Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, observational study
Brief summary
This is an open-label, multicenter and observational study in China, which is designed to record the data of RA & AS patients within 52 weeks after rheumatologists decided to prescribe etanercept, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatment. All eligible subjects agreed to be recruited in the study and can withdraw anytime if they choose so. Patients with RA or AS are typically managed by rheumatologists. As this study seeks to record the data of RA & AS patient in etanercept and evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatment, patients will be recruited from Rheumatic department. Rheumatologist will be asked to build up the database for RA & AS patient surveillance prospectively in outpatient dept, which benefits for the patient treatment outcomes evaluation and clinical management.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this non-interventional study is to evaluate the safety of etanercept in Chinese RA and AS subjects. Total of 600 subjects (300 RA subjects and 300 AS subjects) will be enrolled in the study. If the true rate of an adverse event is no less than 0.5%, with sample size of 600 subjects, this study will have 95% probability to detect at least one occurrence of the adverse event. The study prematurely discontinued on January 15, 2013 due to slow enrollment and low adherence of etanercept. It should be noted that safety concerns have not been seen in this study and have not factored into this decision.
Interventions
25mg biweekly or 50mg per week, subcutaneous injection
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subject has a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. * Subject has accepted physician's prescription of etanercept in rheumatology department. * Subject agreed to be enrolled in the observational study and sign the ICD. * Subject is≥18 years of age at the time of consent. * Subject is willing and able to understand and complete questionnaires
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of active or suspected latent infection including HIV, or any underlying disease, including open cutaneous ulcers that could predispose the subject to infections. * Immunodeficiency syndromes including Felty syndrome or large granular lymphocyte syndrome. * Active tuberculosis (TB) or a history of TB, or findings consistent with previous exposure to TB on a chest x-ray (CXR). Investigators must follow China's guidelines for appropriate screening and treatment of TB. * History of hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients in either preparation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 Weeks | First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. |
| Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 Weeks | First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. |
| Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 Weeks | Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 24 weeks | An SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. |
| Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 Weeks | Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 52 weeks | An SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category. |
| Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52 | TJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and the knees. The joints were assessed for tenderness using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed. |
| Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52 | SJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP, and the knees. The joints were assessed for swelling using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed. |
| Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52 | Physicians indicated on a 0-100 millimeters (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess the activity of the participant's disease according to the participant's clinical condition, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active). |
| Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52 | Counts of participants had good, moderate and no response to treatment with etanercept. Good response was present DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>1.2. Moderate response was 1) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>3.2 and \<=5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>1.2, or \>0.6 and \<=1.2; 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2; or 3) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \> 1.2. No response was 1) DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \<=0.6 regardless present DAS28-4 (ESR), or 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2. |
| Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52 | Counts of participants had remission of disease. Remission of disease was defined by a DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6. |
| Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 52 | DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS: DAS28-4 (ESR)=0.56\*square root(TJC 28 joints) + 0.28\*square root(SJC 28 joints) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. DAS28-4 (ESR) above 5.1 indicated high disease activity whereas a DAS28-4 (ESR) below 3.2 indicated low disease activity. |
| Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52 | Participants placed a vertical line on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of their global disease activity, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active). |
| VAS Score for Pain | Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52 | Participants placed a mark on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of pain, with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning the most severe pain. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52 | Treatment adherence rate was calculated using the following formula: \[Actual dosing/expected dosing on the basis of approved product label\] × 100%. Counts of participants by 6 levels of treatment adherence rate: 1), \<50%, 2), \>=50% and \<70%, 3), \>=70% and \<80%, 4), \>=80% and \<100%, 5), \>=100% and \<120%, and 6), \>=120%. |
| Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52 | Participants were allocated to 5 groups by age as 10 years separately: \<20 years, \>=20 and \<30 years, \>=30 and \<40 years, \>=40 and \<50 years, \>50 years. The number of participants with treatment adherence rate 1), \<50%, 2), \>=50% and \<70%, 3), \>=70% and \<80%, 4), \>=80% and \<100%, 5), \>=100% and \<120%, and 6), \>=120% were provided for each age group described above. |
| Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results | Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 52 | Number of participants with any abnormal laboratory test results, criteria for abnormalities were complete blood count (CBC) including hemoglobin (\<0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\]), mean corpuscular volume (MCV, \<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*upper limit of normal\[ULN\]), hematocrit (\<0.8\*LLN), red blood cell count (\<0.8\*LLN), platelets (\<0.5\*LLN or \>1.75\*ULN), white blood cell count (\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN), lymphocytes (\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN), neutrophils (\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN), basophil (\>1.2\*ULN), eosinophil (\>1.2\*ULN), and monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN); ESR (\>1.5\*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST,\>3.0\*ULN); alanine aminotransferase (ALT,\>3.0\*ULN); blood urea nitrogen (BUN,\>1.3\*ULN); and creatinine (CRE,\>1.3\*ULN). |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] Participants with RA who received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg weekly per standard medical practice were observed for 52 weeks | 69 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] Participants with AS who received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg weekly per standard medical practice were observed for 52 weeks | 90 |
| Total | 159 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Did not meet entrance criteria | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 12 | 18 |
| Overall Study | Other | 12 | 17 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 3 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Screen failure | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Study terminated by sponsor | 2 | 15 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 34 | 21 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Total | Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized >=30 and <40 years | 7 Participants | 28 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Age, Customized >=40 and <50 years | 22 Participants | 40 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Age, Customized >=50 years | 34 Participants | 43 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Age, Customized greater than or equal to (>=) 20 and <30 years | 3 Participants | 30 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Age, Customized less than (<) 20 years | 3 Participants | 18 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 50 Participants | 74 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 19 Participants | 85 Participants | 66 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 8 / 69 | 9 / 90 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 69 | 0 / 90 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 Weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 Weeks | 7 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 Weeks | 9 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 Weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 Weeks | 8 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 Weeks | 9 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 Weeks
An SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Time frame: Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 52 weeks
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 Weeks | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 Weeks | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 Weeks
An SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Time frame: Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 24 weeks
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 Weeks | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 Weeks | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category.
Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Gastrointestinal disorders | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Investigations | 3 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Hepatobiliary disorders | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | General disorders+administration site conditions | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Infections and infestations | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Eye disorders | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Eye disorders | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Gastrointestinal disorders | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | General disorders+administration site conditions | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Hepatobiliary disorders | 2 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Infections and infestations | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Investigations | 3 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category.
Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Gastrointestinal disorders | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Investigations | 3 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Hepatobiliary disorders | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | General disorders+administration site conditions | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Infections and infestations | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Eye disorders | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Eye disorders | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Gastrointestinal disorders | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | General disorders+administration site conditions | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Hepatobiliary disorders | 2 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Infections and infestations | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Investigations | 3 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1 Participants |
Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS: DAS28-4 (ESR)=0.56\*square root(TJC 28 joints) + 0.28\*square root(SJC 28 joints) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. DAS28-4 (ESR) above 5.1 indicated high disease activity whereas a DAS28-4 (ESR) below 3.2 indicated low disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were RA participants who were evaluated for DAS28-4 (ESR). n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Baseline (Week 0), n=55 | 5.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.338 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Week 2, n=20 | 4.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.305 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Week 4, n=18 | 3.31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.453 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Week 8, n=1 | 2.88 units on a scale | — |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Week 12, n=8 | 2.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.702 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Week 36, n=1 | 1.20 units on a scale | — |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Week 52, n=2 | 3.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.083 |
Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate
Participants were allocated to 5 groups by age as 10 years separately: \<20 years, \>=20 and \<30 years, \>=30 and \<40 years, \>=40 and \<50 years, \>50 years. The number of participants with treatment adherence rate 1), \<50%, 2), \>=50% and \<70%, 3), \>=70% and \<80%, 4), \>=80% and \<100%, 5), \>=100% and \<120%, and 6), \>=120% were provided for each age group described above.
Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for treatment adherence rate; those participants with partial dosing dates were excluded. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding age group.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (<50%), n=7,21 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=70% and <80%), n=22,17 | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=80% and <100%), n=22,17 | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=100% and <120%), n=22,17 | 5 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=120%), n=22,17 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (<50%), n=34,9 | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=50% and <70%), n=34,9 | 19 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=70% and <80%), n=34,9 | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=80% and <100%), n=34,9 | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=100% and <120%), n=34,9 | 10 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=120%), n=34,9 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (<50%), n=3,15 | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=50% and <70%), n=3,15 | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=70% and <80%), n=3,15 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=80% and <100%), n=3,15 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=100% and <120%), n=3,15 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=120%), n=3,15 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (<50%), n=3,26 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=50% and <70%), n=3,26 | 3 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=70% and <80%), n=3,26 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=80% and <100%), n=3,26 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=100% and <120%), n=3,26 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=120%), n=3,26 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=50% and <70%), n=7,21 | 3 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=70% and <80%), n=7,21 | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=80% and <100%), n=7,21 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=100% and <120%), n=7,21 | 3 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=120%), n=7,21 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (<50%), n=22,17 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=50% and <70%), n=22,17 | 13 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=100% and <120%), n=3,15 | 4 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (<50%), n=7,21 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=70% and <80%), n=22,17 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=120%), n=3,15 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=80% and <100%), n=22,17 | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=120%), n=7,21 | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=100% and <120%), n=22,17 | 7 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (<50%), n=3,26 | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=120%), n=22,17 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=50% and <70%), n=7,21 | 9 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (<50%), n=34,9 | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=50% and <70%), n=3,26 | 14 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=50% and <70%), n=34,9 | 2 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=100% and <120%), n=7,21 | 10 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=70% and <80%), n=34,9 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=70% and <80%), n=3,26 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=80% and <100%), n=34,9 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=70% and <80%), n=7,21 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=100% and <120%), n=34,9 | 6 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=80% and <100%), n=3,26 | 2 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >50 years (>=120%), n=34,9 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (<50%), n=22,17 | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (<50%), n=3,15 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=100% and <120%), n=3,26 | 9 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=50% and <70%), n=3,15 | 11 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=30 and <40 years (>=80% and <100%), n=7,21 | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=70% and <80%), n=3,15 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=20 and <30 years (>=120%), n=3,26 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | <20 years (>=80% and <100%), n=3,15 | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate | >=40 and <50 years (>=50% and <70%), n=22,17 | 8 Participants |
Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results
Number of participants with any abnormal laboratory test results, criteria for abnormalities were complete blood count (CBC) including hemoglobin (\<0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\]), mean corpuscular volume (MCV, \<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*upper limit of normal\[ULN\]), hematocrit (\<0.8\*LLN), red blood cell count (\<0.8\*LLN), platelets (\<0.5\*LLN or \>1.75\*ULN), white blood cell count (\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN), lymphocytes (\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN), neutrophils (\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN), basophil (\>1.2\*ULN), eosinophil (\>1.2\*ULN), and monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN); ESR (\>1.5\*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST,\>3.0\*ULN); alanine aminotransferase (ALT,\>3.0\*ULN); blood urea nitrogen (BUN,\>1.3\*ULN); and creatinine (CRE,\>1.3\*ULN).
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for laboratory test abnormalities.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results | 25 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results | 34 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%
Treatment adherence rate was calculated using the following formula: \[Actual dosing/expected dosing on the basis of approved product label\] × 100%. Counts of participants by 6 levels of treatment adherence rate: 1), \<50%, 2), \>=50% and \<70%, 3), \>=70% and \<80%, 4), \>=80% and \<100%, 5), \>=100% and \<120%, and 6), \>=120%.
Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for treatment adherence rate; those participants with partial dosing dates were excluded.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | <50% | 3 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >= 50% and <70% | 40 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >=70% and <80% | 4 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >=80% and <100% | 4 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >=100% and <120% | 18 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >=120% | 0 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >=100% and <120% | 36 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | <50% | 3 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >=80% and <100% | 4 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >= 50% and <70% | 44 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >=120% | 1 Participants |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% | >=70% and <80% | 0 Participants |
Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement
Counts of participants had good, moderate and no response to treatment with etanercept. Good response was present DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>1.2. Moderate response was 1) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>3.2 and \<=5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>1.2, or \>0.6 and \<=1.2; 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2; or 3) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \> 1.2. No response was 1) DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \<=0.6 regardless present DAS28-4 (ESR), or 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2.
Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Good response (Week 2), n=17 | 4 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Moderate response (Week 2), n=17 | 10 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | No response (Week 2), n=17 | 3 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Good response (Week 4), n=16 | 8 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Moderate response (Week 4), n=16 | 6 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | No response (Week 4), n=16 | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Good response (Week 8), n=1 | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Moderate response (Week 8), n=1 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | No response (Week 8), n=1 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Good response (Week 12), n=7 | 5 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Moderate response (Week 12), n=7 | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | No response (Week 12), n=7 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Good response (Week 36), n=1 | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Moderate response (Week 36), n=1 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | No response (Week 36), n=1 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Good response (Week 52), n=1 | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | Moderate response (Week 52), n=1 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement | No response (Week 52), n=1 | 0 Participants |
Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease
Counts of participants had remission of disease. Remission of disease was defined by a DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for DAS28-4 (ESR). n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease | Baseline (Week 0), n=55 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease | Week 2, n=20 | 2 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease | Week 4, n=18 | 5 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease | Week 8, n=1 | 0 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease | Week 12, n=8 | 4 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease | Week 36, n=1 | 1 Participants |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease | Week 52, n=2 | 1 Participants |
Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity
Participants placed a vertical line on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of their global disease activity, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active).
