Skip to content

Comparison of Survival Benefit of Panitumumab With Supportive Care to Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Trial to Evaluate the Survival Benefit of Panitumumab and Best Supportive Care, Compared to Best Supportive Care Alone, in Subjects With Chemorefractory Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01412957
Enrollment
377
Registered
2011-08-09
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2017-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Best Supportive Care, Panitumumab, Chemorefractory, Wild-type KRAS, Overall Survival, Phase 3

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of panitumumab in addition to best supportive care compared to best supportive care alone in patients with chemorefractory wild-type KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) metastatic colorectal cancer.

Interventions

OTHERBest Supportive Care (BSC)

BSC was defined as the best palliative care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and could include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any other symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated.

DRUGPanitumumab

Administered intravenously

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) * Wild-type (without mutation in codons 12 and 13) KRAS gene in tumor tissue confirmed by a central laboratory * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2 * At least 1 measurable or non-measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 guidelines. * Treatment failure (defined as failure due to either disease progression \[clinical or radiological\] or toxicity \[treatment intolerance\]) of a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan may have been administered sequentially or in combination. * Disease relapse within 6 months after completing adjuvant chemotherapy (with either an irinotecan or oxaliplatin containing regimen) will also be considered as treatment failure of a prior regimen for metastatic disease * Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of CRC * Man or woman at least 18 years of age * Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function * Negative pregnancy test within 72 hours before randomization (for women of childbearing potential only) * Subject or subject's legally acceptable representative has provided informed consent. * Other protocol-specified criteria may apply

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment * History of another primary cancer within 5 years of randomization * Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFR inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib) * Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy) within 21 days before randomization * Radiotherapy within 14 days before randomization. *

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).Overall survival was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date and participants with survival data obtained after the planned analysis data cut-off date had survival censored at the cut-off date.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival in Participants With Wild-type RASFrom randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).A secondary efficacy endpoint was overall survival in participants with wild-type rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) (without mutation in exons 2 \[codons 12 and 13\], 3 \[codons 59 and 61\], and 4 \[codons 117 and 146\] of KRAS and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene (NRAS)). In participants with wild-type RAS, RAS mutation status was defined by KRAS exon 2 mutation status per clinical trial assay testing and mutation status of KRAS exon 3 and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3 and 4 per Sanger bi-directional sequencing. Overall survival was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date and participants with survival data obtained after the planned analysis data cut-off date had survival censored at the cut-off date.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Wild-type RASFrom randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).PFS was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression per RECIST version 1.1 or death. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions compared with the smallest size since treatment started and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, any new lesions, or an increase in size of non-target lesions thought be ≥ 20% with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or significant increase in pleural effusions, ascites or other fluid collections with cytologic proof of malignancy. Participants who were alive and did not meet the criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.
Objective Response RateResponse was assessed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. Radiographic tumor assessments and investigator's assessment of response were performed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until disease progression (radiographic or clinical progression). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD and no new lesions.
Progression-free SurvivalFrom randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions compared with the smallest size since treatment started and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, any new lesions or an increase in size of non-target lesions thought be ≥ 20% and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or significant increase in pleural effusions, ascites or other fluid collections with cytologic proof of malignancy. Participants who were alive and did not meet the criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From first dose until 30 days after last dose; median safety reporting periods were 4.2 months and 2.2 months for panitumumab plus BSC arm and BSC alone arm, respectively.The severity of each AE was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (Grade 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate (discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity); 3 = Severe (incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity); 4 = Life-threatening and 5 = Fatal), with the exception of the skin-or nail-related AEs which were graded using a CTCAE version 3.0 with modifications. A serious AE was defined as an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: • fatal, • life-threatening, • required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, • resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, • congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or • other medically important serious event. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) are those the investigator considered there was reasonable possibility that the event might have been caused by study drug.
Maximum Post-baseline Change From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) IntervalBaseline (pre-dose), Week 1 and Week 7 (post-dose) and 4 weeks after the last dose (Safety Follow-up visit)QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle as measured by electrocardiogram (ECG). QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate. To evaluate the effect of panitumumab treatment on the QTc interval length among participants treated with panitumumab, ECGs were collected at the following time points from participants randomized to panitumumab arm at a limited number of sites: Week 1 prior to the first panitumumab infusion (Baseline) and within 30 minutes following the end of the first infusion of panitumumab (Cmax), Week 7 after 3 doses of panitumumab (steady state), and at the safety follow-up visit. The ECGs were submitted for independent central review to calculate the reported QTc interval. QTc was calculated using both the Bazett correction (QTcB) and the Fridericia correction (QTcF).
Objective Response Rate in Participants With Wild-type RASResponse was assessed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. Radiographic tumor assessments and investigator's assessment of response were performed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until disease progression (radiographic or clinical progression). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD and no new lesions.

