Skip to content

A Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment With Enbrel in Adult Patient in Outpatient Department

A Non-Interventional Study of the Treatment With Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Subjects in Rheumatology Department

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01411215
Acronym
ENBREL NIS CN
Enrollment
160
Registered
2011-08-08
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2014-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, observational study

Brief summary

This is an open-label, multicenter and observational study in China, which is designed to record the data of RA & AS patients within 52 weeks after rheumatologists decided to prescribe etanercept, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatment. All eligible subjects agreed to be recruited in the study and can withdraw anytime if they choose so. Patients with RA or AS are typically managed by rheumatologists. As this study seeks to record the data of RA & AS patient in etanercept and evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatment, patients will be recruited from Rheumatic department. Rheumatologist will be asked to build up the database for RA & AS patient surveillance prospectively in outpatient dept, which benefits for the patient treatment outcomes evaluation and clinical management.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this non-interventional study is to evaluate the safety of etanercept in Chinese RA and AS subjects. Total of 600 subjects (300 RA subjects and 300 AS subjects) will be enrolled in the study. If the true rate of an adverse event is no less than 0.5%, with sample size of 600 subjects, this study will have 95% probability to detect at least one occurrence of the adverse event. The study prematurely discontinued on January 15, 2013 due to slow enrollment and low adherence of etanercept. It should be noted that safety concerns have not been seen in this study and have not factored into this decision.

Interventions

DRUGEnbrel

25mg biweekly or 50mg per week, subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. * Subject has accepted physician's prescription of etanercept in rheumatology department. * Subject agreed to be enrolled in the observational study and sign the ICD. * Subject is≥18 years of age at the time of consent. * Subject is willing and able to understand and complete questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of active or suspected latent infection including HIV, or any underlying disease, including open cutaneous ulcers that could predispose the subject to infections. * Immunodeficiency syndromes including Felty syndrome or large granular lymphocyte syndrome. * Active tuberculosis (TB) or a history of TB, or findings consistent with previous exposure to TB on a chest x-ray (CXR). Investigators must follow China's guidelines for appropriate screening and treatment of TB. * History of hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients in either preparation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 WeeksFirst day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeksAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 WeeksFirst day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeksAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 WeeksInformed consent or signed data privacy statement through 24 weeksAn SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 WeeksInformed consent or signed data privacy statement through 52 weeksAn SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksFirst day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeksAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category.
Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksFirst day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeksAn AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsBaseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52TJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and the knees. The joints were assessed for tenderness using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed.
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsBaseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52SJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP, and the knees. The joints were assessed for swelling using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed.
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52Physicians indicated on a 0-100 millimeters (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess the activity of the participant's disease according to the participant's clinical condition, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active).
Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementWeek 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52Counts of participants had good, moderate and no response to treatment with etanercept. Good response was present DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>1.2. Moderate response was 1) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>3.2 and \<=5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>1.2, or \>0.6 and \<=1.2; 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2; or 3) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \> 1.2. No response was 1) DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \<=0.6 regardless present DAS28-4 (ESR), or 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2.
Number of RA Participants Had Remission of DiseaseBaseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52Counts of participants had remission of disease. Remission of disease was defined by a DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6.
Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 52DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS: DAS28-4 (ESR)=0.56\*square root(TJC 28 joints) + 0.28\*square root(SJC 28 joints) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. DAS28-4 (ESR) above 5.1 indicated high disease activity whereas a DAS28-4 (ESR) below 3.2 indicated low disease activity.
Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityBaseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52Participants placed a vertical line on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of their global disease activity, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active).
VAS Score for PainBaseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52Participants placed a mark on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of pain, with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning the most severe pain.
Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52Treatment adherence rate was calculated using the following formula: \[Actual dosing/expected dosing on the basis of approved product label\] × 100%. Counts of participants by 6 levels of treatment adherence rate: 1), \<50%, 2), \>=50% and \<70%, 3), \>=70% and \<80%, 4), \>=80% and \<100%, 5), \>=100% and \<120%, and 6), \>=120%.
Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence RateFirst day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52Participants were allocated to 5 groups by age as 10 years separately: \<20 years, \>=20 and \<30 years, \>=30 and \<40 years, \>=40 and \<50 years, \>50 years. The number of participants with treatment adherence rate 1), \<50%, 2), \>=50% and \<70%, 3), \>=70% and \<80%, 4), \>=80% and \<100%, 5), \>=100% and \<120%, and 6), \>=120% were provided for each age group described above.
Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test ResultsBaseline (Week 0) up to Week 52Number of participants with any abnormal laboratory test results, criteria for abnormalities were complete blood count (CBC) including hemoglobin (\<0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\]), mean corpuscular volume (MCV, \<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*upper limit of normal\[ULN\]), hematocrit (\<0.8\*LLN), red blood cell count (\<0.8\*LLN), platelets (\<0.5\*LLN or \>1.75\*ULN), white blood cell count (\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN), lymphocytes (\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN), neutrophils (\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN), basophil (\>1.2\*ULN), eosinophil (\>1.2\*ULN), and monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN); ESR (\>1.5\*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST,\>3.0\*ULN); alanine aminotransferase (ALT,\>3.0\*ULN); blood urea nitrogen (BUN,\>1.3\*ULN); and creatinine (CRE,\>1.3\*ULN).

