Skip to content

A 3 Year Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Low Dose Ladostigil in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment

A 36-month, Multi-centre, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Low Dose Ladostigil in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01429623
Enrollment
210
Registered
2011-09-07
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Mild Cognitive Impairment, Early Stage Dementia, Conversion to Alzheimer's disease, Memory Impairment

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with the investigational drug ladostigil will delay the onset of Alzheimer's disease(AD) in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). MCI is now recognized as a precursor to AD and clinical tools are available to assess cognitive performance at this earlier stage. Ladostigil is currently under investigation for the treatment of AD. In this study, the investigators will be examining ladostigil at a lower dose level. At this dose level, ladostigil has been shown to reduce signs of early memory loss in animals. Thus, in this study the investigators are attempting to determine if earlier invention with a lower dose of ladostigil will significantly reduce initial memory loss and delay the subsequent progression to more serious cognitive dysfunction.

Detailed description

Ladostigil shows neuroprotective activity, reducing oxidative stress, activating microglia, and inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines in pre-clinical models. Study assessed its safety and potential efficacy in a 3-year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Patients from 16 centers in Austria, Germany and Israel with MCI (Albert et al 2011), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) \> 24, Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised Verbal Paired Associates ≤ 18, and medial temporal lobe atrophy were stratified by APOE4 genotype and randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) using blocks of 4, to receive either ladostigil, 10 mg per day, or placebo as identically-appearing capsules. The primary endpoint was onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Secondary endpoints were the NTB, DAD, and GDS. Exploratory outcomes were MRI-derived whole brain, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex volumes; the NeuroTrax Mindstreams computerized cognitive battery; and the CDR. Between February 17, 2012 and August 1, 2013, we randomly allocated 210 patients to placebo (107 patients) or ladostigil (103 patients); 4 patients in each group lacked post baseline assessments. After 36 months 20.4% (21 of 103 patients) of the placebo group and 14.1% (14 of 99 patients) of the ladostigil group progressed to AD (log-rank test p=.16). There were no significant effects on NTB, DAD, or GDS outcomes. There was less decline in whole brain volume in the ladostigil group as compared to placebo (p\<.02), but not hippocampus and entorhinal cortex volumes, and CDR and a trend for less decline on the RAVLT total delayed score component of the NTB (p=.09). Fourteen patients taking placebo and 21 taking ladostigil discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Serious adverse events were reported by 26 (25.2%) patients in the ladostigil group and 28 (26.2%) patients in the placebo group. Ladostigil appeared safe, well-tolerated, and may have potential for improving memory and delaying progression to dementia.

Interventions

10mg ladostigil base administered once daily as hard gelatin capsule

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo comparator

Sponsors

Avraham Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women (non-childbearing potential) with a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to consensus criteria as defined by Petersen * Abnormal memory function will be evaluated by Verbal Paired Associates from the Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised. Norm values for healthy adults in two age cohorts are: a) 50-70 years 19.7 (SD=2.9) and b) 75-95 years 18.3 (SD=2.8). Patients that score \< or = 23 will be included. * Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5 (Memory box score 0.5 or 1, no box score \> 1) * Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) \> 24 and \< or = 30 * General cognition and functional performance is sufficiently preserved such that a diagnosis of AD can be excluded by the site physician at the time of the screening visit. * No significant cerebrovascular disease indicated by Modified Hackinski Ischaemic Score equal to or below 4 * Age 55-85 years based upon correlation of cognition and Scheltens score observed in this age range * Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) of \< or = 5 * An informer who has frequent contact with the subject (e.g. an average of 10 hours per week or more) is available and agrees to monitor administration of study drug, to observe the subject for adverse events and to accompany the subject to clinical visits during the trial, if the presence of the informer is required. * All patients have to undergo an MRI scan after the screening visit, i.e. during the screening visit, irrespective of MRIs having been performed prior to entry into the study. MRI findings have to be consistent with a diagnosis of MCI. * Central rating of medial temporal lobe according to Scheltens scale. The right and left medial temporal structures will be rated separately and an overall estimate will be deduced using the average of the two ratings. An average score \> 1 is required to make patients eligible for the study. * Adequate visual and auditory acuity must be demonstrated to allow for neuropsychological testing. * Good general health status acceptable for participation in a 36-month clinical trial, with no additional diseases expected to interfere with the study * ECG without clinically significant abnormalities according to

