Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of FLOSEAL for Hemostasis in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FLOSEAL for Hemostasis in Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01410240
Enrollment
137
Registered
2011-08-05
Start date
2011-09-30
Completion date
2013-01-31
Last updated
2014-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Replacement Surgery, Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of FLOSEAL to standard of care for hemostasis in subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard of Care

Conventional hemostatic techniques, such as cautery and manual compression, will be used.

DRUGFLOSEAL Hemostatic Matrix + Standard of care

FLOSEAL will be applied topically to areas of the knee where bleeding is observed (e.g. cut bone surfaces, subcutaneous tissue, posterior joint capsule, synovial tissue, medial and lateral gutters, branches of the genicular vessels, and suprapatellar pouch) and will occur intraoperatively. Sufficient amounts of FLOSEAL will be applied quickly using the provided applicators, followed by immediate approximation with a damp gauze, lap pad or sponge for approximately 2 minutes. \+ Standard of care: conventional hemostatic techniques, such as cautery and manual compression, will be used

Sponsors

Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is 18 to 80 years of age inclusive at the time of screening * Participant is planned for primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty * Participant has signed the informed consent form * Participant is in stable health (i.e., able to undergo surgery and participate in a follow-up program based on physical examination and medical history) * Participant has a preoperative Hgb level \> 10 g/dL * If female of childbearing potential, the participant presents with a negative urine pregnancy test and agrees to employ adequate birth control measures for the duration of the study * Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has had a previous total or partial knee arthroplasty or any surgery on the knee within the previous 6 months * Participant has osteonecrosis or arthrotomy within the last year * Participant has prior or current hardware in target knee * Participant has had injections in the knee: 1. Steroids within the 3 months prior to scheduled surgery, 2. Synvisc, Hyalin, etc. within the 6 months prior to scheduled surgery * Participant has had general surgery within 3 months * Participant has rheumatoid arthritis or any other inflammatory or traumatic bone injuries to the knee within the 12 months prior to scheduled surgery * Participant has allergies to products of bovine origin * Participant has a history of bleeding, platelet, or bone marrow disorders * Participant has donated more than 1 unit of blood donation in the 3 weeks prior to surgery * Participant has a history of a coagulation disorder * Participant is currently taking dipyridamole/ASA (Aggrenox) and/or enoxaparin (Lovenox) * Participant has been treated with aspirin or Warfarin (Coumadin) or clopidogrel (Plavix) within 7 days prior to surgery * Participant is not permitted to remain without his/her anti-coagulant regimen (e.g. Plavix) for 48 hours postoperatively * Participant has taken nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents or herbal supplements within 7 days of surgery * Participant has a history of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs) or is an active smoker * Participant has liver cirrhosis * Participant has erythropoietin agonist/stimulating agent within 90 days prior to surgery * Participant has an active infection or previous history of infection in the affected joint within the previous 6 months * Participant has participated in another clinical study involving an investigational product (IP) or device within 30 days prior to study enrollment or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving an IP or device during the course of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at Day 2 Post-operativelyPre-operative and 2 days post-operatively
Proportion of Participants Who Have Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product (IP)Throughout the study period, 1 year and 4 months* Proportion of Participants who have serious injuries (SIs) related to IP * Proportion of Participants who have non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) related to IP

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 1Pre-operative and day 1 post-operativelyParticipants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hct levels.
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 2Pre-operative and day 2 post-operatively
Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 3Pre-operative and day 3 post-operatively
Total Tourniquet TimeIntra-operatively (on day of surgery = Day 0)Measured from the time point of the tourniquet inflation to deflation using the same watch/clock
Amount of FLOSEAL AppliedIntra-operatively (Day 0)
Duration of SurgeryTime from first incision to complete wound closure (Day 0)
Transfusion Requirements - Packed Red Blood CellsIntra-operatively (Day 0) thru Postoperative Day 3
Total Drain Output at Day 1 Post-operatively1 day post-operatively
Pain Management - Number of Days When Pain Medication Was UsedPre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0); and post-operatively daily thru week 6Each participant kept a knee pain management diary. The diary was used to document the pain medication taken on a daily basis. While the participants were hospitalized, either they filled out the diary, or study team members collected the pain diary data and filled out the diary.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresPre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Day 3, Week 1, 2 and 6Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Day 3Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Day 3Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 1Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 1Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 2Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 2Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 6Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 6Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresPre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0), and post-operatively at Day 3 and Week 1, 2 and 6A well-validated scale to reflect problems in people with lower limb issues. 1. Pain scale (5 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme pain) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater pain. The overall pain scale = 0 (no pain) to 50 (extreme pain) 2. Stiffness scale (2 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme stiffness) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater stiffness. The overall stiffness scale = 0 (no stiffness) to 20 (extreme stiffness) 3. Physical Activity Difficulty (PAD) scale (17 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme PAD) is used to grade each item, with higher scores indicating greater PAD. The overall PAD scale = 0 (no PAD) to 170 (extreme PAD) Averages calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above and dividing by total number of items, range = 0 (no issues) to 10 (extreme issues). Total Scores calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above, range = 0 (no issues) to 240 (extreme issues) Postoperative (Postop)
Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 1 Post-operativelyPre-operative and day 1 post-operatively
Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Preoperative, and Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. Scores were included where data was available.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Baseline and Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. Scores were included where data was available. Change in SF-36 Scores From Baseline = (Postoperative Week 1,2, or 6 Scores) - (Baseline Scores).
Length of Hospital StayFrom the day of hospitalization to the day of discharge
Proportion of Participants With Transfusion RequirementsIntra-operative
Proportion of Participants With Wound Complications (ie, Hematoma, Cellulitis, Dehiscence, Superficial or Deep Infection, and Persistent Drainage)Day 0; Post-operative Days 1, 3 and Weeks 1, 2, 6
Proportion of Participants With Any Adverse Events or Serious Injuries During or After SurgeryDay 0; Post-operative Days 1, 3 and Weeks 1, 2, 6
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical Therapist60 daysThe number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without Assistance60 daysThe number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walker60 daysThe number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking Cane60 daysThe number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Wheelchair60 daysThe number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)60 daysThe number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of Bed60 daysThe number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to Walk60 daysThe number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day
Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresPre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0), and post-operatively at Day 3 and Week 1, 2 and 6A well-validated scale to reflect problems in people with lower limb issues. 1. Pain scale (5 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme pain) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater pain. The overall pain scale = 0 (no pain) to 50 (extreme pain) 2. Stiffness scale (2 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme stiffness) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater stiffness. The overall stiffness scale = 0 (no stiffness) to 20 (extreme stiffness) 3. Physical Activity Difficulty (PAD) scale (17 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme PAD) is used to grade each item, with higher scores indicating greater PAD. The overall PAD scale = 0 (no PAD) to 170 (extreme PAD) Averages calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above and dividing by total number of items, range = 0 (no issues) to 10 (extreme issues). Total Scores calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above, range = 0 (no issues) to 240 (extreme issues). Postoperative (Postop)
Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 3 Post-operativelyPre-operative and day 3 post-operativelyParticipants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hgb levels.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled at 12 clinical sites in the United States, beginning October 2011

