Skip to content

Ocriplasmin for Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole

A Randomized, Sham-controlled, Double-masked, Multicenter Study Evaluating Ocriplasmin Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01429441
Acronym
OASIS
Enrollment
220
Registered
2011-09-07
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2016-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion / (VMT) including macular hole with ocriplasmin.

Detailed description

The present study is designed to assess anatomical and functional outcomes following a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin 0.125mg in subjects with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA)/ (VMT) including macular hole.

Interventions

0.125 mg single intravitreal injection

OTHERSham injection

Sham injection

Sponsors

ThromboGenics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects 18 years of age or older and of either gender * Presence of vitreomacular adhesion * Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/32 or worse in study eye * BCVA of 20/800 or better in the non-study eye

Exclusion criteria

* History or current evidence of proliferative retinopathy, exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or retinal vein occlusion in the study eye * Any vitreous hemorrhage or any other vitreous opacification which precludes the visualization of the posterior pole by visual inspection OR adequate assessment of the macula by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in the study eye * Macular hole of \> 400 µm diameter in the study eye * Presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) * Aphakia in the study eye * High myopia (more than 8D) in study eye * History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in either eye * History of vitrectomy in the study eye * Previous participation in this trial or prior administration of ocriplasmin in the study eye

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects With Pharmacological Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMA) / (Vitreomacular Traction [VMT]) Resolution at Day 28Day 28Pharmacological VMA resolution without anatomical defect, based on SD-OCT and determined by the masked central reading center (CRC), with post-resolution vitrectomy considered as a failure. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects With a ≥2 Lines Improvement in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline at Month 24Month 24≥2 lines improvement in BCVA from baseline, irrespective of vitrectomy. Missing data were imputed using the LOCF method.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 25 study sites in the United States. The first subject was enrolled on 02 November 2011 and the last subject completed the study on 22 October 2014.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ocriplasmin
Subjects in the ocriplasmin group received a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin 0.125mg
146
Sham
Subjects in the sham group received a single sham injection
74
Total220

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event51
Overall StudyDeath02
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up52
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2718

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOcriplasminShamTotal
Age, Continuous69.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.99
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.94
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants45 Participants148 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants29 Participants72 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
132 / 14657 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
49 / 14627 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Subjects With Pharmacological Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMA) / (Vitreomacular Traction [VMT]) Resolution at Day 28

Pharmacological VMA resolution without anatomical defect, based on SD-OCT and determined by the masked central reading center (CRC), with post-resolution vitrectomy considered as a failure. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.

Time frame: Day 28

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS is the set of all randomized subjects who received the initial treatment, and for whom data of at least 1 post-injection efficacy assessment was present. Two (2) subjects (1 in each treatment group) were excluded from the FAS as they withdrew consent and did not attend any of the post-injection visits.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcriplasminProportion of Subjects With Pharmacological Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMA) / (Vitreomacular Traction [VMT]) Resolution at Day 2841.7 Percentage (weighted across strata)
ShamProportion of Subjects With Pharmacological Vitreomacular Adhesion (VMA) / (Vitreomacular Traction [VMT]) Resolution at Day 286.2 Percentage (weighted across strata)
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects With a ≥2 Lines Improvement in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline at Month 24

≥2 lines improvement in BCVA from baseline, irrespective of vitrectomy. Missing data were imputed using the LOCF method.

Time frame: Month 24

Population: FAS. 1 subject did not have BCVA results at baseline and was excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OcriplasminProportion of Subjects With a ≥2 Lines Improvement in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline at Month 2450.5 Percentage (weighted across strata)
ShamProportion of Subjects With a ≥2 Lines Improvement in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline at Month 2439.1 Percentage (weighted across strata)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026