, defined as death, MI, or clinically-driven TLR at 1 year post-procedure among all enrolled patients, for whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion are completed and the study stent(s) (XIENCE V and/or XIENCE PRIME) is inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.
Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (MACE Includes Per ARC Definition of MI)Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesSuccessful recanalization of the CTO defined as: 1. Confirmation of placement of the guide wire in the distal true lumen (component 1) 2. Absence of in-hospital MACE, based on ARC MI (component 2)
Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the CTO (MACE Includes Per Protocol Definition of MI)Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesSuccessful recanalization of the CTO defined as: 1. Confirmation of placement of the guide wire in the distal true lumen (component 1) 2. Absence of in-hospital MACE, based on protocol MI (component 2)
Percentage of Participants With Angioplasty Predilatation-related: Successful Predilatation of the CTOParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes1. Successful delivery of the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter to and across the target lesion and; 2. Successful inflation and deflation of the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter and; 3. Absence of clinically significant vessel perforation, flow-limiting vessel dissection, reduction in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) from baseline or clinically significant arrhythmias requiring medical treatment or device intervention following dilatation with MINI-TREK and; 4. Achievement of final TIMI flow 3 for the target lesion at the conclusion of the index procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Subintimal Tracking and Re-entry (STAR) TechniqueParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Knuckle WireParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Primary Retrograde Wire CrossingParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Percentage of Participants With Procedure SuccessParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDevice success and absence of in-hospital MACE. Per-protocol MI definition: Myocardial infarctions per protocol definition were categorized as Q-wave (development of new, pathological Q waves on the ECG) or non-Q-wave (elevation of CK levels to greater than two times the upper limit of normal and elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves). Per ARC MI definition: Myocardial infarctions per ARC definition were also categorized as Q-wave (development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads (according to the Minnesota code) with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal) or non-Q-wave (all MIs not classified as Q-wave). ARC defined MIs were further classified as Periprocedural PCI, Periprocedural CABG, Spontaneous, Sudden Death, and Reinfarction based on biomarker and additional criteria and as ST Elevation MI (STEMI) or Non-ST Elevation MI (NSTEMI) based on ST segment.
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Antegrade CrossingParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique.
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Controlled Antegrade-Retrograde Technique (CART)Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Reverse CARTParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Kissing Wire TechniqueParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Sub Intimal TechniqueParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique.
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Multiple Crossing TechniquesParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesDefined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique
Resource Utilization: Procedural TimeParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes
Resource Utilization: Fluoroscopic TimeParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes
Resource Utilization: Contrast VolumeParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes
Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Pre-procedureParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. MLD is the average of 2 orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in stent, or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) by the Angiographic Core Laboratory.
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)30 daysPer protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
Number of Participants Experiencing Death30 daysMACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).
Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death30 daysTLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)30 daysMACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.
Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI30 daysTLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)30 daysRepeat percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) to the target lesion/site.
Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)30 daysTLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.
Number of Participants With Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)1 yearTLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)30 daysRepeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)30 daysComposite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when any of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)30 daysComposite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR. Per protocol.
Number of Participants With Stent ThrombosisAcute (0-24 hours)Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion1 yearAssessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.
Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant PerforationParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesAny perforation resulting in hemodynamic instability and/or requiring intervention including pericardiocentesis, embolization, prolonged balloon occlusion, stent graft or comparable therapy
Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Post-procedureParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. MLD is the average of 2 orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in stent, or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Laboratory.
Percentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedureParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. TIMI Classification: TIMI 0 No perfusion. TIMI 1 Penetration with minimal perfusion. Contrast fails to opacify the entire bed distal to the stenosis for the duration of the cine run. TIMI 2 Partial perfusion. Contrast opacifies the entire coronary bed distal to the stenosis. However, the rate of entry and/or clearance is slower in the coronary bed distal to the obstruction than in comparable areas not perfused by the dilated vessel. TIMI 3 Complete perfusion. Filling and clearance of contrast equally rapid in the coronary bed distal to stenosis as in other coronary beds.
Percentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedureParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesPre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. TIMI Classification: TIMI 0 No perfusion. TIMI 1 Penetration with minimal perfusion. Contrast fails to opacify the entire bed distal to the stenosis for the duration of the cine run. TIMI 2 Partial perfusion. Contrast opacifies the entire coronary bed distal to the stenosis. However, the rate of entry and/or clearance is slower in the coronary bed distal to the obstruction than in comparable areas not perfused by the dilated vessel. TIMI 3 Complete perfusion. Filling and clearance of contrast equally rapid in the coronary bed distal to stenosis as in other coronary beds.
Percentage of Participants With Device SuccessParticipants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutesAchievement of \<50% diameter stenosis within the target lesion segment using assigned study device

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 250 subjects were enrolled in 20 sites from September 13, 2011 to February 7, 2013. Twenty-eight participants were excluded from ITT (N=222) in whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion were not completed and/or study stent was not inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.

