Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Product Feasibility of a New Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

A Study to Evaluate the Product Feasibility of a New Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01412983
Enrollment
100
Registered
2011-08-09
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2014-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to determine the clinical feasibility and to evaluate the product performance of investigational contact lenses developed by Bausch + Lomb.

Interventions

DEVICEBausch & Lomb Test lens

Lens to be worn on a daily wear basis for one week. Participants will be provided with Bausch + Lomb renu® fresh™ multi-purpose solution for daily rinsing, cleaning, and disinfecting of their lenses.

DEVICECiba Vision soft contact lens

Lens to be worn on a daily wear basis for one week. Participants will be provided with Bausch + Lomb renu® fresh™ multi-purpose solution for daily rinsing, cleaning, and disinfecting of their lenses.

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have physiologically normal anterior segments not exhibiting clinically significant biomicroscopy findings (greater than grade 1 and/or presence of infiltrates). * Be adapted wearers of soft contact lenses, wear a lens in each eye, and each lens must be of the same manufacture and brand. * Be correctable through spherocylindrical refraction to 32 letters (0.3 logMAR) or better (distance, high contrast) in each eye. * Be myopic and require lens correction from -0.50 to -6.00 diopters (D) in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

* An active ocular disease, any corneal infiltrative response or are using any ocular medications. * Have worn gas permeable (GP) contact lenses within last 30 days or PMMA lenses within last 3 months. * Any Grade 2 or greater finding during the slit lamp examination that, in the Investigator's judgment, interferes with contact lens wear. * Any scar or neovascularization within the central 4mm of the cornea. * Have had any corneal surgery. * Any Present finding during the slit lamp examination that, in the Investigator's judgment, interferes with contact lens wear. * Any systemic disease affecting ocular health. * Using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular physiology or lens performance. * Currently wear monovision, multifocal, or toric contact lenses. * Allergic to any component in the study care products.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual AcuityOne weekThe mean difference in high contrast logMAR, over all lens visual acuities (VAs) between lens groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall ComfortOne weekThe mean difference in comfort-related symptoms/complaints scores between lens groups. Rated on a scale of 0-100 with 100 being the most favorable score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 5 clinical sites in the US. First participant was enrolled 08/08/2011 and last participant exited on 09/01/2011.

Pre-assignment details

100 participants (200 eyes) were enrolled in this 2 week crossover study. Participants were divided into 2 groups wearing one study lens for 1 week and then crossing over to the other study lens for 1 week. 96 participants completed the study, 1 participant was ineligible at baseline while 3 participants were discontinued during the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
All 99 participants in study
99
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
1st PeriodInability to maintain wear01
1st PeriodIneligible01
1st PeriodPositive slit lamp finding01
1st PeriodUnacceptable lens movement01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Continuous29.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
94 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
99 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 990 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 990 / 99

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Acuity

The mean difference in high contrast logMAR, over all lens visual acuities (VAs) between lens groups.

Time frame: One week

Population: All eligible dispensed eyes

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bausch+Lomb Test LensVisual Acuity-0.054 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.115
Ciba Vision Soft Contact LensVisual Acuity-0.051 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.115
Secondary

Overall Comfort

The mean difference in comfort-related symptoms/complaints scores between lens groups. Rated on a scale of 0-100 with 100 being the most favorable score.

Time frame: One week

Population: All eligible dispensed eyes

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bausch+Lomb Test LensOverall Comfort81.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
Ciba Vision Soft Contact LensOverall Comfort82.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026