Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Ozenoxacin 1% Cream Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With Impetigo

A Phase III 3 Arms, Multicenter, Randomised, Investigator-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ozenoxacin 1% Cream Applied Twice Daily for 5 Days Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With Impetigo

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01397461
Enrollment
465
Registered
2011-07-19
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2016-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impetigo

Brief summary

This is multicenter, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel, blinded (double-blind for ozenoxacin versus placebo comparison and investigator blinded for retapamulin versus placebo comparison), superiority clinical study comparing ozenoxacin cream versus placebo and retapamulin ointment vs placebo, in patients with a clinical diagnosis of non-bullous or bullous impetigo.

Interventions

DRUGozenoxacin placebo

cream

DRUGozenoxacin 1% cream

1% cream

Sponsors

Ferrer Internacional S.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of bullous or non bullous impetigo. The patient has a total affected area comprised between 1-100 cm2 with surrounding erythema not extending more than 2 cm from the edge of any affected area. In case of multiple affected areas the total area will be the sum of each affected area and will not exceed 100 cm2. Additionally for patients \< 12 years the total area will not exceed a maximum of 2% of the body surface area. * Total Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score of at least 8, including pus/exudate score of at least 1

Exclusion criteria

* Has a bacterial infection, which in the opinion of the investigator, could not be appropriately treated by a topical antibiotic. * Has systemic signs and symptoms of infection (e.g. a fever; defined as an axillary temperature over 37.2 °C (99.0 °F)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success2 weeksClinical response (clinical success or clinical failure) at end of therapy (Visit 3) in the intent to treat clinical (ITTC) population. Clinical succes at Visit 3 was defined as: SIRS score 0 for exudates/pus, crusting, tissue warmth and pain and no more than 1 each for erythema/inflammation, tissue edema and itching such that no additional antimicrobial therapy in the baseline (Visit 1) affected area is necessary. The SIRS is a severity index based on seven signs or symptoms: * Exudate/pus * Crusting * Erythema/inflammation * Tissue warmth * Tissue oedema * Itching * Pain Each sign/symptom is rated on a scale from 0 to 6: 0 = absent 1 2 = mild 3 4 = moderate 5 6 = severe

Countries

Germany, South Africa

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled at 27 sites in the USA, Germany, Romania, Ukraine, and South Africa.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ozenoxacin 1% Cream
1% cream ozenoxacin 1% cream: 1% cream
156
Ozenoxacin Placebo
cream ozenoxacin placebo: cream
156
Retapamulin 1% Ointment
1% ointment retapamulin 1% ointment: ointment
152
Total464

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy030
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up021
Overall StudyNot treated001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject210

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalOzenoxacin 1% CreamOzenoxacin PlaceboRetapamulin 1% Ointment
Age, Customized
>=12 years to <18 years
52 Participants19 Participants18 Participants15 Participants
Age, Customized
>=18 years to <65 years
116 Participants36 Participants40 Participants40 Participants
Age, Customized
2>=years to <12 years
283 Participants95 Participants94 Participants94 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65
13 Participants6 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska native
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
233 Participants78 Participants77 Participants78 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed race
56 Participants19 Participants15 Participants22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
170 Participants58 Participants62 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
178 Participants56 Participants60 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
286 Participants100 Participants96 Participants90 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1560 / 1560 / 152
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1560 / 1560 / 152

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Success

Clinical response (clinical success or clinical failure) at end of therapy (Visit 3) in the intent to treat clinical (ITTC) population. Clinical succes at Visit 3 was defined as: SIRS score 0 for exudates/pus, crusting, tissue warmth and pain and no more than 1 each for erythema/inflammation, tissue edema and itching such that no additional antimicrobial therapy in the baseline (Visit 1) affected area is necessary. The SIRS is a severity index based on seven signs or symptoms: * Exudate/pus * Crusting * Erythema/inflammation * Tissue warmth * Tissue oedema * Itching * Pain Each sign/symptom is rated on a scale from 0 to 6: 0 = absent 1 2 = mild 3 4 = moderate 5 6 = severe

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ozenoxacin 1% CreamClinical Success34.8 percentage of participants
Ozenoxacin PlaceboClinical Success19.2 percentage of participants
Retapamulin 1% OintmentClinical Success37.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: The treatment comparison was done using only the outcomes of Clinical success and Clinical failure. The p value of the chi square test (without continuity correction) and corresponding 95% asymptotic (Wald) CI for the difference in success rates for the ozenoxacin versus placebo were provided. The analysis was performed to test the superiority of ozenoxacin versus placebo.~Text extracted from the statistical analysis plan. No additional data was pre-specified for the statistical comparisonp-value: 0.003Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026