Spatial Neglect, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
stroke, neglect, hemianopsia, virtual reality
Brief summary
Compared to the classical paper and pencil-tests, testing patients in our virtual reality setup might have a higher sensitivity and specificity.
Interventions
testing for neglect in a virtual reality setup
testing for neglect with the classical paper-and-pencil tests
structural and functional (resting state) imaging
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
for neglect patients: * age ≥18 and \<80 years * first stroke * neglect symptoms * no hemianopsia symptoms * consent given by the patient Inclusion Criteria for hemianopsia patients: * age ≥18 and \<80 years * first stroke * no neglect symptoms * hemianopsia symptoms * consent given by the patient Inclusion Criteria for Controls: * age ≥18 and \<80 years * no neurological deficits * informed consent
Exclusion criteria
(for all groups): * language comprehension deficits * motor deficits of the upper extremities * cognitive impairments (MMSE \<20 or SKT \>15 or DEMTEC \>12) * depression * seizure disorders * claustrophobia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility | within the first 2 years after stroke | Feasibility of the use of a virtual reality setup in the diagnostics of neglect |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity and Specificity | within the first 2 years after stroke | The diagnostics of neglect via a virtual reality setup is more sensitive and more specific than the standard diagnostics via paper-and-pencil Tests |
| mri (functional (resting state) and structural imaging | within the first 2 years after stroke | We hypothesize that there are connectivity-based differences in the different stages of neglect and anatomical and functional connectivity correlates with respect to behavioural impairment. |
Countries
Germany