Skip to content

HAART Model 300 Annuloplasty Ring

A Prospective, Non-randomized, Multi-center Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the HAART Model 300 Annuloplasty Ring When Used to Surgically Repair a Leaking Aortic Valve Using a 3-D Intra-annular Mounting Frame

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01400841
Enrollment
18
Registered
2011-07-22
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2017-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Regurgitation

Keywords

Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Valve Repair

Brief summary

This investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HAART model 300 annuloplasty ring when used to surgically repair a leaking aortic valve using a 3-D intra-annular mounting frame

Detailed description

Aortic Regurgitation, (also known as Aortic Insufficiency; AI), is the failure of the aortic valve to close completely during diastole which causes blood to flow from the aorta back into the left ventricle. Aortic Regurgitation (AR) is a frequent cause of both disability and death due to congestive heart failure, primarily in individuals forty or older, but can also occur in younger populations. Traditionally management of aortic regurgitation has been by aortic valve replacement, however, as has been observed in patients who have had mitral valve repair, the option of maintaining ones native aortic valve versus a replacement, either bioprosthetic or mechanical, can have added multiple benefits. The advantage of repair is the avoidance of prosthetic valve-related complications with bioprosthetic valves over 10-15 years or the need for anticoagulation with mechanical valves and the related problems of this therapy. Therefore, potentially aortic valve repair is a good option for patients with AR or AI.

Interventions

Implantation of device for aortic valve repair

Sponsors

Biostable Science & Engineering
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The subject is 50 years old or older * The subject has a tricuspid aortic valve morphology * Patients with documented severe aortic insufficiency with aortic annular dilation without severe concomitant aortic stenosis * Patients referred to center for documented moderate to severe Chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) associated with annular dilatation with or without cusp prolapse of one, two, or all three leaflets * Patients with or without Sinotubular Junction (STJ) dilatation or aortic root aneurysms * Patients who are free of coronary disease or those with evidence of minor stable (1-2 vessel) coronary disease * Subject is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations, including transesophageal echocardiography if there are inadequate images by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to assess the aortic valve * The subject has signed the written informed consent * The subject agrees to return for all follow-up evaluations for the duration of the study (i.e. geographically stable * The subject is New York Hospital Association (NYHA) class II or III

Exclusion criteria

* The subject has preexisting valve prosthesis in the atrial, the mitral, pulmonary, and/or tricuspid position * The subject requires an additional valve replacement * The subject's aortic valve morphology is not tricuspid * The subject has active endocarditis * Heavily calcified valves * Valvular retraction with severely reduced mobility * The subject has mixed stenosis and regurgitation of the aortic valve with predominant stenosis * The subject requires a repair of the mitral or tricuspid valve with the use of an annuloplasty device * Leukopenia * Acute anemia (Hb \< 9mg%) * Platelet count \<100,000 cell/mm3 * Need for emergency surgery for any reason * History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or the subject refuses blood transfusions * Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, subjects may enroll 4 weeks after discontinuation of antibiotics) * Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated * Non elective presentation * Low Ejection Fraction (EF) EF \< 40% * Life expectancy \< 1 year * Rheumatic disease * The subject has severe leaflet fenestration or leaflets damaged by endocarditis * The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product or has participated in such a study within the 30 days prior to screening * The subject is a minor, an illicit drug user, alcohol abuser, prisoner, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent * The subject is pregnant or lactating * This patient will not agree to return to the implant center for the required number of follow-up visits or is geographically unavailable for follow-up * The subject has not signed and dated the study informed consent * Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) * Myocardial infarction (MI) within one month of trial inclusion * Have a known intolerance to titanium or polyester * Sole therapy for correction for patients with aortic root aneurysm * Subjects requiring simultaneous cardiac procedures * The subject has asymptomatic AR and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \> 50%

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival1 month postprocedureEvent-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure6 months postprocedureAortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification6 months postprocedureFour classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Peak Gradient - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureTransthoracic echocardiography parameter
Mean Gradient - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureTransthoracic echocardiography parameter
LV Mass - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureLeft ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
LVID Diastole - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureLeft ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Implant Procedure Successdischarge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes firstSuccess is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure: * Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage * Paravalvular leak \> +2 or requiring intervention * Mitral valve impingement due to implant * implant dehiscence/migration into aorta * implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle * Hemodynamics requiring intervention * Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.
LV Diastolic Volume - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureLeft ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
LV Systolic Volume - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureLeft ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
LVEF - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureLeft ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Cardiac Output - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureStroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Cardiac Index - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureHemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area
LVID Systole - Change From BaselineBaseline, 6 months postprocedureLeft ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events1 month postprocedureFreedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 1 month postprocedure: * Device-related mortality * Complete heart block * Structural device failure * Endocarditis * Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence * Thromboembolism * Bleeding Event * Native Valve Deterioration * Valve Thrombosis * Hemolysis * Reoperation and explant at 1 month
Event-free Survival6 months postprocedureEvent-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
Implantation of HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device for aortic valve repair HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device: Implantation of device for aortic valve repair
16
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Extended Study Phase (2 Years)Adverse Event2
Initial Study Phase (6 Months)Death1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Age, Continuous68.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Aortic Valvular Regurgitation
0
0 participants
Aortic Valvular Regurgitation
1+
0 participants
Aortic Valvular Regurgitation
2+
6 participants
Aortic Valvular Regurgitation
3+
7 participants
Aortic Valvular Regurgitation
4+
3 participants
Cardiac index3.41 l/min/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Cardiac output6.77 l/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Gender
Female
3 Participants
Gender
Male
13 Participants
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)53.2 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Left ventricular internal dimension (LVID) diastole5.44 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Left ventricular (LV) mass260.0 g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 57.1
LV diastolic volume180.7 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.2
LVID systole4.09 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76
LV systolic volume84.7 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.4
Mean gradient6.8 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
NYHA Classification
I
0 participants
NYHA Classification
II
10 participants
NYHA Classification
III
6 participants
NYHA Classification
IV
0 participants
Peak gradient13.3 mm Hg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
13 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure

Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure02 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure1+7 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure2+2 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure3+0 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure4+0 participants
Primary

Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure

Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure02 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure1+9 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure2+3 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure3+1 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure4+0 participants
Primary

Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival

Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death

Time frame: 1 month postprocedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival100 percentage of participants
Primary

Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival

Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death

Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Extended follow-up participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePrimary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 2 years postprocedure: * Device-related mortality * Complete heart block * Structural device failure * Endocarditis * Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence * Thromboembolism * Bleeding Event * Native Valve Deterioration * Valve Thrombosis * Hemolysis * Reoperation and explant at 2 years

Time frame: 2 years postprocedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceActuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events81.5 percentage of implant procedures
Secondary

Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 1 month postprocedure: * Device-related mortality * Complete heart block * Structural device failure * Endocarditis * Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence * Thromboembolism * Bleeding Event * Native Valve Deterioration * Valve Thrombosis * Hemolysis * Reoperation and explant at 1 month

Time frame: 1 month postprocedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceActuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events100 percentage of implant procedures
Secondary

Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Both baseline and 2-year measure available for 5 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceCardiac Index - Change From Baseline-0.22 l/min/m^2Standard Deviation 0.18
Secondary

Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Both baseline and 6-month measure available for 7 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceCardiac Index - Change From Baseline-0.40 l/min/m^2Standard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Both baseline and 6-month measure available for 7 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceCardiac Output - Change From Baseline-0.73 l/minStandard Deviation 1.55
Secondary

Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Both baseline and 2-year measure available for 5 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceCardiac Output - Change From Baseline-0.36 l/minStandard Deviation 0.34
Secondary

Event-free Survival

Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death

Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceEvent-free Survival100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Implant Procedure Success

Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure: * Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage * Paravalvular leak \> +2 or requiring intervention * Mitral valve impingement due to implant * implant dehiscence/migration into aorta * implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle * Hemodynamics requiring intervention * Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.

Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceImplant Procedure Success87.5 percentage of implant procedures
Secondary

Implant Procedure Success

Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure: * Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage * Paravalvular leak \> +2 or requiring intervention * Mitral valve impingement due to implant * implant dehiscence/migration into aorta * implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle * Hemodynamics requiring intervention * Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.

Time frame: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceImplant Procedure Success100 percentage of implant procedures
Secondary

LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Both baseline and 6-month measure available for 7 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline-49.9 mlStandard Deviation 64.2
Secondary

LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Both baseline and 2-year measure available for 5 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline-75.4 mlStandard Deviation 74.3
Secondary

LVEF - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Both baseline and 6-month measure available for 7 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLVEF - Change From Baseline5.13 percentage of blood volumeStandard Deviation 6.53
Secondary

LVEF - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Both baseline and 2-year measure available for 5 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLVEF - Change From Baseline12.20 percentage of blood volumeStandard Deviation 9.57
Secondary

LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Both baseline and 6-month measure available for 8 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLVID Diastole - Change From Baseline-0.52 cmStandard Deviation 0.61
Secondary

LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Both baseline and 2-year measure available for 7 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLVID Diastole - Change From Baseline-0.33 cmStandard Deviation 0.82
Secondary

LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Both baseline and 2-year measure available for 3 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLVID Systole - Change From Baseline0.03 cmStandard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Both baseline and 6-month measure available for 5 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLVID Systole - Change From Baseline-0.75 cmStandard Deviation 0.68
Secondary

LV Mass - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Both baseline and 6-month measure available for 8 of 15 participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLV Mass - Change From Baseline-53.4 gStandard Deviation 57.1
Secondary

LV Mass - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Both baseline and 2-year measure available for 6 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLV Mass - Change From Baseline-23.3 gStandard Deviation 72
Secondary

LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Both baseline and 2-year measure available for 5 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline-48.4 mlStandard Deviation 38.2
Secondary

LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Both baseline and 6-month measure available for 7 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceLV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline-30.6 mlStandard Deviation 30.2
Secondary

Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Baseline measure not available for 1 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceMean Gradient - Change From Baseline2.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Baseline measure not available for 1 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceMean Gradient - Change From Baseline4.8 mm HgStandard Deviation 4.8
Secondary

New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification

Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationI8 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationII3 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationIII0 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationIV0 participants
Secondary

New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification

Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

Population: NYHA evaluation not done on 1 of 15 participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationI11 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationII3 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationIII0 participants
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DeviceNew York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity ClassificationIV0 participants
Secondary

Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

Population: Baseline measure not available for 1 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePeak Gradient - Change From Baseline10.1 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.4
Secondary

Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

Population: Baseline measure not available for 1 of 15 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HAART 300 Annuloplasty DevicePeak Gradient - Change From Baseline4.9 mm HgStandard Deviation 5.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026