Skip to content

Assessment of Right Ventricular Volume in Tetralogy of Fallott (TOF) Patients

Assessment of Right Ventricular Volume Using the Ventripoint Medical System in Patients With Tetralogy of Fallott Following Repair; A Comparison Study to cMRI

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01419756
Acronym
VMS TOF
Enrollment
109
Registered
2011-08-18
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2014-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tetralogy of Fallot

Brief summary

Assessment of Right Ventricular Volume using the VentriPoint Medical system in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot following repair; a comparison study to cMRI. The objective of this study is: To evaluate the accuracy of the VentriPoint Medical System to calculate right ventricular volumes in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot following surgical repair. Secondary objectives are: To validate Inter and Intra observer variability at 3 clinical sites. The analyses will be the same for EDV and ESV. For either right ventricular volume, the primary effectiveness measure is the % difference between VMS and cMRI results, i.e. (VMS-cMRI)\*100%/average of VMS and cMRI results. There will be two null hypotheses for the primary analysis: H0+: true mean % difference \> 10% and H0-: true mean % difference \< -10% The observed mean % difference will be presented with 95% confidence intervals. The VMS right ventricular volume estimates will be regarded as equivalent to cMRI estimates if both H0+ and H0- are rejected at a 1-sided 0.025 level by a paired t test for both EDV and ESV. Since H0+ and H0- cannot both be true, the total type I error rate for each measure is 0.025 and the overall type I error rate for both EDV and ESV is 0.05.

Interventions

The Knowledge Based Reconstruction (KBR) method generates a 3D reconstruction of the RV based on the Piecwise smooth subdivision surface method but without requiring manual border tracing. Instead KBR reconstructs a new patient's ventricular surface from the placement of anatomic landmark points on a 2D ultrasound image

Sponsors

VentriPoint Diagnostics Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot following surgical repair * Patients who can be expected to lie motionless during imaging

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of informed consent * Surgical repair for Tetralogy of Fallot with RV-PA conduit * Known arrhythmia that interferes with image acquisition. * Implanted cardiac defibrillator, pacemaker, or other devices containing ferromagnetic materials * Pregnant woman * Contraindications for MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary endpoint of this study is the percent difference between the VentriPoint Medical System (VMS) and cMRI for estimating the end diastolic and end systolic right ventricular volumes (EDV and ESV) in subjects following repair for TOF.4 monthsThe trial will be regarded as successful if it demonstrates the mean VMS-cMRI percent difference to be \<10% and \>-10% at a 1-sided 0.025 statistical significance level for each of EDV and ESV, with no safety concerns for the VMS procedure.

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026