Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Trial of Delamanid for 6 Months in Participants With Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Delamanid (OPC-67683) Administered Orally as 200 mg Total Daily Dose for Six Months in Patients With Pulmonary Sputum Culture-positive, Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01424670
Enrollment
511
Registered
2011-08-29
Start date
2011-09-02
Completion date
2016-07-04
Last updated
2019-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis

Keywords

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether delamanid is effective in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) in combination with other MDR TB medications during 6 months of treatment.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of delamanid administered orally as 100 milligrams (mg) twice daily (BID) for 2 months followed by 200 mg once daily (QD) for 4 months in combination with an optimized background treatment regimen (OBR) versus placebo with OBR during the 6-month Intensive Period of MDR TB treatment. Following the 6-month Intensive Period, OBR was administered alone during the Continuation Period for 12 to 18 months (from Month 7 up to Month 24). The trial also included a post-treatment follow-up period of 6 to 12 months (Month 19 to Month 24 to the end of Month 30). OBR given throughout the study was administered as per World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and national treatment norms. This trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, stratified, placebo-controlled trial that was conducted globally in 2 parallel groups at 17 sites in 7 countries qualified to treat MDR TB.

Interventions

DRUGDelamanid + OBR

The assigned doses of delamanid were administered with an OBR. The selection and administration of the OBR were based on WHO's guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant TB, in conjunction with national TB program guidelines in each country.

DRUGPlacebo + OBR

Matching placebo was administered with an OBR. The selection and administration of the OBR were based on WHO's guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant TB, in conjunction with national TB program guidelines in each country.

Sponsors

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provide written, informed consent * Current diagnosis of MDR TB * Chest radiograph consistent with TB * Able to produce sputum * Negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use a highly effective method of birth control and/or adequate method of contraception

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to any nitro-imidazoles or nitro-imidazole derivates * Diseases or conditions in which the use of nitro-imidazoles or nitro-imidazole derivates is contra-indicated * Use of disallowed medications * Renal impairment * Abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) results * Cardiovascular disorders * Body mass index (BMI) \< 16 kg/m\^2 * Karnofsky score \< 50% * Significant metabolic, gastrointestinal, neurological, psychiatric, or endocrine diseases, active malignancy * Alcohol abuse * Pregnant, breast-feeding, or planning to conceive or father a child * Recent use of methadone, benzodiazepines, cocaine, amphetamine/methamphetamine, tetrahydrocannabinol, barbiturates, and opiates * Previous exposure to delamanid * Administered an investigational medicinal product (IMP) within 1 month prior to Screening (Days -21 to -2). * Evidence of extensively drug-resistant TB based on the definition from WHO * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection for participants screened at sites not participating in the HIV subtrial (data from the HIV subtrial will be reported separately from the Clinical Study Report for Study 242-09-213).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time To Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) During 6-Month Intensive Period Using The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) SystemMonth 6SCC at 6 months was determined by the observation of a sputum specimen negative for growth of mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) using the MGIT culture system, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative sputum culture at least 25 days after the first negative and not followed by a confirmed positive (defined as at least 2 observed positive results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results). 2 specimens were collected at each visit and an algorithm in the statistical analysis plan (SAP) was used to define a single representative result. Time to SCC was then defined as the interval between the date of first dose of IMP and the date of first of 2 consecutive negative single representative time points that were at least 25 days apart. The median time in days to SCC up to Month 6 is presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITMonth 18, Month 24, and Month 30Sustained SCC was defined as SCC achieved by Month 6 and not followed by a confirmed positive thereafter, where confirmed positive was defined as 2 or more observed positive single representative culture results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results. Sustained SCC was analyzed at Month 18 to 30 using MGIT.
Treatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRMonth 24Final treatment outcomes were assessed by the Principal Investigator (PI) at the end of treatment with OBR (24 months post randomization) according to the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) outcome definitions for treating participants with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). Frequency counts and percentage of participants achieving favorable and unfavorable outcomes were provided by treatment group. Participants who had non-missing Principal Investigator assessed treatment outcomes at the end of treatment with OBR were included in the analysis.
Number of Participants Who Developed Resistance To DelamanidUp to Month 30Acquired resistance was defined as a post-baseline resistant result at any time point after a Baseline susceptible result. The overall resistance to delamanid during the trial was assessed.
Proportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITMonth 2 and Month 6SCC was evaluated at 2 and 6 months (6-month Intensive Period) using MGIT. SCC at 2 months was defined to occur at the date of collection of the first sputum specimen with mycobacterial culture negative for growth of MTB using MGIT culture, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative MGIT culture result at least 25 days after the first negative specimen and not followed by any sputum specimens positive for growth in the MGIT culture at any point up to 3 months (Week 12). SCC at 6 months was determined by the observation of a sputum specimen negative for growth of MTB using the MGIT culture system, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative sputum culture at least 25 days after the first negative and not followed by a confirmed positive (defined as at least 2 observed positive results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results). 2 specimens were collected at each visit and an algorithm in the SAP was used to define a single representative result.
Mean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemBaseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 24, Week 26, and Last visit (Month 18 or last visit for participants treated beyond Month 18)The value for TTD was defined (in days) as the time interval from inoculation until a MGIT machine detects a positive signal for a sputum culture during the routine 42-day incubation period. TTD analysis was based only on the corresponding qualitative sputum results of pure positive and pure negative cultures in days and hours of the initial positive signal for a culture from the MGIT printout. Mean change is reported for Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 24, Week 26, and Last visit (Month 18 or last visit for participants treated beyond Month 18).
Proportion of Participants With Final Outcome At Month 30 As A Treatment Success Or Failure (Including Relapse) Using MGITMonth 30Treatment success was defined as achieving SCC by 6 months using MGIT, completing the trial out to 30 months with sustained SCC and alive at the last contact for follow-up. All other participants were treatment failures who failed to achieve SCC by Month 6, achieved SCC but have a confirmed positive, early terminate from the trial prior to the Month 30 visit but are alive at the last contact for follow-up, lost to follow-up and vital status unknown and death.
Mean (Time Averaged) Area Under The Curve (AUC) Of Change From Baseline In Time To Detection (TTD) To Month 6 Using MGITBaseline, up to Month 6The value for TTD was defined (in days) as the time interval from inoculation until a MGIT machine detects a positive signal for a sputum culture. The AUC of the change from Baseline for TTD in days (from Baseline to Month 6) summarizes the overall participant response for the treatment period. The change from Baseline in original time to detection of MGIT positive signal, in days, up to 6 months was performed using AUC in MGIT. The Baseline was defined as the average of Day -1 and Day 1 values if cultures on both days were positive; if only 1 culture was positive, the value for TTD for the positive culture was used as the Baseline. The TTD is Time to Detection measured by day, so the unit of AUC of change from baseline in TTD is day\*day. Since Mean AUC is reported, which is actually Time Averaged AUC, the AUC was divided by the duration of the observation, and thus the unit of the Mean AUC is day.

