Skip to content

Lens Wear Schedules and End-of-Day Comfort

Effect of Recovery Periods on Ocular Comfort During Daily Lens Wear

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01433549
Acronym
INVERMERE
Enrollment
44
Registered
2011-09-14
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2013-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of lens-free (recovery) intervals of varying lengths on end-of-day comfort and tear film changes with daily contact lens wear.

Detailed description

This study was conducted in a cross-over design with two phases. Each phase consisted of four cycles approximately 12 hours in length. During each cycle, contact lenses were worn for 2-hour intervals, separated by lens-free (recovery) intervals of either 0, 30, 60, or 80 minutes. A new pair of contact lenses was dispensed for each 2-hour interval of lens wear. A 12-hour lens-free wear period preceded each phase.

Interventions

Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel, single-vision contact lens FDA-approved for daily wear and extended (overnight) wear up to 6 nights.

DEVICESenofilcon A

Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel, single-vision contact lens FDA-approved for daily wear and extended (overnight) wear up to 6 nights.

Sponsors

University of Waterloo
CollaboratorOTHER
CIBA VISION
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer. * Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule. * Has had an ocular examination in the last two years. * Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer. * Experiences a decrease in ocular comfort through a lens-wearing day. * Has a current pair of spectacles. * Has a distance contact lens prescription of +6.00 diopters to -10.00 diopters and an acceptable fit with the study lenses. * Has astigmatism less than or equal to -1.00 DC. * Achieves visual acuity of 6/9 or better with the study lenses and with habitual spectacles. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Has any ocular disease. * Has a systemic condition that may affect a study outcome variable. * Is using any systemic or topical medications that may affect ocular health. * Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean End-of-Day ComfortHour 12As assessed by the participant using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (extremely uncomfortable) to 100 (very comfortable and fresh) at the end of each 12-hour (approximate) cycle. During each cycle, contact lenses were worn for 2-hour intervals, separated by lens-free (recovery) intervals of either 0, 30, 60, or 80 minutes. A new pair of contact lenses was dispensed for each 2-hour interval of lens wear.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Hour 12As assessed by the investigator using a corneal topographer. NITBUT was assessed at the end of each 12-hour (approximate) cycle. During each cycle, contact lenses were worn for 2-hour intervals, separated by lens-free (recovery) intervals of either 0, 30, 60, or 80 minutes. A new pair of contact lenses was dispensed for each 2-hour interval of lens wear. A longer tear film break-up time indicates a more stable tear film and may lead to a more comfortable lens-wearing experience.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from one study center located in Canada.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 44 participants enrolled, 16 were exited from the study prior to randomization (screen failures). Three subjects were randomized/fitted with lenses but discontinued prior to product dispense. This reporting group includes all participants enrolled and dispensed product. A 12-hour lens-free wear period preceded each phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall
Lotrafilcon B and Senofilcon A worn in cross-over fashion as randomized. Each product was worn bilaterally in 2-hour intervals, separated by lens-free (recovery) intervals of either 0, 30, 60, or 80 minutes, over the course of a 12-hour day, for a total of 4 cycles (days).
25
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Phase 2: Second Study ProductAdverse Event01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall
Age, Customized25 years
Region of Enrollment
Canada
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 280 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 280 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Mean End-of-Day Comfort

As assessed by the participant using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (extremely uncomfortable) to 100 (very comfortable and fresh) at the end of each 12-hour (approximate) cycle. During each cycle, contact lenses were worn for 2-hour intervals, separated by lens-free (recovery) intervals of either 0, 30, 60, or 80 minutes. A new pair of contact lenses was dispensed for each 2-hour interval of lens wear.

Time frame: Hour 12

Population: All participants who participated in both phases of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BMean End-of-Day ComfortSix 2-hr wear intervals/0-min recovery intervals48.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Lotrafilcon BMean End-of-Day ComfortFive 2-hr wear intervals/30-min recovery intervals51.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Lotrafilcon BMean End-of-Day ComfortFour 2-hr wear intervals/60-min recovery intervals56.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
Lotrafilcon BMean End-of-Day ComfortFour 2-hr wear intervals/80-min recovery intervals51.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Senofilcon AMean End-of-Day ComfortFour 2-hr wear intervals/80-min recovery intervals58.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Senofilcon AMean End-of-Day ComfortSix 2-hr wear intervals/0-min recovery intervals56.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
Senofilcon AMean End-of-Day ComfortFour 2-hr wear intervals/60-min recovery intervals58.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Senofilcon AMean End-of-Day ComfortFive 2-hr wear intervals/30-min recovery intervals53.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
Secondary

Mean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)

As assessed by the investigator using a corneal topographer. NITBUT was assessed at the end of each 12-hour (approximate) cycle. During each cycle, contact lenses were worn for 2-hour intervals, separated by lens-free (recovery) intervals of either 0, 30, 60, or 80 minutes. A new pair of contact lenses was dispensed for each 2-hour interval of lens wear. A longer tear film break-up time indicates a more stable tear film and may lead to a more comfortable lens-wearing experience.

Time frame: Hour 12

Population: All participants who participated in both phases of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon BMean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Six 2-hr wear intervals/0-min recovery intervals4.6 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.9
Lotrafilcon BMean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Five 2-hr wear intervals/30-min recovery intervals5.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.2
Lotrafilcon BMean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Four 2-hr wear intervals/60-min recovery intervals4.4 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.2
Lotrafilcon BMean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Four 2-hr wear intervals/80-min recovery intervals4.9 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.6
Senofilcon AMean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Four 2-hr wear intervals/80-min recovery intervals4.8 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.2
Senofilcon AMean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Six 2-hr wear intervals/0-min recovery intervals4.3 SecondsStandard Deviation 1.2
Senofilcon AMean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Four 2-hr wear intervals/60-min recovery intervals4.4 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.4
Senofilcon AMean Non-Invasive Tear Film Break-Up Time (NITBUT)Five 2-hr wear intervals/30-min recovery intervals4.7 SecondsStandard Deviation 2.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026