Skip to content

Benefits and Costs of Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Benefits and Costs of Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01423227
Acronym
HomeBase
Enrollment
144
Registered
2011-08-25
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2019-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

COPD, exercise, rehabilitation, dyspnea, quality of life, economic evaluation

Brief summary

Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective treatment for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which improves symptoms, reduces hospitalisation and lowers healthcare costs. However less than 1% of Australians with COPD receive pulmonary rehabilitation each year, due to poor access to programs and high levels of disability. This randomised controlled trial will examine the benefits and costs of a novel, entirely home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program for COPD. We hypothesise that home-based pulmonary rehabilitation can deliver equivalent clinical outcomes at lower cost than the centre-based program. We will randomly allocate 144 people with COPD to undertake either standard pulmonary rehabilitation in a hospital setting, or a low-cost home-based program. Those who undertake pulmonary rehabilitation in the hospital setting will attend the hospital twice each week for eight weeks for supervised exercise training and education. People in the home pulmonary rehabilitation group will receive one home visit and weekly telephone calls for eight weeks, for supervision and mentoring of exercise and provision of education. We will compare the number of people who complete the program in each setting. We will also test whether the groups have similar results for the standard pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes of breathlessness, quality of life and exercise capacity, at the end of the program and 12 months later. We will compare health care costs and personal costs between groups after 12 months. If home-based pulmonary rehabilitation can improve uptake of this important treatment, deliver good clinical outcomes and reduce costs this will have significant and long-lasting benefits for patients, the community and the health system

Interventions

One home visit plus weekly telephone calls for 8 weeks

Standard twice-weekly 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program

Sponsors

The Alfred
CollaboratorOTHER
Austin Health
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Monash University
CollaboratorOTHER
La Trobe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* current or former smokers of at least 10 packet years * aged 40 years or over * diagnosis of COPD confirmed on spirometry.

Exclusion criteria

* previous diagnosis of asthma * have attended a pulmonary rehabilitation program in the last two years * exacerbation of COPD within the last four weeks * have comorbidities which prevent participation in an exercise training program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in 6-minute walk testBaseline, 8 weeks and 12 monthsTesting equivalence between groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Chronic Respiratory Disease QuestionnaireBaseline, 8 weeks and 12 months
Change in Modified Medical Research Council ScaleBaseline, 8 weeks and 12 months
Cost-effectiveness12 months
SF-36 v2Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 monthsContributes to cost effectiveness analysis
Program completion rate8 weeks

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026