Skip to content

Neocartilage Implant to Treat Cartilage Lesions of the Knee

Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Neocartilage Implant in the Management of ICRS Grade 3 to 4 Articular Cartilage Lesions of the Knee

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01400607
Enrollment
14
Registered
2011-07-22
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2017-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Cartilage Injury, Articular Cartilage Disorder, Chronic Cartilage Injury, Defect of Articular Cartilage, Degeneration; Articular Cartilage

Keywords

cartilage, knee surgery, cartilage injury, knee pain, cartilage repair, cartilage damage, cartilage lesion, cartilage defect, articular cartilage lesion, articular cartilage defect, juvenile, cells, ISTO Technologies, Neocartilage, RevaFlex

Brief summary

ISTO Technologies, Inc. is proposing a clinical study with 225 subjects, to establish the safety and efficacy of the Neocartilage Implant for the treatment of ICRS Grade 3 and 4 articular cartilage lesions of the knee compared to microfracture treatment.

Detailed description

In the United States alone, more than 500,000 cartilage lesions per year require some treatment to reduce pain, restore joint mobility, and prevent further damage caused by the progression of osteoarthritis. The lack of effective cartilage repair approaches or products for restoration of defective articular cartilage to its native, hyaline morphology only continues to exacerbate the incidence of osteoarthritis as these initial defects enlarge and degrade over a 10 to 20 year period. The repair of cartilage, especially in the knee, remains a formidable clinical challenge. Regenerative medicine approaches to cartilage repair have only begun to be explored as possible options and there is a clear trend toward biological solutions for the repair and regeneration of damaged or diseased articular cartilage. The study was designed to compare how well the Neocartilage Implant works against the microfracture therapy, a widely used and accepted cartilage repair therapy. Data to be collected include Pain and Function in Daily Living scores, symptoms, Function in Sports and Recreation, and Knee Related Quality of Life. Additionally, MRI and X-rays will be collected to evaluate the cartilage repair progress. These assessments will be used through the five years of post-operative follow-up.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALNeocartilage Implant/DeNovo® ET (Engineered Tissue Graft)

The Neocartilage Implant is a cartilage repair technology cultured from juvenile human cartilage cells.

OTHERMicrofracture

Marrow stimulation using the microfracture technique; performed arthroscopically

Sponsors

ISTO Technologies, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Generally, the following inclusion criteria must be met, however, this is not a complete list. * Male or Female between the ages of 18 and 60 * (1) or (2) articular cartilage lesions of the distal femur ranging in no more than 5 cm2 each * Ipsilateral knee compartment has intact menisci (or meniscectomized remnant with \> 5mm wide rim) and stable ligaments in the affected knee * 3 months out from initiation of conservative non-surgical management (e.g.hyaluronic acid injection, activity modification) or previous minimal surgical intervention (e.g., arthroscopic lavage, debridement) or 12 months out from marrow stimulation for this condition

Exclusion criteria

Generally, if a potential participant meets any of the following criterions, they will not be eligible for this study. Additionally, more criteria will be evaluated to confirm eligibility as this list is not a complete list of criteria. * Osteoarthritis * Rheumatoid arthritis * History of septic or reactive arthritis * Gout or a history of gout or pseudo-gout in the affected knee * Osteochondritis dissecans or osteochondral lesions of the knee with bone loss \> 6mm deep * Bipolar articular cartilage involvement (or kissing lesions) of the ipsilateral compartment (i.e., \> than ICRS Grade 2 on the opposing articular surface) * Associated damage to the underlying subchondral bone requiring an osteochondral graft * Is pregnant or breast-feeding * Has a BMI \> 35 (kg/m2) * Has prior total meniscectomy of either knee * Has received, within the past three months, intra-articular hyaluronic acid therapy, or steroid therapy * Has more than two clinically relevant chondral lesion(s) on the index knee

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores (KOOS)36 monthsKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores (KOOS) Pain and Function in Daily Living (ADL) subscales.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IKDC Knee ExaminationBaseline, 6 week, 6, 12, 18, 24 months and annually through 5 years
Subject reported questionnairesBaseline, 6 week, 6, 12, 18, 24 months and annually through 5 yearsVarious questionnaires are required to be completed by the subject before and after treatment throughout the study.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026