Skip to content

The Effect of Interscalene Peripheral Nerve Block With 0.25% Bupivacaine vs 0.125% Bupivacaine on Lung Function

Investigation Into the Effect of 0.25% Bupivacaine for Interscalene Peripheral Nerve Block vs 0.125% Bupivacaine on Pulmonary Function

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01429584
Enrollment
30
Registered
2011-09-07
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2010-02-28
Last updated
2013-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diaphragm Paralysis

Keywords

bupivacaine concentration, interscalene nerve block, diaphragm function, diaphragm weakness

Brief summary

Peripheral nerve blocks are used to provide post-operative pain relief. Nerve blocks in the neck, in the interscalene area, provide pain relief after shoulder surgery but can cause temporary weakness or paralysis of the diaphragm. The investigators hypothesized that a lower concentration of bupivacaine would cause less weakness of the diaphragm but still provide good pain relief. Lung function and pain control was studied after interscalene peripheral nerve block with 20 milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine or 0.125% bupivacaine.

Detailed description

Prior to placement of interscalene brachial plexus peripheral nerve block (ISPNB), diaphragm function was assessed using ultrasound as normal, no movement, or paradoxical. Room air pulse oximetry (SpO2) was recorded. Patients were randomized to receive either 0.25% bupivacaine or 0.125% bupivacaine. ISPNB was performed using a coded syringe of the study drug, so that the anesthesiologists performing the nerve block, the patient, and the nurses assessing the patient were blinded as to the concentration. Patients were given a general endotracheal anesthesia for rotator cuff repair, and opioids were administered at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. When patients met criteria for PACU discharge, diaphragm function was again assessed using ultrasound and room air SpO2 was recorded.

Interventions

DRUGinterscalene nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine

interscalene nerve block performed with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine

DRUGinterscalene block with 0.125% bupivacaine

interscalene block with 20 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients presenting for outpatient rotator cuff repair * adults * English as the primary language

Exclusion criteria

* evidence of peripheral nerve damage on affected side * refusal of peripheral nerve block * pregnant women * lung disease, including obstructive sleep apnea * chronic opioid use * mental handicap

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Abnormal Lung FunctionAt discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, within 5 hours of the completion of surgeryLung function was evaluated by examining diaphragm movement using ultrasound imaging and change in room air oxygen saturation (SpO2). Diaphragm movement was assessed using ultrasound as Normal (diaphragm moves caudad with inspiration), Abnormal (diaphragm does not move caudad with inspiration), and Paradoxical (diaphragm moves cephalad with inspiration). Both diaphragm function and room air SpO2 were assessed prior to any intervention to establish a baseline, and again on discharge from the PACU, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain ReliefAt discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, within 5 hours of the completion of surgeryPain relief was assessed by recording the amount of opioid administered intraoperatively and in the PACU. The Visual Analogue Score of pain scores (0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable) were recorded at the time of discharge from the PACU, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery.
Satisfaction With Pain ControlWithin 30 daysA follow-up phone call was made to patients within 30 days of surgery to assess the presence of any complications related to the block and overall satisfaction with pain control. Overall satisfaction was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale of 1-not at all satisfied with pain control 2-mostly unsatisfied with pain control 3-slightly unsatisfied with pain control 4-no opinion 5-slightly satisfied with pain control 6-mostly satisfied with pain control 7-completely satisfied with pain control.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
0.25% Bupivacaine
interscalene nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine
15
0.125% Bupivacaine
interscalene nerve block with 0.125% bupivacaine
15
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic0.25% Bupivacaine0.125% BupivacaineTotal
Age, Continuous55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants15 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Abnormal Lung Function

Lung function was evaluated by examining diaphragm movement using ultrasound imaging and change in room air oxygen saturation (SpO2). Diaphragm movement was assessed using ultrasound as Normal (diaphragm moves caudad with inspiration), Abnormal (diaphragm does not move caudad with inspiration), and Paradoxical (diaphragm moves cephalad with inspiration). Both diaphragm function and room air SpO2 were assessed prior to any intervention to establish a baseline, and again on discharge from the PACU, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery.

Time frame: At discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery

Population: Power analysis was performed and a drop-out rate of 10% was anticipated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
0.25% BupivacaineAbnormal Lung Function11 participants w/ abnormal diaphragm fxn
0.125% BupivacaineAbnormal Lung Function3 participants w/ abnormal diaphragm fxn
Secondary

Pain Relief

Pain relief was assessed by recording the amount of opioid administered intraoperatively and in the PACU. The Visual Analogue Score of pain scores (0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable) were recorded at the time of discharge from the PACU, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery.

Time frame: At discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, within 5 hours of the completion of surgery

Population: Same as other outcome measures.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
0.25% BupivacainePain Relief0 Visual Analogue Scale for painStandard Deviation 0
0.125% BupivacainePain Relief0.7 Visual Analogue Scale for painStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Satisfaction With Pain Control

A follow-up phone call was made to patients within 30 days of surgery to assess the presence of any complications related to the block and overall satisfaction with pain control. Overall satisfaction was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale of 1-not at all satisfied with pain control 2-mostly unsatisfied with pain control 3-slightly unsatisfied with pain control 4-no opinion 5-slightly satisfied with pain control 6-mostly satisfied with pain control 7-completely satisfied with pain control.

Time frame: Within 30 days

Population: Same as other outcome measures

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
0.25% BupivacaineSatisfaction With Pain Control6.6 Likert Satisfaction ScaleStandard Deviation 0.5
0.125% BupivacaineSatisfaction With Pain Control6.6 Likert Satisfaction ScaleStandard Deviation 1.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026