Skip to content

Efficacy of Neuro-HAART in Patients With HIV

The Efficacy of Neuro-HAART in HIV Infected Individuals

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01434654
Acronym
HANDobs
Enrollment
19
Registered
2011-09-15
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2016-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV

Keywords

HAND, HIV, Neurology, Neurocognitive, Neuro-HAART, HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND)

Brief summary

Patients infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) are at risk of brain related complications despite the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Such complications are termed HIV neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and comprise a spectrum from asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), through mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to severe HIV dementia (HAD). Prior to HAART approximately 30% of patients with advanced HIV disease had cognitive impairment; with HAART the incidence of HAND has decreased but its prevalence increased. The reasons for the ongoing development of cognitive impairment in HAART treated patients are not clear. They might relate to virus induced brain injury prior to starting HAART, the onset of a separate neurological process, toxicity related to HAART, or ongoing viral infection in the brain. It is clear that the ability of different antiretroviral drugs to penetrate the brain varies but what is not established is whether these differences between drugs lead to different neurological outcomes. The investigators propose to study HIV infected patients stable on HAART for 12 months; subdividing the groups according to the brain penetrance of their drug combination. Patients would undergo neuropsychological assessment and MRI brain scan at the start of the study and after 12 months. Differences in neuropsychological tests and MRI would be sought between treatment groups to establish whether HAART with better CNS penetration is associated with better outcome and fewer MRI changes.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

ViiV Healthcare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV positive with nadir cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count \<350 /microlitre (uL) * Taking HAART with CNS Penetration Effectiveness (CPE) score of either ≤7.0 or ≥7.5 for 1 year or more. Changes in antiretrovirals (ARVs) within the last 12 months are allowed so long as the CPE score does not lead to a change groups * Plasma HIV viral load \<50 copies / mL for preceding 12 months or longer * Informed consent given by participant or legally appointed guardian

Exclusion criteria

* Non-HIV related neurological disorders and active CNS opportunistic infection as assessed by full blood count, electrolytes, creatinine, glucose, liver function tests, cryptococcal antigen, venereal disease reaction level (VDRL), MRI brain scan and cerebrospinal fluid analyses for cell count, protein, glucose, culture, VDRL and cryptococcal antigen. * Psychiatric disorders on the psychotic axis, current major depression, and current substance use disorder as assessed by the Study Enrolment Questionnaire for Eligibility * Severe substance use disorders (within 12 months of study entry) * Active Hepatitis C virus (HCV) (detectable HCV RNA because HCV per se can cause cognitive impairment) * History of loss of consciousness \>1 hour * Non-proficient in English as assessed by the English as a second language questionnaire * Medications known pharmacologically to interact with ARVs * Pregnancy as assessed by the urinary pregnancy test

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Neurocognitive FunctioningChange from baseline Neuropsychological testing at 6 and 12 monthsChange in overall neurocognitive performance, defined as a global neurocognitive z-score, after a 12-month period of observation, between HIV positive patients taking antiretroviral regimens categorized as being either of high or low CNS penetration. To derive this score, 1) raw scores obtained from a 5-domain brief neurocognitive battery were converted to age-corrected z-scores (M=0, Standard Deviation=1) and 2) the set of individual subtest z-scores were averaged to generate a single composite (global) z-score for each subject. Lower (negative) scores therefore indicate greater levels of cognitive impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaBaseline and 12 monthsChange in major cerebral metabolites in the basal ganglia, as measured by 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), after a 12 month period of observation. Spectra were acquired on a Phillips Achieva 3T MRI scanner using point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence with short echo time (TE). jMRUI/AMARES algorithm was used to process spectra. Metabolite ratios were calculated for the following metabolites: N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), myo-inositol (mIo), in relation to internal water (H20) as standard.
Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterBaseline and 12 monthsChange in major cerebral metabolites in the frontal white matter, as measured by 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), between baseline and 12-months. Spectra were acquired on a Phillips Achieva 3T MRI scanner using point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence with short TE. jMRUI/AMARES algorithm was used to process spectra. Metabolite ratios were calculated for the following metabolites: N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), myo-inositol (mIo), glutamate/glutamine complex (Glx), in relation to internal H20 as standard.
Cerebrospinal FluidBaseline to 12 MonthsTo measure plateaux CSF ARV concentrations. This will identify the proportion of patients achieving levels of specific ARVs capable of inhibiting 95% of in vitro viral replication (IC95).

