Skip to content

Study on Primary Care Health Service Utilization in Hong Kong

Utilization Pattern of Primary Health Care Services in Hong Kong - Does Having a Family Doctor Make Any Difference?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01422031
Enrollment
3148
Registered
2011-08-23
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2015-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Family Practice, Health Services Utilization, Primary Care

Keywords

Primary care, Family doctor, Consultation, utilization, Non-drug managements, Patient enablement index

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to find out the utilization rate and pattern of primary health care services, and the process and outcomes of primary care consultations of the general population in Hong Kong, and whether having a family doctor would make any difference. The study objectives were to determine 1. the rates and pattern of utilization of different primary health care services and self-care 2. Patient self-reported outcomes (global rating on change in health, satisfaction and patient enablement) of primary care consultations; 3. the process of care in consultations including drug and non-drug managements, investigations, preventive care and referrals; 4. the effect of having a regular family doctor on service utilization rate and pattern, health promotion practice, and process and outcomes of primary care consultations.

Detailed description

Study Design: A Cross-sectional general population survey and a longitudinal study (12-weeks follow up) Method: Two phases, corresponding to Summer and Winter, respectively, of cross-sectional telephone survey on the Hong Kong general population using a structured questionnaire to collect information on the choice primary care doctors, illness rates, primary care service utilization rates and self-reported process and outcomes of consultations. A longitudinal study for 12 weeks was carried out on a sub-sample of the cross-sectional study subjects to collect data to cross-validate cross-sectional data. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to determine whether there was any difference in service utilization rates, process and outcomes among people using different types of primary care doctors.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written consent to study

Exclusion criteria

* Non-residential numbers * Inability to communicate in Cantonese, Putonghua or English * Refusal to telephone interview * No contact after 5 attempts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary care doctor choice groupbaseline
Monthly utilization rateBaseline
Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI)Baseline
Rates of non-drug managementsBaseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Self-perceived health scoreBaseline
Doctor shopping rateBaseline
Patient satisfactionBaseline
Self-medication rates during the last episode of illnessBaseline
Prescribing rate during last episode of illnessBaseline
Prevalence of preventive careBaseline

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026