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]
Participants with RA who received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg weekly per standard medical practice were observed for 52 weeks
69
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]
Participants with AS who received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg weekly per standard medical practice were observed for 52 weeks
90
Total159

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyDid not meet entrance criteria01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy24
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1218
Overall StudyOther1217
Overall StudyProtocol Violation35
Overall StudyScreen failure01
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor215
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3421

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRheumatoid Arthritis [RA]TotalAnkylosing Spondylitis [AS]
Age, Customized
>=30 and <40 years
7 Participants28 Participants21 Participants
Age, Customized
>=40 and <50 years
22 Participants40 Participants18 Participants
Age, Customized
>=50 years
34 Participants43 Participants9 Participants
Age, Customized
greater than or equal to (>=) 20 and <30 years
3 Participants30 Participants27 Participants
Age, Customized
less than (<) 20 years
3 Participants18 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants74 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants85 Participants66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 699 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 690 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 Weeks

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 Weeks7 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 Weeks9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 Weeks

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 Weeks8 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 Weeks9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 Weeks

An SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 52 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 Weeks0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 Weeks0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 Weeks

An SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 24 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 Weeks0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 Weeks0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category.

Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksGastrointestinal disorders0 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksInvestigations3 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksHepatobiliary disorders0 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksMetabolism and nutrition disorders1 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksGeneral disorders+administration site conditions2 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksInfections and infestations1 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksEye disorders0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksEye disorders1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksGastrointestinal disorders1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksGeneral disorders+administration site conditions1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksHepatobiliary disorders2 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksInfections and infestations1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksInvestigations3 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksMetabolism and nutrition disorders0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 WeeksMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category.

Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksGastrointestinal disorders0 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksInvestigations3 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksHepatobiliary disorders0 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksMetabolism and nutrition disorders1 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksGeneral disorders+administration site conditions2 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksInfections and infestations1 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksEye disorders0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksEye disorders1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksGastrointestinal disorders1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksGeneral disorders+administration site conditions1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksHepatobiliary disorders2 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksInfections and infestations1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksInvestigations3 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksMetabolism and nutrition disorders0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 WeeksMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1 Participants
Secondary

Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])

DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS: DAS28-4 (ESR)=0.56\*square root(TJC 28 joints) + 0.28\*square root(SJC 28 joints) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. DAS28-4 (ESR) above 5.1 indicated high disease activity whereas a DAS28-4 (ESR) below 3.2 indicated low disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were RA participants who were evaluated for DAS28-4 (ESR). n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Baseline (Week 0), n=555.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.338
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Week 2, n=204.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.305
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Week 4, n=183.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.453
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Week 8, n=12.88 units on a scale
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Week 12, n=82.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.702
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Week 36, n=11.20 units on a scale
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Week 52, n=23.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.083
Secondary

Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate

Participants were allocated to 5 groups by age as 10 years separately: \<20 years, \>=20 and \<30 years, \>=30 and \<40 years, \>=40 and \<50 years, \>50 years. The number of participants with treatment adherence rate 1), \<50%, 2), \>=50% and \<70%, 3), \>=70% and \<80%, 4), \>=80% and \<100%, 5), \>=100% and \<120%, and 6), \>=120% were provided for each age group described above.

Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for treatment adherence rate; those participants with partial dosing dates were excluded. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding age group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (<50%), n=7,210 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=70% and <80%), n=22,172 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=80% and <100%), n=22,172 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=100% and <120%), n=22,175 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=120%), n=22,170 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (<50%), n=34,92 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=50% and <70%), n=34,919 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=70% and <80%), n=34,91 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=80% and <100%), n=34,92 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=100% and <120%), n=34,910 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=120%), n=34,90 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (<50%), n=3,151 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=50% and <70%), n=3,152 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=70% and <80%), n=3,150 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=80% and <100%), n=3,150 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=100% and <120%), n=3,150 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=120%), n=3,150 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (<50%), n=3,260 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=50% and <70%), n=3,263 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=70% and <80%), n=3,260 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=80% and <100%), n=3,260 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=100% and <120%), n=3,260 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=120%), n=3,260 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=50% and <70%), n=7,213 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=70% and <80%), n=7,211 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=80% and <100%), n=7,210 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=100% and <120%), n=7,213 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=120%), n=7,210 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (<50%), n=22,170 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=50% and <70%), n=22,1713 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=100% and <120%), n=3,154 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (<50%), n=7,210 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=70% and <80%), n=22,170 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=120%), n=3,150 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=80% and <100%), n=22,171 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=120%), n=7,211 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=100% and <120%), n=22,177 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (<50%), n=3,261 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=120%), n=22,170 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=50% and <70%), n=7,219 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (<50%), n=34,91 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=50% and <70%), n=3,2614 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=50% and <70%), n=34,92 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=100% and <120%), n=7,2110 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=70% and <80%), n=34,90 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=70% and <80%), n=3,260 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=80% and <100%), n=34,90 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=70% and <80%), n=7,210 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=100% and <120%), n=34,96 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=80% and <100%), n=3,262 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>50 years (>=120%), n=34,90 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (<50%), n=22,171 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (<50%), n=3,150 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=100% and <120%), n=3,269 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=50% and <70%), n=3,1511 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=30 and <40 years (>=80% and <100%), n=7,211 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=70% and <80%), n=3,150 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=20 and <30 years (>=120%), n=3,260 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate<20 years (>=80% and <100%), n=3,150 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate>=40 and <50 years (>=50% and <70%), n=22,178 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results

Number of participants with any abnormal laboratory test results, criteria for abnormalities were complete blood count (CBC) including hemoglobin (\<0.8\*lower limit of normal\[LLN\]), mean corpuscular volume (MCV, \<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*upper limit of normal\[ULN\]), hematocrit (\<0.8\*LLN), red blood cell count (\<0.8\*LLN), platelets (\<0.5\*LLN or \>1.75\*ULN), white blood cell count (\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN), lymphocytes (\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN), neutrophils (\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN), basophil (\>1.2\*ULN), eosinophil (\>1.2\*ULN), and monocytes (\>1.2\*ULN); ESR (\>1.5\*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST,\>3.0\*ULN); alanine aminotransferase (ALT,\>3.0\*ULN); blood urea nitrogen (BUN,\>1.3\*ULN); and creatinine (CRE,\>1.3\*ULN).

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for laboratory test abnormalities.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results25 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results34 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%

Treatment adherence rate was calculated using the following formula: \[Actual dosing/expected dosing on the basis of approved product label\] × 100%. Counts of participants by 6 levels of treatment adherence rate: 1), \<50%, 2), \>=50% and \<70%, 3), \>=70% and \<80%, 4), \>=80% and \<100%, 5), \>=100% and \<120%, and 6), \>=120%.

