Congenital Bleeding Disorder, Haemophilia B
Conditions
Brief summary
This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe, Japan, North America and South Africa. The aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonacog beta pegol (NNC-0156-0000-0009) after long-term exposure in patients with haemophilia B. This trial is an extension to trials NN7999-3747 (NCT01333111/paradigm™ 2) and NN7999-3773 (NCT01386528/paradigm™ 3).
Interventions
One single dose administered intravenously (into the vein) once weekly. Patients will receive instruction on how to treat any bleeding episode they may experience.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Previous participation in NN7999-3747 (NCT01333111) and/or NN7999-3773
Exclusion criteria
* Known history of FIX inhibitors based on existing medical records, laboratory report reviews and patient and LAR (legal acceptable representative) interviews * Current FIX inhibitors above or equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units) * Congenital or acquired coagulation disorders other than haemophilia B * Previous arterial thrombotic events (e.g. myocardial infarction and intracranial thrombosis) or previous deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (as defined by available medical records) * Any disease (liver, kidney, inflammatory and mental disorders included) or condition which, according to the Investigator's (trial physician) judgement, could imply a potential hazard to the patient, interfere with trial participation, or interfere with trial outcome
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units) | From Day 1 up to 2 years | The primary endpoint was incidence of inhibitors against coagulation factor nine (FIX) defined as titre ≥0.6 Bethesda unit (BU). Number of subjects who developed inhibitors against FIX are reported. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | From Day 1 up to 2 years | The haemostatic effect was evaluated by a four-point scale where an excellent or good outcome translated into a successful treatment, and a moderate or poor outcome was considered a treatment failure. The values mentioned below do not include bleeds with missing response. |
| Number of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis | From Day 1 up to 2 years | Annualized bleeding rate is the total number of bleeding episodes/total exposure time. It is analysed by a Poisson regression model with dose as a factor allowing for over-dispersion and using treatment duration as an offset. Median annualized bleeding rate is the median of individual annualized bleeding rates. Numbers are based on the treatment arm at the time of each bleed. |
| FIX Trough Levels | From Day 1 up to 2 years | During the trial, the pre-dose FIX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay. Measurements taken at least 5 days and no more than 10 days after last dose as well as at least 14 days after last bleeding episode were included in this analysis. The mean FIX trough levels were estimated based on the mixed effects model on the log-transformed plasma concentration with subject as a random effect. The mean FIX trough level was presented back-transformed to the natural scale. |
| Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) | From Day 1 up to 2 years | AEs were summarized by frequency of events and frequency of patients with any event. Incidence of AEs was expressed as number of AEs per subject years of exposure (total number of events /total time in trial). |
| Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | From Day 1 up to 2 years | AEs were summarized by frequency of events and frequency of patients with any event. Incidence of serious AEs was expressed as number of serious AEs per subject years of exposure (total number of events /total time in trial). |
Countries
Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The trial was conducted at 41 sites in 15 countries as follows: France: 1 site; Germany: 3 sites; Italy: 2 sites; Japan: 4 sites; Macedonia: 2 sites; Malaysia: 1 site; Netherlands: 1 site; Romania: 1 site, Russia: 1 site; South Africa: 1 site; Taiwan: 1 site, Thailand: 2 sites; Turkey: 3 sites; United Kingdom: 5 sites; United States: 13 sites
Pre-assignment details
A total of 71 unique subjects were dosed during this trial. During the trial, subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple arms.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg Subjects were given 10 IU/kg weekly nonacog beta pegol. Subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. Administration of the appropriate volume of nonacog beta pegol was given as an i.v. bolus injection. The maximum injection rate was 4 mL/min. Subjects on prophylaxis who experienced a bleeding episode were to treat the bleeding episode with a single dose of 40 IU/kg, unless the bleeding episode was severe in which case it was to be treated with 80 IU/kg. | 18 |
| Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg Subjects were given 40 IU/kg weekly nonacog beta pegol. Subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. Administration of the appropriate volume of nonacog beta pegol was given as an i.v. bolus injection. The maximum injection rate was 4 mL/min. Subjects on prophylaxis who experienced a bleeding episode were to treat the bleeding episode with a single dose of 40 IU/kg, unless the bleeding episode was severe in which case it was to be treated with 80 IU/kg. | 48 |
| Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg Subjects were dosed with 80 IU/kg every second week. Subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. Administration of the appropriate volume of nonacog beta pegol was given as an i.v. bolus injection. The maximum injection rate was 4 mL/min. Subjects on prophylaxis who experienced a bleeding episode were to treat the bleeding episode with a single dose of 40 IU/kg, unless the bleeding episode was severe in which case it was to be treated with 80 IU/kg. | 0 |
| On-demand Subjects in the on-demand group were administered with the single dose of 40 IU/kg of nonacog beta pegol. The recommended dose for treatment of a mild or moderate bleeding episode, for example a joint bleed, was a single dose of 40 IU/kg nonacog beta pegol. If there was no observed effect of 40 IU/kg, the investigator was to be contacted prior to administration of the second dose of 40 IU/kg. The recommended dose for severe bleeds was 80 IU/kg nonacog beta pegol. Subjects were free to switch between treatment arms if agreed between the investigator and the subject. | 5 |
| Total | 71 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Unclassified | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal criteria | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg | Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg | On-demand | Total | Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 32.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 | 31.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 | 37.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 | 32.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 | — |
| Age, Customized 13 - 17 years | 3 Participants | 12 Participants | 0 Participants | 15 Participants | — |
| Age, Customized 18 - 70 years | 15 Participants | 36 Participants | 5 Participants | 56 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 18 Participants | 48 Participants | 5 Participants | 71 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 8 / 21 | 8 / 52 | 0 / 2 | 5 / 5 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 21 | 5 / 52 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 5 |
Outcome results
Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units)
The primary endpoint was incidence of inhibitors against coagulation factor nine (FIX) defined as titre ≥0.6 Bethesda unit (BU). Number of subjects who developed inhibitors against FIX are reported.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years
Population: Safety Analysis Set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg | Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units) | 0 Patients with inhibitory antibodies |
| Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg | Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units) | 0 Patients with inhibitory antibodies |
| Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg | Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units) | 0 Patients with inhibitory antibodies |
| On-demand | Incidence of Inhibitory Antibodies Against FIX Defined as Titre Above or Equal to 0.6 BU (Bethesda Units) | 0 Patients with inhibitory antibodies |
FIX Trough Levels
During the trial, the pre-dose FIX levels was measured with the one-stage clotting assay. Measurements taken at least 5 days and no more than 10 days after last dose as well as at least 14 days after last bleeding episode were included in this analysis. The mean FIX trough levels were estimated based on the mixed effects model on the log-transformed plasma concentration with subject as a random effect. The mean FIX trough level was presented back-transformed to the natural scale.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years
Population: Full analysis set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. This endpoint was analysed only for the prophylaxis arms (i.e.,10 IU/kg, 40 IU/kg). No pre-dose measurements were collected for patients on 80 IU/kg every second week prophylaxis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg | FIX Trough Levels | 0.098 IU/mL |
| Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg | FIX Trough Levels | 0.213 IU/mL |
Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor)
The haemostatic effect was evaluated by a four-point scale where an excellent or good outcome translated into a successful treatment, and a moderate or poor outcome was considered a treatment failure. The values mentioned below do not include bleeds with missing response.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years
Population: Full analysis set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Success | 97.1 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Failure | 2.9 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Failure | 5.2 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Success | 94.8 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Failure | 0 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Success | 100 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| On-demand | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Success | 93.2 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| On-demand | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Failure | 6.8 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| Total | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Failure | 5.4 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
| Total | Haemostatic Effect of Nonacog Beta Pegol When Used for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Assessed as Success/Failure Based on a Four-point Scale for Haemostatic Response (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor) | Success | 94.6 Percentage of bleeding episodes |
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
AEs were summarized by frequency of events and frequency of patients with any event. Incidence of AEs was expressed as number of AEs per subject years of exposure (total number of events /total time in trial).
Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years
Population: Safety Analysis Set consisted of all subjects who were exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg | Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) | 2.4 Events per subject year of exposure |
| Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg | Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) | 1.9 Events per subject year of exposure |
| Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg | Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) | 0 Events per subject year of exposure |
| On-demand | Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) | 3.2 Events per subject year of exposure |
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs were summarized by frequency of events and frequency of patients with any event. Incidence of serious AEs was expressed as number of serious AEs per subject years of exposure (total number of events /total time in trial).
Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years
Population: Safety Analysis set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg | Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | 0.1 Events per subject year of exposure |
| Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg | Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | 0.1 Events per subject year of exposure |
| Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg | Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | 0 Events per subject year of exposure |
| On-demand | Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | 0 Events per subject year of exposure |
Number of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis
Annualized bleeding rate is the total number of bleeding episodes/total exposure time. It is analysed by a Poisson regression model with dose as a factor allowing for over-dispersion and using treatment duration as an offset. Median annualized bleeding rate is the median of individual annualized bleeding rates. Numbers are based on the treatment arm at the time of each bleed.
Time frame: From Day 1 up to 2 years
Population: Full analysis set consisted of all subjects exposed to nonacog beta pegol. Subjects who switched arms were represented in multiple columns.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis 10 IU/kg | Number of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis | 1.36 bleeds/patient/year |
| Prophylaxis 40 IU/kg | Number of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis | 1.00 bleeds/patient/year |
| Prophylaxis 80 IU/kg | Number of Bleeding Episodes During Routine Prophylaxis | 0 bleeds/patient/year |