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from St Vincent's Hospital and/or referred from tertiary sexual health centres over the period January 2012 to June 2013.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)
Participants will be assessed based on their current Highly Active Antiretroviral Treatment (HAART). A scoring system is utilised to determine if their current treatment has high Central Nervous System (CNS) penetrance or low CNS penetrance. This will determine which study cohort they are randomised to. No treatment adjustments or changes will be made, they will remain on their usual HAART regimen.
5
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)
Participants will be assessed based on their current Highly Active Antiretroviral Treatment (HAART). A scoring system is utilised to determine if their current treatment has high Central Nervous System (CNS) penetrance or low CNS penetrance. This will determine which study cohort they are randomised to. No treatment adjustments or changes will be made, they will remain on their usual HAART regimen.
12
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNeuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)TotalNon Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)
Age, Continuous55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
53.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
50.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
Current CD4583 cells/mm3684 cells/mm3943 cells/mm3
Education12.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
12.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
14.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND) status
Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment (ANI)
7 participants9 participants2 participants
HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND) status
HIV-Associated Dementia (HAD)
0 participants1 participants1 participants
HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND) status
Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (MND)
3 participants4 participants1 participants
HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND) status
Normal/Unimpaired
2 participants3 participants1 participants
Nadir cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4)115 cells/mm3200 cells/mm3400 cells/mm3
Premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ)102.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
103.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
104.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants2 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
11 participants15 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
12 participants17 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants17 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 75 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Neurocognitive Functioning

Change in overall neurocognitive performance, defined as a global neurocognitive z-score, after a 12-month period of observation, between HIV positive patients taking antiretroviral regimens categorized as being either of high or low CNS penetration. To derive this score, 1) raw scores obtained from a 5-domain brief neurocognitive battery were converted to age-corrected z-scores (M=0, Standard Deviation=1) and 2) the set of individual subtest z-scores were averaged to generate a single composite (global) z-score for each subject. Lower (negative) scores therefore indicate greater levels of cognitive impairment.

Time frame: Change from baseline Neuropsychological testing at 6 and 12 months

Population: Modified intent-to-treat analysis. All enrolled participants were included aside n=2 low CNS penetrance with baseline data only (1 lost to follow-up, 1 withdrew before 6-months).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in Neurocognitive FunctioningBaseline-0.26 Global neurocognitive z-scoreStandard Error 0.27
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in Neurocognitive Functioning6 months-0.09 Global neurocognitive z-scoreStandard Error 0.27
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in Neurocognitive Functioning12 months-0.07 Global neurocognitive z-scoreStandard Error 0.27
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in Neurocognitive FunctioningBaseline-0.80 Global neurocognitive z-scoreStandard Error 0.17
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in Neurocognitive Functioning6 months-0.63 Global neurocognitive z-scoreStandard Error 0.17
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in Neurocognitive Functioning12 months-0.61 Global neurocognitive z-scoreStandard Error 0.17
Comparison: The primary outcome was analysed using a mixed-effect regression model with arm and time as fixed linear effects, arm\*time interaction as a non-linear fixed effect and participant as a random effect to account for participant attrition.p-value: 0.99Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Cerebrospinal Fluid

To measure plateaux CSF ARV concentrations. This will identify the proportion of patients achieving levels of specific ARVs capable of inhibiting 95% of in vitro viral replication (IC95).

Time frame: Baseline to 12 Months

Population: Data presented for n=5 participants with detectable CSF ARV concentrations who had lumbar puncture at Baseline and 12 months. The pre-specified analysis was not conducted as nevirapine, raltegravir, and darunavir were the only ARVs detected in CSF, and of these, only nevirapine was detected above the minimum threshold (set at \>50 ug/L).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidNevirapine BaselineNA ug/L
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidNevirapine 12 monthsNA ug/L
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidRaltegravir Baseline38 ug/L
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidRaltegravir 12 months32 ug/L
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidDarunavir Baseline46 ug/L
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidDarunavir 12 monthsNA ug/L
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidDarunavir Baseline39 ug/L
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidNevirapine Baseline1161.5 ug/LStandard Error 101.5
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidRaltegravir 12 monthsNA ug/L
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidNevirapine 12 months1445 ug/LStandard Error 234
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidDarunavir 12 months50 ug/L
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Cerebrospinal FluidRaltegravir Baseline39 ug/L
Secondary

Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal Ganglia

Change in major cerebral metabolites in the basal ganglia, as measured by 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), after a 12 month period of observation. Spectra were acquired on a Phillips Achieva 3T MRI scanner using point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence with short echo time (TE). jMRUI/AMARES algorithm was used to process spectra. Metabolite ratios were calculated for the following metabolites: N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), myo-inositol (mIo), in relation to internal water (H20) as standard.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: n=1 participant in high CNS penetrance arm did not return for 12-months follow-up visit. Their baseline data were therefore excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaNAA Baseline4.14 RatioStandard Error 0.2
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaCho Baseline1.81 RatioStandard Error 0.16
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaCr Baseline3.18 RatioStandard Error 0.18
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaNAA 12 months3.96 RatioStandard Error 0.2
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliamIo Baseline1.22 RatioStandard Error 0.21
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaCr 12 Months3.20 RatioStandard Error 0.18
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliamIo 12 Months1.12 RatioStandard Error 0.21
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaCho 12 Months1.78 RatioStandard Error 0.16
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliamIo 12 Months1.18 RatioStandard Error 0.14
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaNAA Baseline4.00 RatioStandard Error 0.13
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaNAA 12 months3.99 RatioStandard Error 0.13
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaCr Baseline3.03 RatioStandard Error 0.12
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaCr 12 Months3.27 RatioStandard Error 0.12
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaCho Baseline1.79 RatioStandard Error 0.11
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliaCho 12 Months1.72 RatioStandard Error 0.11
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Basal GangliamIo Baseline1.27 RatioStandard Error 0.14
Comparison: Change in NAA/H20 levels was analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.58ANOVA
Comparison: Change in Cr/H20 levels was analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.44ANOVA
Comparison: Change in Cho/H20 levels was analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.86ANOVA
Comparison: Change in mIo/H20 levels was analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.98ANOVA
Secondary

Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White Matter

Change in major cerebral metabolites in the frontal white matter, as measured by 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), between baseline and 12-months. Spectra were acquired on a Phillips Achieva 3T MRI scanner using point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence with short TE. jMRUI/AMARES algorithm was used to process spectra. Metabolite ratios were calculated for the following metabolites: N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), myo-inositol (mIo), glutamate/glutamine complex (Glx), in relation to internal H20 as standard.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: n=1 participant in high CNS penetrance arm did not return for 12-months follow-up visit. Their baseline data were therefore excluded from analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterNAA Baseline4.39 RatioStandard Error 0.22
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterNAA 12 Months4.74 RatioStandard Error 0.22
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterCr Baseline2.77 RatioStandard Error 0.19
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterCr 12 Months3.29 RatioStandard Error 0.19
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterCho Baseline2.25 RatioStandard Error 0.13
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterCho 12 Months2.50 RatioStandard Error 0.13
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MattermIo Baseline1.06 RatioStandard Error 0.09
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MattermIo 12 Months1.19 RatioStandard Error 0.09
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterGlx Baseline2.26 RatioStandard Error 0.16
Non Neuro-HAART (Low CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterGlx 12 Months2.13 RatioStandard Error 0.19
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MattermIo 12 Months1.23 RatioStandard Error 0.06
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterNAA Baseline4.38 RatioStandard Error 0.15
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterCho 12 Months2.31 RatioStandard Error 0.08
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterNAA 12 Months4.32 RatioStandard Error 0.15
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterGlx 12 Months1.96 RatioStandard Error 0.11
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterCr Baseline3.09 RatioStandard Error 0.12
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MattermIo Baseline1.05 RatioStandard Error 0.06
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterCr 12 Months3.16 RatioStandard Error 0.12
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterGlx Baseline2.13 RatioStandard Error 0.11
Neuro-HAART (High CNS Penetrance)Change in MRS Cerebral Metabolite Ratios in Frontal White MatterCho Baseline2.33 RatioStandard Error 0.09
Comparison: Change in NAA/H20 levels were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.16ANOVA
Comparison: Change in Cr/H20 levels were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.09ANOVA
Comparison: Change in Cho/H20 levels were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.06ANOVA
Comparison: Change in mIo/H20 levels were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.68ANOVA
Comparison: Change in Glx/H20 levels were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with arm, time, and arm\*time interaction as fixed effects.p-value: 0.58ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026