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for PtGA of disease activity. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Baseline (Week 0), n=65, 84 | 64.9 mm | Standard Deviation 20.27 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 2, n=42,61 | 45.1 mm | Standard Deviation 27 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 4, n=35, 60 | 42.2 mm | Standard Deviation 31.16 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 8, n=23, 47 | 36.1 mm | Standard Deviation 38.1 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 12, n=16,33 | 34.6 mm | Standard Deviation 35.19 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 24, n=7,18 | 26.6 mm | Standard Deviation 35.02 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 36, n=2,12 | 5.0 mm | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 52, n=3,6 | 12.7 mm | Standard Deviation 20.23 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 52, n=3,6 | 22.5 mm | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Baseline (Week 0), n=65, 84 | 61.8 mm | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 12, n=16,33 | 38.8 mm | Standard Deviation 35.54 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 2, n=42,61 | 48.9 mm | Standard Deviation 27.52 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 36, n=2,12 | 13.5 mm | Standard Deviation 12.92 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 4, n=35, 60 | 44.1 mm | Standard Deviation 30.78 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 24, n=7,18 | 32.1 mm | Standard Deviation 32.72 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity | Week 8, n=23, 47 | 44.4 mm | Standard Deviation 31.25 |
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Physicians indicated on a 0-100 millimeters (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess the activity of the participant's disease according to the participant's clinical condition, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active).
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for physician's global assessment of disease activity. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Baseline (Week 0), n=65,82 | 63.4 mm | Standard Deviation 20.62 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 2, n=44,59 | 45.3 mm | Standard Deviation 26.33 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 4, n=35,61 | 40.5 mm | Standard Deviation 30.77 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 8, n=24,47 | 34.8 mm | Standard Deviation 37.39 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 12, n=16,34 | 34.8 mm | Standard Deviation 35.22 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 24, n=7,18 | 27.4 mm | Standard Deviation 35.18 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 36, n=2,13 | 5.0 mm | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 52, n=3,6 | 10.7 mm | Standard Deviation 15.14 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 52, n=3,6 | 16.5 mm | Standard Deviation 12.08 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Baseline (Week 0), n=65,82 | 60.9 mm | Standard Deviation 22.91 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 12, n=16,34 | 39.2 mm | Standard Deviation 35.88 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 2, n=44,59 | 48.2 mm | Standard Deviation 29.14 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 36, n=2,13 | 19.8 mm | Standard Deviation 26.49 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 4, n=35,61 | 44.2 mm | Standard Deviation 31.23 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 24, n=7,18 | 30.1 mm | Standard Deviation 30.78 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 8, n=24,47 | 43.9 mm | Standard Deviation 30.76 |
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants
SJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP, and the knees. The joints were assessed for swelling using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were RA participants who were evaluated for SJC. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Baseline (Week 0), n=68 | 5.5 Joints | Standard Deviation 5.75 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Week 2, n=44 | 2.3 Joints | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Week 4, n=34 | 1.5 Joints | Standard Deviation 2.54 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Week 8, n=22 | 0.3 Joints | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Week 12, n=17 | 0.5 Joints | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Week 24, n=6 | 0.2 Joints | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Week 36, n=2 | 0.0 Joints | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants | Week 52, n=3 | 0.3 Joints | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants
TJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and the knees. The joints were assessed for tenderness using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were RA participants who were evaluated for TJC. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Baseline (Week 0), n=68 | 10.0 Joints | Standard Deviation 7.77 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Week 2, n=44 | 4.0 Joints | Standard Deviation 4.72 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Week 4, n=34 | 2.9 Joints | Standard Deviation 4.02 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Week 8, n=22 | 1.7 Joints | Standard Deviation 4.31 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Week 12, n=17 | 2.0 Joints | Standard Deviation 4.76 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Week 24, n=6 | 0.7 Joints | Standard Deviation 1.21 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Week 36, n=2 | 0.0 Joints | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants | Week 52, n=3 | 2.0 Joints | Standard Deviation 1.73 |
VAS Score for Pain
Participants placed a mark on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of pain, with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning the most severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for pain. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 48, n=3,6 | 13.7 mm | Standard Deviation 18.72 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | VAS Score for Pain | Baseline (Week 0), n=65,84 | 64.8 mm | Standard Deviation 19.56 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 2, n=42,62 | 42.7 mm | Standard Deviation 27.9 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 4, n=35,60 | 41.0 mm | Standard Deviation 32.31 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 8, n=23,47 | 35.2 mm | Standard Deviation 38.28 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 12, n=16,34 | 35.6 mm | Standard Deviation 35.5 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 24, n=7,18 | 27.0 mm | Standard Deviation 36.52 |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 36, n=2,13 | 5.0 mm | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 36, n=2,13 | 20.0 mm | Standard Deviation 26.97 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 48, n=3,6 | 17.2 mm | Standard Deviation 15.09 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 8, n=23,47 | 41.7 mm | Standard Deviation 31.39 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | VAS Score for Pain | Baseline (Week 0), n=65,84 | 60.5 mm | Standard Deviation 23.38 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 24, n=7,18 | 30.0 mm | Standard Deviation 30.04 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 2, n=42,62 | 47.4 mm | Standard Deviation 28.63 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 12, n=16,34 | 39.7 mm | Standard Deviation 36.57 |
| Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS] | VAS Score for Pain | Week 4, n=35,60 | 42.7 mm | Standard Deviation 31.08 |