Skip to content

Comparison of Two Methods of Subscapularis Management in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Tenotomy Versus Peel

Comparison of Two Methods of Subscapularis Management in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Tenotomy Versus Peel: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01404143
Enrollment
100
Registered
2011-07-27
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2021-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subscapularis Injury

Brief summary

What is the difference in subscapularis strength between two different methods of subscapularis mobilization: incision of the tendon (tenotomy) versus peel. It is the investigators' hypothesis that a peel of the subscapularis will result in greater strength, a higher healing rate, and a greater improvement in shoulder function and quality of life following shoulder replacement.

Detailed description

The primary research question is to determine the difference in subscapularis strength between two different methods of subscapularis mobilization in shoulder arthroplasty: intra-substance division of the tendon tenotomy versus direct detachment of the subscapularis tendon from its insertion on the lesser tuberosity the peel. The primary outcome is strength as measured by a hand-held dynamometer in the belly-press position at one-year post operative. Secondary research questions include determination of the difference in disease specific quality of life between patients who undergo a subscapularis tenotomy versus subscapularis peel, as measured by the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), Constant score and the ASES score at one year post-operatively. Finally, the healing rate of the subscapularis, as measured by ultrasound at 1 year post-operative will be determined.

Interventions

PROCEDURESubscapularis Tenotomy

After the deltopectoral approach is completed, the subscapularis tendon will be tenotomized one centimeter medial to its insertion on the lesser tuberosity. The tendon will be tagged for later repair. Repair will take place with a combination of transosseous sutures (3) placed in a mattress configuration through the area of exposed lesser tuberosity. In addition, a soft tissue tendon to tendon repair will be carried out using figure-8 stitches using #2 (heavy) non-absorbable suture (Ticron).

The subscapularis will be elevated from the lesser tuberosity. The tendon will be tagged with stay sutures for later reattachment (3 sutures in mattress configuration). Reapproximation will take place with three non-absorbable mattress sutures placed in a trans-osseous fashion through the bicipital groove, exiting the greater tuberosity and tied over a 4-hole mini-fragment plate.

Sponsors

St. Joseph's Health Care London
CollaboratorOTHER
Unity Health Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or older * Imaging, and intra-operative findings confirming advanced humeral head cartilage loss, and/glenoid cartilage loss. * Ability to understand and adhere to rehab protocols and testing procedure * Persistent pain and functional disability for at least 6 months and failure of 6 months of conservative treatment * surgical arthroplasty patients

Exclusion criteria

* Active joint of systemic infection * Significant muscle paralysis * Rotator cuff tear arthropathy * Pregnancy * Charcot's arthropathy * Major medical illness ( life expectancy less then 1 year or unacceptably high operative risk) * Patients unable to provide informed consent due to language barrier or mental status * Unable to speak or read English/French * Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent * Patients unwilling to be followed for the duration of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
What is the difference in subscapularis strength between two different methods of subscapularis mobilization: incision of the tendon (tenotomy) versus peel12 monthsWhat is the difference in subscapularis strength between two different methods of subscapularis mobilization: incision of the tendon (tenotomy) versus peel, as measured by a hand-held dynamometer in the belly-press position at one year post operative?

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life as measured by WORC, ASES and Constant12 months1. What is the difference in disease specific quality of life between patients who undergo a subscapularis tenotomy versus peel, as measured by the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) at one year post-operatively in patients who undergo shoulder arthroplasty? 2. What is the difference in outcome as measured by the Constant score and the ASES score, at one year post operatively? 3. What are the healing rates, as measured by ultrasound at 1 year post-operative?

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026