Skip to content

Dasatinib Added to Gemcitabine for Subjects With Locally-advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Placebo-controlled Double-blind Trial of Dasatinib Added to Gemcitabine for Subjects With Locally-advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01395017
Acronym
LAPC
Enrollment
202
Registered
2011-07-15
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2016-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer, Dasatinib, chemotherapy, Locally advanced

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who receive dasatinib added to standard of care (gemcitabine) live longer, compared to patients who receive standard of care (gemcitabine) plus placebo; i.e. gemcitabine alone.

Interventions

DRUGdasatinib

GEM 1000 mg/m2 by intravenous \[IV\] infusion weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus dasatinib 100 mg (or matched placebo) by mouth once daily (QD). Subjects will continue to receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or study termination.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching Placebo

Sponsors

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologic or cytologic documentation of unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. * Recovery from toxicity of previous procedures to establish the diagnosis. ECOG PS 0 or 1. * Adequate organ function.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of metastatic disease. * Previous radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. * History of or current pleural effusion. * History of significant cardiovascular disease. * Clinically significant bleeding disorder or coagulopathy. * Concomitant medication with strong CYP 3A4 inhibitor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization until date of death from any cause by 02 December 2013Overall survival (OS) is the time from randomization until time of death from any cause by 02 December 2013.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Time from randomization to earliest PFS event by 02 December 2013PFS - time from randomization to unequivocal local or distant disease progression, death or discontinuation from trial for any reason by 02 December 2013. Progression events were determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 every 8 weeks.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Romania, Russia, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

202 participants were enrolled at 79 study sites in 15 countries.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive dasatinib + gemcitabine (GEM) or placebo + GEM. Participants were stratified at the time of randomization by baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) (0 versus 1) and intent to receive radiotherapy (RT) (yes or no).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dasatinib + GEM
GEM 1000 mg/m2 by IV infusion weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus dasatinib 100 mg by mouth QD.
100
Placebo + GEM
GEM 1000 mg/m2 by IV infusion weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus matched placebo by mouth QD.
102
Total202

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event2612
Overall StudyDeath43
Overall StudyDisease progression4258
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1115
Overall StudyProtocol deviation12
Overall StudySponsor discontinued study14
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject148

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDasatinib + GEMPlacebo + GEMTotal
Age, Continuous64.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
64.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
64.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants56 Participants99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants46 Participants103 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
93 / 9898 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
53 / 9848 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is the time from randomization until time of death from any cause by 02 December 2013.

Time frame: From randomization until date of death from any cause by 02 December 2013

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) data which was composed of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib + GEMOverall Survival375 Days
Placebo + GEMOverall Survival393 Days
Comparison: Using a 1-sided alpha=0.2, a population of 200 participants (100 GEM plus dasatinib and 100 GEM plus placebo) has 79% power to show an increase in median OS from 10 to 13.3 months (hazard ratio \[HR\] =0.75, assuming analysis of 135 deaths).p-value: 0.386495% CI: [0.85, 1.65]Cox proportional hazard model
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS - time from randomization to unequivocal local or distant disease progression, death or discontinuation from trial for any reason by 02 December 2013. Progression events were determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 every 8 weeks.

Time frame: Time from randomization to earliest PFS event by 02 December 2013

Population: The ITT data which was composed of all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dasatinib + GEMProgression Free Survival (PFS)167 Days
Placebo + GEMProgression Free Survival (PFS)166 Days
Comparison: Trial has 88% power to show a median PFS increase from 5 to 7 months (with 1-sided alpha=0.15, total 176 events, HR=0.714).p-value: 0.676195% CI: [0.73, 1.34]Cox proportional hazard model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026