Pre-assignment details

137 participants were enrolled and screened. 5 were screen failures. 14 withdrew prior to surgery (1 physician decision, 4 study terminated, 8 withdrawn by participant, 1 sponsor educator not available). 12 were run-in participants. Therefore, 106 of the 137 enrolled were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care (SoC)
SoC: conventional hemostatic techniques such as cautery and manual compression
53
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC) - Non-Run-In
FLOSEAL will be applied topically to areas of the knee where bleeding is observed. FLOSEAL consists of bovine-derived gelatin granules and a human plasma-derived thrombin component. Standard of Care: Conventional hemostatic techniques, such as cautery and manual compression
53
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC) - Run-In
Run-In = The first participant who qualified for surgery at each site was treated with FLOSEAL + SoC to allow the investigator to familiarize with the study procedures and the use of FLOSEAL. FLOSEAL will be applied topically to areas of the knee where bleeding is observed. FLOSEAL consists of bovine-derived gelatin granules and a human plasma-derived thrombin component. Standard of Care: Conventional hemostatic techniques, such as cautery and manual compression
12
Total118

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyMissed week 6 assessments111
Overall StudyPhysician Decision001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard of Care (SoC)FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC) - Non-Run-InFLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC) - Run-InTotal
Age, Continuous66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.09
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.73
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.49
64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.14
Region of Enrollment
United States
53 participants53 participants12 participants118 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants29 Participants7 Participants65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants24 Participants5 Participants53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 653 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 656 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at Day 2 Post-operatively

Time frame: Pre-operative and 2 days post-operatively

Population: Full Analysis Set~Participants who required a transfusion prior to the primary outcome assessment of Hgb level at postoperative Day 2 were excluded from the primary outcome analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at Day 2 Post-operatively-3.73 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.497
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Level at Day 2 Post-operatively-3.70 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.205
p-value: 0.453one-sided, two-sample t-test
Primary

Proportion of Participants Who Have Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product (IP)

* Proportion of Participants who have serious injuries (SIs) related to IP * Proportion of Participants who have non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs) related to IP

Time frame: Throughout the study period, 1 year and 4 months

Population: Safety Analysis Set~Note: The FLOSEAL (+ Standard of Care (SoC)) Arm/Group Includes the 12 Run-In participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants Who Have Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product (IP)Participants who have SIs related to IP0.00 Proportion of participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants Who Have Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product (IP)Participants who have non-SAEs related to IP0.02 Proportion of participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants Who Have Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product (IP)Participants who have SIs related to IP0.00 Proportion of participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants Who Have Adverse Events Related to Investigational Product (IP)Participants who have non-SAEs related to IP0.00 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Amount of FLOSEAL Applied

Time frame: Intra-operatively (Day 0)

Population: Safety Analysis Set~Note: The FLOSEAL (+ Standard of Care (SoC)) Arm/Group Includes the 15 Run-In participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Amount of FLOSEAL Applied18.1 mLStandard Deviation 5.52
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Scores

A well-validated scale to reflect problems in people with lower limb issues. 1. Pain scale (5 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme pain) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater pain. The overall pain scale = 0 (no pain) to 50 (extreme pain) 2. Stiffness scale (2 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme stiffness) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater stiffness. The overall stiffness scale = 0 (no stiffness) to 20 (extreme stiffness) 3. Physical Activity Difficulty (PAD) scale (17 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme PAD) is used to grade each item, with higher scores indicating greater PAD. The overall PAD scale = 0 (no PAD) to 170 (extreme PAD) Averages calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above and dividing by total number of items, range = 0 (no issues) to 10 (extreme issues). Total Scores calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above, range = 0 (no issues) to 240 (extreme issues). Postoperative (Postop)

Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0), and post-operatively at Day 3 and Week 1, 2 and 6

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Stiffness (N= 41, 40)-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Total Score (N= 25, 28)-55.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.91
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Total Score (N= 18, 24)-22.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 57.04
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Pain (N= 49, 47)-18.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.46
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Pain (N= 41, 41)-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.54
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Stiffness (N= 49, 46)-6.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.54
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Pain (N= 41, 43)-11.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Physical Functioning (N= 42, 40)-63.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.27
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Physical Functioning (N= 18, 24)-16.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.58
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Average (N= 42, 39)-3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Stiffness (N= 41, 42)-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.84
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Total Score (N= 42, 39)-87.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.8
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Total Score (N= 15, 16)0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.66
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Pain (N= 46, 42)-7.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.72
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Physical Functioning (N= 26, 28)-40.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.65
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Stiffness (N= 46, 42)-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.79
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Average (N= 18, 24)-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Physical Functioning (N= 15, 16)4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.93
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Average (N= 25, 28)-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Average (N= 15, 16)-0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Average (N= 25, 28)-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Total Score (N= 15, 16)19.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 54.7
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Pain (N= 41, 41)-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.23
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Stiffness (N= 41, 40)0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.05
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Physical Functioning (N= 18, 24)-7.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.39
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Average (N= 18, 24)-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 1: Total Score (N= 18, 24)-6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 54.6
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Pain (N= 41, 43)-7.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.98
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Stiffness (N= 41, 42)-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.39
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Physical Functioning (N= 26, 28)-18.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 43.74
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Average (N= 15, 16)0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 2: Total Score (N= 25, 28)-24.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 57.34
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Pain (N= 49, 47)-15.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Stiffness (N= 49, 46)-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.34
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Physical Functioning (N= 42, 40)-48.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.69
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Average (N= 42, 39)-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Week 6: Total Score (N= 42, 39)-66.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.9
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Pain (N= 46, 42)-5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.43
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Stiffness (N= 46, 42)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline at Postoperative Day 3, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) ScoresChange Day 3: Physical Functioning (N= 15, 16)17.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.37
Comparison: Change Day 3: Painp-value: 0.534two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Day 3: Stiffnessp-value: 0.269two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Day 3: Physical Functioningp-value: 0.693two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Day 3: Average Scorep-value: 0.343two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Day 3: Total Scorep-value: 0.343two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Painp-value: 0.978two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Stiffnessp-value: 0.709two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Physical Functioningp-value: 0.594two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Average Scorep-value: 0.501two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Total Scorep-value: 0.501two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Painp-value: 0.171two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Stiffnessp-value: 0.077two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Physical Functioningp-value: 0.026two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Average Scorep-value: 0.012two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Total Scorep-value: 0.012two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Painp-value: 0.126two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Stiffnessp-value: 0.044two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
p-value: 0.153two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Average Scorep-value: 0.134two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Total Scorep-value: 0.134two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 1

Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hct levels.

