Skip to content

Comparison Between Implanted Functional Electrical Stimulation and Foot Orthosis

Implanted Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Levators of the Ankle Versus Orthosis in the Treatment of Chronic Foot Neurological STEPPAGE-gait by Central Attack

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01415700
Acronym
STEPSTIM
Enrollment
27
Registered
2011-08-12
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2014-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hysterical Simulation of Disease

Keywords

feet STEPPAGE of central neurological origin, implanted functional electrical stimulation, feet orthosis

Brief summary

The implantable feet stimulator proposes to correct the feet's STEPPAGE observed after central nervous system's injury such as hemiplegia secondary to stroke. It aims to improve the patient's walking floor by removing the STEPPAGE, reducing the effort of walking, facilitating the flow and removing anomalies compensatory (such as the mowing of the hip). Its objective is to improve the patient's autonomy locomotor. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the implementation of an implanted stimulator in the levator muscles of the foot to the results obtained by wearing a splint-type reliever, which is considered standard treatment, in order to determine if the implanted stimulation may be proposed in the treatment of foot drop off a neurological center.

Detailed description

The implantable feet stimulator proposes to correct the feet's STEPPAGE observed after central nervous system's injury such as hemiplegia secondary to stroke. It aims to improve the patient's walking floor by removing the STEPPAGE, reducing the effort of walking, facilitating the flow and removing anomalies compensatory (such as the mowing of the hip). Its objective is to improve the patient's autonomy locomotor.

Interventions

DEVICEFunctional electrical stimulator

The stimulator is surgically implanted

DEVICEfeet orthosis

feet orthosis specifically mold

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* STEPPAGE foot walking in a patient with a central neurological disease * can walk for 50 meters with or without technical assistance * stable disease for at least 1 year * possible walk with a brace-type reliever * verification of possible nerve stimulation * age greater than or equal to 18 years and under 75 years * no toxin for 4 months * no alcohol for 6 months * no neurotomy for 1 year * patient who agreed to sign an informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* cons-indication to general anesthesia * wearing a stimulator implanted for other reasons * patients taking neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants or other drugs that interfere with the quality of walking * advanced peripheral neuropathy * excessive restriction of passive range of ankle * poorly controlled epilepsy * pregnant or lactating * non-membership of a social security scheme * wearing orthopaedic shoes including the malleolus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of walking speed at 3 monthsMeasurement will be performed at 3 monthsThe measurement is taken for a spontaneous march floor then fast. It follows from the establishment of the average of 3 to 5 passes on a walking track of a platform for analysis of movement
Measurement of walking speed at 6 monthsMeasurement will be performed at 6 monthsThe measurement is taken for a spontaneous march floor then fast. It follows from the establishment of the average of 3 to 5 passes on a walking track of a platform for analysis of movement

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026