Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Hydromorphone in Elderly Emergency Department Patients With Acute Severe Pain

Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Hydromorphone Using Incremental Doses of 0.5 mg in Elderly ED Patients With Acute Severe Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01429285
Enrollment
350
Registered
2011-09-07
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2018-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Pain, Hydromorphone, Acute, Emergency Department

Brief summary

The hydromorphone protocol is more effective than usual care in Emergency Department (ED) patients age 65 years and older in terms of proportion who choose to forgo additional pain medication within 60 minutes post-baseline in the two groups.

Interventions

DRUGHydromorphone

0.5 mg IV hydromorphone followed by an optional 0.5 mg IV dose

DRUGUsual care

Attending administers any IV opioid in any dose he chooses

Sponsors

Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age greater than or equal to 65 years: This is a study of elderly patients. 2. Pain with onset within 7 days: Pain within seven days is the definition of acute pain that has been used in Emergency Department (ED) literature. 3. ED attending physician's judgment that patient's pain may warrant intravenous (IV) opioids: The factors that influence the decision to use parenteral opioids are complex and extensive. An approach that is commonly taken to address the issue of patient selection in drug trials is to use a specific condition (e.g., renal colic) or treatment (e.g., post-hysterectomy) that would generally be thought to be appropriately treated with an opioid analgesic, thereby eliminating individual judgment about eligibility for the study. However in order to assess the role of opioids with the widest generalizability in the ED setting, the investigators decided to enroll patients with a variety of diagnoses, all with a complaint of acute pain. Opioids are not an appropriate treatment for all patients who present with a complaint of pain (e.g., gastroenteritis, migraine). Therefore, unless there is a restriction to patients with a specific diagnosis, either a comprehensive list of diagnoses and situations in which opioids are indicated must be specified, or clinical judgment needs to be used. The investigators have opted for the latter alternative. 4. Normal mental status: In order to provide measures of pain experienced the patient needs to have a normal mental status. The investigators will use a 6-item screener (Wilber 2008) as an indicator of sufficiently normal mental status to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior use of methadone: the effect of methadone use on the perception of acute pain is unknown and suspected to be altered. The investigators feel that the needs of patients on methadone may exceed the dosage ceiling of 1 mg that will be used for this study. Similar to sickle cell patients and chronic cancer patients, patients on methadone usually require significantly higher doses of opioids to control their pain. Thus, the investigators feel that it would be unethical to restrict the dose that this subset of patients can receive. 2. Use of other opioids or tramadol within past seven days: to avoid introducing bias related to opioid tolerance that may alter the response to the study medication thereby masking the medication's effect. 3. Prior adverse reaction to opioids. 4. Chronic pain syndrome: frequently recurrent or daily pain for at least 3 months results in alteration in pain perception which is thought to be due to down-regulation of pain receptors. Examples of chronic pain syndromes include sickle cell anemia, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, migraine, and peripheral neuropathies. 5. Alcohol intoxication: the presence of alcohol intoxication as judged by the treating physician may alter perception, report, and treatment of pain. 6. Systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg: Opioids can produce peripheral vasodilation that may result in orthostatic hypotension. 7. Oxygen saturation \<95% on room air: For this study, oxygen saturation must be 95% or above on room air in order to be enrolled. 8. Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors in past 30 days: MAO inhibitors have been reported to intensify the effects of at least one opioid drug causing anxiety, confusion and significant respiratory depression or coma. 9. C02 measurement greater than 46: In accordance with a similar study (04-12-360), three subsets of patients will have their CO2 measured using a handheld capnometer prior to enrollment in the study. If the CO2 measurement is greater than 46, then the patient will be excluded from the study. The 3 subsets are as follows: * All patients who have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) * All patients who report a history of asthma together with greater than a 20 pack-year smoking history * All patients reporting less than a 20 pack-year smoking history who are having an asthma exacerbation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Successful Treatment1 hourNumber of patients with successful treatment is defined as the number of patients who declined additional pain medication within 1 hour of study entry when asked the question, Do you want more pain medication?. This measure looks at declining pain medication at either 15 minutes or 60 minutes, whereas 4. Post-Hoc refers only to the answer to the question at the 60 minute mark post-baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline to 60 Minutes60 minutesPain intensity is measured on the numerical rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The change in scores over time is calculated by subtracting the score at 60 minutes from the score at baseline (before treatment). These change values were then averaged.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hydromorphone
Hydromorphone protocol Hydromorphone: 0.5 mg IV hydromorphone followed by an optional 0.5 mg IV dose
153
Usual Care
Usual care Usual care: Attending administers any IV opioid in any dose he chooses
166
Total319

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyErroneously Enrolled Twice82
Overall StudyMissing Data53
Overall StudyProtocol Violation94

