Skip to content

Auriculotherapy as a Coping Strategy in Professional Nursing

Applicability of Auriculotherapy as a Strategy for Stress and Coping in Nursing Professionals

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01424072
Enrollment
75
Registered
2011-08-26
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2013-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coping Behavior, Stress, Psychological

Keywords

stress psychological, coping behavior

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial aimed at evaluating the auriculotherapy as coping strategies in 75 nursing professionals in a University Hospital.

Detailed description

There is consensus that psychological and social factors can lead to physical health problems of individuals and coping strategies in stressful situations may be crucial for the mental, physical and social development of people. Taking care of professionals who provide health services is a key strategy, since good results depend on the service, especially in work teams healthy and, therefore, able to promote the humanization of service.

Interventions

The chinese auriculotherapy is a intervention used by Chinese Traditional Medicine in order to balance the body energy and to treat several kind of diseases using semi-permanent needles in specific points of the auricular pavilion.

We used the three points Shenmen, Kidney, and Brain Stem with mustard seeds, 1 time per week for 8 sessions.The subjects were instructed to stimulate the points three times a day.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
23 Years to 61 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Average and high score by the List of Stress Symptoms * Voluntary participation in the study * Availability of time for submission to the sessions

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Medical license or vacation during the period * Low score of stress

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Coping Strategy: Domain Social Support(After 60 Days)after 60daysScale information: Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory with 66 items. The scale is constructed by 8 different domains: confrontation, distancing, self-control, social support, acceptance of responsibility, escape avoidance, problem solving and positive reappraisal.The questions are scored by Likert scale: 0 (not used this strategy); 1 (used somewhat); 2 (used enough) and 3(used in large quantities) to the 66 items (Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory). It performed a summation of items and defined the scores: 0-4 points (not use this strategy), 5-9 (use this strategy a bit), 10-14 ( use this strategy quite) 14-18 (use strategy plenty).
Coping Strategy: Distancing Domainafter 75 daysThe questions are scored by Likert scale: 0 (not used this strategy); 1 (used somewhat); 2 (used enough) and 3(used in large quantities) to the 66 items (Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory). It performed a summation of items and defined the scores: 0-4 points (not use this strategy), 5-9 (use this strategy a bit), 10-14 ( use this strategy quite) 14-18 (use strategy plenty).
Coping Strategy: Social Support Domainafter 60 daysScale information: Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory with 66 items. The scale is constructed by 8 different domains: confrontation, distancing, self-control, social support, acceptance of responsibility, escape avoidance, problem solving and positive reappraisal.The questions are scored by Likert scale: 0 (not used this strategy); 1 (used somewhat); 2 (used enough) and 3(used in large quantities) to the 66 items (Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory). It performed a summation of items and defined the scores: 0-4 points (not use this strategy), 5-9 (use this strategy a bit), 10-14 ( use this strategy quite) 14-18 (use strategy plenty).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stress Scaleafter 60 daysScale information: Stress Symptoms List (LSS)with 60 items (better outcome)Low score: 12/29 points; Medium score: 30/60 points; High score: 61/120 points; Very high score (worse outcome): \>120 points.

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment was conducted between January and September 2011 at University Hospital. Study participants were professionals from different sectors of the hospital after the invitation and 109 people answered the Stress Symptoms List. Obeying the exclusion criteria, 75 subjects were enrolled and randomized into three groups.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 109 subjects, 4 were eliminated for having a low level of stress and three for not belonging to nursing staff.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Auriculotherapy by Needles
The investigators used 3 points, Shenmen, Kidney, and Brain Stem with semi-permanent needles of 1.8 mm, 1 time per week for 8 sessions. auriculotherapy by needles : The chinese auriculotherapy is a intervention used by Chinese Traditional Medicine in order to balance the body energy and to treat several kind of diseases using semi-permanent needles in specific points of the auricular pavilion.
27
Auriculotherapy by Seeds
The investigators used the three points Shenmen, Kidney, and Brain Stem with mustard seeds, 1 time per week for 8 sessions. auriculotherapy by seeds : We used the three points Shenmen, Kidney, and Brain Stem with mustard seeds, 1 time per week for 8 sessions.The subjects were instructed to stimulate the points three times a day.
26
Control Group
Control Group didn't receive any treatment and was evaluated at the same time and the same way of interventions group
22
Total75

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAuriculotherapy by SeedsControl GroupAuriculotherapy by NeedlesTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants22 Participants27 Participants75 Participants
Age Continuous45.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
39.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.17
41.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.23
42.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.27
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
26 participants22 participants27 participants75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants21 Participants25 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 271 / 260 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 260 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Coping Strategy: Distancing Domain

The questions are scored by Likert scale: 0 (not used this strategy); 1 (used somewhat); 2 (used enough) and 3(used in large quantities) to the 66 items (Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory). It performed a summation of items and defined the scores: 0-4 points (not use this strategy), 5-9 (use this strategy a bit), 10-14 ( use this strategy quite) 14-18 (use strategy plenty).

