Framing, Perinatal Decision Making, Prematurity
Conditions
Keywords
Decision Making, Premature infant, Informed consent, Prematurity, Framing, Negotiation Model
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to study how people make decisions regarding delivery room management for infants born extremely premature when survival and long term outcomes are uncertain. The hypothesis is that the way in which information is presented will impact decisions. There have been many advances in neonatal care in recent decades. However, the investigators do not know if these children will grow up to be healthy or if they will have problems with mental retardation, behavior or physical handicaps. In these circumstances, where the medical profession cannot predict what sort of life a child will have, parents have a choice of having intensive care started or of allowing the baby to die naturally. The age most often cited by physicians at which this care is optional and under parental discretion is 23 weeks gestation. The purpose of this study was to ask people, recruited through the world wide web, what they would want for the doctor to do in the case of a hypothetical 23 week premature delivery in order to evaluate the decision process and the presence of autonomous choice. This study had two parts. The first part, presented outcome information in 2 different ways -either as survival and lack of severe disability or as mortality and presence of severe disability. The results of the first part have been published (Message Framing and Perinatal Decisions, Pediatrics, 2008). The second part, investigated whether the way in which the way in which delivery room management options were presented- either as agreeing with a course of action or opting out- impacted resuscitation decisions. This part was administered as a separate survey to a different sample of participants at a later date. The remainder of the questionnaires asked demographic and opinion questions as a means to assess variables that may influence how people respond to the information they receive.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALSurvey
Participants were randomized to one of two survey groups. In one arm (resuscitation default arm), resuscitation was presented as the course of action that would be followed unless the participant objected. In the other arm (comfort care default arm), comfort care was presented as the course of action that would be followed unless the participant objected.
Sponsors
Columbia University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
\>18 yo
Exclusion criteria
\<18 yo
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants deciding to resuscitate an extremely premature infant. | Up to 1 year from the start of the study | Each participants decisional outcome (resuscitation or comfort care) per survey arm will be counted. We expect 60% of the participants will decide to resuscite in both arms. We expect that 90% will select resuscitation in those who receive the resuscitation default and 60% will select resuscitation in the comfort care default |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed