Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of NNC-0156-0000-0009 After Long-Term Exposure in Patients With Haemophilia B: An Extension to Trials NN7999-3747 and NN7999-3773

Safety and Efficacy of NNC-0156-0000-0009 After Long-Term Exposure in Patients With Haemophilia B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01395810
Acronym
paradigm™ 4
Enrollment
71
Registered
2011-07-18
Start date
2012-04-15
Completion date
2014-03-30
Last updated
2018-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital Bleeding Disorder, Haemophilia B

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe, Japan, North America and South Africa. The aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonacog beta pegol (NNC-0156-0000-0009) after long-term exposure in patients with haemophilia B. This trial is an extension to trials NN7999-3747 (NCT01333111/paradigm™ 2) and NN7999-3773 (NCT01386528/paradigm™ 3).

Interventions

One single dose administered intravenously (into the vein) once weekly. Patients will receive instruction on how to treat any bleeding episode they may experience.

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
13 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Previous participation in NN7999-3747 (NCT01333111) and/or NN7999-3773

Exclusion criteria

* Known history of FIX inhibitors based on existing medical records, laboratory report reviews and patient and LAR (legal acceptable representative) interviews * Current FIX inhibitors above or equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units) * Congenital or acquired coagulation disorders other than haemophilia B * Previous arterial thrombotic events (e.g. myocardial infarction and intracranial thrombosis) or previous deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (as defined by available medical records) * Any disease (liver, kidney, inflammatory and mental disorders included) or condition which, according to the Investigator's (trial physician) judgement, could imply a potential hazard to the patient, interfere with trial participation, or interfere with trial outcome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)From Day 1 up to 2 yearsThe primary endpoint was incidence of inhibitors against coagulation factor nine (FIX) defined as titre ≥0.6 Bethesda unit (BU). Number of subjects who developed inhibitors against FIX are reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)From Day 1 up to 2 yearsThe haemostatic effect was evaluated by a four-point scale where an excellent or good outcome translated into a successful treatment, and a moderate or poor outcome was considered a treatment failure. The values mentioned below do not include bleeds with missing response.
Number of Bleeding Episodes During Routine ProphylaxisFrom Day 1 up to 2 yearsAnnualized bleeding rate is the total number of bleeding episodes/total exposure time. It is analysed by a Poisson regression model with dose as a factor allowing for over-dispersion and using treatment duration as an offset. Median annualized bleeding rate is the median of individual annualized bleeding rates. Numbers are based on the treatment arm at the time of each bleed.
FIX Trough LevelsFrom Day 1 up to 2 yearsDuring the trial, the pre-dose FIX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay. Measurements taken at least 5 days and no more than 10 days after last dose as well as at least 14 days after last bleeding episode were included in this analysis. The mean FIX trough levels were estimated based on the mixed effects model on the log-transformed plasma concentration with subject as a random effect. The mean FIX trough level was presented back-transformed to the natural scale.
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)From Day 1 up to 2 yearsAEs were summarized by frequency of events and frequency of patients with any event. Incidence of AEs was expressed as number of AEs per subject years of exposure (total number of events /total time in trial).
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From Day 1 up to 2 yearsAEs were summarized by frequency of events and frequency of patients with any event. Incidence of serious AEs was expressed as number of serious AEs per subject years of exposure (total number of events /total time in trial).

Countries

Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 41 sites in 15 countries as follows: France: 1 site; Germany: 3 sites; Italy: 2 sites; Japan: 4 sites; Macedonia: 2 sites; Malaysia: 1 site; Netherlands: 1 site; Romania: 1 site, Russia: 1 site; South Africa: 1 site; Taiwan: 1 site, Thailand: 2 sites; Turkey: 3 sites; United Kingdom: 5 sites; United States: 13 sites

Pre-assignment details

A total of 71 unique subjects were dosed during this trial. During the trial, subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg
Subjects were given 10 IU/kg weekly nonacog beta pegol. Subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. Administration of the appropriate volume of nonacog beta pegol was given as an i.v. bolus injection. The maximum injection rate was 4 mL/min. Subjects on prophylaxis who experienced a bleeding episode were to treat the bleeding episode with a single dose of 40 IU/kg, unless the bleeding episode was severe in which case it was to be treated with 80 IU/kg.
18
Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg
Subjects were given 40 IU/kg weekly nonacog beta pegol. Subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. Administration of the appropriate volume of nonacog beta pegol was given as an i.v. bolus injection. The maximum injection rate was 4 mL/min. Subjects on prophylaxis who experienced a bleeding episode were to treat the bleeding episode with a single dose of 40 IU/kg, unless the bleeding episode was severe in which case it was to be treated with 80 IU/kg.
48
Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg
Subjects were dosed with 80 IU/kg every second week. Subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. Administration of the appropriate volume of nonacog beta pegol was given as an i.v. bolus injection. The maximum injection rate was 4 mL/min. Subjects on prophylaxis who experienced a bleeding episode were to treat the bleeding episode with a single dose of 40 IU/kg, unless the bleeding episode was severe in which case it was to be treated with 80 IU/kg.
0
On-demand
Subjects in the on-demand group were administered with the single dose of 40 IU/kg of nonacog beta pegol. The recommended dose for treatment of a mild or moderate bleeding episode, for example a joint bleed, was a single dose of 40 IU/kg nonacog beta pegol. If there was no observed effect of 40 IU/kg, the investigator was to be contacted prior to administration of the second dose of 40 IU/kg. The recommended dose for severe bleeds was 80 IU/kg nonacog beta pegol. Subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject.
5
Total71

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy0100
Overall StudyUnclassified2000
Overall StudyWithdrawal criteria0200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProphylaxis 10 IU/kgProphylaxis 40 IU/kgOn-demandTotalProphylaxis 80 IU/kg
Age, Continuous32.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
31.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
37.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
32.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
Age, Customized
13 - 17 years
3 Participants12 Participants0 Participants15 Participants
Age, Customized
18 - 70 years
15 Participants36 Participants5 Participants56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants48 Participants5 Participants71 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 218 / 520 / 25 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 215 / 520 / 20 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)

The primary endpoint was incidence of inhibitors against coagulation factor nine (FIX) defined as titre ≥0.6 Bethesda unit (BU). Number of subjects who developed inhibitors against FIX are reported.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years

Population: Safety Analysis Set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Prophylaxis 10 IU/kgIncidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)0 Patients with inhibitory antibodies
Prophylaxis 40 IU/kgIncidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)0 Patients with inhibitory antibodies
Prophylaxis 80 IU/kgIncidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)0 Patients with inhibitory antibodies
On-demandIncidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)0 Patients with inhibitory antibodies
Secondary

FIX Trough Levels

During the trial, the pre-dose FIX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay. Measurements taken at least 5 days and no more than 10 days after last dose as well as at least 14 days after last bleeding episode were included in this analysis. The mean FIX trough levels were estimated based on the mixed effects model on the log-transformed plasma concentration with subject as a random effect. The mean FIX trough level was presented back-transformed to the natural scale.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years

Population: Full analysis set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. This endpoint was analysed only for the prophylaxis arms (i.e.,10 IU/kg, 40 IU/kg). No pre-dose measurements were collected for patients on 80 IU/kg every second week prophylaxis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Prophylaxis 10 IU/kgFIX Trough Levels0.098 IU/mL
Prophylaxis 40 IU/kgFIX Trough Levels0.213 IU/mL
Secondary

Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)

The haemostatic effect was evaluated by a four-point scale where an excellent or good outcome translated into a successful treatment, and a moderate or poor outcome was considered a treatment failure. The values mentioned below do not include bleeds with missing response.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years

Population: Full analysis set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Prophylaxis 10 IU/kgHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Success97.1 Percentage of bleeding episodes
Prophylaxis 10 IU/kgHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Failure2.9 Percentage of bleeding episodes
Prophylaxis 40 IU/kgHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Failure5.2 Percentage of bleeding episodes
Prophylaxis 40 IU/kgHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Success94.8 Percentage of bleeding episodes
Prophylaxis 80 IU/kgHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Failure0 Percentage of bleeding episodes
Prophylaxis 80 IU/kgHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Success100 Percentage of bleeding episodes
On-demandHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Success93.2 Percentage of bleeding episodes
On-demandHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Failure6.8 Percentage of bleeding episodes
TotalHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Failure5.4 Percentage of bleeding episodes
TotalHaemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)Success94.6 Percentage of bleeding episodes
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs were summarized by frequency of events and frequency of patients with any event. Incidence of AEs was expressed as number of AEs per subject years of exposure (total number of events /total time in trial).

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years

Population: Safety Analysis Set consisted of all subjects who were exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Prophylaxis 10 IU/kgIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)2.4 Events per subject year of exposure
Prophylaxis 40 IU/kgIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)1.9 Events per subject year of exposure
Prophylaxis 80 IU/kgIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)0 Events per subject year of exposure
On-demandIncidence of Adverse Events (AEs)3.2 Events per subject year of exposure
Secondary

Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AEs were summarized by frequency of events and frequency of patients with any event. Incidence of serious AEs was expressed as number of serious AEs per subject years of exposure (total number of events /total time in trial).

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years

Population: Safety Analysis set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Prophylaxis 10 IU/kgIncidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0.1 Events per subject year of exposure
Prophylaxis 40 IU/kgIncidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0.1 Events per subject year of exposure
Prophylaxis 80 IU/kgIncidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 Events per subject year of exposure
On-demandIncidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 Events per subject year of exposure
Secondary

Number of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis

Annualized bleeding rate is the total number of bleeding episodes/total exposure time. It is analysed by a Poisson regression model with dose as a factor allowing for over-dispersion and using treatment duration as an offset. Median annualized bleeding rate is the median of individual annualized bleeding rates. Numbers are based on the treatment arm at the time of each bleed.

Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years

Population: Full analysis set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Prophylaxis 10 IU/kgNumber of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis1.36 bleeds/patient/year
Prophylaxis 40 IU/kgNumber of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis1.00 bleeds/patient/year
Prophylaxis 80 IU/kgNumber of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis0 bleeds/patient/year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026