Skip to content

Caudal Versus Rectus Sheath Study

A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized Comparison of Caudal Analgesia Versus Ultrasound Guided Rectus Sheath Blocks for Umbilical Herniorrhaphy in the Pediatric Population

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01394523
Enrollment
39
Registered
2011-07-14
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Umbilical Hernia

Brief summary

The literature has clearly demonstrated that the effective treatment of postoperative pain in infants and children is challenging. In an effort to improve postoperative analgesia while limiting opioid-related adverse effects, there continues to be an increased use of regional anesthetic techniques in infants and children. Although the pediatric caudal remains the most commonly used pediatric regional anesthetic technique, it has been demonstrated that effective analgesia can be provided with the use of peripheral nerve blockade even in the pediatric-aged patient. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare post-operative pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair who have received either a caudal block or bilateral rectus sheath blocks for analgesia

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine

0.25% or 0.5%

Sponsors

Nationwide Children's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA physical status I or II * Weight less than or equal to 20 kg * Presenting for repair of umbilical hernia

Exclusion criteria

* ASA physical status \> II * Weight greater than 20 kg * Co-morbid diseases (cardiac, pulmonary, neurological disease) * Patients having concomitant procedures (circumcision, orchiopexy, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative Pain Score30 minutesHannallah et al developed the Objective Pain Scale (OPS) to monitor pain in children after surgery. Parameters: (1) systolic blood pressure, (2) crying, (3) movement, (4) agitation (confused, excited), (5) complains of pain (may not be possible in younger children). Interpretation: minimum score: 0; maximum score: 10; maximum score if too young to complain of pain: 8; the higher the score, the greater the degree of pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Caudal Epidural
The caudal epidural block will be delivered with 1.5ml/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine up to a maximum of 30 mL. Bupivacaine: 0.25% or 0.5%
13
Rectus Sheath
The rectus sheath block will be performed with 0.1ml/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine on each side at the T9-T10 distribution under ultrasound guidance. Bupivacaine: 0.25% or 0.5%
13
Local
The surgeon will inject either 0.5% Bupivicaine 0.5ml/kg or 0.25% Bupivicaine 1ml/kg at the surgeon's discretion. Bupivacaine: 0.25% or 0.5%
13
Total39

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyUnable to place block100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCaudal EpiduralRectus SheathLocalTotal
Age, Continuous4.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
4.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
4.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
4.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants10 Participants6 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants3 Participants7 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 130 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 130 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Post-operative Pain Score

Hannallah et al developed the Objective Pain Scale (OPS) to monitor pain in children after surgery. Parameters: (1) systolic blood pressure, (2) crying, (3) movement, (4) agitation (confused, excited), (5) complains of pain (may not be possible in younger children). Interpretation: minimum score: 0; maximum score: 10; maximum score if too young to complain of pain: 8; the higher the score, the greater the degree of pain.

Time frame: 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Caudal EpiduralPost-operative Pain Score2.9 pain scoreStandard Deviation 3.3
Rectus SheathPost-operative Pain Score3.1 pain scoreStandard Deviation 3.1
LocalPost-operative Pain Score2.1 pain scoreStandard Deviation 2.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026