Skip to content

Effects of the Oral Care With Vaccines for Pneumonia in Elderly; Going Home Together Both Physician and Dentist

The Interventional Study in the Effects of Oral Care With Vaccines at Nursing Home; the Role of the Partnership With Physician, Dentist and Other Co-medical Stuff

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01403805
Enrollment
199
Registered
2011-07-27
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2012-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pneumonia

Keywords

Oral care, Vaccine, Pneumonia, Elderly, Prevention, Primary care

Brief summary

Prospective study comparing the effects of interventions (combined oral care and pneumococcal plus influenza vaccinations) in preventing pneumonia and increasing the survival rate from pneumonia.

Detailed description

The elderly population can be expected to increase not only in developed countries, but also in developing countries. Pneumonia is one of the most common causes of death in the elderly. The investigators conducted a prospective study comparing the effects of interventions (combined oral care and pneumococcal plus influenza vaccinations) in preventing pneumonia and increasing the survival rate from pneumonia in consecutive elderly patients at a nursing home in Yubari during one year from 2009, with the results in a non-intervention group.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPneumococcal vaccination (Pneumovax NP, 21800AMY10131000)

Injection,subcutaneous,0.5ml,ones,Planned duration of intervention:a day

BIOLOGICALInfluenza vaccination (Flubik HA, 16100EZZ01207000)

Injection,subcutaneous,0.5ml,ones,Planned duration of intervention:a day

OTHERSpecific frequency of oral care

1 dentist and 2 dental hygienists visited the nursing home once a week. After the residents agreed our receive oral care, the dentist/dental hygienist spent 15 minutes with brushing of teeth, scaling, oral wiping, gargling and cleaning of dentures, to reduce dental plaque which is oral bacteria mechanically by using cleaning tools, including toothbrush, interdental brush, dental scaler, tongue brush, and sponge brush to treatment of periodontal disease at the washstand in their private room primary care physicians. At the same time, they taught and recorded to the nursing care workers the methods of administering responsible oral care to dye for dental plaque by using plaque disclosing agent material.

Sponsors

Health Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Yubari Kibounomori
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The residents or an agent who understand the purpose of this study and give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* The residents contraindicated to vaccine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Pneumonia1 yearNumber of Participants with Pneumonia sufferers

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death From Pneumonia1 yearNumber of participants for the death from pneumonia

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Leaving Nursing HomeThese participants were followed for the duration of nursing home stay, an average of 22 weeks.Numer of resident for leaving nursing home
Reject Oral CareThis participant rejected oral care before treatment, Day 1Number of resident to reject oral care
Reject VaccineThese participants rejected vaccine before treatment, Day 1Number of resident to reject vaccine
Died Before Oral Care StartingThis participant was died before treatment, Day 1Number of resident died before the start of oral care

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Influenza Vaccine
Number of Participants with only an influenza vaccine(Flubik HA, 0.5ml, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharm. Co.Ltd.).
94
Oral Care With Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccines
Number of Participants with oral care and both an influenza vaccines (Flubik HA, 0.5ml, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharm. Co.Ltd.) and a pneumococcal vaccine (PNEUMOVAX NP, 0.5ml, MSD Co.Ltd.) How to do oral care is the following; 1 dentist and 2 dental hygienists visited the nursing home once a week. After the residents agreed our receive oral care, the dentist/dental hygienist spent 15 minutes with brushing of teeth, scaling, oral wiping, gargling and cleaning of dentures, to reduce dental plaque which is oral bacteria mechanically by using cleaning tools, including toothbrush, interdental brush, dental scaler, tongue brush, and sponge brush to treatment of periodontal disease at the washstand in their private room. At the same time, we taught and recorded to the nursing care workers the methods of administering responsible oral care to dye for dental plaque by using plaque disclosing agent material.
105
Total199

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject04

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOral Care With Influenza and Pneumococcal VaccinesInfluenza VaccineTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
105 Participants92 Participants197 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Age Continuous86.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.64
85.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.48
85.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.56
Region of Enrollment
Japan
105 participants94 participants199 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
77 Participants66 Participants143 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants28 Participants56 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 940 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 942 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Pneumonia

Number of Participants with Pneumonia sufferers

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Influenza VaccineNumber of Participants With Pneumonia21 participants
Oral Care With Influenza and Pneumococcal VaccinesNumber of Participants With Pneumonia2 participants
Comparison: The results were analyzed as means ± standard deviation (SD) or numbers (%). Differences between the 2 nursing homes were compared using Fisher's test.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Death From Pneumonia

Number of participants for the death from pneumonia

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Influenza VaccineDeath From Pneumonia8 participants
Oral Care With Influenza and Pneumococcal VaccinesDeath From Pneumonia1 participants
Comparison: The results are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) or numbers (%). Differences between the 2 nursing homes were compared using Fisher's test.p-value: 0.05Fisher Exact
Other Pre-specified

Died Before Oral Care Starting

Number of resident died before the start of oral care

Time frame: This participant was died before treatment, Day 1

Population: This participant was determined as Not Completed due to Died before oral care starting. We excluded this participant from analysis for outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Influenza VaccineDied Before Oral Care Starting1 participants
Other Pre-specified

Leaving Nursing Home

Numer of resident for leaving nursing home

Time frame: These participants were followed for the duration of nursing home stay, an average of 22 weeks.

Population: These participants were determined as Not Completed due to Leaving nursing home. We excluded these participants from analysis for outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Influenza VaccineLeaving Nursing Home2 participants
Other Pre-specified

Reject Oral Care

Number of resident to reject oral care

Time frame: This participant rejected oral care before treatment, Day 1

Population: This participant was determined as Not Completed due to Reject oral care. We excluded this participant from analysis for outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Influenza VaccineReject Oral Care1 participants
Other Pre-specified

Reject Vaccine

Number of resident to reject vaccine

Time frame: These participants rejected vaccine before treatment, Day 1

Population: These participants were determined as Not Completed due to Reject vaccine. We excluded these participants from analysis for outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Influenza VaccineReject Vaccine3 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026