Skip to content

Effects of Pioglitazone, a PPARgamma Receptor Agonist, on the Abuse Liability of Oxycodone

Effects of Pioglitazone, a PPARgamma Receptor Agonist, on the Abuse Liability of Oxycodone

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01395784
Enrollment
32
Registered
2011-07-18
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2016-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid Abuse

Keywords

Oxycodone, Opioid abuse

Brief summary

The ability of pioglitazone (PIO) to alter the effects of opioids in humans has not been characterized in a controlled laboratory setting. Accordingly, the proposed investigation seeks to examine the effects of PIO on oxycodone, one of the most commonly used and abused opioid drugs in the U.S. (Davis et al., 2003). More specifically, the primary aim of this investigation is to characterize the subjective effects of oxycodone under maintenance on various doses of PIO (0, 15, and 45 mg) in non-dependent, prescription opioid abusers. Secondary aims of the study are to examine the influence of PIO on the analgesic, cognitive, and physiological effects of oxycodone.

Detailed description

This 9-week investigation will use an inpatient/outpatient design in which participants will be maintained on ascending doses of pioglitazone (3 weeks on placebo followed by 3 weeks on PIO 15 mg followed by 3 weeks on PIO 45 mg). At the end of each maintenance period the effects of oxycodone (0, 10, and 20 mg) will be examined during a single laboratory session using a cumulative dosing procedure.

Interventions

DRUGpioglitazone

A PPARγ agonist, also marketed as Actos. Participants will be maintained on ascending doses of Placebo, pioglitazone 15 mg and 45 mg, prior to completing a lab session at the end of each dosing period.

Sponsors

Omeros Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Recreational use of prescription opioids at least once per month within the past year 2. No current major mood, psychotic, or anxiety disorder 3. Physically healthy 4. aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) within normal limits 5. Able to perform study procedures 6.21-45 years of age 7.Blood glucose concentration between 70-145 mg/dl for men and 70-125 mg/dl for women (fasting) 8.Hb \> 13 for men and Hb \> 11 for women with no other evidence of medical disorder resulting in blood loss or anemia/hematological disease

Exclusion criteria

1. Physical dependence on any drugs, excluding nicotine and caffeine 2. Participants requesting treatment 3. Participants on parole or probation 4. Pregnancy or lactation: Female participants must agree to the use of a barrier control method of contraception (e.g. male and female condoms, diaphragms, cervical caps and contraceptive sponges used in combination with spermicide) 5. Current or recent history of significant violent behavior (within the past 6 months) 6. Current major Axis I psychopathology that might interfere with ability to participate in the study 7. Significant suicide risk 8. Current chronic pain 9. Current or history of congestive heart failure, edema, or diabetes mellitus 10. Sensitivity, allergy, or contraindication to opioids or pioglitazone 11. Unstable physical disorders that might make participation hazardous, such as end-stage AIDS, hypertension (blood pressure \> 140/90), or heart disease (please note that participants will be asked about previous visits to a cardiologist, chest pain, or strong palpitations; if these exist, they will be referred to a cardiologist and excluded unless cleared for participation by a cardiologist)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Ratings of Good Drug EffectMeasured during the lab session conducted at the end of each maintenance periodVisual analog scale ratings (0-100 mm scale, 0=Not at all, 100=Extremely)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analgesic Responses Using the Cold Pressor TestMeasured during the lab session conducted at the end of each maintenance periodLatency to withdraw hand from cold water during the cold pressor test.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Withing-subjects, Placebo-Controlled
Participants will complete the various outcome measures following maintenance period of: Placebo, Pioglitazone 15 mg, and 45 mg.
17
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up7
Overall StudyPhysician Decision5
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWithing-subjects, Placebo-Controlled
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants
Age, Continuous35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Subjective Ratings of Good Drug Effect

Visual analog scale ratings (0-100 mm scale, 0=Not at all, 100=Extremely)

Time frame: Measured during the lab session conducted at the end of each maintenance period

Population: Shown below are peak drug effects from each of the 3 maintenance periods (Placebo, Pioglitazone (PIO) 15, and PIO 45)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsSubjective Ratings of Good Drug EffectPlacebo37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
All ParticipantsSubjective Ratings of Good Drug EffectPIO 1535 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
All ParticipantsSubjective Ratings of Good Drug EffectPIO 4535 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Secondary

Analgesic Responses Using the Cold Pressor Test

Latency to withdraw hand from cold water during the cold pressor test.

Time frame: Measured during the lab session conducted at the end of each maintenance period

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsAnalgesic Responses Using the Cold Pressor TestPlacebo110 secondsStandard Deviation 23
All ParticipantsAnalgesic Responses Using the Cold Pressor TestPIO 1571 secondsStandard Deviation 8
All ParticipantsAnalgesic Responses Using the Cold Pressor TestPIO 4575 secondsStandard Deviation 10

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026