Lowback and Leg Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of high frequency (HF SCS) stimulation and sham stimulation (Sham SCS - i.e. no stimulation) and conventional spinal cord stimulation (Conv SCS) on the patient reported global impression of change, pain intensity and health related quality of life.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* signed informed consent * treated with spinal cord stimulation * stable pain relief achieved
Exclusion criteria
* failure to give informed consent * unable to use or understand how to handle the equipment, PGIC,VAS score or EQ-5D questionnaires.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Intensity of Pain | — |
| Quality of Life (EQ-5D) | — |
Countries
Switzerland, United Kingdom