Skip to content

Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Venous Ulcer Treatment Using a Hand Plasma Generator (PlasmaDerm) Chronisch venöser Ulzerationen (PlasmaDerm)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01415622
Enrollment
30
Registered
2011-08-12
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2012-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Insufficiency

Keywords

plasma therapy, ulcus cruris

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to prove the safety and efficacy of plasma as an add-on treatment in combination with conventional treatment in cases of chronical venous Ulcus cruris.

Detailed description

Ulcus cruris consists of pathologically changed tissue of the lower leg. Up to 80% are of venous origin. Because of the high prevalence of up to 2% the treatment of Ulcus cruris is of special economical importance. Depending on the size, depth and possible infections, the conventional treatment of these wounds consists of an adequate compression, preparation of the lesion, cover and of appropriate control of infections. All tasks are undertaken in order to faciliate the healing of these chronic wounds. Plasma consists of free ions or electrons and can be created by various techniques. Commonly, it is use in the sterilization of medicinal equipment, the cauterization of tissue and in the field of coagulation. Because of its bactericidal characteristics, the direct interaction of plasma created by temperatures below 40°C on tissue is intensively studied. Both in vitro and in vivo studies proved a significant reduction of bacterial contamination in different test systems. As bacterial contamination might slow down wound healing, plasma treatment might be a useful tool to complement conventional methods in the treatment of chronical wounds.

Interventions

DEVICEPlasmaDerm

plasma treatment 3 times a week for 8 weeks, 45 sec / cm² of Ulcus cruris size, in addition to standard care.

PROCEDUREstandard care of Ulcera crurum

standard care of Ulcera crurum: Mepithel gaze for non-exsudative wounds, Mepilex for exsudative wounds, followed by surgical hose treatment. Additionally, a standardized compression therapy with Ulcer X is applied.

Sponsors

Institut fuer anwendungsorientierte Forschung und klinische Studien GmbH
CollaboratorOTHER
University Medical Center Goettingen
CollaboratorOTHER
Cinogy GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* persons of both gender aged 50 and older; females must be in menopause for at least one year * at least one chronical venous ulcerisation at one or both legs with the following characteristics: size between 5 cm² and 30 cm²; duration 12 weeks to 10 years; located between knee and ankle; dermis and subkutis being involved, without damage of muscles, bones or tendon * vital wound ground with granulation tissue * proof of ulcerisation caused by venous malformation by duplex sonography, the tibiobrachiale index being between 0.8 and 1.3 * no active wound treatment one week before study treatment starts

Exclusion criteria

* females not being in menopause * non-venous cause for ulzerisation * lymphatic oedema, wound infection, necrotic tissue, venous fistula, bradytrophe wound ground * clinical treatment of the venes during the last three months * background therapy with systemic corticosteroides above Cushing-level (7.5 mg Prednisolonequivalent) * previous radiation treatment of the ulzerisation area * patients with defibrillator, after organ transplantation, cardiac insufficiency, known connective tissue disease, malnutrition (Albumin i.S. \< 2.5 g/dl), Diabetes mellitus (HbA1c \> 8%), active maligne disease, severe rheumatoide arthritis, hemodialysis, active sickle cell anemia * known alcohol or drug abuse * patients currently participating or having participated during the last 4 weeks in another clinical trial * patients being unable to understand the intention of the clinical trial * patients being not compliant or not being independant from the sponsor or investigator * missing approval to collect and process pseudomized data * hospitalization in a mental institution due to § 20 MPG

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
number of SAEs2 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
size of the Ulcus crurusonce a week
pain assessment between treatments2 months
pain assessment during treatment2 months
inflammation of the Ulcus crurus2 months
overall assessment of the treatment from patient's view2 months
overall assessment of the treatment from investigator's view2 months
relapse rate 4 weeks after end of treatmentafter 4 weeks
patient satisfaction (patient-benefit-index)2 months

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026