Skip to content

Efficacy and Tolerability of Subcutaneously Administered Treprostinil Sodium in Patients With Severe (Non-operable) Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTREPH)

A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Treprostinil Sodium in Patients With Severe Non-operable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTREPH)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01416636
Acronym
CTREPH
Enrollment
105
Registered
2011-08-15
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2022-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-operable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effect on six-minute walking test (6MWT) distance after 24 weeks treatment with subcutaneous (SC) Treprostinil Sodium in patients with Severe (inoperable) Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Detailed description

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is characterized by non-resolving organized thromboembolic obstructing the pulmonary vascular bed. These thrombi are resistant to thrombolytic therapy and chronic plasmatic anticoagulation. An increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), right ventricular overload, and eventually right ventricular failure ensue. The treatment of choice for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), providing a potential cure for the disease. However, about 50 % of patients are not candidates for surgery, mainly because of distal location of thromboemboli. Despite recent advances in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), medical treatments have not been recommended for inoperable CTEPH, because of the concept that a predominantly major vessel obstructive arteriopathy would not be suitable for vasodilators. Furthermore, a major drawback of i.v. prostacyclin therapy is the need for a permanent central venous access that increases the risk of infection (0.22-0.68 per patient per year), thrombosis and new major vessel thromboembolism.

Interventions

Sponsors

SciPharm SàRL
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject must be competent to understand the information given in the written informed consent and from the investigator and must sign and date the informed consent prior to any study mandated procedure. 2. Subject must be at least 18 years of age and can be of any ethnical origin 3. Women of child bearing potential must be surgically sterile or postmenopausal (amenorrhea for at least 12 months) or using an acceptable form of contraception. Reliable contraception is defined as a method which results in a low failure rate, i.e., less than 1% per year when used correctly such as, implants, injectables, oral contraceptive medications, sexual abstinence, or a vasectomised partner. 4. Subject must have a current diagnosis of CTEPH, as defined by the following criteria: * A test result of perfusion scintigraphy and pulmonary angiography and/or multislice CT not older than 6 months, consistent with the diagnosis CTEPH. In case of recurrent PH after PEA, test results from before the surgery are acceptable if a typical specimen was harvested during PEA substantiating the diagnosis of CTEPH. * A right heart catheterization, not older than 6 months, consistent with the diagnosis CTEPH but specifically with a mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAPm) of \> 25 mmHg, and a PVR of \> 300 dyn.s.cm-5 * At least three months of effective anticoagulation therapy (without improvement / to exclude subacute pulmonary emboli) 5. Subject must have CTEPH classified as severe, as defined by the following criteria: * An un-encouraged 6MWT distance of between 150 and 400 meters * Classification in the WHO/New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV 6. The subject must not be suitable to undergo a PEA and is therefore defined as non-operable, due to at least one of the following reasons: * Clot is not accessible * Discrepancy between severity of PH and morphologic lesion * Subject is not a good surgical candidate for other reasons: PVR \> 1500 dynes.s.cm-5 Age Comorbidity No functional lung parenchyma * Unsuccessful PEA in the past with residual/recurrent CTEPH * No consent for PEA given by subject 7. Subject must be willing and able to follow all study procedures Exclusion: 1. Subject with any form of pulmonary arterial hypertension or any disease known to cause PAH (WHO Group I) 2. Subjects with a total lung capacity (TLC) of \< 70% predicted or a forced expiratory volume/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC \< 50%) 3. Subject who received any prostanoids, within the 30 days before screening or be scheduled to receive prostanoids during the course of the study 4. Subject with a new type of chronic therapy (a different category of vasodilator or diuretic) for PAH added within the last month, except anticoagulants 5. Subject with an increased risk for hemorrhage or stroke or with a major cardiovascular event during the past 6 months. 6. Unstable subjects for any reason (according to the investigators discretion) 7. Subject who received any investigational medication within 30 days prior to the screening visit of this study or be scheduled to receive another investigational drug during the course of this study 8. Subject with a known intolerance to any drug relevant for this trial, especially to Treprostinil sodium or prostanoids 9. Subject with a history or suspicion of non compliance 10. Subject who has any musculoskeletal disease or any other disease that would limit ambulation 11. Subject with other cardiovascular, liver, renal, hematologic, gastrointestinal immunologic, endocrine, metabolic, or central nervous system disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, may adversely affect the safety of the subject and /or efficacy of the study drug or limit the lifespan of the subject 12. Female who is considering pregnancy or who is pregnant and/or lactating 13. Subject who is an investigator or any other team member involved directly or indirectly in the conduct of the clinical study. 14. Subject who is an inmate of a psychiatric ward, prison or is suspected not to be able to give consent of his free will