Countries

Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Peru, Philippines, South Africa

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

511 participants were randomized to receive investigational medicinal product (IMP) and an optimized background treatment regimen (OBR) for 6 months, followed by OBR treatment alone for 12-18 months. The trial also included a post-treatment follow-up period of 6-12 months. Participants who stopped taking IMP and/or OBR could remain in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Delamanid + OBR
In the first period of this study, known as the 6-month Intensive Period, participants were randomized to receive 100 mg delamanid orally BID (morning and evening) + OBR for 2 months, followed by 200 mg delamanid QD (every morning) + OBR for 4 months. Following the 6-month Intensive Period, participants entered the second period of the study, known as the Continuation Period, wherein OBR was administered alone for 12 to 18 months.
341
Placebo + OBR
In the first period of this study, known as the 6-month Intensive Period, participants were randomized to receive placebo orally BID (morning and evening) + OBR for 2 months followed by placebo QD (every morning) + OBR for 4 months. Following the 6-month Intensive Period, participants entered the second period of the study, known as the Continuation Period, wherein OBR was administered alone for 12 to 18 months.
170
Total511

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)Adverse Event22
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)Lost to Follow-up01
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)Met Protocol Withdrawal Criteria21
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)Physician Decision23
6-Month Intensive Period (182 Days)Withdrawal by Subject137
Continuation PeriodAdverse Event135
Continuation PeriodLost to Follow-up20
Continuation PeriodMet Protocol Withdrawal Criteria11
Continuation PeriodPhysician Decision54
Continuation PeriodWithdrawal by Subject134

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDelamanid + OBRPlacebo + OBRTotal
Age, Continuous34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
34.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
98 Participants45 Participants143 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
243 Participants125 Participants368 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
18 / 3418 / 170
other
Total, other adverse events
335 / 341165 / 170
serious
Total, serious adverse events
89 / 34147 / 170

Outcome results

Primary

Time To Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) During 6-Month Intensive Period Using The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) System

SCC at 6 months was determined by the observation of a sputum specimen negative for growth of mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) using the MGIT culture system, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative sputum culture at least 25 days after the first negative and not followed by a confirmed positive (defined as at least 2 observed positive results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results). 2 specimens were collected at each visit and an algorithm in the statistical analysis plan (SAP) was used to define a single representative result. Time to SCC was then defined as the interval between the date of first dose of IMP and the date of first of 2 consecutive negative single representative time points that were at least 25 days apart. The median time in days to SCC up to Month 6 is presented.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Delamanid + OBRTime To Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) During 6-Month Intensive Period Using The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) System51 Days
Placebo + OBRTime To Sputum Culture Conversion (SCC) During 6-Month Intensive Period Using The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) System57 Days
Comparison: Comparison of distributions of time to SCC using the MGIT culture system during the 6-month (26-week) Intensive Period.p-value: 0.0562Modified Peto-Peto test
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT System

