Skip to content

A Study for Absorption of Intranasal Epinephrine Compared to Conventional Intramuscular Epinephrine

Comparison of Absorption of Epinephrine Into the Circulation After Epinephrine Intranasal Spray Administration and After Intramuscular Injection

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01432522
Acronym
Epinephrine
Enrollment
12
Registered
2011-09-13
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2011-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaphylaxis

Keywords

Intranasal epinephrine, Plasma epinephrine level

Brief summary

This study is a preliminary report of pharmacokinetic data of epinephrine administered via intranasal route (IN) comparing with intramuscular (IM) route in healthy adult volunteers.

Detailed description

Patients are reluctant to use Epipen® on emergency basis, perhaps because of improperly training, hesitancy and fear of needle. Other route of administration of epinephrine (EPI) may be more benefit such as intranasal route.

Interventions

DRUGEpinephrine

1. Intranasal epinephrine 5 mg /spray 2. Intramuscular epinephrine 0.3 mg 3. Intranasal saline spray

Sponsors

Mahidol University
CollaboratorOTHER
Siriraj Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Healthy subjects 2. 18-30 years-old

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy 2. Subjected who use current medication that interfere with result of plasma epinephrine level such as pseudoephedrine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of Pharmacokinetics of epinephrinepredose, 5 , 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes post-doseCmax, Area Under Curve, Tmax of epinephrine compare between 0.3 mg intramuscular and 5 mg intranasal route

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numbers of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability1 yearAny side effects from such administration such as bad smelling, sorethroat.

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026