Time frame: First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for treatment adherence rate; those participants with partial dosing dates were excluded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%<50%3 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>= 50% and <70%40 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>=70% and <80%4 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>=80% and <100%4 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>=100% and <120%18 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>=120%0 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>=100% and <120%36 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%<50%3 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>=80% and <100%4 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>= 50% and <70%44 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>=120%1 Participants
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%>=70% and <80%0 Participants
Secondary

Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement

Counts of participants had good, moderate and no response to treatment with etanercept. Good response was present DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>1.2. Moderate response was 1) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>3.2 and \<=5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>1.2, or \>0.6 and \<=1.2; 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \<=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2; or 3) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \> 1.2. No response was 1) DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \<=0.6 regardless present DAS28-4 (ESR), or 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) \>5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline \>0.6 and \<=1.2.

Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementGood response (Week 2), n=174 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementModerate response (Week 2), n=1710 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementNo response (Week 2), n=173 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementGood response (Week 4), n=168 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementModerate response (Week 4), n=166 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementNo response (Week 4), n=162 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementGood response (Week 8), n=11 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementModerate response (Week 8), n=10 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementNo response (Week 8), n=10 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementGood response (Week 12), n=75 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementModerate response (Week 12), n=72 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementNo response (Week 12), n=70 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementGood response (Week 36), n=11 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementModerate response (Week 36), n=10 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementNo response (Week 36), n=10 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementGood response (Week 52), n=11 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementModerate response (Week 52), n=10 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) ImprovementNo response (Week 52), n=10 Participants
Secondary

Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease

Counts of participants had remission of disease. Remission of disease was defined by a DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for DAS28-4 (ESR). n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had Remission of DiseaseBaseline (Week 0), n=550 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had Remission of DiseaseWeek 2, n=202 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had Remission of DiseaseWeek 4, n=185 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had Remission of DiseaseWeek 8, n=10 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had Remission of DiseaseWeek 12, n=84 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had Remission of DiseaseWeek 36, n=11 Participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Number of RA Participants Had Remission of DiseaseWeek 52, n=21 Participants
Secondary

Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity

Participants placed a vertical line on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of their global disease activity, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active).

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for PtGA of disease activity. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityBaseline (Week 0), n=65, 8464.9 mmStandard Deviation 20.27
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 2, n=42,6145.1 mmStandard Deviation 27
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 4, n=35, 6042.2 mmStandard Deviation 31.16
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 8, n=23, 4736.1 mmStandard Deviation 38.1
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 12, n=16,3334.6 mmStandard Deviation 35.19
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 24, n=7,1826.6 mmStandard Deviation 35.02
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 36, n=2,125.0 mmStandard Deviation 7.07
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 52, n=3,612.7 mmStandard Deviation 20.23
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 52, n=3,622.5 mmStandard Deviation 16.4
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityBaseline (Week 0), n=65, 8461.8 mmStandard Deviation 21.5
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 12, n=16,3338.8 mmStandard Deviation 35.54
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 2, n=42,6148.9 mmStandard Deviation 27.52
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 36, n=2,1213.5 mmStandard Deviation 12.92
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 4, n=35, 6044.1 mmStandard Deviation 30.78
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 24, n=7,1832.1 mmStandard Deviation 32.72
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease ActivityWeek 8, n=23, 4744.4 mmStandard Deviation 31.25
Secondary

Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity

Physicians indicated on a 0-100 millimeters (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess the activity of the participant's disease according to the participant's clinical condition, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active).

