Digestive System Diseases, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency, Pancreatic Diseases
Conditions
Keywords
Digestive System Diseases, Therapeutic Uses, Pancreatectomy, Gastrointestinal Agents, Pancreatic Diseases, Pancrelipase, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency
Brief summary
This study aims at collecting the information related to the safety and effectiveness in the pancreatic exocrine insufficiency patients receiving the treatment with LipaCreon for a long term in order to evaluate the effective and safe use of LipaCreon.
Detailed description
Criteria for evaluation: 1. Adverse events 2. Nutritional endpoints * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin 3. Symptoms related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency * Steatorrhoea * Frequency of bowel movements * Diarrhoea * Foul stool odour * Decreased appetite * Abdominal distension 4. Patient's quality of life (QOL) 5. Degree of general improvement
Interventions
This study was an observational study and no intervention was specified
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients who receive LipaCreon for the replacement of pancreatic digestive enzymes in pancreatic exocrine insufficiency
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the ingredient of LipaCreon. * Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to porcine protein.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients With Adverse Drug Reaction | At week 52 | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavourable or unintended disease, or symptom or sign of such a disease, or abnormal laboratory finding that occurred in a patient who received Lipacreon, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Also, an AE for which the relationship with Lipacreon could not be ruled out was regarded as an adverse drug reaction (ADR). 1. Related : There is a temporal relationship between the use of the medicinal product and the onset of an AE, or a relapse with readministration,where other factors are less likely to be involved. 2. Relationship cannot be ruled out : There are other potential factors although there is a temporal relationship between the use of the medicinal product and the onset of an AE |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional Endpoints - BMI | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin |
| Nutritional Endpoints - Serum Total Protein | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin |
| Nutrition Endpoints - Albumin | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin |
| Nutrition Endpoints - Total Cholesterol | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Health (Summary) | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. PCS8 score is calculated by the following formula (All summed). PCS8 score = (0.23024×SF8GH)+(0.40672×SF8PF)+(0.38317×SF8RP)+(0.33295×SF8BP)+(0.07537×SF8VT)+(-0.01275×SF8SF)+(-0.30469×SF8MH)+(-0.14803×SF8RE)+0.67371 The minimum value of PCS8 is 5.315, and the maximum value is 70.689. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No) |
| Nutrition Endpoints - Triglycerides | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin |
| Nutrition Endpoints - Haemoglobin | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health (Summary) | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. MCS8 score is calculated by the following formula (All summed). MCS8 score = (-0.02020×SF8GH)+(-0.19972×SF8PF)+(-0.16579×SF8RP)+(-0.15992×SF8BP)+(0.16737×SF8VT)+(0.27264×SF8SF)+(0.57583×SF8MH)+(0.42927×SF8RE)+4.34744 The minimum value of MCS8 is 10.108, and the maximum value is 74.511. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Patient's Quality of Life - General Health | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8GH scores; 1:63.38, 2:58.54, 3:50.27, 4:40.40, 5:34.38, 6:26.89 The minimum value of SF8GH is 26.89, and the maximum value is 63.38. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Functioning | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8PF scores; 1:53.54, 2:47.77, 3:41.45, 4:27.59, 5:16.69 The minimum value of SF8PF is 16.69, and the maximum value is 53.54. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Degree of General Improvement | At week 24 | It was assessed at 24 weeks after the start of Lipacreon treatment and at the end of the observation period, using the following 4 grades: Improved, unchanged, exacerbated, unassessable |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Body Pain | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8BP scores; 1:60.35, 2:52.46, 3:46.10, 4:38.21, 5:31.59, 6:21.68. The minimum value of SF8BP is 21.68, and the maximum value is 60.35. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Vitality | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8VT scores; 1:60.01, 2:53.74, 3:44.48, 4:38.51, 5:28.68. The minimum value of SF8VT is 28.68, and the maximum value is 60.01. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Social Functioning | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8SF scores; 1:55.14, 2:45.60, 3:37.65, 4:29.15, 5:26.00. The minimum value of SF8SF is 26.00, and the maximum value is 55.14. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8MH scores; 1:56.93, 2:50.72, 3:44.94, 4:36.30, 5:27.59. The minimum value of SF8MH is 27.59, and the maximum value is 56.93. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Role Emotional | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8RE scores; 1:54.19, 2:48.04, 3:42.24, 4:31.42, 5:19.98. The minimum value of SF8RE is 19.98, and the maximum value is 54.19. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
| Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Frequency of Bowel Movements | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No) |
| Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No) |
| Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No) |
| Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No) |
| Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No) |
| Patient's Quality of Life - Role Physical | Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks | Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8RP scores; 1:54.09, 2:47.42, 3:40.65, 4:27.91, 5:21.80. The minimum value of SF8RP is 21.80, and the maximum value is 54.09. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point. |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Recruitment details
From August 30, 2011 to July 31, 2014, 579 patients were registered at 144 departments of 136 facilities (patient registration period: August 30, 2011 to July 31, 2014) and the survey forms of 562 patients were collected from 140 departments of 132 facilities.