Pre-assignment details

ITT set included 222 subjects who met entry criteria, were enrolled in the trial and whose target lesion was successfully crossed and predilated. PP set included all ITT subjects (N = 183) in whom at least 1 study stent was implanted,met procedure success,had follow-up data and had no major protocol deviations due to inappropriate enrollment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CTO Treatment
Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO: * XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent * HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization * MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation CTO Treatment Device: Subjects receiving at least 1 of the following for the treatment of CTO: * XIENCE V® and/or XIENCE nano™ and/or XIENCE PRIME™ LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent * HT PROGRESS and/or HT PILOT guide wires in recanalization * MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter in predilatation
222
Total222

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
ITT at 1 MonthDeath1
ITT at 1 MonthLost to Follow-up4
ITT at 1 MonthWithdrawal by Subject1
ITT at 1 YearDeath1
ITT at 1 YearLost to Follow-up6
ITT at 1 YearWithdrawal by Subject2
ITT at 2 YearsDeath7
ITT at 2 YearsLost to Follow-up4
ITT at 2 YearsWithdrawal by Subject2
ITT at 3 YearsDeath5
ITT at 3 YearsLost to Follow-up4
ITT at 3 YearsWithdrawal by Subject2
ITT at 4 YearsDeath4
ITT at 4 YearsLost to Follow-up1
ITT at 4 YearsWithdrawal by Subject2
ITT at 6 MonthsDeath2
ITT at 6 MonthsLost to Follow-up3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCTO Treatment
Age, Continuous61.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43
Clinical Characteristics
Atrial fibrillation
14 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Cancer
4 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Congestive Heart Failure
27 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Diabetes Mellitus
89 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Dyslipidemia
215 participants
Clinical Characteristics
History of bleeding
18 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Hypertension
203 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Mental Illness
5 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Previous Percutaneous Intervention (PCI)
96 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
22 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI)
61 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Renal Insufficiency/failure
1 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Stroke
2 participants
Clinical Characteristics
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
3 participants
Number of diseased vessels
Double
38 participants
Number of diseased vessels
Single
170 participants
Number of diseased vessels
Triple
14 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
178 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
222 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
180 Participants
Tobacco use
Current or former, quit within the past month
54 participants
Tobacco use
Former user, quit more than 1 month ago
89 participants
Tobacco use
Never used tobacco
65 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
20 / 222
other
Total, other adverse events
141 / 222
serious
Total, serious adverse events
92 / 222

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Stent-related: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Per ITT Set)

The primary stent-related endpoint is MACE, defined as death, MI, or clinically-driven TLR at 1 year post-procedure among all enrolled patients, for whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion are completed and the study stent(s) (XIENCE V and/or XIENCE PRIME) is inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) definition: ITT subjects include all subjects who met the study entry criteria, signed the written informed consent, were enrolled in the trial and whose target lesion was successfully crossed and predilated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent-related: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Per ITT Set)39 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Stent-related: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Per Protocol Set)

The primary stent-related endpoint is MACE, defined as death, MI, or clinically-driven TLR at 1 year post-procedure among all enrolled patients, for whom recanalization and pre-dilatation of the target lesion are completed and the study stent(s) (XIENCE V and/or XIENCE PRIME) is inserted into the coronary guiding catheter.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Per-protocol (PP) definition: The per-protocol population is defined as all ITT subjects in whom at least 1 study stent was implanted, met procedure success, had available follow up data (i.e. a MACE event within 360 days or follow up of at least 330 days), and did not have major protocol deviations due to inappropriate enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent-related: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) (Per Protocol Set)15 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Angioplasty Predilatation-related: Successful Predilatation of the CTO

1. Successful delivery of the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter to and across the target lesion and; 2. Successful inflation and deflation of the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter and; 3. Absence of clinically significant vessel perforation, flow-limiting vessel dissection, reduction in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) from baseline or clinically significant arrhythmias requiring medical treatment or device intervention following dilatation with MINI-TREK and; 4. Achievement of final TIMI flow 3 for the target lesion at the conclusion of the index procedure

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: Angiographically Evaluable Subjects

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Angioplasty Predilatation-related: Successful Predilatation of the CTO93.8 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (MACE Includes Per ARC Definition of MI)

Successful recanalization of the CTO defined as: 1. Confirmation of placement of the guide wire in the distal true lumen (component 1) 2. Absence of in-hospital MACE, based on ARC MI (component 2)