Exclusion criteria

listed below * Subject is not pregnant, lactating or of childbearing potential (i.e. women must be two years post menopausal or surgically sterile) * Signed informed consent by patient and informer prior to any study specific procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Placebo3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 monthsTotal number of conversions from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's disease across entire 3 year study period. Conversion is determined, or defined, by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of greater than or equal to one. Composite rating ranges from 0 no symptoms of dementia to 3 Severe symptoms of dementia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Geriatric Depression Scale for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 monthsMean value change (from baseline) in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) across entire study period. The GDS ranges from 0 to 30. Scores of 0-9 are considered normal, 10-19 mildly depressed, and 20-30 severely depressed.
Change in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 monthsMean value change (from baseline) in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery (NTB) across entire study period. The NTB included the following well known cognitive tests: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Controlled Word Association Test (COWAT), Category Fluency Test (CFT), WMS-R Digit Span, and Trail Making Part A and B. The mean value was comprised of the z score of each of these tests with all z scores in the direction of higher scores better functioning. Range -3 to +3.
Change in Disability Assessment in Dementia for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 monthsMean value change (from baseline) in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) across entire study period. DAD evaluates the basic and instrumental activities in daily activities of elderly people with dementia. Higher scores reflect better functioning. DAD ranges from 0 to 100.

Countries

Austria, Germany, Israel

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment between Feb. 17, 2012 and August 1, 2013.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ladostigil Hemitartrate
10mg ladostigil base ladostigil hemitartrate: 10mg ladostigil base administered once daily as hard gelatin capsule
103
Placebo Control
drug product excipients Placebo: Placebo comparator
107
Total210

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event714
Overall StudyAssorted12
Overall StudyConversion to Alzheimer's disease1421
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyNo post baseline data44
Overall StudyPhysician Decision23
Overall StudyProtocol Violation32
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1913

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLadostigil HemitartratePlacebo ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
88 Participants91 Participants179 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants16 Participants31 Participants
Age, Continuous71.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
71.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
71.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.54
Region of Enrollment
Austria
23 participants24 participants47 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
33 participants33 participants66 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
47 participants50 participants97 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants41 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants66 Participants133 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1030 / 107
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 10359 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
26 / 10328 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Conversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Placebo

Total number of conversions from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's disease across entire 3 year study period. Conversion is determined, or defined, by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of greater than or equal to one. Composite rating ranges from 0 no symptoms of dementia to 3 Severe symptoms of dementia.

Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months

Population: All randomized subjects with at least one post-baseline visit.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Ladostigil HemitartrateConversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Placebo14 Participants
Placebo ControlConversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Placebo21 Participants
p-value: <0.1695% CI: [0.74, 3.25]Log Rank
Secondary

Change in Disability Assessment in Dementia for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

Mean value change (from baseline) in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) across entire study period. DAD evaluates the basic and instrumental activities in daily activities of elderly people with dementia. Higher scores reflect better functioning. DAD ranges from 0 to 100.

Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ladostigil HemitartrateChange in Disability Assessment in Dementia for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population-0.77 Change from basline on units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.43
Placebo ControlChange in Disability Assessment in Dementia for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population-0.40 Change from basline on units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.11
p-value: <0.97Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Geriatric Depression Scale for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

Mean value change (from baseline) in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) across entire study period. The GDS ranges from 0 to 30. Scores of 0-9 are considered normal, 10-19 mildly depressed, and 20-30 severely depressed.

Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months

Population: Modified Intent to Treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ladostigil HemitartrateChange in Geriatric Depression Scale for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population.084 Change from basline on units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo ControlChange in Geriatric Depression Scale for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population.242 Change from basline on units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
p-value: <0.61Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

Mean value change (from baseline) in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery (NTB) across entire study period. The NTB included the following well known cognitive tests: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Controlled Word Association Test (COWAT), Category Fluency Test (CFT), WMS-R Digit Span, and Trail Making Part A and B. The mean value was comprised of the z score of each of these tests with all z scores in the direction of higher scores better functioning. Range -3 to +3.

Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months

Population: Modified Intent to treat (all randomized subject with at least one post baseline assessment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ladostigil HemitartrateChange in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population.21 Change from basline on units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Placebo ControlChange in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population.17 Change from basline on units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
p-value: <0.32Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026