Pre-assignment details
For this survey, the contract for the conduct of the survey was concluded with 190 departments of 181 facilities during the period from August 30, 2011 to July 31, 2014.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| LipaCreon those with an exposure | 553 |
| Total | 553 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 46 |
| Overall Study | AE and Patient's rejection | 5 |
| Overall Study | Death | 7 |
| Overall Study | Drug not administered | 1 |
| Overall Study | Exacerbation of underlying disease | 5 |
| Overall Study | Failure to visit | 7 |
| Overall Study | Failure to visit after administration | 40 |
| Overall Study | Forgetting prescription | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 8 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy and Patient's rejection | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 17 |
| Overall Study | Oral feeding difficulty | 5 |
| Overall Study | Other | 2 |
| Overall Study | Patient's rejection | 27 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 5 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 |
| Overall Study | Symptom improvement | 6 |
| Overall Study | Transfer to a different hospital | 17 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | LipaCreon |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 310 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 243 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 65.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 553 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 210 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 343 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 553 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 553 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 81 / 553 |
Outcome results
Number of Patients With Adverse Drug Reaction
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavourable or unintended disease, or symptom or sign of such a disease, or abnormal laboratory finding that occurred in a patient who received Lipacreon, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Also, an AE for which the relationship with Lipacreon could not be ruled out was regarded as an adverse drug reaction (ADR). 1. Related : There is a temporal relationship between the use of the medicinal product and the onset of an AE, or a relapse with readministration,where other factors are less likely to be involved. 2. Relationship cannot be ruled out : There are other potential factors although there is a temporal relationship between the use of the medicinal product and the onset of an AE
Time frame: At week 52
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Number of Patients With Adverse Drug Reaction | 36 participants |
Degree of General Improvement
It was assessed at 24 weeks after the start of Lipacreon treatment and at the end of the observation period, using the following 4 grades: Improved, unchanged, exacerbated, unassessable
Time frame: At week 24
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Degree of General Improvement | Improved | 299 Participants |
| LipaCreon | Degree of General Improvement | Unchanged | 87 Participants |
| LipaCreon | Degree of General Improvement | Exacerbated | 3 Participants |
| LipaCreon | Degree of General Improvement | Unassessable | 15 Participants |
Degree of General Improvement
It was assessed at 24 weeks after the start of Lipacreon treatment and at the end of the observation period, using the following 4 grades: Improved, unchanged, exacerbated, unassessable
Time frame: At week 52
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Degree of General Improvement | Improved | 240 Participants |
| LipaCreon | Degree of General Improvement | Unchanged | 62 Participants |
| LipaCreon | Degree of General Improvement | Exacerbated | 1 Participants |
| LipaCreon | Degree of General Improvement | Unassessable | 11 Participants |
Nutritional Endpoints - BMI
The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:407 patients, 4 weeks:239 patients, 8 weeks:241 patients, 24 weeks:256 patients, 52weeks: 195 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - BMI | Baseline | 20.452 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 3.144 |
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - BMI | 4 weeks | 20.193 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 2.933 |
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - BMI | 8 weeks | 20.229 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 2.991 |
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - BMI | 24 weeks | 20.520 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 2.847 |
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - BMI | 52 weeks | 20.720 kg/m2 | Standard Deviation 2.853 |
Nutritional Endpoints - Serum Total Protein
The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:428 patients, 4 weeks:308 patients, 8 weeks:305 patients, 24 weeks:291 patients, 52weeks: 231 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - Serum Total Protein | Baseline | 6.579 g/dL | Standard Deviation 0.798 |
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - Serum Total Protein | 4 weeks | 6.955 g/dL | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - Serum Total Protein | 8 weeks | 6.761 g/dL | Standard Deviation 0.654 |
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - Serum Total Protein | 24 weeks | 6.901 g/dL | Standard Deviation 0.596 |
| LipaCreon | Nutritional Endpoints - Serum Total Protein | 52 weeks | 6.914 g/dL | Standard Deviation 0.637 |
Nutrition Endpoints - Albumin
The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:429 patients, 4 weeks:319 patients, 8 weeks:316 patients, 24 weeks:309 patients, 52weeks: 235 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Albumin | Baseline | 3.688 g/dL | Standard Deviation 0.663 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Albumin | 4 weeks | 3.912 g/dL | Standard Deviation 2.164 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Albumin | 8 weeks | 3.843 g/dL | Standard Deviation 0.628 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Albumin | 24 weeks | 3.984 g/dL | Standard Deviation 0.509 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Albumin | 52 weeks | 3.959 g/dL | Standard Deviation 0.579 |