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in 6-minute Walk Test Distance After 24 WeeksBaseline and 24 weeksTo determine the effect of subcutaneous Treprostinil sodium on 6-minute walk test distance after 24 weeks in patients with severe non-operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension severe (inoperable) Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Time frame of the 6-minute walk test: The 6-minute walk test was conducted at the following visits: * baseline (day 1) * Visit 6 (day 168) In case of missing values, Last-Observation-Carried-Forward imputation method was used. In such cases values documented at Visit 4 (day84) were used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect on Maximal Borg Score During 6-minutes Walk TestBaseline and 24 weeksThe Borg scale was used for rating of dyspnea during 6-minutes walk test. The scale is defined from 0 to \> 10 (upper bound) (0 = NOTHING AT ALL; 0.5 = VERY VERY SLIGHT (just noticeable); 1 = VERY SLIGHT; 2 = SLIGHT; 3 = MODERATE; 4 = SOMEWHAT SEVERE; 5 = SEVERE; 6-9 = VERY SEVERE; 10 = VERY VERY SEVERE (almost maximum); \>10 MAXIMUM). As can be seen with the scale, the higher scale values represent a worse outcome. As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 48 patients in low dose group.
Change in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassBaseline and 24 weeksClass I - Patients with pulmonary hypertension but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope. Class II - Patients with pulmonary hypertension resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity causes undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope. Class III - Patients with pulmonary hypertension resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope Class IV - Patients with pulmonary hypertension in the inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. These patients manifest signs of right heart failure. Dyspnea and/or fatigue may even be present at rest. Discomfort is increased by any physical activity.
Effect on Quality of Life by the MINNESOTA QuestionnaireBaseline and 24 weeksThis questionnaire is composed of 21 questions relating to limitations in lifestyle associated with Heart Failure. Respondents use a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (too much), with a score of 0 representing no limitation and a score of 5 representing maximum limitation. The change in individual score sum was evaluated and is displayed in the results, with a possible range of 0-105. Higher values indicate more limitations in Quality of Life. As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 50 patients randomized to high dose group and 46 patients in low dose group.
Effect on N-terminal Pro-BNP LevelsBaseline and 24 weeksbaseline values, assessment after 12 and 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 46 patients randomized to high dose group and 46 patients in low dose group.
Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (PVR - Pulmonary Vascular Resistance)Baseline and 24 weeksbaseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.
Number of Participants With Clinical Worsening12 weeks and 24 weeksClinical worsening defined as a decrease of 6-minute walk test distance of more than 20% from baseline due to Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, decrease of New York Heart Association functional class, hospitalization with the requirement for additional Pulmonary Hypertension specific treatment and/or death due to worsening Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Clinical Worsening was assessed after 12 weeks and 24 weeks, participants experiencing clinical worsening at any time-point are reported.
Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (CO - Cardiac Output)Baseline and 24 weeksbaseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.
Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (mPAP - Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure)Baseline and 24 weeksbaseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 47 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.
Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (mRap - Mean Right Atrial Pressure)Baseline and 24 weeksbaseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.
Effect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHBaseline and 24 weeksbaseline values, assessment after 24 weeks
Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (CI - Cardiac Index)Baseline and 24 weeksbaseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.

