Skip to content

A 24-Week Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rivastigmine Patch Study in Patients With Probable Alzheimer's Disease

A 24-Week, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group, Active-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Once-daily Rivastigmine Patch Formulation in Patients With Probable Alzheimer's Disease (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) 10-20)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01399125
Enrollment
501
Registered
2011-07-21
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

Alzheimer's, Rivastigmine, Patch, Dementia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Exelon® patch in patients with probable AD (MMSE 10-20), in order to support a planned regulatory submission and registration of Exelon transdermal patch in China. The study is designed to confirm the non-inferiority of the efficacy of Exelon patch (target 10 cm² patch size) versus Exelon capsules (target 6.0 mg bid dose) on cognition, using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog).

Interventions

Once-daily target patch size 10 cm²

DRUGRivastigmine Capsules

Twice-daily target dose of 6 mg oral capsule

DRUGPlacebo to Rivastigmine patch

Matching placebo to Rivastigmine patch

DRUGPlacebo to Rivastigmine capsules

matching Placebo to Rivastigmine capsules

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* have a diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria; * have a clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria. * have a brain scan (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT)) consistent with the diagnosis of AD. The brain scan must have been performed within one year prior to randomization; * have an MMSE score of ≥ 10 and ≤ 20; * have sufficient education to have been able to read, write, and communicate effectively during the premorbid state; * be residing with someone in the community throughout the study or, if living alone, in contact with the primary caregiver everyday;

Exclusion criteria

* have an advanced, severe, progressive, or unstable infectious, metabolic, immune, endocrinologic, hepatic, hematological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and/or urological condition that may interfere with efficacy and safety assessments or put the patient at special risk; * have a history or current diagnosis of any medical or neurological condition other than AD that is identified as contributing cause of the patient's dementia; * have a current diagnosis of probable or possible vascular dementia according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences criteria (NINDS-AIREN); * have a score of \> 4 on the Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS); * have a current DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression, unless, in the opinion of the investigator, is in remission for at least 12 weeks; Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline on Cognition, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)Change at 24 weeksThe Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. It was assessed by a mental health professional (e.g., M.D., Ph.D., Pharm.D., R.N., or other equivalent qualifications) with a minimum of 2 years research experience meeting certification requirements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Change at 24 weeksAlzheimer's disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) scale provides a single global rating of change from baseline. It was recommended that the baseline interview be conducted by two raters, one designated as the primary rater, the other as a backup. Both raters were independent trained clinicians, experienced in the assessment of patients with dementia. Neither rater was involved in any other way with the patients' treatment or evaluation throughout the study. At baseline, both raters had access to all of the patient's available records and evaluations. Subsequently, for all ratings of change from baseline, the rater relied solely on information obtained during the baseline interview of the patient and caregiver, including written notes and, if available, the baseline interview audio- or videotape. The rater had no access to any other safety or efficacy data, including all previous post-baseline ADCS-CGIC ratings by either rater.
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total ScoreChange at 24 weeksAlzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) is a caregiver-based Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale composed of 23 items developed for use in dementia clinical studies. It was designed to assess the patient's performance of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living such as those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, as well as making judgments and decisions. Responses for each item were obtained from the caregiver through an interview. For each basic ADL, there was a forced choice of best response or a yes or no question with additional sub questions. Higher numbered scores and answers of yes reflected a more self-sufficient individual. Therefore, the higher total score, the higher functioning the patient was. The total score was the sum of all items and sub questions. The range for the total ADCS-ADL score was 0 to 78.
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total ScoreChange at 24 weeksNPI including Caregiver Distress Scale (NPI-D) assesses a wide range of behavior problems encountered in dementia patients to provide a means of distinguishing frequency and severity of changes in behavioral problems & facilitates rapid behavioral assessment using screening questions.10 behavioral problems & 2 neurovegetative domains were evaluated through an interview of the caregiver by a mental health professional. The scale includes both frequency & severity ratings of ea. domain as well as a composite domain score(frequency x severity). Frequency: 1(occasionally) - 4(very frequently)&severity:1(mild) - 3(marked).The sum of the composite scores of the 12 domains yields the NPI total score. The NPI-D: 0(not severe & not at all distressing) - 5 (very severe or extremely distressing) for each of the 12 domains. NPI-12 total score: from 0-144, the NPI-10 total score: from 0-120, & NPI-D score: from 0-60, all with higher scores indicating more severe behavioral disturbance.
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total ScoreChange at 24 weeksThe Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to establish patient's eligibility for the study and it was also used as an efficacy parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period. The MMSE is a brief, practical screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language) and results in a total possible score of 30, with higher scores indicating betterfunction. The total MMSE score at screening was between 10 and 20, inclusive, in order forthe patient to be eligible to participate in the trial.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rivastigmine Patch
Once-daily target patch size 10 cm²
248
Rivastigmine Capsules
Twice-daily target dose of 6 mg oral capsule
253
Total501

