Skip to content

Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft

Ridge Preservation Comparing a Socket Allograft Alone to a Socket Allograft Plus a Facial Overlay Xenograft: A Clinical and Histologic Study In Humans

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01431131
Enrollment
24
Registered
2011-09-09
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2017-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical Efficacy

Keywords

graft placement, bone resorption

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two methods of ridge preservation in the maxillary anterior esthetic zone to determine the best method to establish adequate bone and soft tissue to accommodate implant placement. For the positive control group a mineralized cancellous allograft will be placed in the extraction socket. For the test group a mineralized cancellous allograft will be placed in the extraction socket plus an additional graft will be placed to overlay the facial surface of the socket that will be composed of bovine xenograft material. Outcomes will be clinical horizontal and vertical dimensional change and histologic analysis of the graft material at 4 months post-placement.

Detailed description

Subjects met the eligibility criteria if they were at least 18 years of age and had one nonmolar tooth requiring extraction that would be replaced by a dental implant. Extraction sites were bordered by at least one tooth. Exclusion criteria included: 1) debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on the periodontium; 2) molar extraction sites; 3) presence of or history of osteonecrosis of the jaws; 4) history of IV bisphosphonate treatment; 5) history of oral bisphosphonate treatment for more than three years; 6) pregnancy or lactation; 7) known allergy to any material or medication used in the study; 8) required antibiotic prophylaxis; 9) previous head and neck radiation therapy; 10) history of chemotherapy in the last 12 months; 11) long term steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy; or 12) failure to sign an informed consent approved by the Human Studies Committee. Patients were excluded post-treatment if they developed infection or had an adverse reaction to any of the materials used in the study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntrasocket graft

Intrasocket mineralized cancellous allograft

PROCEDUREIntrasocket plus facial overlay graft

Intrasocket mineralized cancellous allograft plus a facial overlay graft of bovine xenograft

Sponsors

University of Louisville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Have one non-molar tooth requiring extraction that will be replaced by a dental implant. The site must be bordered by at least one tooth. 2. Healthy person that is at least 18 years old. 3. Patients must sign an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville Human Studies Committee.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on the periodontium. 2. Molar teeth. 3. Presence of or history of osteonecrosis of the jaws. 4. Patients who are currently taking IV bisphosphonates or who had IV treatment with bisphosphonates irrespective of the duration. 5. Patients who have been treated with oral bisphosphonates for more than three years. 6. Pregnant women due to the possibility of miscarriage. 7. Patients with an allergy to any material or medication used in the study. 8. Patients who need prophylactic antibiotics. 9. Previous head and neck radiation therapy. 10. Chemotherapy in the previous 12 months. 11. Patients on long term NSAID or steroid therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Horizontal Ridge DimensionBaseline and 4 monthsWIll be measured with a digital caliper at baseline and 4 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histologic Healing of the Osseous Graft4 monthsHistologic analysis to determine vital bone, nonvital bone, and trabecular space percentages

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted between September 2011 and July 2012 in the Graduate Periodontics clinic at the University of Louisville School of Dentistry.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intrasocket Graft
Positive control, an intrasocket cancellous allograft was placed
12
Intrasocket Plus Facial Overlay Graft
Intrasocket cancellous allograft plus a facial overlay bovine xenograft
12
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntrasocket Plus Facial Overlay GraftIntrasocket GraftTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Gender
Female
5 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
Gender
Male
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants12 participants24 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Horizontal Ridge Dimension

WIll be measured with a digital caliper at baseline and 4 months.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intrasocket GraftHorizontal Ridge Dimension-1.6 mmStandard Deviation 0.8
Intrasocket Plus Facial Overlay GraftHorizontal Ridge Dimension-0.3 mmStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Histologic Healing of the Osseous Graft

Histologic analysis to determine vital bone, nonvital bone, and trabecular space percentages

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intrasocket GraftHistologic Healing of the Osseous Graft35 percentage vital boneStandard Deviation 16
Intrasocket Plus Facial Overlay GraftHistologic Healing of the Osseous Graft40 percentage vital boneStandard Deviation 16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026