Countries

Austria, Czechia, Germany, Poland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Dose
Treprostinil sodium high dose
53
Low Dose
Treprostinil sodium low dose
52
Total105

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh DoseLow DoseTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
38 Participants25 Participants63 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants26 Participants41 Participants
Age, Continuous68.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.16
60.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.59
64.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.44
Region of Enrollment
Austria
28 participants26 participants54 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
17 participants17 participants34 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
8 participants8 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants30 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants22 Participants56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 531 / 52
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 5351 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 5310 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Change in 6-minute Walk Test Distance After 24 Weeks

To determine the effect of subcutaneous Treprostinil sodium on 6-minute walk test distance after 24 weeks in patients with severe non-operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension severe (inoperable) Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Time frame of the 6-minute walk test: The 6-minute walk test was conducted at the following visits: * baseline (day 1) * Visit 6 (day 168) In case of missing values, Last-Observation-Carried-Forward imputation method was used. In such cases values documented at Visit 4 (day84) were used.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

Population: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseChange in 6-minute Walk Test Distance After 24 Weeks45.43 mStandard Deviation 71.29
Low DoseChange in 6-minute Walk Test Distance After 24 Weeks3.83 mStandard Deviation 56.21
p-value: 0.002ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional Class

Class I - Patients with pulmonary hypertension but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope. Class II - Patients with pulmonary hypertension resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity causes undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope. Class III - Patients with pulmonary hypertension resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope Class IV - Patients with pulmonary hypertension in the inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. These patients manifest signs of right heart failure. Dyspnea and/or fatigue may even be present at rest. Discomfort is increased by any physical activity.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High DoseChange in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassImproved27 Participants
High DoseChange in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassNo change22 Participants
High DoseChange in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassWorse2 Participants
High DoseChange in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassNot done2 Participants
Low DoseChange in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassNot done4 Participants
Low DoseChange in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassImproved9 Participants
Low DoseChange in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassWorse3 Participants
Low DoseChange in WHO/NYHA (World Health Organization - New York Heart Association) Functional ClassNo change36 Participants
p-value: 0.0019Chi-squared
Secondary

Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (CI - Cardiac Index)

baseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (CI - Cardiac Index)0.42 L/min/m2Standard Deviation 0.9
Low DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (CI - Cardiac Index)-0.16 L/min/m2Standard Deviation 0.54
p-value: 0.000003Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (CO - Cardiac Output)

baseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (CO - Cardiac Output)0.63 L/minStandard Deviation 1.47
Low DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (CO - Cardiac Output)-0.22 L/minStandard Deviation 1.06
p-value: 0.00008Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (mPAP - Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure)

baseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 47 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (mPAP - Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure)-3.36 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.04
Low DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (mPAP - Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure)-0.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.87
p-value: 0.04Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (mRap - Mean Right Atrial Pressure)

baseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (mRap - Mean Right Atrial Pressure)0.65 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.08
Low DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (mRap - Mean Right Atrial Pressure)2.87 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.82
p-value: 0.227Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effect on Hemodynamic Parameter (PVR - Pulmonary Vascular Resistance)

baseline values, assessment after 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 47 patients in low dose group.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (PVR - Pulmonary Vascular Resistance)-214.23 dyn.s.cm^-5Standard Deviation 324.28
Low DoseEffect on Hemodynamic Parameter (PVR - Pulmonary Vascular Resistance)72.96 dyn.s.cm^-5Standard Deviation 284.95
p-value: 0.00001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effect on Maximal Borg Score During 6-minutes Walk Test

The Borg scale was used for rating of dyspnea during 6-minutes walk test. The scale is defined from 0 to \> 10 (upper bound) (0 = NOTHING AT ALL; 0.5 = VERY VERY SLIGHT (just noticeable); 1 = VERY SLIGHT; 2 = SLIGHT; 3 = MODERATE; 4 = SOMEWHAT SEVERE; 5 = SEVERE; 6-9 = VERY SEVERE; 10 = VERY VERY SEVERE (almost maximum); \>10 MAXIMUM). As can be seen with the scale, the higher scale values represent a worse outcome. As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 48 patients randomized to high dose group and 48 patients in low dose group.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

