Skip to content

Glutathione and Health With Post-Polio Syndrome

Oral Glutathione and Health Outcomes Among Persons With Post-Polio Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01402570
Enrollment
20
Registered
2011-07-26
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2017-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Pain, Physical Activity, Post-polio Syndrome, Sleep Disorders

Keywords

disability, polio, rehabilitation, wellness

Brief summary

In this study, people who have symptoms of post polio will take oral glutathione supplements for three months. Their levels of fatigue, physical activity and sleep efficiency will be assessed.

Detailed description

Subjects will take a glutathione supplement by mouth for three months after an initial medical visit, blood draw and physical exam. There are four timepoints during the three months when subjects will fill out surveys and record food intake and sleep times in diaries for seven days. They will also wear a small device for seven days, a Sensewear monitor that records physical activity, body temperature and other measures. After the fourth timepoint they will return to the medical center for another physical exam and blood draw. Physicians trained in physical medicine and rehabilitation will be monitoring the study.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTGlutathione

glutathione is a dietary supplement and an antioxidant. Subjects will take 1000 mg per day for three month. Each capsule contains 500 mg glutathione.

Sponsors

Penn State University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to walk 100 feet with usual assistive devices (ex. cane or walker) * Having a function score of 18-32 when tested with the IPPS (Index of Post- Polio Sequelae). This will include people with post-polio symptoms in a very specific range of severity.

Exclusion criteria

* Having another serious medical condition (cancer, multiple sclerosis, etc.)or inflammatory disease (ie., lupus) * Currently taking glutathione or other antioxidants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Physical FunctioningBaseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsAbility to carry out activities that require physical actions, ranging from self-care (activities of daily living) to more complex activities that require a combination of skills, often within a social context. Scores are standardized T-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate better physical function.
Sleep EfficiencyBaseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsThe ratio of time asleep over time in bed gathered from sleep diaries completed at bedtime and at awakening. Scores range from 0 to 100%, higher values indicate better sleep efficiency or more time sleeping in bed.
Steps Per DayBaseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsCount of steps per day using activity monitor worn on upper arm.
PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) FatigueBaseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 monthsAssesses fatigue from mild subjective feelings to an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that is likely to decrease one's ability to carry out daily activities, including the ability to work effectively and to function at one's usual level in family or social roles. Fatigue is divided conceptually into the experience of fatigue (e.g., frequency, duration, and intensity), and the impact of fatigue upon physical, mental and social activities. Scores are on a T-metric with mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate greater fatigue.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Study Group
All subjects were assigned the intervention. The intervention was a three-month trial of twice daily, oral, 1,000 mg glutathione supplements (Glutathione 500 Ultrathione, The Glutathione Corporation, Elmsford, New York; 500 mg. capsule with 250 mg. ascorbic acid).
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStudy Group
Age, Continuous60.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.89
Gender
Female
9 Participants
Gender
Male
11 Participants
Physical activity, number of steps daily4004.1 steps/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3357.9
PROMIS Fatigue56.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
PROMIS Physical Functioning37.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
Subjective sleep efficiency82.0 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue

Assesses fatigue from mild subjective feelings to an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that is likely to decrease one's ability to carry out daily activities, including the ability to work effectively and to function at one's usual level in family or social roles. Fatigue is divided conceptually into the experience of fatigue (e.g., frequency, duration, and intensity), and the impact of fatigue upon physical, mental and social activities. Scores are on a T-metric with mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate greater fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study GroupPROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) FatigueBaseline56.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Study GroupPROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue1 month54.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Study GroupPROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue2 months53.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Study GroupPROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Fatigue3 months52.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Comparison: Linear mixed modeling (LMM) with random effects for intercept and repeated effects for assessment period was used to analyze change over time for study outcomes. The primary predictor of interest in this study was the relationship of time to each of the outcomes to evaluate the potential effect of the intervention. Independent LMMs were used to study outcomes.p-value: 0.0795% CI: [-2.21, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Physical Functioning

Ability to carry out activities that require physical actions, ranging from self-care (activities of daily living) to more complex activities that require a combination of skills, often within a social context. Scores are standardized T-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate better physical function.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study GroupPROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Physical FunctioningBaseline37.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Study GroupPROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Physical Functioning1 month37.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Study GroupPROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Physical Functioning2 months37.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Study GroupPROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Physical Functioning3 months38.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Comparison: Linear mixed modeling (LMM) with random effects for intercept and repeated effects for assessment period was used to analyze change over time for study outcomes. The primary predictor of interest in this study was the relationship of time to each of the outcomes to evaluate the potential effect of the intervention. Independent LMMs were used to study outcomes.p-value: 0.6695% CI: [-0.67, 0.95]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Sleep Efficiency

The ratio of time asleep over time in bed gathered from sleep diaries completed at bedtime and at awakening. Scores range from 0 to 100%, higher values indicate better sleep efficiency or more time sleeping in bed.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study GroupSleep EfficiencyBaseline82.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Study GroupSleep Efficiency1 month86.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Study GroupSleep Efficiency2 months87.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Study GroupSleep Efficiency3 months87.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Comparison: Linear mixed modeling (LMM) with random effects for intercept and repeated effects for assessment period was used to analyze change over time for study outcomes. The primary predictor of interest in this study was the relationship of time to each of the outcomes to evaluate the potential effect of the intervention. Independent LMMs were used to study outcomes.p-value: 0.4495% CI: [-0.01, 0.02]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Steps Per Day

Count of steps per day using activity monitor worn on upper arm.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Study GroupSteps Per DayBaseline4004.1 steps per dayStandard Deviation 3357.9
Study GroupSteps Per Day1 month3590.7 steps per dayStandard Deviation 2928.3
Study GroupSteps Per Day2 months3598.9 steps per dayStandard Deviation 3139.3
Study GroupSteps Per Day3 months3693.1 steps per dayStandard Deviation 3317.8
Comparison: Linear mixed modeling (LMM) with random effects for intercept and repeated effects for assessment period was used to analyze change over time for study outcomes. The primary predictor of interest in this study was the relationship of time to each of the outcomes to evaluate the potential effect of the intervention. Independent LMMs were used to study outcomes.p-value: 0.3595% CI: [-178.93, 470.02]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026