Countries

Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, Estonia, Greece, India, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Romania, Serbia, South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 377 participants were randomized at 66 centers in Europe, Asia, North and South America from 8 November 2011 until 30 July 2013. Results are reported as of the primary analysis data cut-off date of 10 June 2014.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were stratified according to geographic region (Europe vs Asia vs rest of the world) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 or 1 vs 2) and randomized (1:1 ratio) to 1 of 2 treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Panitumumab + BSC
Participants received panitumumab administered intravenously 6 mg/kg every 14 days plus best supportive care (BSC) until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, death, or intolerance of study drug.
189
BSC Alone
Participants received best supportive care until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or death.
188
Total377

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath136133
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up72
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject622

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPanitumumab + BSCBSC AloneTotal
Age, Continuous60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 0
71 participants65 participants136 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 1
100 participants107 participants207 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Grade 2
18 participants16 participants34 participants
Geographic Region
Asia
80 participants82 participants162 participants
Geographic Region
Europe
86 participants85 participants171 participants
Geographic Region
Rest of world
23 participants21 participants44 participants
Location of Primary Tumor
Colon
108 participants106 participants214 participants
Location of Primary Tumor
Missing
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Location of Primary Tumor
Rectum
81 participants81 participants162 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
79 participants82 participants161 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
23 participants22 participants45 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
166 participants166 participants332 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
107 participants102 participants209 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
82 Participants79 Participants161 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
107 Participants109 Participants216 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
174 / 18974 / 188
serious
Total, serious adverse events
48 / 18937 / 188

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date and participants with survival data obtained after the planned analysis data cut-off date had survival censored at the cut-off date.

Time frame: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Analysis Set (all randomized participants); participants in the ITT Analysis Set were required to have wild-type KRAS exon 2 (codons 12 and 13, alleles G12A, G12D, G12R, G12C, G12S, G12V, or G13D) per protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab + BSCOverall Survival10.0 months
BSC AloneOverall Survival7.4 months
Comparison: The primary hypothesis was that panitumumab plus BSC would improve overall survival compared to BSC alone. A comparison between treatments was performed using the log-rank test stratified by the randomization factors at a 5% significance level.p-value: 0.0096Log Rank
Secondary

Maximum Post-baseline Change From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) Interval

QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle as measured by electrocardiogram (ECG). QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate. To evaluate the effect of panitumumab treatment on the QTc interval length among participants treated with panitumumab, ECGs were collected at the following time points from participants randomized to panitumumab arm at a limited number of sites: Week 1 prior to the first panitumumab infusion (Baseline) and within 30 minutes following the end of the first infusion of panitumumab (Cmax), Week 7 after 3 doses of panitumumab (steady state), and at the safety follow-up visit. The ECGs were submitted for independent central review to calculate the reported QTc interval. QTc was calculated using both the Bazett correction (QTcB) and the Fridericia correction (QTcF).

Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose), Week 1 and Week 7 (post-dose) and 4 weeks after the last dose (Safety Follow-up visit)

Population: QTc Analysis Set is defined as the subset of participants in the Safety Analysis Set who received at least one panitumumab dose and were enrolled at the limited number of sites participating in QTc evaluation and had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline QTc assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Panitumumab + BSCMaximum Post-baseline Change From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) IntervalQTcF14.58 msecStandard Deviation 13.6
Panitumumab + BSCMaximum Post-baseline Change From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) IntervalQTcB12.57 msecStandard Deviation 12.15
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

The severity of each AE was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (Grade 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate (discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity); 3 = Severe (incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity); 4 = Life-threatening and 5 = Fatal), with the exception of the skin-or nail-related AEs which were graded using a CTCAE version 3.0 with modifications. A serious AE was defined as an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: • fatal, • life-threatening, • required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, • resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, • congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or • other medically important serious event. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) are those the investigator considered there was reasonable possibility that the event might have been caused by study drug.

Time frame: From first dose until 30 days after last dose; median safety reporting periods were 4.2 months and 2.2 months for panitumumab plus BSC arm and BSC alone arm, respectively.