Population: For this endpoint no imputation role was applied. For 48 patients of the high dose group, as well as for the low dose group, baseline data and also 24 week data are available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseEffect on Maximal Borg Score During 6-minutes Walk Test-0.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Low DoseEffect on Maximal Borg Score During 6-minutes Walk Test-0.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
p-value: 0.307Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effect on N-terminal Pro-BNP Levels

baseline values, assessment after 12 and 24 weeks As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 46 patients randomized to high dose group and 46 patients in low dose group.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseEffect on N-terminal Pro-BNP Levels0.84 percentage change to baselineStandard Deviation 63.32
Low DoseEffect on N-terminal Pro-BNP Levels41.68 percentage change to baselineStandard Deviation 104.2
p-value: 0.032Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effect on Quality of Life by the MINNESOTA Questionnaire

This questionnaire is composed of 21 questions relating to limitations in lifestyle associated with Heart Failure. Respondents use a 5-point scale that ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (too much), with a score of 0 representing no limitation and a score of 5 representing maximum limitation. The change in individual score sum was evaluated and is displayed in the results, with a possible range of 0-105. Higher values indicate more limitations in Quality of Life. As no imputation rule applied only full-data sets were evaluated. Complete data sets were available for 50 patients randomized to high dose group and 46 patients in low dose group.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseEffect on Quality of Life by the MINNESOTA Questionnaire-6.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Low DoseEffect on Quality of Life by the MINNESOTA Questionnaire-4.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.34
p-value: 0.557Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPH

baseline values, assessment after 24 weeks

Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHOrthopnoea : Baseline9 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDyspnoea at rest : Baseline7 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHNausea/Vomiting : Baseline4 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDyspnoea at rest : Week 243 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHOrthopnoea : Week 243 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHParoxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea : Baseline7 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHAscites : Baseline2 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHParoxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea : Week 244 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHChest pain : Baseline13 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDyspnoea on exertion : Baseline53 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDizziness : Baseline25 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDyspnoea on exertion : Week 2446 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHAscites : Week 241 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHSyncope : Baseline3 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDizziness : Week 2411 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHSyncope : Week 241 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHChest pain : Week 248 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHFatigue : Baseline33 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHPalpitations : Baseline19 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHFatigue : Week 2426 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHNausea/Vomiting : Week 245 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHThirst : Baseline12 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHPalpitations : Week 249 participants
High DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHThirst : Week 2412 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHParoxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea : Baseline1 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHThirst : Week 2413 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHAscites : Baseline3 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHAscites : Week 243 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHNausea/Vomiting : Baseline9 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHNausea/Vomiting : Week 249 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHChest pain : Baseline11 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHChest pain : Week 243 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHOrthopnoea : Baseline9 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHOrthopnoea : Week 245 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDizziness : Baseline21 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDizziness : Week 2410 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHPalpitations : Baseline18 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHPalpitations : Week 2411 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDyspnoea at rest : Baseline10 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDyspnoea at rest : Week 2410 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHParoxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea : Week 243 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDyspnoea on exertion : Baseline51 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHDyspnoea on exertion : Week 2443 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHSyncope : Baseline6 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHSyncope : Week 242 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHFatigue : Baseline37 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHFatigue : Week 2427 participants
Low DoseEffect on Signs & Symptoms of the CTEPHThirst : Baseline21 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Worsening

Clinical worsening defined as a decrease of 6-minute walk test distance of more than 20% from baseline due to Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, decrease of New York Heart Association functional class, hospitalization with the requirement for additional Pulmonary Hypertension specific treatment and/or death due to worsening Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Clinical Worsening was assessed after 12 weeks and 24 weeks, participants experiencing clinical worsening at any time-point are reported.

Time frame: 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Population: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
High DoseNumber of Participants With Clinical Worsening7 Participants
Low DoseNumber of Participants With Clinical Worsening12 Participants
p-value: 0.605Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026