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHydromorphoneUsual CareTotal
Age, Continuous75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Diagnosis
Appendicitis
0 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Diagnosis
Back pain
14 Participants13 Participants27 Participants
Diagnosis
biliary colic/cholecystitis
6 Participants11 Participants17 Participants
Diagnosis
Colitis/diverticulitis
14 Participants10 Participants24 Participants
Diagnosis
Extremity fracture
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Diagnosis
Kidney stone/pyelonephritis
7 Participants11 Participants18 Participants
Diagnosis
Musculoskeletal pain
24 Participants24 Participants48 Participants
Diagnosis
Non-specific abdominal pain
50 Participants57 Participants107 Participants
Diagnosis
Other (pancreatitis, perforated viscus, etc)
15 Participants14 Participants29 Participants
Diagnosis
Small Bowel Obstruction
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
Nauseated or vomited before receiving opioids in the ED
No
87 Participants89 Participants176 Participants
Nauseated or vomited before receiving opioids in the ED
Unknown
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Nauseated or vomited before receiving opioids in the ED
Yes
65 Participants77 Participants142 Participants
Pain Intensity
NRS = 10
76 Participants81 Participants157 Participants
Pain Intensity
NRS = 3-6
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
Pain Intensity
NRS = 7
14 Participants20 Participants34 Participants
Pain Intensity
NRS = 8
31 Participants28 Participants59 Participants
Pain Intensity
NRS = 9
20 Participants24 Participants44 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
35 Participants44 Participants79 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
97 Participants103 Participants200 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
15 Participants16 Participants31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
153 Participants166 Participants319 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
105 Participants108 Participants213 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
48 Participants58 Participants106 Participants
Weight162 lbs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33
165 lbs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38
164 lbs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1530 / 166
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 15332 / 166
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1530 / 166

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Successful Treatment

Number of patients with successful treatment is defined as the number of patients who declined additional pain medication within 1 hour of study entry when asked the question, Do you want more pain medication?. This measure looks at declining pain medication at either 15 minutes or 60 minutes, whereas 4. Post-Hoc refers only to the answer to the question at the 60 minute mark post-baseline.

Time frame: 1 hour

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and the number analyzed is due to patient never being given IV opioids (13), enrolled twice (10), and missing primary outcome data (8)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HydromorphoneNumber of Patients With Successful TreatmentAchieved satisfactory analgesia within 60 min127 Participants
HydromorphoneNumber of Patients With Successful TreatmentNo satisfactory analgesia within 60 min26 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Patients With Successful TreatmentAchieved satisfactory analgesia within 60 min137 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Patients With Successful TreatmentNo satisfactory analgesia within 60 min29 Participants
Secondary

Mean Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline to 60 Minutes

Pain intensity is measured on the numerical rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The change in scores over time is calculated by subtracting the score at 60 minutes from the score at baseline (before treatment). These change values were then averaged.

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and the number analyzed is due to patient never being given IV opioids (13), enrolled twice (10), and missing primary outcome data (8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HydromorphoneMean Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline to 60 Minutes5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Usual CareMean Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline to 60 Minutes5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Post Hoc

Number of Patients Who Achieved Satisfactory Analgesia at 15 Minutes Post-baseline

Satisfactory Analgesia is defined as declining additional pain medication when asked the question, Do you want more pain medication?

Time frame: 15 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and the number analyzed is due to patient never being given IV opioids (13), enrolled twice (10), and missing primary outcome data (8)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HydromorphoneNumber of Patients Who Achieved Satisfactory Analgesia at 15 Minutes Post-baseline89 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Patients Who Achieved Satisfactory Analgesia at 15 Minutes Post-baseline111 Participants
Post Hoc

Number of Patients Who Achieved Satisfactory Analgesia at 60 Minutes Post-baseline

Satisfactory analgesia is defined as the patient declining additional pain medication when asked the question, Do you want more pain medication?. This measure refers only to the answer to this question asked at the 60 minute mark. The Primary Outcome (1. Primary Outcome - Number of Patients with successful treatment) refers to the answering no to this question at 15 minutes or 60 minutes post-baseline.

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and the number analyzed is due to patient never being given IV opioids (13), enrolled twice (10), and missing primary outcome data (8)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HydromorphoneNumber of Patients Who Achieved Satisfactory Analgesia at 60 Minutes Post-baseline111 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Patients Who Achieved Satisfactory Analgesia at 60 Minutes Post-baseline119 Participants
Post Hoc

Number of Patients With 50% or Greater Decline in Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to 60 Minutes

Pain intensity is measured on the numerical rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The 50% or greater change in pain score is measured by subtracting the pain score at 60 minutes from the pain score at baseline, then dividing that value by the original baseline value and multiplying by 100% to get a percent change value.

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and the number analyzed is due to patient never being given IV opioids (13), enrolled twice (10), and missing primary outcome data (8)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HydromorphoneNumber of Patients With 50% or Greater Decline in Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to 60 Minutes106 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Patients With 50% or Greater Decline in Pain Intensity Score From Baseline to 60 Minutes107 Participants
Post Hoc

Number of Patients With a Pain Intensity Score of 3 or Less at 60 Minutes

Pain intensity is measured on the numerical rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and the number analyzed is due to patient never being given IV opioids (13), enrolled twice (10), and missing primary outcome data (8)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HydromorphoneNumber of Patients With a Pain Intensity Score of 3 or Less at 60 Minutes83 Participants
Usual CareNumber of Patients With a Pain Intensity Score of 3 or Less at 60 Minutes87 Participants
Post Hoc

Pain Intensity Score at 60 Minutes

Pain intensity is measured on the numerical rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: 60 minutes

Population: The discrepancy between the number of patients enrolled and randomized and the number analyzed is due to patient never being given IV opioids (13), enrolled twice (10), and missing primary outcome data (8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
HydromorphonePain Intensity Score at 60 Minutes3 units on a scale
Usual CarePain Intensity Score at 60 Minutes3 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026