The value for TTD was defined (in days) as the time interval from inoculation until a MGIT machine detects a positive signal for a sputum culture during the routine 42-day incubation period. TTD analysis was based only on the corresponding qualitative sputum results of pure positive and pure negative cultures in days and hours of the initial positive signal for a culture from the MGIT printout. Mean change is reported for Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 24, Week 26, and Last visit (Month 18 or last visit for participants treated beyond Month 18).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 24, Week 26, and Last visit (Month 18 or last visit for participants treated beyond Month 18)

Population: The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 14.3 daysStandard Deviation 7.9
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 2440.4 daysStandard Deviation 6.6
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 27.7 daysStandard Deviation 8.9
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 2423.4 daysStandard Deviation 10.2
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 120.8 daysStandard Deviation 10.3
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 2640.6 daysStandard Deviation 5.9
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 328.4 daysStandard Deviation 11.8
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 2623.8 daysStandard Deviation 9.5
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 224.6 daysStandard Deviation 11.5
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Last Visit39.4 daysStandard Deviation 8.4
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 311.6 daysStandard Deviation 9.8
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Last Visit22.7 daysStandard Deviation 10.7
Delamanid + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Baseline16.7 daysStandard Deviation 7.9
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Last Visit24.9 daysStandard Deviation 9.5
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Baseline15.4 daysStandard Deviation 7.7
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 119.9 daysStandard Deviation 11.1
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 14.8 daysStandard Deviation 7.8
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 223.1 daysStandard Deviation 11.4
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 27.5 daysStandard Deviation 7.8
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 325.5 daysStandard Deviation 12.4
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 310.4 daysStandard Deviation 9.6
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 2441.3 daysStandard Deviation 3.9
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 2425.5 daysStandard Deviation 8.3
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Week 2640.5 daysStandard Deviation 5.5
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemChange from Baseline at Week 2624.6 daysStandard Deviation 9.4
Placebo + OBRMean Change From Baseline In TTD Using The MGIT SystemAt Last Visit40.3 daysStandard Deviation 6.3
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Week 1.p-value: 0.6825ANCOVA
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Week 2.p-value: 0.807ANCOVA
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Week 3.p-value: 0.269ANCOVA
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Week 24.p-value: 0.2333ANCOVA
Comparison: Statistical analysis for Month 6.p-value: 0.9397ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean (Time Averaged) Area Under The Curve (AUC) Of Change From Baseline In Time To Detection (TTD) To Month 6 Using MGIT

The value for TTD was defined (in days) as the time interval from inoculation until a MGIT machine detects a positive signal for a sputum culture. The AUC of the change from Baseline for TTD in days (from Baseline to Month 6) summarizes the overall participant response for the treatment period. The change from Baseline in original time to detection of MGIT positive signal, in days, up to 6 months was performed using AUC in MGIT. The Baseline was defined as the average of Day -1 and Day 1 values if cultures on both days were positive; if only 1 culture was positive, the value for TTD for the positive culture was used as the Baseline. The TTD is Time to Detection measured by day, so the unit of AUC of change from baseline in TTD is day\*day. Since Mean AUC is reported, which is actually Time Averaged AUC, the AUC was divided by the duration of the observation, and thus the unit of the Mean AUC is day.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Month 6

Population: The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both, who had both a baseline and at least one post baseline TTD value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Delamanid + OBRMean (Time Averaged) Area Under The Curve (AUC) Of Change From Baseline In Time To Detection (TTD) To Month 6 Using MGIT21.9 daysStandard Deviation 9.44
Placebo + OBRMean (Time Averaged) Area Under The Curve (AUC) Of Change From Baseline In Time To Detection (TTD) To Month 6 Using MGIT23.3 daysStandard Deviation 8.93
Comparison: Statistical comparison of mean AUC of change from Baseline.p-value: 0.698695% CI: [-1.9, 1.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Developed Resistance To Delamanid

Acquired resistance was defined as a post-baseline resistant result at any time point after a Baseline susceptible result. The overall resistance to delamanid during the trial was assessed.

Time frame: Up to Month 30

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) sample comprised all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Delamanid + OBRNumber of Participants Who Developed Resistance To Delamanid3 participants
Placebo + OBRNumber of Participants Who Developed Resistance To Delamanid0 participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Final Outcome At Month 30 As A Treatment Success Or Failure (Including Relapse) Using MGIT

Treatment success was defined as achieving SCC by 6 months using MGIT, completing the trial out to 30 months with sustained SCC and alive at the last contact for follow-up. All other participants were treatment failures who failed to achieve SCC by Month 6, achieved SCC but have a confirmed positive, early terminate from the trial prior to the Month 30 visit but are alive at the last contact for follow-up, lost to follow-up and vital status unknown and death.

