Skip to content

The Effect of Boceprevir in Russian Participants Diagnosed With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 (P08160)

Safety and Efficacy of Boceprevir in Combination With Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 in Russia: Previously Untreated Patients and Patients Who Failed Prior Treatment With Pegylated-Interferon Plus Ribavirin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01425203
Enrollment
238
Registered
2011-08-29
Start date
2011-11-23
Completion date
2013-10-21
Last updated
2021-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Boceprevir (BOC, SCH 503034, MK-3034) in combination with Peginterferon Alfa 2-b (PEG) plus Ribavirin (RBV) \[PEG+RBV=PR\] is effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1 among the Russian population. The primary hypothesis is that the percentage of participants achieving sustained virologic response in the BOC + PR group is superior to that in the Placebo (PBO) + PR group.

Interventions

DRUGBoceprevir

boceprevir 200-mg capsules, 800 mg 3 times a day (TID), orally (PO)

DRUGPlacebo

boceprevir-matched placebo four 200-mg capsules PO TID.

BIOLOGICALpeginterferon alfa-2b

peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 μg/kg/wk subcutaneously (SC)

DRUGRibavirin

ribavirin (weight-based dosing) 800 to 1400 mg/day PO divided twice daily dose (BID).

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* body weight ≥40 kg and ≤125 kg * previously documented CHC genotype 1 infection; * must have a liver biopsy with histology consistent with CHC and no other etiology * if cirrhosis present, must have an ultrasound within 6 months of the screening visit (or between screening and Day 1) with no findings suspicious for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) * agree to use acceptable methods of contraception with partner * previously untreated with pegylated-interferon (either alfa-2a or alfa-2b) plus RBV or failing prior treatment with pegylated-interferon (either alfa-2a or alfa-2b) plus RBV

Exclusion criteria

* co-infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B virus (Hepatitis B surface antigen \[HBsAg\] positive). * required discontinuation of previous interferon or ribavirin regimen for an adverse event (possibly or probably related) * treatment with ribavirin within 90 days and any interferon-alpha, based on the amendment, should be within 1 month prior to screening * treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days of the screening visit in this trial * evidence of decompensated liver disease including, but not limited to, a history or presence of clinical ascites, bleeding varices, or hepatic encephalopathy * diabetic and/or hypertensive with clinically significant ocular examination findings * clinical diagnosis of substance abuse of specified drugs within specified timeframes * any known pre-existing medical condition that could interfere with the participant's participation in and completion of the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response At Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) Among Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Any Trial Medication (Full Analysis Set Population)Follow-up Week 24 (up to 72 weeks)SVR24 was defined as an undetectable plasma Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) level at Follow-up Week 24 (FW24). If a participant was missing FW24 data and had undetectable HCV-RNA at FW12, the participant was considered a sustained virologic responder.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Among Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Experimental Trial Drug (Modified Intent-To-Treat [mITT] Population)Follow-up Week 24 (up to 72 weeks)SVR24 was defined as an undetectable plasma HCV-RNA level at FW24. If a participant was missing FW24 data and had undetectable HCV-RNA at FW12, the participant was considered a sustained virologic responder.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Early Virologic Response (EVR) At Treatment Week (TW) 8Treatment Week 8EVR was defined as an undetectable HCV-RNA level at TW 8. This analysis was conducted when all participants had completed 8 weeks of the study or had discontinued prior to TW 8.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 18 Russian sites recruited participants for this boceprevir (BOC) trial.

