Device Success Rate, Device Performance
Conditions
Brief summary
In the following randomized, crossover study, the investigators test the hypothesis that ease of insertion and oropharyngeal leak pressure differ between the LMA ProSealTM and the i-GelTM in anesthetized pediatric patients.
Interventions
DEVICEi-Gel
Oropharyngeal leak pressure Insertion success
DEVICEProSeal
Oropharyngeal leak pressure Insertion success
Sponsors
Schulthess Klinik
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Months to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* ASA I and II * Age 1.5-6 years
Exclusion criteria
* known or predicted difficult airway * body mass index \> 35 kg m-2 * risk of aspiration
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Oropharyngeal leak pressure | 10 Minutes |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Insertion success rate | 1 Minute |
Countries
Austria, Switzerland
Outcome results
None listed