Skip to content

Safety Evaluation of a New Preservative in a Lubricating Eye Drop

A Single-Center Study Evaluating the Safety of a New Preservative in an OTC Lubricant Eye Drop Used QID in Healthy Adults and in Subjects Diagnosed With Dry Eye

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01434277
Enrollment
44
Registered
2011-09-14
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2011-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Keywords

Preservative, Eye Drops

Brief summary

This study is to evaluate the safety of a new preservative in a lubricant eye drop used four times a day in healthy adults and subjects diagnosed with dry eye.

Detailed description

Single-site, open-labeled study. Twenty two subjects will be enrolled into the healthy adult group and twenty two subjects into the dry eye group. Each subject will be in the study for approximately 2 weeks (treatment) and seen at three study Visits: Visit 1 (Day 0, Baseline), Visit 2 (Day 7 +/- 1) and Visit 3 (Day 14 +/- 1). Dosing regimen is 1-2 drops into each eye, four times daily, for two weeks. Assessments will be comprised of visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy, fluorescein corneal staining, and product comfort.

Interventions

OTHEREye Drops with Experimental Preservative

Glycerin, Hypromellose, Polyethylene glycol 400 with experimental preservative PQ-42

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18 years of age * Able to follow all study instructions and attend all required study visits * Provide written informed consent * Visual health and eye comfort within protocol-specified parameters * Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening, not be breast-feeding, and agree to use a protocol-specified acceptable form of birth control throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

* Any medical condition or history, or ocular scores, or use of any drug, device or medication that, per protocol or in the opinion of the investigator, might compromise the safety of the subject or analysis of the study results. * Use of contact lenses outside protocol allowance * Self-reported pregnancy, positive urine pregnancy test, breast-feeding; intends to become pregnant or breast-feed during the duration of the study, refuses protocol-specified urine pregnancy testing, and/or does not use protocol-specified birth control methods and agree to continue doing so for the duration of the study. * Participated in an investigational drug or device trial within 30 days of entering the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline in Pre-Dose Central Stainingbaseline, Within Two WeeksPre-dose Central Staining: Means and Differences from Visit 1
Change from Baseline in Pre-dose Inferior Stainingbaseline, Within Two weeksMeans and Differences from Visit 1 in Pre-Dose Inferior Staining
Change from Baseline in Pre-Dose Superior Stainingbaseline, Within Two WeeksPre-Dose Superior Staining: Means and Differences from Visit 1
Change from Baseline in Mean Corneal Stainingbaseline, Within Two WeeksMean Corneal Staining averaging over the 5 corneal regions and averaging over both eyes (NEI scale 0-3)
Post-dose Product Comfortbaseline, Within Two weeksProduct (ocular) comfort was assessed for each eye immediately, and at 1, 2, and 3 minutes following dosing at Visit 1 and 3 using a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 is very uncomfortable and 10 is very comfortable.
Change from Baseline in Pre-Dose Visual Acuitybaseline, Within Two weeksChange from Baseline in Pre-Treatment Means of Pre-Dose Visual Acuity on the LogMAR scale. (The LogMAR scale converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. It measures visual acuity loss; positive values indicate vision loss, while negative values denote normal or better visual acuity.)
Change from Baseline in Pre-Dose Temporal Stainingbaseline, Within Two WeeksPre-dose Temporal Staining: Means and Differences from Visit 1
Change from Baseline in Pre-Dose Nasal Stainingbaseline, Within Two WeeksPre-dose Nasal Staining: Means and Differences from Visit 1
Change from Baseline in Pre-Dose Average Stainingbaseline, Within Two WeeksPre-dose Average Staining: Means and Differences from Visit 1
Changes in Slit-Lamp Findings: Eye Structure: LidWithin Two WeeksSlit-lamp findings were recorded for the Lid ocular structure at 6 time points
Changes in Slit-Lamp Findings: Eye Structure: Lensbaseline, Within Two WeeksSlit-lamp findings were recorded for the Lens ocular structure at 6 time points
Changes in Slit-Lamp Findings: Eye Structure: Conjunctivabaseline, Within Two WeeksSlit-lamp findings were recorded for the Conjunctiva ocular structure at 6 time points
Change from Baseline in Slit-Lamp Findings: Eye Structure: Corneabaseline, Within Two WeeksSlit-lamp findings were recorded for the Cornea ocular structure at 6 time points

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026