Skip to content

Reintroduction Regimens After Hepatitis During Anti-tuberculosis Treatment

Different Reintroduction Regimens of Antituberculosis Drugs After Development of Hepatitis During Anti-tuberculosis Treatment

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01395654
Enrollment
100
Registered
2011-07-15
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2012-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Brief summary

Despite the availability of effective anti-tuberculosis agents that exist to treat this illness, hepatotoxicity during first-line drugs anti-tuberculosis medications (ATT) such as isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), and pyrazinamide (PZA) is not uncommon and limit their use. There is no consensus on method of the reintroduction of anti-TB medications. The risk of reintroducing of a anti-TB medications could be hazardous. There are several differences between the guidelines from the ATS, BTS and the Task Force of the European Respiratory Society, the WHO and the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease about the methods of reintroducing of anti-TB medications. The investigators plan to do a prospective study to evaluate the outcome and safety of reintroduction of anti-TB medications after resolution of hepatitis during anti-TB treatment among TB patients in the investigators hospital.

Detailed description

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading health problem in both developing and developed countries. Despite the availability of effective chemotherapeutic agents that exist to treat this illness, hepatotoxicity during first-line drugs anti-tuberculosis medications (ATT) such as isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), and pyrazinamide (PZA) is not uncommon and limit their use. In the case of confirmed moderate or severe drug-induced hepatotoxicity, treatment should be interrupted and reintroduced after the hepatotoxicity has resolved. There is no consensus on method of the reintroduction of anti-TB medications. The risk of reintroducing of a anti-TB medications could be hazardous. There are several differences between the guidelines from the ATS, BTS and the Task Force of the European Respiratory Society, the WHO and the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease about the methods of reintroducing of anti-TB medications. We plan to do a prospective study to evaluate the outcome and safety of reintroduction of anti-TB medications after resolution of hepatitis during anti-TB treatment among TB patients in our hospital.

Interventions

DRUGisoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide

rechallenge of isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), and pyrazinamide (PZA) aftr recovery from hepatitis

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hepatitis during anti-tuberculosis treatment * Hold RMP, INH and PZA after hepatitis * Age \>= 18 years old * HIV(-) * T-bilirubin \< 2.5 mg/dL * No allergy to RMP, INH and PZA

Exclusion criteria

* Liver cirrhosis, child B or C * Pregnancy and breast feeding * Life expectation \< 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The duration needed for successfully rechallenge anti-tuberculosis treatmentparticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of participants with recurrence of hepatitisparticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactJann-Yuan Wang, MD
jywang@ntu.edu.tw886-2-3123456

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026