Time frame: after 75 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Auriculotherapy by NeedlesCoping Strategy: Distancing Domain6.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Auriculotherapy by SeedsCoping Strategy: Distancing Domain6.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Control GroupCoping Strategy: Distancing Domain7.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Comparison: It was carried out the analysis of variance (ANOVA) among the groups at the follow up (after 75 days). The main objective was to compare the difference among the control group, seeds and needles and to recognize significant outcomes of auriculotherapy by seeds or needles.p-value: 0.039ANOVA
Comparison: Coping Strategy: Confrontation domainp-value: 0.029ANOVA
Primary

Coping Strategy: Domain Social Support(After 60 Days)

Scale information: Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory with 66 items. The scale is constructed by 8 different domains: confrontation, distancing, self-control, social support, acceptance of responsibility, escape avoidance, problem solving and positive reappraisal.The questions are scored by Likert scale: 0 (not used this strategy); 1 (used somewhat); 2 (used enough) and 3(used in large quantities) to the 66 items (Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory). It performed a summation of items and defined the scores: 0-4 points (not use this strategy), 5-9 (use this strategy a bit), 10-14 ( use this strategy quite) 14-18 (use strategy plenty).

Time frame: after 60days

Population: Of the 109 subjects, four were eliminated for having a low level of stress and three for not belonging to nursing staff;seven didn't appear in the first session. Some lost sessions and were also excluded. One abandoned the treatment because of the side effects, one didn't complete the questionnaire, seven went on vacation or sick leave(2).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Auriculotherapy by NeedlesCoping Strategy: Domain Social Support(After 60 Days)8.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Auriculotherapy by SeedsCoping Strategy: Domain Social Support(After 60 Days)8.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Control GroupCoping Strategy: Domain Social Support(After 60 Days)11.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Comparison: It was carried out the analysis of variance (ANOVA) among the groups in the 3rd assessment (after 60 days) and at the follow up (after 75 days). The main objective was to compare the difference among the control group, seeds and needles and to recognize significant outcomes of auriculotherapy by seeds or needles.p-value: ,0ANOVA
Primary

Coping Strategy: Social Support Domain

Scale information: Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory with 66 items. The scale is constructed by 8 different domains: confrontation, distancing, self-control, social support, acceptance of responsibility, escape avoidance, problem solving and positive reappraisal.The questions are scored by Likert scale: 0 (not used this strategy); 1 (used somewhat); 2 (used enough) and 3(used in large quantities) to the 66 items (Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategy Inventory). It performed a summation of items and defined the scores: 0-4 points (not use this strategy), 5-9 (use this strategy a bit), 10-14 ( use this strategy quite) 14-18 (use strategy plenty).

Time frame: after 60 days

Population: Of the 109 subjects, four were eliminated for having a low level of stress and three for not belonging to nursing staff;seven didn't appear in the first session. Some lost sessions and were also excluded. One abandoned the treatment because of the side effects, one didn't complete the questionnaire, seven went on vacation or sick leave(2).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Auriculotherapy by NeedlesCoping Strategy: Social Support Domain8.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Auriculotherapy by SeedsCoping Strategy: Social Support Domain8.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Control GroupCoping Strategy: Social Support Domain11.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Stress Scale

Scale information: Stress Symptoms List (LSS)with 60 items (better outcome)Low score: 12/29 points; Medium score: 30/60 points; High score: 61/120 points; Very high score (worse outcome): \>120 points.

Time frame: after 60 days

Population: Of the 109 subjects, four were eliminated for having a low level of stress and three for not belonging to nursing staff;seven didn't appear in the first session. Some lost sessions and were also excluded. One abandoned the treatment because of the side effects, one didn't complete the questionnaire, seven went on vacation or sick leave(2).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Auriculotherapy by NeedlesStress Scale59.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.04
Auriculotherapy by SeedsStress Scale67.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.77
Control GroupStress Scale67.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.73
Comparison: The main objective was to compare the difference among the control group, seeds and needles and to recognize significant outcomes of auriculotherapy by seeds or needles.p-value: 0.023ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026