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: All the subjects who met the study entry criteria, signed the written informed consent, were enrolled in the trial and in whom an attempt was made to cross the target lesion with the HT Progress or the HT Pilot guide wires, are included in the ITT population for the guide wire-related analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (MACE Includes Per ARC Definition of MI)Guide Wire-related Endpoint79.0 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (MACE Includes Per ARC Definition of MI)Component 189.9 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) (MACE Includes Per ARC Definition of MI)Component 289.1 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the CTO (MACE Includes Per Protocol Definition of MI)

Successful recanalization of the CTO defined as: 1. Confirmation of placement of the guide wire in the distal true lumen (component 1) 2. Absence of in-hospital MACE, based on protocol MI (component 2)

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: All the subjects who met the study entry criteria, signed the written informed consent, were enrolled in the trial and in whom an attempt was made to cross the target lesion with the HT Progress or the HT Pilot guide wires, are included in the ITT population for the guide wire-related analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the CTO (MACE Includes Per Protocol Definition of MI)Guide Wire-related Endpoint87.7 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the CTO (MACE Includes Per Protocol Definition of MI)Component 189.9 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Guide Wire-related: Successful Recanalization of the CTO (MACE Includes Per Protocol Definition of MI)Component 297.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Post-procedure

Pre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. MLD is the average of 2 orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in stent, or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Laboratory.

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CTO TreatmentMinimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Post-procedureIn-Segment1.85 mmStandard Deviation 0.47
CTO TreatmentMinimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Post-procedureIn-Stent2.32 mmStandard Deviation 0.39
Secondary

Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Pre-procedure

Pre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. MLD is the average of 2 orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in stent, or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) by the Angiographic Core Laboratory.

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CTO TreatmentMinimum Lumen Diameter (MLD): Pre-procedure0.01 mmStandard Deviation 0.05
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death

TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death

TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death

TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death

TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death

TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death

TLF component. Cardiac death was defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Cardiac Death1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Death

MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Death4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Death

MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Death1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Death

MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Death20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Death

MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Death16 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Death

MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Death11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Experiencing Death

MACE Component; per protocol. Death is divided into 2 categories: Cardiac death is defined as death due to any of the following: 1. Acute MI 2. Cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade 3. Arrhythmia or conduction abnormality 4. Stroke within 30 days of the procedure or stroke suspected of being related to the procedure 5. Death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery 6. Any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. Non-cardiac death is defined as a death not due to cardiac causes (as defined above).

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants Experiencing Death3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)21 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)22 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)24 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)

Repeat PCI or CABG of the target vessel. Revascularization in the target vessel associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)15 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)

TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)

TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)

TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)19 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)

TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)

TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)

TLF and MACE component. Revascularization at the target lesion associated with positive functional ischemia study or ischemic symptoms AND an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis \>= 50% by QCA, or revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis \>= 70% by QCA without either angina or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (Clinically-Driven TLR)13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)44 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)37 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)21 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

Per protocol. Defined as death, MI (Q wave and non-Q wave) or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 720 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 690 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)32 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)

MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)24 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)

MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)26 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)

MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)29 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)

MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)31 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)

MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)34 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)

MACE Component; Myocardial Infarction (per ARC definition) * Q wave MI: Development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal * Non-Q-wave MI: All MIs not classified as Q-wave.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Myocardial Infarction Q Wave and Non-Q Wave (MI)37 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion

Assessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 720 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 690 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion0.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion

Assessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion0.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion

Assessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion0.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion

Assessed by fluoroscopy in patients undergoing clinically-driven angiographic follow-up.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 360 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 330 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Occurrence of Stent Fracture at Target Lesion0.0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis

Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.

Time frame: Subacute (>24 hours to 30 days)

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent Thrombosis2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis

Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent Thrombosis3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis

Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent Thrombosis3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis

Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent Thrombosis3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis

Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.

Time frame: Acute (0-24 hours)

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent Thrombosis0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis

Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent Thrombosis3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis

Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria; definite and probable. Definite stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy). Probable stent thrombosis as defined by ARC criteria: Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause.

Time frame: Late (>30 days to 1 year)

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Stent Thrombosis1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)32 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR. Per protocol.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR. Per protocol.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR. Per protocol.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)19 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)26 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)

Composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and clinically-driven TLR

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF)29 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Repeat percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) to the target lesion/site.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)19 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)

Repeat PCI or CABG to the target lesion/site.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)21 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when any of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)36 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1080 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1050 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)32 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)29 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)21 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Composite endpoint comprised of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization. Per protocol. Target vessel failure will be reported when ANY of the following events occur: * Recurrent MI occurs in territory not clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel. * Cardiac death not clearly due to a non-target vessel endpoint. * Target vessel revascularization is determined.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI

TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI23 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI

TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.~The overall number of participants analysed include ITT subjects who experienced the specific event within 1440 days or ITT subjects with follow-up of at least 1410 days.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI28 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI

TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI28 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI

TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI27 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI

TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI25 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI

TLF Component; per ARC Target vessel-related MI: All infarcts that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel will be considered related to the target vessel.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CTO TreatmentNumber of Participants With Target Vessel-related MI24 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure

Pre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. TIMI Classification: TIMI 0 No perfusion. TIMI 1 Penetration with minimal perfusion. Contrast fails to opacify the entire bed distal to the stenosis for the duration of the cine run. TIMI 2 Partial perfusion. Contrast opacifies the entire coronary bed distal to the stenosis. However, the rate of entry and/or clearance is slower in the coronary bed distal to the obstruction than in comparable areas not perfused by the dilated vessel. TIMI 3 Complete perfusion. Filling and clearance of contrast equally rapid in the coronary bed distal to stenosis as in other coronary beds.

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set.The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure095.9 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure13.6 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure20.0 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Change in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade: Pre-procedure30.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure

Pre- and post predilatation with the MINI-TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter. TIMI Classification: TIMI 0 No perfusion. TIMI 1 Penetration with minimal perfusion. Contrast fails to opacify the entire bed distal to the stenosis for the duration of the cine run. TIMI 2 Partial perfusion. Contrast opacifies the entire coronary bed distal to the stenosis. However, the rate of entry and/or clearance is slower in the coronary bed distal to the obstruction than in comparable areas not perfused by the dilated vessel. TIMI 3 Complete perfusion. Filling and clearance of contrast equally rapid in the coronary bed distal to stenosis as in other coronary beds.

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure00.5 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure10.0 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure21.8 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Change in TIMI Flow Grade: Post-procedure397.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Perforation

Any perforation resulting in hemodynamic instability and/or requiring intervention including pericardiocentesis, embolization, prolonged balloon occlusion, stent graft or comparable therapy

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Clinically Significant PerforationPost Last Mini-Trek Balloon Angiography (n=67)0.0 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Clinically Significant PerforationFinal Angiography (n=221)0 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Clinically Significant PerforationSite reported (n=222)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Device Success

Achievement of \<50% diameter stenosis within the target lesion segment using assigned study device

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Device Success100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Antegrade Crossing

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique.

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Antegrade Crossing97.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Controlled Antegrade-Retrograde Technique (CART)

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Controlled Antegrade-Retrograde Technique (CART)100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Kissing Wire Technique

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set.The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Kissing Wire Technique100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Knuckle Wire

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Knuckle Wire100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Multiple Crossing Techniques

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Multiple Crossing Techniques80.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Primary Retrograde Wire Crossing

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Primary Retrograde Wire Crossing91.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Reverse CART

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Reverse CART77.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Sub Intimal Technique

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique.

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Sub Intimal Technique100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Subintimal Tracking and Re-entry (STAR) Technique

Defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACE with antegrade crossing technique

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include the numbers of subjects with corresponding crossing method that were evaluable for procedural success.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedural Success With Subintimal Tracking and Re-entry (STAR) Technique100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Procedure Success

Device success and absence of in-hospital MACE. Per-protocol MI definition: Myocardial infarctions per protocol definition were categorized as Q-wave (development of new, pathological Q waves on the ECG) or non-Q-wave (elevation of CK levels to greater than two times the upper limit of normal and elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves). Per ARC MI definition: Myocardial infarctions per ARC definition were also categorized as Q-wave (development of new pathological Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads (according to the Minnesota code) with or without post-procedure CK or CK-MB levels elevated above normal) or non-Q-wave (all MIs not classified as Q-wave). ARC defined MIs were further classified as Periprocedural PCI, Periprocedural CABG, Spontaneous, Sudden Death, and Reinfarction based on biomarker and additional criteria and as ST Elevation MI (STEMI) or Non-ST Elevation MI (NSTEMI) based on ST segment.

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedure SuccessPer Protocol MI definition96.4 percentage of participants
CTO TreatmentPercentage of Participants With Procedure SuccessPer ARC MI definition89.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Resource Utilization: Contrast Volume

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CTO TreatmentResource Utilization: Contrast Volume259.00 mLStandard Deviation 136.74
Secondary

Resource Utilization: Fluoroscopic Time

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CTO TreatmentResource Utilization: Fluoroscopic Time33.61 MinutesStandard Deviation 23.29
Secondary

Resource Utilization: Procedural Time

Time frame: Participants were monitored for the duration of index procedure, an average of 79.9 ± 48.5 minutes

Population: ITT set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CTO TreatmentResource Utilization: Procedural Time79.88 MinutesStandard Deviation 48.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026