Alzheimer's Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Alzheimer's, Rivastigmine, Patch, Dementia
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Exelon® patch in patients with probable AD (MMSE 10-20), in order to support a planned regulatory submission and registration of Exelon transdermal patch in China. The study is designed to confirm the non-inferiority of the efficacy of Exelon patch (target 10 cm² patch size) versus Exelon capsules (target 6.0 mg bid dose) on cognition, using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog).
Interventions
Once-daily target patch size 10 cm²
Twice-daily target dose of 6 mg oral capsule
Matching placebo to Rivastigmine patch
matching Placebo to Rivastigmine capsules
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* have a diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria; * have a clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria. * have a brain scan (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT)) consistent with the diagnosis of AD. The brain scan must have been performed within one year prior to randomization; * have an MMSE score of ≥ 10 and ≤ 20; * have sufficient education to have been able to read, write, and communicate effectively during the premorbid state; * be residing with someone in the community throughout the study or, if living alone, in contact with the primary caregiver everyday;
Exclusion criteria
* have an advanced, severe, progressive, or unstable infectious, metabolic, immune, endocrinologic, hepatic, hematological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and/or urological condition that may interfere with efficacy and safety assessments or put the patient at special risk; * have a history or current diagnosis of any medical or neurological condition other than AD that is identified as contributing cause of the patient's dementia; * have a current diagnosis of probable or possible vascular dementia according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences criteria (NINDS-AIREN); * have a score of \> 4 on the Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS); * have a current DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression, unless, in the opinion of the investigator, is in remission for at least 12 weeks; Other protocol-defined inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline on Cognition, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) | Change at 24 weeks | The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. It was assessed by a mental health professional (e.g., M.D., Ph.D., Pharm.D., R.N., or other equivalent qualifications) with a minimum of 2 years research experience meeting certification requirements. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Change at 24 weeks | Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) scale provides a single global rating of change from baseline. It was recommended that the baseline interview be conducted by two raters, one designated as the primary rater, the other as a backup. Both raters were independent trained clinicians, experienced in the assessment of patients with dementia. Neither rater was involved in any other way with the patients' treatment or evaluation throughout the study. At baseline, both raters had access to all of the patient's available records and evaluations. Subsequently, for all ratings of change from baseline, the rater relied solely on information obtained during the baseline interview of the patient and caregiver, including written notes and, if available, the baseline interview audio- or videotape. The rater had no access to any other safety or efficacy data, including all previous post-baseline ADCS-CGIC ratings by either rater. |
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score | Change at 24 weeks | Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) is a caregiver-based Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale composed of 23 items developed for use in dementia clinical studies. It was designed to assess the patient's performance of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living such as those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, as well as making judgments and decisions. Responses for each item were obtained from the caregiver through an interview. For each basic ADL, there was a forced choice of best response or a yes or no question with additional sub questions. Higher numbered scores and answers of yes reflected a more self-sufficient individual. Therefore, the higher total score, the higher functioning the patient was. The total score was the sum of all items and sub questions. The range for the total ADCS-ADL score was 0 to 78. |
| Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | Change at 24 weeks | NPI including Caregiver Distress Scale (NPI-D) assesses a wide range of behavior problems encountered in dementia patients to provide a means of distinguishing frequency and severity of changes in behavioral problems & facilitates rapid behavioral assessment using screening questions.10 behavioral problems & 2 neurovegetative domains were evaluated through an interview of the caregiver by a mental health professional. The scale includes both frequency & severity ratings of ea. domain as well as a composite domain score(frequency x severity). Frequency: 1(occasionally) - 4(very frequently)&severity:1(mild) - 3(marked).The sum of the composite scores of the 12 domains yields the NPI total score. The NPI-D: 0(not severe & not at all distressing) - 5 (very severe or extremely distressing) for each of the 12 domains. NPI-12 total score: from 0-144, the NPI-10 total score: from 0-120, & NPI-D score: from 0-60, all with higher scores indicating more severe behavioral disturbance. |
| Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score | Change at 24 weeks | The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to establish patient's eligibility for the study and it was also used as an efficacy parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period. The MMSE is a brief, practical screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language) and results in a total possible score of 30, with higher scores indicating betterfunction. The total MMSE score at screening was between 10 and 20, inclusive, in order forthe patient to be eligible to participate in the trial. |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Rivastigmine Patch Once-daily target patch size 10 cm² | 248 |
| Rivastigmine Capsules Twice-daily target dose of 6 mg oral capsule | 253 |
| Total | 501 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Abnormal Lab values | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Administrative Problems | 7 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 32 | 30 |
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Deviation | 5 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Unsatisfactory Therapeutic Effect | 0 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Rivastigmine Patch | Rivastigmine Capsules | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 70.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.02 | 69.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 | 70.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.11 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 140 Participants | 139 Participants | 279 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 108 Participants | 114 Participants | 222 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 82 / 247 | 111 / 251 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 16 / 247 | 21 / 251 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline on Cognition, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. It was assessed by a mental health professional (e.g., M.D., Ph.D., Pharm.D., R.N., or other equivalent qualifications) with a minimum of 2 years research experience meeting certification requirements.
