Skip to content

Optimisation of the Treatment of Infectious Bursitis

One-stage Versus Two-stage Surgical Treatment of Infectious Bursitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01406652
Enrollment
224
Registered
2011-08-01
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2019-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Olecranon Bursitis, Patellar Bursitis

Keywords

septic bursitis, bursectomy, primary closure

Brief summary

The study investigates prospectively the cost-savings related to a one-stage bursectomy (debridement, drainage and closure at the same time) versus two-stage bursectomy (debridement, left open and closure at a second time) of severe bursitis among hospitalized patients for surgical treatment of septic bursitis. We suppose that the one-stage bursectomy reveals similar recurrence rates but is associated with a significant shortening of hospital stay, consumption of resources and increased patient satisfaction.

Detailed description

Start as single center interventional study at Geneva University Hospitals Study open for additional centres (electronic CRF) Funding on 24.6.2011 (50,000 Swiss Francs). Further demand for funding ongoing. Septic bursitis of knee and elbows, for which the patients are hospitalised (a substantial part of patient with failure of conservative treatment) Randomisation 1:1 (one-stage vs. two-stage). Duration of concomitant postsurgical antibiotic therapy fixed to 7 days Exclusion of severely immuno-depressed patients. Assessment of all costs of inpatient treatment and outpatient follow-up of included cases. Interim analysis after ca. 100 cases planified.

Interventions

PROCEDURETwo-stage bursectomy

Debridement, drainage, and secondary closure of septic bursitis during two surgical interventions

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomization 1:1 with two arms: One versus two-stage bursectomy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 years 2. Hospitalized for bursectomy for septic bursitis

Exclusion criteria

1. Bacteraemic diseases 2. Presence of another concomitant infection requiring antibiotics 3. Presence of osteosynthesis material beneath the bursitis 4. Septic bursitis outside of the elbow or the knee 5. Severe immune suppression (transplantation, HIV with Cluster of Differentiation cell count \<200 cells/mm3, immune suppressive treatment with equivalence of more than 15 mg of prednisone daily ). 6. Recurrent septic bursitis episodes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Costs of the Combined Surgical and Medical Treatment2 monthsThe overall costs are of primary interest in the study protocol.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Post-surgical Wound Dehiscence2 monthsWe assess clinical failures of bursectomy for bursitis. As recurrences are associated with wound dehiscence, we evaluate the dehiscence a the most important parameter for Failure. Of course, dehiscence can also occur without recurrent infection, but this is also considered as failure.

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

See below

Participants by arm

ArmCount
One-stage Bursectomy
Bursectomy with debridement and primary closure of the wound during one surgical intervention
79
Two-stage Bursectomy
Two-stage bursectomy: Debridement, drainage, and secondary closure of septic bursitis during two surgical interventions
85
Total164

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyInfection not sure1010
Overall StudyInsufficient follow-up54
Overall StudyLost-to-follow-up34
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTwo-stage BursectomyTotalOne-stage Bursectomy
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
80 Participants150 Participants70 Participants
Age, Continuous51 years52 years53 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
85 Participants164 Participants79 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
85 participants164 participants79 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants28 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
74 Participants136 Participants62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 790 / 85
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 7915 / 85
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 790 / 85

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Costs of the Combined Surgical and Medical Treatment

The overall costs are of primary interest in the study protocol.

Time frame: 2 months

Population: The overall costs (Swiss francs; CHF) are of primary interest in the study protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
One-stage BursectomyOverall Costs of the Combined Surgical and Medical Treatment6881 Swiss Francs
Two-stage BursectomyOverall Costs of the Combined Surgical and Medical Treatment11178 Swiss Francs
Secondary

Number of Participants With Post-surgical Wound Dehiscence

We assess clinical failures of bursectomy for bursitis. As recurrences are associated with wound dehiscence, we evaluate the dehiscence a the most important parameter for Failure. Of course, dehiscence can also occur without recurrent infection, but this is also considered as failure.

Time frame: 2 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
One-stage BursectomyNumber of Participants With Post-surgical Wound Dehiscence2 participants
Two-stage BursectomyNumber of Participants With Post-surgical Wound Dehiscence10 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026