Time frame: Pre-operative and day 1 post-operatively

Population: Full Analysis Set~Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hct levels.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 1-9.0 percentStandard Deviation 3.85
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 1-8.8 percentStandard Deviation 3.92
p-value: 0.561one-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 2

Time frame: Pre-operative and day 2 post-operatively

Population: Full Analysis Set~Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hct levels.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 2-11.2 percentStandard Deviation 4.67
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 2-10.6 percentStandard Deviation 4.21
p-value: 0.356one-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 3

Time frame: Pre-operative and day 3 post-operatively

Population: Full Analysis Set~Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hct levels.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 3-11.1 percentStandard Deviation 4.46
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (Hct) at Postoperative Day 3-11.0 percentStandard Deviation 4.31
p-value: 0.533one-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6

Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. Scores were included where data was available. Change in SF-36 Scores From Baseline = (Postoperative Week 1,2, or 6 Scores) - (Baseline Scores).

Time frame: Baseline and Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: PF (N= 39, 38)1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.21
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: GH (N= 40, 40)0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.23
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: RP (N= 36, 42)-4.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.48
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: RE (N= 48, 47)5.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: BP (N= 40, 42)2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: VT (N= 39, 40)-5.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.66
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: GH (N= 39, 42)-0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.26
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: PF (N= 38, 37)-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: VT (N= 39, 42)-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.07
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: SF (N= 40, 40)-10.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.75
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: SF (N= 40, 42)-3.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.95
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: PCS (N= 45, 46)10.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.43
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: RE (N= 34, 41)-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.89
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: RE (N= 36, 38)-3.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.85
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: MH (N= 39, 42)0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.36
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: RP (N= 38, 37)-8.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.05
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: PCS (N= 32, 37)-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.76
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: MH (N= 39, 40)-2.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.79
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: MCS (N= 32, 37)0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: MH (N= 48, 47)5.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: PF (N= 46, 46)12.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.34
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: PCS (N= 34, 37)-3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.97
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: RP (N= 49, 47)8.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.84
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: BP (N= 40, 40)-2.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.93
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: BP (N= 49, 47)12.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.43
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: MCS (N= 34, 37)-5.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: GH (N= 48, 47)1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.33
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: MCS (N= 45, 46)2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.53
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: VT (N= 48, 47)5.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: SF (N= 49, 47)5.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.62
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: VT (N= 48, 47)1.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.95
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: SF (N= 49, 47)2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.64
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: RE (N= 48, 47)0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.76
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: MH (N= 48, 47)2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.52
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: PCS (N= 45, 46)7.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.62
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: MCS (N= 45, 46)-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.97
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: PF (N= 38, 37)-2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: RP (N= 38, 37)-6.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.39
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: BP (N= 40, 40)-3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.65
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: GH (N= 40, 40)-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.68
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: VT (N= 39, 40)-5.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.81
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: SF (N= 40, 40)-6.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: RE (N= 36, 38)-6.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.12
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: MH (N= 39, 40)-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.26
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: PCS (N= 34, 37)-3.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.73
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: MCS (N= 34, 37)-4.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.13
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: PF (N= 39, 38)-1.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.07
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: RP (N= 36, 42)-6.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.08
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: BP (N= 40, 42)-1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.39
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: GH (N= 39, 42)1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.92
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: VT (N= 39, 42)-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.39
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: SF (N= 40, 42)-6.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.14
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: RE (N= 34, 41)-6.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.08
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: MH (N= 39, 42)0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.83
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: PCS (N= 32, 37)-2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.89
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: MCS (N= 32, 37)-2.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.83
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: PF (N= 46, 46)8.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.89
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: RP (N= 49, 47)5.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: BP (N= 49, 47)7.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in SF-36 Scores at Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: GH (N= 48, 47)2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.73
Comparison: Change Week 1: Physical Functioningp-value: 0.962two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Role-Physicalp-value: 0.714two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Bodily Painp-value: 0.668two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: General Healthp-value: 0.556two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Vitalityp-value: 0.705two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Social Functioningp-value: 0.122two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Role-Emotionalp-value: 0.254two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Mental Healthp-value: 0.5two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Physical Component Summaryp-value: 0.849two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 1: Mental Component Summaryp-value: 0.959Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Change Week 2: Physical Functioningp-value: 0.574two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Role-Physicalp-value: 0.524two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Bodily Painp-value: 0.049two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: General Healthp-value: 0.447two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Vitalityp-value: 0.823two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Social Functioningp-value: 0.661two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Role-Emotionalp-value: 0.086two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Mental Healthp-value: 0.635two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Physical Component Summaryp-value: 0.481two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 2: Mental Component Summaryp-value: 0.14two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Physical Functioningp-value: 0.107two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Role-Physicalp-value: 0.298two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Bodily Painp-value: 0.071two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: General Healthp-value: 0.94two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Vitalityp-value: 0.293two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Social Functioningp-value: 0.265two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Role-Emotionalp-value: 0.036two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Mental Healthp-value: 0.307two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Physical Component Summaryp-value: 0.448two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Comparison: Change Week 6: Mental Component Summaryp-value: 0.255two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Day 3

Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.

Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Day 3

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Day 3-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Day 3-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
p-value: 0.058two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 1

Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.

Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 1

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 1-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 10.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
p-value: 0.421two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 2

Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.

Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 2

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 2-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 2-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
p-value: 0.161two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 6

Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.

Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 6-3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at Postoperative Week 6-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
p-value: 0.016two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 1 Post-operatively

Time frame: Pre-operative and day 1 post-operatively

Population: Full Analysis Set~Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hgb levels.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 1 Post-operatively-3.02 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.069
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 1 Post-operatively-3.15 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.217
p-value: 0.708one-sided, two-sample t-test
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 3 Post-operatively

Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hgb levels.

Time frame: Pre-operative and day 3 post-operatively

Population: Full Analysis Set~Participants who required a transfusion prior to the outcome assessments were excluded from the efficacy analyses of Hgb levels.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 3 Post-operatively-3.81 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.427
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Change in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels at Day 3 Post-operatively-3.84 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.324
p-value: 0.527one-sided, two-sample t-test
Secondary

Duration of Surgery

Time frame: Time from first incision to complete wound closure (Day 0)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Duration of Surgery74.5 minutesStandard Deviation 19.73
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Duration of Surgery76.9 minutesStandard Deviation 17.33
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay

Time frame: From the day of hospitalization to the day of discharge

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Length of Hospital Stay3.52 DaysStandard Deviation 0.857
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Length of Hospital Stay3.38 DaysStandard Deviation 0.918
p-value: 0.052two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Pain Management - Number of Days When Pain Medication Was Used

Each participant kept a knee pain management diary. The diary was used to document the pain medication taken on a daily basis. While the participants were hospitalized, either they filled out the diary, or study team members collected the pain diary data and filled out the diary.

Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0); and post-operatively daily thru week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Pain Management - Number of Days When Pain Medication Was UsedAll pain medications28.7 daysStandard Deviation 13.71
Standard of Care (SoC)Pain Management - Number of Days When Pain Medication Was UsedNarcotics25.1 daysStandard Deviation 13.66
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Pain Management - Number of Days When Pain Medication Was UsedAll pain medications31.9 daysStandard Deviation 12.72
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Pain Management - Number of Days When Pain Medication Was UsedNarcotics30.3 daysStandard Deviation 12.84
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Any Adverse Events or Serious Injuries During or After Surgery

Time frame: Day 0; Post-operative Days 1, 3 and Weeks 1, 2, 6

Population: Safety Analysis Set~Note: The FLOSEAL (+ Standard of Care (SoC)) Arm/Group Includes the 12 Run-In participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants With Any Adverse Events or Serious Injuries During or After Surgery0.26 Proportion of participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants With Any Adverse Events or Serious Injuries During or After Surgery0.36 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Transfusion Requirements

Time frame: Intra-operative

Population: Safety Analysis Set~Note: The FLOSEAL (+ Standard of Care (SoC)) Arm/Group Includes the 12 Run-In participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants With Transfusion Requirements0.25 Proportion of participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants With Transfusion Requirements0.19 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Wound Complications (ie, Hematoma, Cellulitis, Dehiscence, Superficial or Deep Infection, and Persistent Drainage)

Time frame: Day 0; Post-operative Days 1, 3 and Weeks 1, 2, 6

Population: Safety Analysis Set~Note: The FLOSEAL (+ Standard of Care (SoC)) Arm/Group Includes the 12 Run-In participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants With Wound Complications (ie, Hematoma, Cellulitis, Dehiscence, Superficial or Deep Infection, and Persistent Drainage)0.03 Proportion of participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Proportion of Participants With Wound Complications (ie, Hematoma, Cellulitis, Dehiscence, Superficial or Deep Infection, and Persistent Drainage)0.06 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6

Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. Scores were included where data was available.

Time frame: Preoperative, and Postoperative Weeks 1, 2, and 6

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: PF (N= 39, 37)23.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.88
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline RP (N= 50, 47)32.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.87
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline BP (N= 50, 47)35.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.58
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline GH (N= 49, 47)52.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.34
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline VT (N= 49, 47)47.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.73
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline SF (N= 50, 47)42.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.73
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline RE (N= 49, 47)40.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.11
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline MH (N= 49, 47)48.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.25
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline PCS (N= 48, 47)31.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.11
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline MCS (N= 48, 47)52.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.46
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline PF (N= 49, 47)24.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.37
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: RP (N= 38, 37)25.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.02
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: BP (N= 40, 40)33.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.99
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: GH (N= 41, 40)52.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.43
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: VT (N= 40, 40)43.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.02
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: SF (N= 40, 40)33.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: RE (N= 37, 38)36.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.03
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: MH (N= 40, 40)48.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.35
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: PCS (N= 36, 37)28.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.26
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: MCS (N= 36, 37)47.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.38
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: PF (N= 40, 38)26.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: RP (N= 36, 42)28.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.47
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: BP (N= 40, 42)38.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.34
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: GH (N= 40, 42)52.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.91
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: VT (N= 40, 42)47.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.55
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: SF (N= 40, 42)39.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: RE (N= 35, 41)38.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.81
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: MH (N= 40, 42)50.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: PCS (N= 33, 37)30.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.72
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: MCS (N= 33, 37)51.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: PF (N= 47, 46)37.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.13
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: RP (N= 49, 47)41.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.05
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: BP (N= 49, 47)47.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: GH (N= 49, 47)54.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.41
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: VT (N= 49, 47)53.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.31
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: SF (N= 49, 47)48.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: RE (N= 49, 47)46.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.52
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: MH (N= 49, 47)54.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.96
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: PCS (N= 47, 46)41.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.87
Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: MCS (N= 47, 46)54.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.96
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: MH (N= 49, 47)52.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.24
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline PF (N= 49, 47)25.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.81
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: PF (N= 40, 38)24.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.06
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline RP (N= 50, 47)33.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: PF (N= 47, 46)34.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline BP (N= 50, 47)36.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: RP (N= 36, 42)26.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.35
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline GH (N= 49, 47)50.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.83
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: SF (N= 49, 47)47.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.94
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline VT (N= 49, 47)47.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.98
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: BP (N= 40, 42)35.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.01
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline SF (N= 50, 47)44.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.18
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: RP (N= 49, 47)38.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.03
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline RE (N= 49, 47)45.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.29
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: GH (N= 40, 42)51.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.59
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline MH (N= 49, 47)50.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.32
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: MCS (N= 47, 46)55.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.32
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline PCS (N= 48, 47)30.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.41
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: VT (N= 40, 42)45.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Baseline MCS (N= 48, 47)55.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.28
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: BP (N= 49, 47)43.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.43
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: PF (N= 39, 37)22.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.16
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: SF (N= 40, 42)37.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.82
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: RP (N= 38, 37)26.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.99
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: RE (N= 49, 47)46.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.57
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: BP (N= 40, 40)33.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.09
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: RE (N= 35, 41)40.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.97
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: GH (N= 41, 40)50.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.09
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: GH (N= 49, 47)52.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.44
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: VT (N= 40, 40)42.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.64
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: MH (N= 40, 42)51.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.32
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: SF (N= 40, 40)37.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.12
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: PCS (N= 33, 37)27.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.33
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: RE (N= 37, 38)39.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.97
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: PCS (N= 47, 46)38.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.29
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: MH (N= 40, 40)50.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.96
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 6: VT (N= 49, 47)49.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.63
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: PCS (N= 36, 37)26.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.16
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 2: MCS (N= 33, 37)53.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.89
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Quality of Life (Utilizing the Short Form 36 Health Survey [SF-36]) Measured Preoperatively (Baseline), and Postoperatively at Week 1, 2, and 6Change Week 1: MCS (N= 36, 37)51.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.18
Secondary

Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of Bed

The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 31 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 9 (N= 37, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 32 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 17 (N= 38, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 33 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 2 (N= 47, 50)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 34 (N= 37, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 18 (N= 40, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 35 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 10 (N= 34, 40)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 36 (N= 38, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 19 (N= 41, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 37 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 6 (N= 42, 42)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 38 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 20 (N= 40, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 39 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 11 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 40 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 21 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 41 (N= 32, 36)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 4 (N= 46, 48)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 42 (N= 31, 35)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 22 (N= 39, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 43 (N= 25, 31)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 12 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 44 (N= 6, 8)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 23 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 7 (N= 40, 42)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 24 (N= 40, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 13 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 48 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 25 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 49 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 3 (N= 46, 50)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 50 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 26 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 51 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 14 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 27 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 8 (N= 38, 42)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 54 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 28 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 15 (N= 40, 42)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 56 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 29 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 57 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 5 (N= 42, 44)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 58 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 30 (N= 36, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 59 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 16 (N= 40, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 60 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 1 (N= 47, 50)23 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 60 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 1 (N= 47, 50)27 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 2 (N= 47, 50)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 3 (N= 46, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 4 (N= 46, 48)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 5 (N= 42, 44)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 6 (N= 42, 42)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 7 (N= 40, 42)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 8 (N= 38, 42)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 9 (N= 37, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 10 (N= 34, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 11 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 12 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 13 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 14 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 15 (N= 40, 42)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 16 (N= 40, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 17 (N= 38, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 18 (N= 40, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 19 (N= 41, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 20 (N= 40, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 21 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 22 (N= 39, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 23 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 24 (N= 40, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 25 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 26 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 27 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 28 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 29 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 30 (N= 36, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 31 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 32 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 33 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 34 (N= 37, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 35 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 36 (N= 38, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 37 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 38 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 39 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 40 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 41 (N= 32, 36)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 42 (N= 31, 35)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 43 (N= 25, 31)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 44 (N= 6, 8)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 48 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 49 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 50 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 51 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 54 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 56 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 57 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 58 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Cannot Get Out of BedDay 59 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
Secondary

Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to Walk

The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 31 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 9 (N= 37, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 32 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 17 (N= 38, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 33 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 2 (N= 47, 50)13 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 34 (N= 37, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 18 (N= 40, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 35 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 10 (N= 34, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 36 (N= 38, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 19 (N= 41,41 )0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 37 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 6 (N= 40, 42)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 38 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 20 (N= 40, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 39 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 11 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 40 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 21 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 41 (N= 32, 36)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 4 (N= 46, 48)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 42 (N= 31, 35)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 22 (N= 39, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 43 (N= 25, 31)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 12 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 44 (N= 6, 8)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 23 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 7 (N= 40, 42)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 24 (N= 40, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 13 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 48 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 25 (N= 39, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 49 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 3 (N= 46, 50)13 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 50 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 26 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 51 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 14 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 27 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 8 (N= 38, 42)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 54 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 28 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 15 (N= 40, 42)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 56 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 29 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 57 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 5 (N= 42, 44)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 58 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 30 (N= 36, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 59 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 16 (N= 40, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 60 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 1 (N= 47, 50)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 60 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 1 (N= 47, 50)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 2 (N= 47, 50)12 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 3 (N= 46, 50)13 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 4 (N= 46, 48)12 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 5 (N= 42, 44)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 6 (N= 40, 42)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 7 (N= 40, 42)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 8 (N= 38, 42)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 9 (N= 37, 41)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 10 (N= 34, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 11 (N= 36, 41)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 12 (N= 36, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 13 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 14 (N= 39, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 15 (N= 40, 42)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 16 (N= 40, 41)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 17 (N= 38, 41)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 18 (N= 40, 41)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 19 (N= 41,41 )1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 20 (N= 40, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 21 (N= 39, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 22 (N= 39, 41)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 23 (N= 39, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 24 (N= 40, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 25 (N= 39, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 26 (N= 39, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 27 (N= 39, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 28 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 29 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 30 (N= 36, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 31 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 32 (N= 37, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 33 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 34 (N= 37, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 35 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 36 (N= 38, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 37 (N= 36, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 38 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 39 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 40 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 41 (N= 32, 36)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 42 (N= 31, 35)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 43 (N= 25, 31)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 44 (N= 6, 8)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 48 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 49 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 50 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 51 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 54 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 56 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 57 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 58 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Had Someone Helping Them to WalkDay 59 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
Secondary

Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical Therapist

The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 31 (N= 35, 40)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 8 (N= 37, 42)19 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 32 (N= 37, 40)13 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 16 (N= 39, 41)16 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 33 (N= 37, 39)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 1 (N= 45, 48)24 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 34 (N= 37, 39)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 17 (N= 37, 41)20 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 35 (N= 38, 39)13 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 9 (N= 35, 39)13 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 36 (N= 38, 39)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 18 (N= 38, 41)13 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 37 (N= 35, 38)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 5 (N= 39, 42)27 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 38 (N= 35, 41)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 19 (N= 40, 40)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 39 (N= 36, 39)11 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 10 (N= 32, 38)17 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 40 (N= 37, 40)11 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 20 (N= 38, 40)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 41 (N= 32, 36)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 3 (N= 44, 49)43 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 42 (N= 30, 35)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 21 (N= 38, 40)16 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 43 (N= 25, 31)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 22 (N= 38, 41)12 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 44 (N= 6, 7)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 11 (N= 35, 41)12 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 45 (N= 3, 4)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 23 (N= 38, 39)14 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 46 (N= 3, 2)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 6 (N= 35, 39)17 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 24 (N= 39, 39)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 48 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 12 (N= 34, 37)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 49 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 25 (N= 37, 40)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 50 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 2 (N= 45, 49)42 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 51 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 26 (N= 38, 39)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 13 (N= 36, 38)14 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 27 (N= 38, 38)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 54 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 7 (N= 37, 39)20 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 28 (N= 37, 39)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 56 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 14 (N= 39, 36)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 57 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 29 (N= 38, 39)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 58 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 4 (N= 45, 47)41 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 59 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 30 (N= 36, 40)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 60 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 15 (N= 39, 41)21 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 60 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 1 (N= 45, 48)22 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 2 (N= 45, 49)47 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 3 (N= 44, 49)48 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 4 (N= 45, 47)46 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 5 (N= 39, 42)31 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 6 (N= 35, 39)16 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 7 (N= 37, 39)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 8 (N= 37, 42)24 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 9 (N= 35, 39)19 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 10 (N= 32, 38)20 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 11 (N= 35, 41)21 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 12 (N= 34, 37)19 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 13 (N= 36, 38)13 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 14 (N= 39, 36)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 15 (N= 39, 41)24 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 16 (N= 39, 41)20 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 17 (N= 37, 41)21 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 18 (N= 38, 41)21 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 19 (N= 40, 40)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 20 (N= 38, 40)9 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 22 (N= 38, 41)14 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 23 (N= 38, 39)10 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 24 (N= 39, 39)12 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 25 (N= 37, 40)13 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 26 (N= 38, 39)9 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 27 (N= 38, 38)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 28 (N= 37, 39)8 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 29 (N= 38, 39)13 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 30 (N= 36, 40)17 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 31 (N= 35, 40)10 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 32 (N= 37, 40)14 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 33 (N= 37, 39)13 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 34 (N= 37, 39)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 35 (N= 38, 39)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 36 (N= 38, 39)13 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 37 (N= 35, 38)10 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 38 (N= 35, 41)12 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 39 (N= 36, 39)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 40 (N= 37, 40)11 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 41 (N= 32, 36)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 42 (N= 30, 35)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 43 (N= 25, 31)12 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 44 (N= 6, 7)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 45 (N= 3, 4)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 46 (N= 3, 2)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 48 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 49 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 50 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 51 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 54 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 56 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 57 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 58 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 59 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Saw Their Physical TherapistDay 21 (N= 38, 40)10 participants
Secondary

Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without Assistance

The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 31 (N= 37, 40)21 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 9 (N= 37, 41)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 32 (N= 37, 40)23 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 17 (N= 38, 41)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 33 (N= 38, 39)23 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 2 (N= 47, 50)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 34 (N= 37, 39)23 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 18 (N= 40, 41)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 35 (N= 38, 39)23 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 10 (N= 34, 40)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 36 (N= 38, 40)22 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 19 (N= 41, 41)12 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 37 (N= 36, 39)23 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 6 (N= 40, 42)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 38 (N= 36, 41)24 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 20 (N= 40, 40)14 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 39 (N= 36, 39)24 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 11 (N= 36, 41)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 40 (N= 37, 40)25 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 21 (N= 39, 40)14 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 41 (N= 32, 36)23 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 4 (N= 46, 48)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 42 (N= 31, 35)22 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 22 (N= 39, 41)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 43 (N= 25, 31)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 12 (N= 36, 39)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 44 (N= 6, 8)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 23 (N= 39, 40)16 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 45 (N= 3, 4)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 7 (N= 40, 42)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 46 (N= 3, 2)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 24 (N= 40, 39)16 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 13 (N= 38, 39)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 48 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 25 (N= 39, 40)17 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 49 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 3 (N= 46, 50)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 50 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 26 (N= 39, 39)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 51 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 14 (N= 39, 39)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 27 (N= 39, 39)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 53(N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 8 (N= 38, 42)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 54 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 28 (N= 38, 39)19 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 15 (N= 40, 42)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 56 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 29 (N= 38, 39)19 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 57 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 5 (N= 42, 44)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 58 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 30 (N= 36, 40)20 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 59 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 16 (N= 40, 41)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 60 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 1 (N= 47, 50)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 60 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 1 (N= 47, 50)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 2 (N= 47, 50)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 3 (N= 46, 50)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 4 (N= 46, 48)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 5 (N= 42, 44)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 6 (N= 40, 42)4 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 7 (N= 40, 42)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 8 (N= 38, 42)4 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 9 (N= 37, 41)7 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 10 (N= 34, 40)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 11 (N= 36, 41)8 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 12 (N= 36, 39)10 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 13 (N= 38, 39)11 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 14 (N= 39, 39)11 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 15 (N= 40, 42)14 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 16 (N= 40, 41)13 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 17 (N= 38, 41)16 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 18 (N= 40, 41)16 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 19 (N= 41, 41)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 20 (N= 40, 40)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 21 (N= 39, 40)16 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 22 (N= 39, 41)16 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 23 (N= 39, 40)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 24 (N= 40, 39)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 25 (N= 39, 40)20 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 26 (N= 39, 39)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 27 (N= 39, 39)21 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 28 (N= 38, 39)22 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 29 (N= 38, 39)20 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 30 (N= 36, 40)26 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 31 (N= 37, 40)27 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 32 (N= 37, 40)25 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 33 (N= 38, 39)27 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 34 (N= 37, 39)27 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 35 (N= 38, 39)28 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 36 (N= 38, 40)29 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 37 (N= 36, 39)28 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 38 (N= 36, 41)30 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 39 (N= 36, 39)29 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 40 (N= 37, 40)30 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 41 (N= 32, 36)27 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 42 (N= 31, 35)26 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 43 (N= 25, 31)24 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 44 (N= 6, 8)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 45 (N= 3, 4)4 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 46 (N= 3, 2)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 47 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 48 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 49 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 50 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 51 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 52 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 53(N= 1, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 54 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 55 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 56 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 57 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 58 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Able to Walk Without AssistanceDay 59 (N= 0, 1)1 participants
Secondary

Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)

The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 31 (N= 37, 40)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 9 (N= 37, 41)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 32 (N= 37, 40)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 17 (N= 38, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 33 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 2 (N= 47, 50)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 34 (N= 37, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 18 (N= 40, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 35 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 10 (N= 34, 40)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 36 (N= 38, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 19 (N= 41, 41)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 37 (N= 36, 39)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 6 (N= 40, 42)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 38 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 20 (N= 40, 40)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 39 (N= 36, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 11 (N= 36, 41)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 40 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 21 (N= 39, 40)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 41 (N= 32, 36)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 4 (N= 46, 48)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 42 (N= 31, 35)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 22 (N= 39, 41)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 43 (N= 25, 31)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 12 (N= 36, 39)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 44 (N= 6, 8)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 23 (N= 39, 40)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 7 (N= 40, 42)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 24 (N= 40, 39)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 13 (N= 38, 39)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 48 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 25 (N= 39, 40)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 49 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 3 (N= 46, 50)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 50 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 26 (N= 39, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 51 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 14 (N= 39, 39)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 27 (N= 39, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 8 (N= 38, 42)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 54 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 28 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 15 (N= 40, 42)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 56 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 29 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 57 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 5 (N= 42, 44)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 58 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 30 (N= 36, 40)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 59 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 16 (N= 40, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 60 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 1 (N= 47, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 60 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 1 (N= 47, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 2 (N= 47, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 3 (N= 46, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 4 (N= 46, 48)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 5 (N= 42, 44)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 6 (N= 40, 42)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 7 (N= 40, 42)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 8 (N= 38, 42)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 9 (N= 37, 41)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 10 (N= 34, 40)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 11 (N= 36, 41)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 12 (N= 36, 39)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 13 (N= 38, 39)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 14 (N= 39, 39)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 15 (N= 40, 42)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 16 (N= 40, 41)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 17 (N= 38, 41)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 18 (N= 40, 41)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 19 (N= 41, 41)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 20 (N= 40, 40)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 21 (N= 39, 40)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 22 (N= 39, 41)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 23 (N= 39, 40)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 24 (N= 40, 39)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 25 (N= 39, 40)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 26 (N= 39, 39)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 27 (N= 39, 39)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 28 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 29 (N= 38, 39)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 30 (N= 36, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 31 (N= 37, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 32 (N= 37, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 33 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 34 (N= 37, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 35 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 36 (N= 38, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 37 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 38 (N= 36, 41)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 39 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 40 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 41 (N= 32, 36)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 42 (N= 31, 35)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 43 (N= 25, 31)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 44 (N= 6, 8)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 48 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 49 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 50 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 51 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 54 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 56 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 57 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 58 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Another Walking Device (Other Than a: Walker, Walking Cane, or Wheelchair)Day 59 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
Secondary

Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walker

The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 31 (N= 37, 40)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 9 (N= 37, 41)26 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 32 (N= 37, 40)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 17 (N= 38, 41)17 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 33 (N= 38, 39)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 2 (N= 47, 50)39 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 34 (N= 37, 39)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 18 (N= 40, 41)17 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 35 (N= 38, 39)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 10 (N= 34, 40)23 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 36 (N= 38, 40)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 19 (N= 41,41 )20 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 37 (N= 36, 39)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 6 (N= 40, 42)34 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 38 (N= 36, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 20 (N= 40, 40)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 39 (N= 36, 39)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 11 (N= 36, 41)24 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 40 (N= 37, 40)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 21 (N= 39, 40)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 41 (N= 32, 36)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 4 (N= 46, 48)38 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 42 (N= 31, 35)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 22 (N= 39, 41)12 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 43 (N= 25, 31)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 12 (N= 36, 39)24 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 44 (N= 6, 8)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 23 (N= 39, 40)12 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 7 (N= 40, 42)32 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 24 (N= 40, 39)12 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 13 (N= 38, 39)26 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 48 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 25 (N= 39, 40)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 49(N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 3 (N= 46, 50)38 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 50 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 26 (N= 39, 39)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 51 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 14 (N= 39, 39)23 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 52 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 27 (N= 39, 39)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 53 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 8 (N= 38, 42)31 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 54 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 28 (N= 38, 39)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 55 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 15 (N= 40, 42)19 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 56 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 29 (N= 38, 39)8 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 57 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 5 (N= 42, 44)33 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 58 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 30 (N= 36, 40)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 59 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 16 (N= 40, 41)19 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 60 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 1 (N= 47, 50)17 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 60 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 1 (N= 47, 50)20 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 2 (N= 47, 50)41 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 3 (N= 46, 50)46 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 4 (N= 46, 48)44 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 5 (N= 42, 44)40 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 6 (N= 40, 42)38 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 7 (N= 40, 42)38 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 8 (N= 38, 42)36 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 9 (N= 37, 41)34 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 10 (N= 34, 40)33 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 11 (N= 36, 41)32 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 12 (N= 36, 39)27 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 13 (N= 38, 39)22 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 14 (N= 39, 39)21 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 15 (N= 40, 42)22 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 16 (N= 40, 41)23 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 17 (N= 38, 41)21 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 18 (N= 40, 41)22 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 19 (N= 41,41 )20 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 20 (N= 40, 40)19 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 21 (N= 39, 40)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 22 (N= 39, 41)17 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 23 (N= 39, 40)16 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 24 (N= 40, 39)14 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 25 (N= 39, 40)11 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 26 (N= 39, 39)9 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 27 (N= 39, 39)7 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 28 (N= 38, 39)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 29 (N= 38, 39)7 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 30 (N= 36, 40)7 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 31 (N= 37, 40)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 32 (N= 37, 40)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 33 (N= 38, 39)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 34 (N= 37, 39)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 35 (N= 38, 39)7 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 36 (N= 38, 40)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 37 (N= 36, 39)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 38 (N= 36, 41)4 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 39 (N= 36, 39)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 40 (N= 37, 40)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 41 (N= 32, 36)4 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 42 (N= 31, 35)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 43 (N= 25, 31)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 44 (N= 6, 8)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 48 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 49(N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 50 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 51 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 54 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 56 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 57 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 58 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WalkerDay 59 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
Secondary

Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking Cane

The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 31 (N= 37, 40)17 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 9 (N= 37, 41)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 32 (N= 37, 40)14 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 17 (N= 38, 41)19 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 33 (N= 38, 39)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 2 (N= 47, 50)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 34 (N= 37, 39)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 18 (N= 40, 41)19 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 35 (N= 38, 39)14 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 10 (N= 34, 40)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 36 (N= 38, 40)15 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 19 (N= 41, 41)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 37 (N= 36, 39)13 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 6 (N= 40, 42)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 38 (N= 36, 41)10 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 20 (N= 40, 40)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 39 (N= 36, 39)13 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 11 (N= 36, 41)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 40 (N= 37, 40)11 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 21 (N= 39, 40)17 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 41 (N= 32, 36)9 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 4 (N= 46, 48)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 42 (N= 31, 35)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 22 (N= 39, 41)20 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 43 (N= 25, 31)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 12 (N= 36, 39)11 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 44 (N= 6, 8)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 23 (N= 39, 40)20 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 45 (N= 3, 4)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 7 (N= 40, 42)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 46 (N= 3, 2)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 24 (N= 40, 39)20 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 47 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 13 (N= 38, 39)12 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 48 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 25 (N= 39, 40)19 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 49 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 3 (N= 46, 50)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 50 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 26 (N= 39, 39)21 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 51 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 14 (N= 39, 39)16 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 27 (N= 39, 39)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 8 (N= 38, 42)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 54 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 28 (N= 38, 39)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 55 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 15 (N= 40, 42)18 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 56 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 29 (N= 38, 39)17 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 57 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 5 (N= 42, 44)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 58 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 30 (N= 36, 40)16 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 59 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 16 (N= 40, 41)20 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 60 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 1 (N= 47, 50)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 60 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 1 (N= 47, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 2 (N= 47, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 3 (N= 46, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 4 (N= 46, 48)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 5 (N= 42, 44)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 6 (N= 40, 42)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 7 (N= 40, 42)4 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 8 (N= 38, 42)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 9 (N= 37, 41)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 10 (N= 34, 40)6 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 11 (N= 36, 41)7 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 12 (N= 36, 39)10 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 13 (N= 38, 39)14 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 14 (N= 39, 39)12 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 15 (N= 40, 42)14 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 16 (N= 40, 41)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 17 (N= 38, 41)17 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 18 (N= 40, 41)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 19 (N= 41, 41)19 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 20 (N= 40, 40)22 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 21 (N= 39, 40)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 22 (N= 39, 41)20 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 23 (N= 39, 40)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 24 (N= 40, 39)17 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 25 (N= 39, 40)19 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 26 (N= 39, 39)21 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 27 (N= 39, 39)20 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 28 (N= 38, 39)19 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 29 (N= 38, 39)19 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 30 (N= 36, 40)17 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 31 (N= 37, 40)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 32 (N= 37, 40)18 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 33 (N= 38, 39)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 34 (N= 37, 39)16 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 35 (N= 38, 39)13 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 36 (N= 38, 40)17 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 37 (N= 36, 39)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 38 (N= 36, 41)16 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 39 (N= 36, 39)14 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 40 (N= 37, 40)15 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 41 (N= 32, 36)11 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 42 (N= 31, 35)11 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 43 (N= 25, 31)9 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 44 (N= 6, 8)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 47 (N= 1, 1)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 48 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 49 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 50 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 51 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 53 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 54 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 56 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 57 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 58 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Walking CaneDay 59 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
Secondary

Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a Wheelchair

The number of participants responding affirmative in their rehabilitation diaries for each day