Pre-assignment details

Of 238 randomized participants, 237 received at least 1 dose of peginterferon alpha-2b (PEG) + ribavirin (RBV) \[PR\] and comprised the Full Analysis Set (FAS). 4 discontinued (DC) treatment during the PR lead-in phase and did not receive BOC or Placebo (PBO). 27 from PBO Arm failed the futility time point and were rolled over into Crossover Phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RGT BOC + PR
Participants received PR for 4 weeks before addition of BOC. Participants then received response guided therapy (RGT) with BOC + PR for up to 32 weeks followed by PBO + PR for up to 20 weeks.
159
PBO + PR (Control)
Participants received PR for 4 weeks before addition of BOC-matched PBO. Participants then received BOC + PR for up to 44 weeks.
78
Total237

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Crossover PhaseFailure at futility timepoint003
Crossover PhaseOther virologic failure criteria003
Treatment PhaseDC during PR Lead-in Phase310
Treatment PhaseDid not receive treatment010
Treatment PhaseFailure at futility timepoint8270
Treatment PhaseOther virologic failure criteria530
Treatment PhaseUnidentified reasons1150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRGT BOC + PRPBO + PR (Control)Total
Age, Continuous38.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
38.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants33 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
94 Participants45 Participants139 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
153 / 15971 / 7822 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 1599 / 781 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response At Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) Among Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Any Trial Medication (Full Analysis Set Population)

SVR24 was defined as an undetectable plasma Hepatitis C Virus-ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) level at Follow-up Week 24 (FW24). If a participant was missing FW24 data and had undetectable HCV-RNA at FW12, the participant was considered a sustained virologic responder.

Time frame: Follow-up Week 24 (up to 72 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS); all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any trial medication (PEG, RBV, or BOC) in the Treatment Phase. Participants in the PBO Control Arm who switched to the Crossover Arm were considered failures for SVR24 in this analysis and are not reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RGT BOC + PRPercentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response At Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) Among Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Any Trial Medication (Full Analysis Set Population)74.8 percentage of participants
PBO + PR (Control)Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Virologic Response At Follow-up Week 24 (SVR24) Among Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Any Trial Medication (Full Analysis Set Population)46.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: The primary statistical comparison was conducted on the FAS using the stratified Miettinen and Nurminen method at alpha level of 0.050 adjusted for stratification factors, including IL28B genotype and previous treatment as specified at the time of randomization.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [16.4, 41.5]Miettinen and Nurminen Method
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Early Virologic Response (EVR) At Treatment Week (TW) 8

EVR was defined as an undetectable HCV-RNA level at TW 8. This analysis was conducted when all participants had completed 8 weeks of the study or had discontinued prior to TW 8.

Time frame: Treatment Week 8

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS); all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any trial medication (PEG, RBV, or BOC) in the Treatment Phase. The Crossover arm had zero participants at TW8 since the first opportunity for participants in the PBO + PR Control arm to roll over to the Crossover arm was at TW12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RGT BOC + PRPercentage of Participants Achieving Early Virologic Response (EVR) At Treatment Week (TW) 887.4 percentage of participants
PBO + PR (Control)Percentage of Participants Achieving Early Virologic Response (EVR) At Treatment Week (TW) 842.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: The percentage of participants achieving EVR at TW8 was compared using the stratified Miettinen and Nurminen method at alpha level of 0.050 adjusted for stratification factors in the FAS population.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [33.2, 57]Miettinen and Nurminen Method
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Among Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Experimental Trial Drug (Modified Intent-To-Treat [mITT] Population)

SVR24 was defined as an undetectable plasma HCV-RNA level at FW24. If a participant was missing FW24 data and had undetectable HCV-RNA at FW12, the participant was considered a sustained virologic responder.

Time frame: Follow-up Week 24 (up to 72 weeks)

Population: mITT population included all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of experimental trial drug: BOC (for Experimental RGT BOC + PR arm) or Placebo (for PBO + PR Control arm). Participants in the PBO Control Arm who switched to the Crossover Arm were considered failures for SVR24 in this analysis and are not reported here.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RGT BOC + PRPercentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Among Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Experimental Trial Drug (Modified Intent-To-Treat [mITT] Population)76.3 percentage of participants
PBO + PR (Control)Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR24 Among Participants Who Received At Least One Dose of Experimental Trial Drug (Modified Intent-To-Treat [mITT] Population)46.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: The key secondary statistical comparison was conducted on the mITT using the stratified Miettinen and Nurminen method at alpha level of 0.050 adjusted for stratification factors.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [17.3, 42.5]Miettinen and Nurminen Method

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026