Time frame: Change at 24 weeks
Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline on Cognition, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline on Cognition, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.74 |
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) is a caregiver-based Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale composed of 23 items developed for use in dementia clinical studies. It was designed to assess the patient's performance of both basic and instrumental activities of daily living such as those necessary for personal care, communicating and interacting with other people, maintaining a household, conducting hobbies and interests, as well as making judgments and decisions. Responses for each item were obtained from the caregiver through an interview. For each basic ADL, there was a forced choice of best response or a yes or no question with additional sub questions. Higher numbered scores and answers of yes reflected a more self-sufficient individual. Therefore, the higher total score, the higher functioning the patient was. The total score was the sum of all items and sub questions. The range for the total ADCS-ADL score was 0 to 78.
Time frame: Change at 24 weeks
Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score | -1.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.02 |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Total Score | -1.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.31 |
Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC)
Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) scale provides a single global rating of change from baseline. It was recommended that the baseline interview be conducted by two raters, one designated as the primary rater, the other as a backup. Both raters were independent trained clinicians, experienced in the assessment of patients with dementia. Neither rater was involved in any other way with the patients' treatment or evaluation throughout the study. At baseline, both raters had access to all of the patient's available records and evaluations. Subsequently, for all ratings of change from baseline, the rater relied solely on information obtained during the baseline interview of the patient and caregiver, including written notes and, if available, the baseline interview audio- or videotape. The rater had no access to any other safety or efficacy data, including all previous post-baseline ADCS-CGIC ratings by either rater.
Time frame: Change at 24 weeks
Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Moderate worsening | 7 participants |
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | No change | 67 participants |
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Moderate improvement | 10 participants |
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Minimal worsening | 38 participants |
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | marked improvement | 1 participants |
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Marked worsening | 1 participants |
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Minimal improvement | 68 participants |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Marked worsening | 0 participants |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | marked improvement | 1 participants |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Moderate improvement | 12 participants |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Minimal improvement | 59 participants |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | No change | 74 participants |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Moderate worsening | 6 participants |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Global Functioning, Assessed by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Clinical Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) | Minimal worsening | 35 participants |
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to establish patient's eligibility for the study and it was also used as an efficacy parameter in the Double-blind Treatment Period. The MMSE is a brief, practical screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language) and results in a total possible score of 30, with higher scores indicating betterfunction. The total MMSE score at screening was between 10 and 20, inclusive, in order forthe patient to be eligible to participate in the trial.
Time frame: Change at 24 weeks
Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score | 0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.31 |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score | 0.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score
NPI including Caregiver Distress Scale (NPI-D) assesses a wide range of behavior problems encountered in dementia patients to provide a means of distinguishing frequency and severity of changes in behavioral problems & facilitates rapid behavioral assessment using screening questions.10 behavioral problems & 2 neurovegetative domains were evaluated through an interview of the caregiver by a mental health professional. The scale includes both frequency & severity ratings of ea. domain as well as a composite domain score(frequency x severity). Frequency: 1(occasionally) - 4(very frequently)&severity:1(mild) - 3(marked).The sum of the composite scores of the 12 domains yields the NPI total score. The NPI-D: 0(not severe & not at all distressing) - 5 (very severe or extremely distressing) for each of the 12 domains. NPI-12 total score: from 0-144, the NPI-10 total score: from 0-120, & NPI-D score: from 0-60, all with higher scores indicating more severe behavioral disturbance.
Time frame: Change at 24 weeks
Population: Per Protocol (PP): patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment on treatment (after Day 140 and not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) of the primary efficacy variable and have no major protocol deviations.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | NPI-10: Total score (frequency x severity) | -1.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.84 |
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | NPI-12: Total score (frequency x severity) | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.22 |
| Rivastigmine Patch | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | NPI-D: Distress score (frequency x severity) | -0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.65 |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | NPI-12: Total score (frequency x severity) | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.98 |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | NPI-10: Total score (frequency x severity) | -1.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.46 |
| Rivastigmine Capsules | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | NPI-D: Distress score (frequency x severity) | -0.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.88 |