Nutrition Endpoints - Haemoglobin
The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:465 patients, 4 weeks:331 patients, 8 weeks:333 patients, 24 weeks:328 patients, 52weeks: 246 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Haemoglobin | 24 weeks | 12.40 g/dL | Standard Deviation 1.96 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Haemoglobin | Baseline | 12.18 g/dL | Standard Deviation 1.99 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Haemoglobin | 4 weeks | 12.03 g/dL | Standard Deviation 1.84 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Haemoglobin | 8 weeks | 12.12 g/dL | Standard Deviation 1.95 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Haemoglobin | 52 weeks | 12.58 g/dL | Standard Deviation 1.88 |
Nutrition Endpoints - Total Cholesterol
The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:310 patients, 4 weeks:184 patients, 8 weeks:188 patients, 24 weeks:195 patients, 52weeks: 150 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Total Cholesterol | Baseline | 164.32 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 47.63 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Total Cholesterol | 4 weeks | 169.40 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 45.34 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Total Cholesterol | 8 weeks | 169.77 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 45.99 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Total Cholesterol | 24 weeks | 168.88 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 39.9 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Total Cholesterol | 52 weeks | 169.41 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 38.27 |
Nutrition Endpoints - Triglycerides
The following nutritional endpoints were measured prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * BMI (height \[only prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment\] and weight) * Serum total protein * Albumin * Total cholesterol * Triglycerides * Haemoglobin
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:298 patients, 4 weeks:163 patients, 8 weeks:178 patients, 24 weeks:188 patients, 52weeks: 142 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Triglycerides | Baseline | 123.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 115 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Triglycerides | 4 weeks | 128.8 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 95.4 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Triglycerides | 8 weeks | 118.6 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 90.1 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Triglycerides | 24 weeks | 117.9 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 70.6 |
| LipaCreon | Nutrition Endpoints - Triglycerides | 52 weeks | 126.5 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 103.5 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Body Pain
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8BP scores; 1:60.35, 2:52.46, 3:46.10, 4:38.21, 5:31.59, 6:21.68. The minimum value of SF8BP is 21.68, and the maximum value is 60.35. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Body Pain | 52 weeks | 54.594 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.852 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Body Pain | Baseline | 48.282 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.178 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Body Pain | 8 weeks | 52.407 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.162 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Body Pain | 24 weeks | 53.746 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.906 |
Patient's Quality of Life - General Health
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8GH scores; 1:63.38, 2:58.54, 3:50.27, 4:40.40, 5:34.38, 6:26.89 The minimum value of SF8GH is 26.89, and the maximum value is 63.38. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - General Health | Baseline | 43.673 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.513 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - General Health | 8 weeks | 48.238 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.395 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - General Health | 24 weeks | 50.250 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.306 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - General Health | 52 weeks | 51.479 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.03 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8MH scores; 1:56.93, 2:50.72, 3:44.94, 4:36.30, 5:27.59. The minimum value of SF8MH is 27.59, and the maximum value is 56.93. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health | Baseline | 46.066 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.459 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health | 8 weeks | 49.619 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.245 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health | 24 weeks | 51.326 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.267 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health | 52 weeks | 51.745 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.395 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health (Summary)
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. MCS8 score is calculated by the following formula (All summed). MCS8 score = (-0.02020×SF8GH)+(-0.19972×SF8PF)+(-0.16579×SF8RP)+(-0.15992×SF8BP)+(0.16737×SF8VT)+(0.27264×SF8SF)+(0.57583×SF8MH)+(0.42927×SF8RE)+4.34744 The minimum value of MCS8 is 10.108, and the maximum value is 74.511. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health (Summary) | Baseline | 44.619 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.405 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health (Summary) | 8 weeks | 47.864 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.255 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health (Summary) | 24 weeks | 49.288 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.23 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Mental Health (Summary) | 52 weeks | 49.894 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.308 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Functioning