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 31 (N= 37, 40)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 9 (N= 37, 41)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 32 (N= 37, 40)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 17 (N= 38, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 33 (N= 38, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 2 (N= 47, 50)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 34 (N= 37, 39)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 18 (N= 40, 41)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 35 (N= 38, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 10 (N= 34, 40)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 36 (N= 38, 40)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 19 (N= 41, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 37 (N= 36, 39)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 6 (N= 40, 42)5 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 38 (N= 36, 41)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 20 (N= 40, 40)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 39 (N= 36, 39)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 11 (N= 36, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 40 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 21 (N= 39, 40)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 41 (N= 32, 36)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 4 (N= 46, 48)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 42 (N= 31, 35)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 22 (N= 39, 41)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 43 (N= 25, 31)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 12 (N= 36, 39)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 44 (N= 6,8 )0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 23 (N= 39, 40)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 7 (N= 40, 42)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 24 (N= 40, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 13 (N= 38, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 48 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 25 (N= 39, 40)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 49 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 3 (N= 46, 50)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 50 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 26 (N= 39, 39)1 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 51 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 14 (N= 39, 39)3 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 27 (N= 39, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 53(N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 8 (N= 38, 42)6 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 54 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 28 (N= 38, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 15 (N= 40, 42)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 56 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 29 (N= 38, 39)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 57 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 5 (N= 42, 44)7 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 58 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 30 (N= 36, 40)2 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 59 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 16 (N= 40, 41)4 participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 60 (N= 0, 1)NA participants
Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 1 (N= 47, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 60 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 1 (N= 47, 50)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 2 (N= 47, 50)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 3 (N= 46, 50)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 4 (N= 46, 48)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 5 (N= 42, 44)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 6 (N= 40, 42)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 7 (N= 40, 42)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 8 (N= 38, 42)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 9 (N= 37, 41)4 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 10 (N= 34, 40)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 11 (N= 36, 41)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 12 (N= 36, 39)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 13 (N= 38, 39)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 14 (N= 39, 39)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 15 (N= 40, 42)5 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 16 (N= 40, 41)3 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 17 (N= 38, 41)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 18 (N= 40, 41)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 19 (N= 41, 41)2 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 20 (N= 40, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 21 (N= 39, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 22 (N= 39, 41)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 23 (N= 39, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 24 (N= 40, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 25 (N= 39, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 26 (N= 39, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 27 (N= 39, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 28 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 29 (N= 38, 39)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 30 (N= 36, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 31 (N= 37, 40)1 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 32 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 33 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 34 (N= 37, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 35 (N= 38, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 36 (N= 38, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 37 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 38 (N= 36, 41)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 39 (N= 36, 39)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 40 (N= 37, 40)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 41 (N= 32, 36)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 42 (N= 31, 35)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 43 (N= 25, 31)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 44 (N= 6,8 )0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 45 (N= 3, 4)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 46 (N= 3, 2)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 47 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 48 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 49 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 50 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 51 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 52 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 53(N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 54 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 55 (N= 1, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 56 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 57 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 58 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Rehabilitation Parameter by Study Day- Number of Participants Who Were Using a WheelchairDay 59 (N= 0, 1)0 participants
Secondary

Total Drain Output at Day 1 Post-operatively

Time frame: 1 day post-operatively

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Total Drain Output at Day 1 Post-operatively839.6 mLStandard Deviation 476.38
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Total Drain Output at Day 1 Post-operatively647.3 mLStandard Deviation 338.96
p-value: 0.063two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Total Tourniquet Time

Measured from the time point of the tourniquet inflation to deflation using the same watch/clock

Time frame: Intra-operatively (on day of surgery = Day 0)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Total Tourniquet Time49.2 minutesStandard Deviation 19.76
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Total Tourniquet Time47.3 minutesStandard Deviation 17.45
p-value: 0.734two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Transfusion Requirements - Packed Red Blood Cells

Time frame: Intra-operatively (Day 0) thru Postoperative Day 3

Population: Full Analysis Set - participants with transfusion requirement

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Transfusion Requirements - Packed Red Blood Cells484.0 mLStandard Deviation 173.54
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Transfusion Requirements - Packed Red Blood Cells403.3 mLStandard Deviation 157.9
p-value: 0.314two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Scores

Participant rated assessment of the level of pain they are experiencing with their operated knee. The VAS Pain Scale rates pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.

Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0) and post-operatively at Day 3, Week 1, 2 and 6

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresDay 3 Postoperative (N= 45, 42)3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresWeek 2 Postoperative (N= 40, 42)3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresWeek 1 Postoperative (N= 40, 40)4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresWeek 6 Postoperative (N= 49, 46)1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresBaseline (N= 50, 47)4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.03
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresWeek 6 Postoperative (N= 49, 46)2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresBaseline (N= 50, 47)4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresDay 3 Postoperative (N= 45, 42)4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresWeek 1 Postoperative (N= 40, 40)4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain ScoresWeek 2 Postoperative (N= 40, 42)3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Secondary

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index Scores

A well-validated scale to reflect problems in people with lower limb issues. 1. Pain scale (5 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme pain) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater pain. The overall pain scale = 0 (no pain) to 50 (extreme pain) 2. Stiffness scale (2 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme stiffness) is used to grade each item, higher scores indicate greater stiffness. The overall stiffness scale = 0 (no stiffness) to 20 (extreme stiffness) 3. Physical Activity Difficulty (PAD) scale (17 items): 0 (none) to 10 (extreme PAD) is used to grade each item, with higher scores indicating greater PAD. The overall PAD scale = 0 (no PAD) to 170 (extreme PAD) Averages calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above and dividing by total number of items, range = 0 (no issues) to 10 (extreme issues). Total Scores calculated by taking sum of all individual item scores listed above, range = 0 (no issues) to 240 (extreme issues) Postoperative (Postop)

Time frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1 to Day 0), and post-operatively at Day 3 and Week 1, 2 and 6

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Physical Functioning (N= 47, 43)91.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.75
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Average (N= 18, 24)4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Post-op: Physical Functioning (N= 15, 16)91.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.9
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Total Score (N= 18, 24)112.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 52.42
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Total Score (N= 47, 43)129.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 52.27
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Pain (N= 41, 43)15.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.07
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Post-op: Average (N= 15, 16)5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Stiffness (N= 41, 42)8.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Stiffness (N= 50, 47)11.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.86
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Physical Functioning (N= 26, 28)51.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.74
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Post-op: Total Score (N= 15, 16)124.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 50.99
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Average (N= 25, 28)3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Postoperative: Pain (N= 46, 42)19.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.87
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Total Score (N= 25, 28)72.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.24
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Pain (N= 41, 41)23.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.54
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Pain (N= 49, 47)8.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Average (N= 47, 43)5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Stiffness (N= 49, 46)5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.64
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Stiffness (N= 41, 40)11.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.57
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Physical Functioning (N= 43, 43)27.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.78
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Postoperative: Stiffness (N= 46, 42)10.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.64
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Average (N= 43, 42)1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Physical Functioning (N= 18, 24)77.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.77
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Total Score (N= 43, 42)41.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.24
Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Pain (N= 50, 47)26.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.81
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Total Score (N= 43, 42)61.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.56
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Pain (N= 50, 47)27.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.69
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Stiffness (N= 50, 47)11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.31
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Physical Functioning (N= 47, 43)92.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.51
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Average (N= 47, 43)5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresBaseline: Total Score (N= 47, 43)130.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.36
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Postoperative: Pain (N= 46, 42)21.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.28
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Postoperative: Stiffness (N= 46, 42)11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Post-op: Physical Functioning (N= 15, 16)97.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.85
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Post-op: Average (N= 15, 16)5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresDay 3 Post-op: Total Score (N= 15, 16)133.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 49.17
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Pain (N= 41, 41)24.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.25
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Stiffness (N= 41, 40)12.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.48
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Physical Functioning (N= 18, 24)76.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.11
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Average (N= 18, 24)4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 1 Post-op: Total Score (N= 18, 24)112.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 52.66
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Pain (N= 41, 43)19.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.04
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Stiffness (N= 41, 42)10.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.07
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Physical Functioning (N= 26, 28)68.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.2
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Average (N= 25, 28)4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 2 Post-op: Total Score (N= 25, 28)99.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 50.09
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Pain (N= 49, 47)12.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.98
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Stiffness (N= 49, 46)7.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.96
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Physical Functioning (N= 43, 43)39.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.98
FLOSEAL + Standard of Care (SoC)Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Function Index ScoresWeek 6 Post-op: Average (N= 43, 42)2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026