Skip to content

Pharmacogenomics for Antidepressant Guidance and Education 1 (PAGE-1_AG1)

A Six-month Study of the Genecept Assay vs. Treatment as Usual to Evaluate Efficacy of Using Assay Guided Treatment in Outpatient Adults With Treatment Resistant Depression

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01426516
Acronym
PAGE-1_AG1
Enrollment
29
Registered
2011-08-31
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2021-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Treatment Resistant, Depression

Brief summary

One-third or more of individuals treated for major depressive disorder (MDD) do not experience remission of symptoms despite at least two adequate antidepressant trials. Such treatment-resistant depression (TRD) contributes disproportionately to the tremendous costs of MDD, in terms of health care costs, functional impairment, and diminished quality of life. The promise of personalized medicine for individuals at high risk for TRD is apparent. If these individuals could be recognized early in their disease course, they could be triaged to more intensive or targeted interventions to improve their likelihood of remission. With the proliferation of treatment options in MDD, at present individuals can spend months or years in and out of treatment before receiving these next-step treatments. At present, no clinical or biomarker-based tool has been shown to assist in matching patients with treatments most likely to be effective for them. The Genecept Assay offers the possibility of Personalized Medicine in psychiatry. Clinicians may find this additional genetic information can lead to optimized treatment plans for individual patients. Before such an assay can be widely applied clinically, it is necessary to demonstrate that this tool usefully impacts treatment outcomes. This study will examine the potential impact of the assay in terms of depression severity at 3 months, with further follow-up out to 6 months. Secondary measures will allow an estimate of its potential to change clinician behavior and improve patient quality of life. Further measures will also allow for refinement of the assay to maximize patient and clinician satisfaction, and estimate the potential savings associated with deployment of this assay in real-world clinical settings.

Interventions

Genetic test which analyzes five pharmacodynamic and two pharmacokinetic genes important in psychiatric disorders

Sponsors

Genomind, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age 18-65 * written informed consent * diagnosis of non-psychotic major depression as determined by study * clinician/current medical prescriber, and mood disorder diagnosis confirmed by PHQ-9 * QIDS-SR score of at least 10 (i.e., moderate depression) at initial visit * failure of at least 1 prior adequate trial of a standard antidepressant (by ATRQ criteria - i.e., 6 weeks at adequate dose)

Exclusion criteria

* psychotic features in the current episode, based upon clinical assessment * 4 or more failed pharmacologic interventions in the current major depressive episode \[response rates for these subjects is likely to be extremely low and would require a substantially larger-scale study to identify treatment effects\] * current substance use disorder other than nicotine which based upon clinical assessment requires inpatient or outpatient detoxification * pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (to include oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy) * women who are breastfeeding * serious suicide or homicide risk, as assessed by evaluating clinician * other unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease, based on review of medical history, physical examination, and screening laboratory tests * patients who have taken an investigational psychotropic drug within the last 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy Measured by Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), Adjusted for Baseline Severity, at 6 Months6 monthsTo determine the efficacy of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU), in terms of depression severity as measured by change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), adjusted for baseline severity, at 6 months Add: * highest score on any 1 of the 4 sleep items (items 1 to 4) * highest score on any 1 of the 4 weight items (items 6 to 9) * highest score on either of the 2 psychomotor items (15 and 16) * scores for each of the 6 MDD symptom domains Total scores range from 0-27. 0 = no signs of depression; 27 = severe depression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinician Behavior as Measured by Change in Recorded Treatment Choice Before and After the Assay Results Are Made Available.one weekClinicians will rank first and alternative treatment choice and dosage prior to assay and first and two alternative treatment choices after receiving assay results (for AGT group). Clinician choices will be compared.
Quality of Life as Measured by Self Reported Assessment of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)baseline, 3, 6 monthsTo determine the efficacy of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder, in terms of patient quality of life (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)) The minimum raw score on the QLESQ is 14, and the maximum score is 70.
Cost6 monthsTo compare costs of AGT versus TAU in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder as measured by claims data.
Acceptability of the Use of AGT for Subjects and Clinicians as Measured by Satisfaction Survey6 monthsTo determine the acceptability to patients and clinicians of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Subjects will give DNA sample for genetic testing but will not receive genetic results and will therefore receive treatment as usual.
12
Genecept Assay
Subjects donate DNA sample for genetic testing and treatment decisions take genetic results into account. Genecept Assay: Genetic test which analyzes five pharmacodynamic and two pharmacokinetic genes important in psychiatric disorders
17
Total29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment as Usual (TAU)Genecept AssayTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants17 Participants29 Participants
Age, Continuous44 Years46 Years45 Years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants17 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 126 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy Measured by Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), Adjusted for Baseline Severity, at 6 Months

To determine the efficacy of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU), in terms of depression severity as measured by change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR), adjusted for baseline severity, at 6 months Add: * highest score on any 1 of the 4 sleep items (items 1 to 4) * highest score on any 1 of the 4 weight items (items 6 to 9) * highest score on either of the 2 psychomotor items (15 and 16) * scores for each of the 6 MDD symptom domains Total scores range from 0-27. 0 = no signs of depression; 27 = severe depression

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Invalid Data Collection

Secondary

Acceptability of the Use of AGT for Subjects and Clinicians as Measured by Satisfaction Survey

To determine the acceptability to patients and clinicians of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder

Time frame: 6 months

Population: invalid data collection

Secondary

Clinician Behavior as Measured by Change in Recorded Treatment Choice Before and After the Assay Results Are Made Available.

Clinicians will rank first and alternative treatment choice and dosage prior to assay and first and two alternative treatment choices after receiving assay results (for AGT group). Clinician choices will be compared.

Time frame: one week

Population: Invalid data collection

Secondary

Cost

To compare costs of AGT versus TAU in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder as measured by claims data.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: invalid data collection

Secondary

Quality of Life as Measured by Self Reported Assessment of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)

To determine the efficacy of assay-guided treatment (AGT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) in outpatient treatment of nonpsychotic major depressive disorder, in terms of patient quality of life (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ)) The minimum raw score on the QLESQ is 14, and the maximum score is 70.

Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 months

Population: Invalid data collection

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026