Time frame: Month 30

Population: The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Delamanid + OBRProportion of Participants With Final Outcome At Month 30 As A Treatment Success Or Failure (Including Relapse) Using MGITSuccess173 Participants
Delamanid + OBRProportion of Participants With Final Outcome At Month 30 As A Treatment Success Or Failure (Including Relapse) Using MGITFailure53 Participants
Placebo + OBRProportion of Participants With Final Outcome At Month 30 As A Treatment Success Or Failure (Including Relapse) Using MGITSuccess78 Participants
Placebo + OBRProportion of Participants With Final Outcome At Month 30 As A Treatment Success Or Failure (Including Relapse) Using MGITFailure23 Participants
Comparison: Statistical comparison of proportion with treatment success at Month 30.p-value: 0.895195% CI: [0.872, 1.127]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGIT

SCC was evaluated at 2 and 6 months (6-month Intensive Period) using MGIT. SCC at 2 months was defined to occur at the date of collection of the first sputum specimen with mycobacterial culture negative for growth of MTB using MGIT culture, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative MGIT culture result at least 25 days after the first negative specimen and not followed by any sputum specimens positive for growth in the MGIT culture at any point up to 3 months (Week 12). SCC at 6 months was determined by the observation of a sputum specimen negative for growth of MTB using the MGIT culture system, followed by at least 1 confirmatory negative sputum culture at least 25 days after the first negative and not followed by a confirmed positive (defined as at least 2 observed positive results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results). 2 specimens were collected at each visit and an algorithm in the SAP was used to define a single representative result.

Time frame: Month 2 and Month 6

Population: The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Delamanid + OBRProportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITAt Month 2132 Participants
Delamanid + OBRProportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITAt Month 6198 Participants
Placebo + OBRProportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITAt Month 254 Participants
Placebo + OBRProportion of Participants With SCC At 2 And 6 Months Using MGITAt Month 687 Participants
Comparison: Statistical comparison of proportion of participants with SCC at 2 months.p-value: 0.381895% CI: [0.889, 1.352]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Statistical comparison of proportion of participants with SCC at 6 months.p-value: 0.713195% CI: [0.927, 1.115]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGIT

Sustained SCC was defined as SCC achieved by Month 6 and not followed by a confirmed positive thereafter, where confirmed positive was defined as 2 or more observed positive single representative culture results, not taking into account indeterminate, missing, or contaminated results. Sustained SCC was analyzed at Month 18 to 30 using MGIT.

Time frame: Month 18, Month 24, and Month 30

Population: The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Delamanid + OBRProportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITAt 18 months180 Participants
Delamanid + OBRProportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITAt 24 months178 Participants
Delamanid + OBRProportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITAt 30 months173 Participants
Placebo + OBRProportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITAt 18 months83 Participants
Placebo + OBRProportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITAt 24 months82 Participants
Placebo + OBRProportion of Participants With Sustained SCC At Month 18, Month 24, And Month 30 Using MGITAt 30 months78 Participants
Comparison: Statistical comparison of proportion with sustained SCC at Month 18.p-value: 0.594595% CI: [0.866, 1.084]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Statistical comparison of proportion with sustained SCC at Month 24.p-value: 0.616495% CI: [0.864, 1.089]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Statistical comparison of proportion with sustained SCC at Month 30.p-value: 0.895195% CI: [0.872, 1.127]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Treatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBR

Final treatment outcomes were assessed by the Principal Investigator (PI) at the end of treatment with OBR (24 months post randomization) according to the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) outcome definitions for treating participants with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB). Frequency counts and percentage of participants achieving favorable and unfavorable outcomes were provided by treatment group. Participants who had non-missing Principal Investigator assessed treatment outcomes at the end of treatment with OBR were included in the analysis.

Time frame: Month 24

Population: The MITT sample comprised all randomized participants who had a positive sputum culture for MTB in MGIT and were resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin from the sputum samples collected on either Day -1 or Day 1, or both.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Delamanid + OBRTreatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRFavorable outcome182 Participants
Delamanid + OBRTreatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRUnfavorable outcome42 Participants
Delamanid + OBRTreatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRMissing PI Assessments2 Participants
Placebo + OBRTreatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRFavorable outcome85 Participants
Placebo + OBRTreatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRUnfavorable outcome16 Participants
Placebo + OBRTreatment Outcomes Assessed By Principal Investigators (PI)At The End Of Treatment With OBRMissing PI Assessments0 Participants
Comparison: Statistical comparison of proportions with favorable treatment outcomes assessed by the Principal Investigator.p-value: 0.526995% CI: [0.869, 1.073]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026