Skip to content

Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab in Treatment of Macular Edema From Vein Occlusion

Comparison of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Agents in the Treatment of Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01428388
Acronym
CRAVE
Enrollment
150
Registered
2011-09-05
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2017-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion

Keywords

macular edema, vein occlusion, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, vascular endothelial growth factor

Brief summary

Antagonists of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway are effective in treating macular edema resulting from retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In the eye, the two most widely used anti-VEGF agents are ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Only ranibizumab has been FDA-approved for the treatment of macular edema from RVO, however bevacizumab has been used off-label by many ophthalmologists with good success. Furthermore, the cost of bevacizumab is less than one-tenth the cost of ranibizumab. Here the investigators conduct a six month randomized, prospective interventional trial comparing the effectiveness of ranibizumab with bevacizumab in the treatment of macular edema from RVO. Primary outcome measures are change in central retinal thickness. Secondary measures are change in visual acuity from baseline and change in angiographic properties of macular lesions from baseline after treatment.

Interventions

1.25 mg per dose, delivered monthly by intravitreal injection for six months

DRUGIntravitreal injection of ranibizumab (0.5 mg per dose)

0.5 mg per dose, delivered monthly by intravitreal injection for six months

Sponsors

Retina Associates of Florida, P.A.
CollaboratorOTHER
Illinois Retina Associates
CollaboratorOTHER
Kresge Eye Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Long Island Vitreoretinal Consultants
CollaboratorOTHER
Mid Atlantic Retina
CollaboratorOTHER
Retina Associates, Kansas City
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
CollaboratorOTHER
Barnes Retina Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to provide informed consent * Visual acuity of 20/40 - 20/320 in the study eye (regardless of relative APD) * Central foveal thickness (CFT) of \> 250 microns as assessed by OCT (see below) * Diagnosis of retinal vein occlusion in the past 9 months * Age over 50 years

Exclusion criteria

* History of previous intraocular surgery in the study eye, including pars plana vitrectomy (but not including uncomplicated cataract surgery), within 60 days of the screening visit * Inability to make study visits * Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 25 mmHg) despite treatment with two or more topical pharmacological anti-glaucomatous medication) * Pregnancy or lactation * Evidence of any diabetic retinopathy on exam or history of diabetic macular edema within 12 weeks of study onset * Any intravitreal injections within 12 weeks of study onset * Prior retinal vein occlusion * History of pan-retinal photocoagulation within 3 months of study onset or anticipated within 4 months after study onset * History of cerebrovascular event or myocardial infarction within 3 months of study onset

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in central retinal thicknesssix months compared to baselinecentral thickness is measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in best-corrected Snellen visual acuitysix months compared to baselinebest-corrected Snellen visual acuity (BCVA) is the best visual acuity measured using a standard Snellen eye chart at 20 feet between (1) uncorrected vision, (2) vision with current eyeglasses or (3) pinholed visual acuity.
change in fluorescein angiogramsix months compared to baselinefluorescein angiograms will measure area of peripheral nonperfusion. This will be interpreted by a designated physician at each testing center.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026