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAbnormal Lab values01
Overall StudyAdministrative Problems711
Overall StudyAdverse Event3230
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up23
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation52
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory Therapeutic Effect04
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject58

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRivastigmine PatchRivastigmine CapsulesTotal
Age, Continuous70.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.02
69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
70.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.11
Sex: Female, Male
Female
140 Participants139 Participants279 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
108 Participants114 Participants222 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
82 / 247111 / 251
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 24721 / 251

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline on Cognition, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)

The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. It was assessed by a mental health professional (e.g., M.D., Ph.D., Pharm.D., R.N., or other equivalent qualifications) with a minimum of 2 years research experience meeting certification requirements.

Time frame: Change at 24 weeks

Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline on Cognition, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline on Cognition, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.74
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score

Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) is a caregiver-based Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale composed of 23 items developed for use in dementia clinical studies. It was designed to assess the patient's performance of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living such as those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, as well as making judgments and decisions. Responses for each item were obtained from the caregiver through an interview. For each basic ADL, there was a forced choice of best response or a yes or no question with additional sub questions. Higher numbered scores and answers of yes reflected a more self-sufficient individual. Therefore, the higher total score, the higher functioning the patient was. The total score was the sum of all items and sub questions. The range for the total ADCS-ADL score was 0 to 78.

Time frame: Change at 24 weeks

Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score-1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.02
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score-1.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)

Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) scale provides a single global rating of change from baseline. It was recommended that the baseline interview be conducted by two raters, one designated as the primary rater, the other as a backup. Both raters were independent trained clinicians, experienced in the assessment of patients with dementia. Neither rater was involved in any other way with the patients' treatment or evaluation throughout the study. At baseline, both raters had access to all of the patient's available records and evaluations. Subsequently, for all ratings of change from baseline, the rater relied solely on information obtained during the baseline interview of the patient and caregiver, including written notes and, if available, the baseline interview audio- or videotape. The rater had no access to any other safety or efficacy data, including all previous post-baseline ADCS-CGIC ratings by either rater.

Time frame: Change at 24 weeks

Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Moderate worsening7 participants
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)No change67 participants
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Moderate improvement10 participants
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Minimal worsening38 participants
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)marked improvement1 participants
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Marked worsening1 participants
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Minimal improvement68 participants
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Marked worsening0 participants
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)marked improvement1 participants
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Moderate improvement12 participants
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Minimal improvement59 participants
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)No change74 participants
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Moderate worsening6 participants
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)Minimal worsening35 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to establish patient's eligibility for the study and it was also used as an efficacy parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period. The MMSE is a brief, practical screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language) and results in a total possible score of 30, with higher scores indicating betterfunction. The total MMSE score at screening was between 10 and 20, inclusive, in order forthe patient to be eligible to participate in the trial.

Time frame: Change at 24 weeks

Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.31
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score0.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score

NPI including Caregiver Distress Scale (NPI-D) assesses a wide range of behavior problems encountered in dementia patients to provide a means of distinguishing frequency and severity of changes in behavioral problems & facilitates rapid behavioral assessment using screening questions.10 behavioral problems & 2 neurovegetative domains were evaluated through an interview of the caregiver by a mental health professional. The scale includes both frequency & severity ratings of ea. domain as well as a composite domain score(frequency x severity). Frequency: 1(occasionally) - 4(very frequently)&severity:1(mild) - 3(marked).The sum of the composite scores of the 12 domains yields the NPI total score. The NPI-D: 0(not severe & not at all distressing) - 5 (very severe or extremely distressing) for each of the 12 domains. NPI-12 total score: from 0-144, the NPI-10 total score: from 0-120, & NPI-D score: from 0-60, all with higher scores indicating more severe behavioral disturbance.

Time frame: Change at 24 weeks

Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total ScoreNPI-10: Total score (frequency x severity)-1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total ScoreNPI-12: Total score (frequency x severity)-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.22
Rivastigmine PatchChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total ScoreNPI-D: Distress score (frequency x severity)-0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.65
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total ScoreNPI-12: Total score (frequency x severity)-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.98
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total ScoreNPI-10: Total score (frequency x severity)-1.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.46
Rivastigmine CapsulesChange From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total ScoreNPI-D: Distress score (frequency x severity)-0.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.88

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026