Population: Safety Analysis Set (all randomized participants)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse event (TRAE)166 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE with worst grade of 370 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE with worst grade of 341 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE with worst grade of 58 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE with worst grade of 44 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event (AE)184 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE with worst grade of 50 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse event (SAE)48 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious treatment-related AE2 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE with worst grade of 417 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE leading to discontinuation of panitumumab1 participants
Panitumumab + BSCNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to discontinuation of panitumumab20 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE leading to discontinuation of panitumumabNA participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event (AE)115 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE with worst grade of 329 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE with worst grade of 45 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE with worst grade of 515 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse event (SAE)37 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related adverse event (TRAE)7 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE with worst grade of 31 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE with worst grade of 41 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related AE with worst grade of 51 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious treatment-related AE3 participants
BSC AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to discontinuation of panitumumabNA participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. Radiographic tumor assessments and investigator's assessment of response were performed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until disease progression (radiographic or clinical progression). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD and no new lesions.

Time frame: Response was assessed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).

Population: ITT analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Panitumumab + BSCObjective Response Rate26.98 percentage of participants
BSC AloneObjective Response Rate1.60 percentage of participants
Comparison: ORR was not formally tested and the p-values are descriptive only. An exact test was used to test the hypothesis that the common odds ratio for panitumumab plus BSC relative to BSC alone for the objective response is equal to 1.0 stratified by the randomization factors.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [7.47, 123.77]Stratified exact test
Secondary

Objective Response Rate in Participants With Wild-type RAS

Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. Radiographic tumor assessments and investigator's assessment of response were performed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until disease progression (radiographic or clinical progression). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD and no new lesions.

Time frame: Response was assessed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).

Population: Wild-type RAS Efficacy Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Panitumumab + BSCObjective Response Rate in Participants With Wild-type RAS30.99 percentage of participants
BSC AloneObjective Response Rate in Participants With Wild-type RAS2.34 percentage of participants
Comparison: ORR was not formally tested and the p-values are descriptive only. An exact test was used to test the hypothesis that the common odds ratio for panitumumab plus BSC relative to BSC alone for the objective response is equal to 1.0 stratified by the randomization factors.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [5.89, 101.62]Stratified exact test
Secondary

Overall Survival in Participants With Wild-type RAS

A secondary efficacy endpoint was overall survival in participants with wild-type rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) (without mutation in exons 2 \[codons 12 and 13\], 3 \[codons 59 and 61\], and 4 \[codons 117 and 146\] of KRAS and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene (NRAS)). In participants with wild-type RAS, RAS mutation status was defined by KRAS exon 2 mutation status per clinical trial assay testing and mutation status of KRAS exon 3 and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3 and 4 per Sanger bi-directional sequencing. Overall survival was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date and participants with survival data obtained after the planned analysis data cut-off date had survival censored at the cut-off date.

Time frame: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).

Population: Wild-type RAS Efficacy Analysis Set (subset of participants in the ITT Analysis Set without mutation in exon 2, 3, and 4 of KRAS or NRAS)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab + BSCOverall Survival in Participants With Wild-type RAS10.0 months
BSC AloneOverall Survival in Participants With Wild-type RAS6.9 months
Comparison: Overall survival in the Wild-type RAS Efficacy Analysis Set was compared at a significance level of 5% conditional on a significant treatment effect for progression-free survival in the ITT Analysis Set.p-value: 0.0135Log Rank
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions compared with the smallest size since treatment started and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, any new lesions or an increase in size of non-target lesions thought be ≥ 20% and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or significant increase in pleural effusions, ascites or other fluid collections with cytologic proof of malignancy. Participants who were alive and did not meet the criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

Time frame: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).

Population: ITT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab + BSCProgression-free Survival3.6 months
BSC AloneProgression-free Survival1.7 months
Comparison: PFS in the ITT Analysis Set was tested at a significance level of 5% conditional on a significant treatment effect on overall survival in the ITT Analysis Set.p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Wild-type RAS

PFS was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression per RECIST version 1.1 or death. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions compared with the smallest size since treatment started and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, any new lesions, or an increase in size of non-target lesions thought be ≥ 20% with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or significant increase in pleural effusions, ascites or other fluid collections with cytologic proof of malignancy. Participants who were alive and did not meet the criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

Time frame: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).

Population: Wild-type RAS Efficacy Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Panitumumab + BSCProgression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Wild-type RAS5.2 months
BSC AloneProgression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Wild-type RAS1.7 months
Comparison: PFS in the Wild-type RAS Efficacy Analysis Set was to be compared at a significance level of 5% if overall survival in the wild-type RAS Efficacy Anaysis Set demonstrated a significant treatment effect.p-value: <0.0001Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026