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8PF scores; 1:53.54, 2:47.77, 3:41.45, 4:27.59, 5:16.69 The minimum value of SF8PF is 16.69, and the maximum value is 53.54. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Functioning | Baseline | 41.941 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.463 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Functioning | 8 weeks | 45.630 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.628 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Functioning | 24 weeks | 47.438 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.617 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Functioning | 52 weeks | 48.325 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.166 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Health (Summary)
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. PCS8 score is calculated by the following formula (All summed). PCS8 score = (0.23024×SF8GH)+(0.40672×SF8PF)+(0.38317×SF8RP)+(0.33295×SF8BP)+(0.07537×SF8VT)+(-0.01275×SF8SF)+(-0.30469×SF8MH)+(-0.14803×SF8RE)+0.67371 The minimum value of PCS8 is 5.315, and the maximum value is 70.689. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Health (Summary) | Baseline | 42.057 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.59 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Health (Summary) | 8 weeks | 46.086 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.75 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Health (Summary) | 24 weeks | 47.919 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.414 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Physical Health (Summary) | 52 weeks | 48.985 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.109 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Role Emotional
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8RE scores; 1:54.19, 2:48.04, 3:42.24, 4:31.42, 5:19.98. The minimum value of SF8RE is 19.98, and the maximum value is 54.19. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Role Emotional | Baseline | 43.320 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.704 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Role Emotional | 8 weeks | 47.179 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.93 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Role Emotional | 24 weeks | 48.670 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.778 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Role Emotional | 52 weeks | 49.607 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.561 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Role Physical
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8RP scores; 1:54.09, 2:47.42, 3:40.65, 4:27.91, 5:21.80. The minimum value of SF8RP is 21.80, and the maximum value is 54.09. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Role Physical | Baseline | 41.325 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.707 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Role Physical | 8 weeks | 45.253 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.983 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Role Physical | 24 weeks | 47.371 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.034 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Role Physical | 52 weeks | 48.222 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.553 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Social Functioning
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8SF scores; 1:55.14, 2:45.60, 3:37.65, 4:29.15, 5:26.00. The minimum value of SF8SF is 26.00, and the maximum value is 55.14. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Social Functioning | Baseline | 42.345 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.332 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Social Functioning | 8 weeks | 46.073 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.255 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Social Functioning | 24 weeks | 47.749 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.393 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Social Functioning | 52 weeks | 48.633 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.973 |
Patient's Quality of Life - Vitality
Baseline, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period, the patient was asked to fill out the standard SF-8™ (1 month) to assess the patient's QOL, which was recorded in the survey form for this survey. SF-8™:The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Japanese version). Items are as follows. Physical health (summary):PCS8, Mental health (summary):MCS8, General health:SF8GH, Physical functioning:SF8PF, Role physical:SF8RP, Body pain:SF8BP, Vitality:SF8VT, Social functioning:SF8SF, Mental health:SF8MH, Role emotional:SF8RE. SF8VT scores; 1:60.01, 2:53.74, 3:44.48, 4:38.51, 5:28.68. The minimum value of SF8VT is 28.68, and the maximum value is 60.01. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The means ± SD was calculated by summing the values at each time point.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:517 patients, 8 weeks:366 patients, 24 weeks:350 patients, 52weeks: 249 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Vitality | Baseline | 44.425 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.216 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Vitality | 8 weeks | 48.408 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.718 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Vitality | 24 weeks | 50.263 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.183 |
| LipaCreon | Patient's Quality of Life - Vitality | 52 weeks | 51.463 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.919 |
Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension
The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:475 patients, 4 weeks:372 patients, 8 weeks:359 patients, 24 weeks:351 patients, 52weeks: 280 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | Baseline, Yes | 130 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | Baseline, No | 345 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | 4 weeks, Yes | 42 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | 4 weeks, No | 330 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | 8 weeks, Yes | 37 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | 8 weeks, No | 322 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | 24 weeks, Yes | 27 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | 24 weeks, No | 324 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | 52 weeks, Yes | 12 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Abdominal Distension | 52 weeks, No | 268 participants |
Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite
The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:482 patients, 4 weeks:376 patients, 8 weeks:362 patients, 24 weeks:355 patients, 52weeks: 283 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | Baseline, Yes | 169 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | Baseline, No | 313 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | 4 weeks, Yes | 72 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | 4 weeks, No | 304 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | 8 weeks, Yes | 58 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | 8 weeks, No | 304 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | 24 weeks, Yes | 37 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | 24 weeks, No | 318 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | 52 weeks, Yes | 17 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Decreased Appetite | 52 weeks, No | 266 participants |
Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea
The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:483 patients, 4 weeks:376 patients, 8 weeks:365 patients, 24 weeks:358 patients, 52weeks: 285 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | Baseline, Yes | 187 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | Baseline, No | 296 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | 4 weeks, Yes | 81 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | 4 weeks, No | 295 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | 8 weeks, Yes | 72 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | 8 weeks, No | 293 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | 24 weeks, Yes | 45 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | 24 weeks, No | 313 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | 52 weeks, Yes | 29 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Diarrhoea | 52 weeks, No | 256 participants |
Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour
The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:460 patients, 4 weeks:360 patients, 8 weeks:350 patients, 24 weeks:344 patients, 52weeks: 274 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | Baseline, Yes | 83 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | Baseline, No | 377 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | 4 weeks, Yes | 37 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | 4 weeks, No | 323 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | 8 weeks, Yes | 30 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | 8 weeks, No | 320 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | 24 weeks, Yes | 21 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | 24 weeks, No | 323 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | 52 weeks, Yes | 18 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Foul Stool Odour | 52 weeks, No | 256 participants |
Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Frequency of Bowel Movements
The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:437 patients, 4 weeks:334 patients, 8 weeks:324 patients, 24 weeks:317 patients, 52weeks: 248 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Frequency of Bowel Movements | Baseline | 2.37 times/day | Standard Deviation 1.87 |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Frequency of Bowel Movements | 4 weeks | 1.82 times/day | Standard Deviation 1.33 |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Frequency of Bowel Movements | 8 weeks | 1.77 times/day | Standard Deviation 1.42 |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Frequency of Bowel Movements | 24 weeks | 1.51 times/day | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Frequency of Bowel Movements | 52 weeks | 1.43 times/day | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea
The following symptoms were assessed as those related to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency prior to the start of Lipacreon treatment, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and at the end of the observation period. * Steatorrhoea (Yes/No) * Frequency of bowel movements (times/day) * Diarrhoea (Yes/No) * Foul stool odour (Yes/No) * Decreased appetite (Yes/No) * Abdominal distension (Yes/No)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks
Population: Among patients in the safety analysis set, 547 patients were included in the efficacy analysis set, excluding 6 patients who were excluded from the efficacy analysis set (Reasons: Unassessable: 5 patients; and off-label use: 1 patient). Among patients in the 547 patients, the patients for which data were obtained at each time frame were analyzed (Baseline:470 patients, 4 weeks:363 patients, 8 weeks:355 patients, 24 weeks:347 patients, 52weeks: 276 patients).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | 4 weeks, No | 330 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | Baseline, Yes | 84 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | Baseline, No | 386 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | 4 weeks, Yes | 33 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | 8 weeks, Yes | 22 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | 8 weeks, No | 333 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | 24 weeks, Yes | 15 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | 24 weeks, No | 332 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | 52 weeks, Yes | 6 participants |
| LipaCreon | Symptoms Related to Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency - Steatorrhoea | 52 weeks, No | 270 participants |