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for physician's global assessment of disease activity. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline (Week 0), n=65,8263.4 mmStandard Deviation 20.62
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 2, n=44,5945.3 mmStandard Deviation 26.33
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 4, n=35,6140.5 mmStandard Deviation 30.77
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 8, n=24,4734.8 mmStandard Deviation 37.39
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 12, n=16,3434.8 mmStandard Deviation 35.22
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 24, n=7,1827.4 mmStandard Deviation 35.18
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 36, n=2,135.0 mmStandard Deviation 7.07
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 52, n=3,610.7 mmStandard Deviation 15.14
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 52, n=3,616.5 mmStandard Deviation 12.08
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline (Week 0), n=65,8260.9 mmStandard Deviation 22.91
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 12, n=16,3439.2 mmStandard Deviation 35.88
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 2, n=44,5948.2 mmStandard Deviation 29.14
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 36, n=2,1319.8 mmStandard Deviation 26.49
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 4, n=35,6144.2 mmStandard Deviation 31.23
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 24, n=7,1830.1 mmStandard Deviation 30.78
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]Physician's Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 8, n=24,4743.9 mmStandard Deviation 30.76
Secondary

Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants

SJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP, and the knees. The joints were assessed for swelling using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were RA participants who were evaluated for SJC. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsBaseline (Week 0), n=685.5 JointsStandard Deviation 5.75
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 2, n=442.3 JointsStandard Deviation 3.07
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 4, n=341.5 JointsStandard Deviation 2.54
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 8, n=220.3 JointsStandard Deviation 0.72
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 12, n=170.5 JointsStandard Deviation 0.94
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 24, n=60.2 JointsStandard Deviation 0.41
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 36, n=20.0 JointsStandard Deviation 0
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 52, n=30.3 JointsStandard Deviation 0.58
Secondary

Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants

TJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and the knees. The joints were assessed for tenderness using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were RA participants who were evaluated for TJC. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsBaseline (Week 0), n=6810.0 JointsStandard Deviation 7.77
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 2, n=444.0 JointsStandard Deviation 4.72
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 4, n=342.9 JointsStandard Deviation 4.02
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 8, n=221.7 JointsStandard Deviation 4.31
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 12, n=172.0 JointsStandard Deviation 4.76
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 24, n=60.7 JointsStandard Deviation 1.21
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 36, n=20.0 JointsStandard Deviation 0
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA ParticipantsWeek 52, n=32.0 JointsStandard Deviation 1.73
Secondary

VAS Score for Pain

Participants placed a mark on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of pain, with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning the most severe pain.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of etanercept. Participants analyzed were participants who were evaluated for pain. n=number of evaluable participants at the corresponding visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]VAS Score for PainWeek 48, n=3,613.7 mmStandard Deviation 18.72
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]VAS Score for PainBaseline (Week 0), n=65,8464.8 mmStandard Deviation 19.56
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]VAS Score for PainWeek 2, n=42,6242.7 mmStandard Deviation 27.9
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]VAS Score for PainWeek 4, n=35,6041.0 mmStandard Deviation 32.31
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]VAS Score for PainWeek 8, n=23,4735.2 mmStandard Deviation 38.28
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]VAS Score for PainWeek 12, n=16,3435.6 mmStandard Deviation 35.5
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]VAS Score for PainWeek 24, n=7,1827.0 mmStandard Deviation 36.52
Rheumatoid Arthritis [RA]VAS Score for PainWeek 36, n=2,135.0 mmStandard Deviation 7.07
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]VAS Score for PainWeek 36, n=2,1320.0 mmStandard Deviation 26.97
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]VAS Score for PainWeek 48, n=3,617.2 mmStandard Deviation 15.09
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]VAS Score for PainWeek 8, n=23,4741.7 mmStandard Deviation 31.39
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]VAS Score for PainBaseline (Week 0), n=65,8460.5 mmStandard Deviation 23.38
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]VAS Score for PainWeek 24, n=7,1830.0 mmStandard Deviation 30.04
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]VAS Score for PainWeek 2, n=42,6247.4 mmStandard Deviation 28.63
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]VAS Score for PainWeek 12, n=16,3439.7 mmStandard Deviation 36.57
Ankylosing Spondylitis [AS]VAS Score for PainWeek 4, n=35,6042.7 mmStandard Deviation 31.08

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026