Skip to content

Hemi Artificial Hipjoint Versus Total Artificial Hipjoint

Clinical and RSA Comparison of Hemi Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty After Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture. A Randomized Double-Blind Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01432691
Acronym
THA
Enrollment
70
Registered
2011-09-13
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Optimized Treatment

Keywords

Hip-fracture, RSA

Brief summary

This is a Randomized Controlled Trial study comparing hemialloplastik versus total joint replacement.

Detailed description

Seventy patients over seventy years who are admitted in our hip fracture department with the indication for hemi joint replacement therapy, due to a Garden 3-4 femoral neck fracture or a fracture Garden 1-2 with over 20-degree posterior tilt are randomized to either hemialloplastik or total joint replacement. The patients are followed for 24 mouths with X-ray Stereo Photogrammetric Analysis (RSA) radiographs and clinical examinations.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHemi (hemialloplastik)

THA vs hemi

Sponsors

Hvidovre University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 70 years, admitted two our hip-fracture department with a 3-4 Garden femoral neck fracture or a fracture Garden 1-2 with over 20-degree posterior tilt. * Preoperative New Mobility Score ≥ 6th * Patients must be able to speak and understand Danish. * Patients must be able to give informed consent and be cognitively intact (Hindsøe score ≥ 6). * Patients should be expected to be able to implement the postoperative controls. Patients should not be medically ill: ASA-score ≤ 3rd

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic and clinicalFive yearsMigration / rotation: Migration is measured by X-ray Stereo Photogrammetric Analysis (RSA). Clinical assessment: The patient is assessed clinically using the WOMAC and EQ-5D.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ClinicalFive yearsImplant Placement: Mobilisation: Patient mobilization level before the fracture is assessed by the New Mobility Score.Under hospital assessed patients' ability to time with current time instrument daily using the Cumulated ambulation score (CAS). Bleeding: Perioperative bleeding set in operation description from start to suture the incision closed. Hgb is measured as standard on the third day in all patients in the hip fracture unit. In addition, registered the need for blood transfusions in the first four postoperative days.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026