Skip to content

Study of Elotuzumab in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma and Various Levels of Renal Function

PH Ib Study of Elotuzumab in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma and Normal Renal Function, Severe Renal Impairment, or End Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01393964
Enrollment
35
Registered
2011-07-14
Start date
2012-01-06
Completion date
2016-07-18
Last updated
2017-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the concentration of Elotuzumab in Myeloma patients with very low kidney function including patients on dialysis.

Interventions

DRUGLenalidomide

Capsules, Oral, 15 mg, One capsule every 48 hours through Days 1-21 (Repeat every 28 days until subject meets criteria for discontinuation of study drug

DRUGDexamethasone

Tablets, Oral, 28 mg weekly, on day 1 (cycle 1); days 1, 8, 15, 22 (cycles 2-3; days 1 &15 (cycle 4 and beyond) Repeat every 28 days until subject meets criteria for discontinuation of study drug

Solution, Intravenous, 10 mg/kg, weekly, on day 1 (cycle 1); days 1, 8, 15, 22 (cycles 2-3; days 1 &15 (cycle 4 and beyond), Repeat every 28 days until subject meets criteria for discontinuation of study drug

Sponsors

AbbVie
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and renal function fitting one of three categories: 1. Severe renal impairment: estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) \<30 ml/min, but not requiring dialysis 2. End-stage renal disease: requiring hemodialysis 3. Normal renal function: estimated CrCl ≥90 ml/min * Documented evidence of symptomatic MM, either newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory * Prior Lenalidomide exposure is permitted only if the subject did not discontinue Lenalidomide due to a Grade ≥3 related Adverse Event (AE)

Exclusion criteria

* Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS), Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, or smoldering myeloma * Active plasma cell leukemia * All adverse events of any prior chemotherapy, surgery, or radiotherapy not resolved * POEMS syndrome (plasma cell dyscrasia with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes) * Acute renal failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geometric Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance MethodDay 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post doseThe quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using a validated Enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. Cmax was measured in micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL). Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.
Geometric Mean Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration AUC(0-T) and From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time AUC(INF) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 - Grouping by C-G CrCl MethodDay 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post doseThe quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD participants had 2 additional sample times: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. AUC was measured in µg\*h/mL. PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.From first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days, up to Primary Endpoint (June 2014), approximately 2 yearsSerum samples were evaluated for the presence of ADAs using a validated bridging electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassay. Samples in: Cycle 1, Day 1 0 h (pre-dose), Cycle 2, Day 1(Study Day 29), 0 h (pre-dose; 672 h post-dose), Cycle 3, Day 1, 0 h and in cycle thereafter, at end of study/discontinuation, and at 30 and 60 day follow up visits post treatment. ADA Positive Participant: baseline negative with at least one ADA positive sample at any time after initiation of treatment or baseline positive with at least one ADA positive sample at any time after initiation of treatment with a titer 9-fold greater than the baseline; Persistent Positive: ADA positive at 2 or more sequential timepoints at least 12 weeks apart; Last Sample Positive: Not persistent positive and ADA Positive Sample in the last sampling timepoint; Other Positive: not persistent positive with ADA negative sample in the last sampling; ADA Negative: no ADA positive sample after the initiation of treatment.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedFrom first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days (Assessed up to July 2016, approximately 54 months)AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsFrom first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days (Assessed up to July 2016, approximately 54 months)National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0 was used to measure toxicity scale. Lower Limits of Normal (LLN). Hemoglobin Gr 1:\<LLN to 10.0 g/dL, Gr 2:\<10.0 to 8.0 g/dL, Gr 3:\<8.0 to 6.5 g/dL, Gr 4:\<6.5 g/dL. Lymphocytes absolute (abs) Gr 1: \<1.5 to 0.8 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 2 \<0.8 to 0.5 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 3: \<0.5 to 0.2 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 4: \<0.2\*10\^3 c/µL. Neutrophils abs: Gr 1:\<LLN to 1.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<1.5 to 1.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<1.0 to 0.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<0.5\*10\^9/L. Platelet count Gr 1:LLN to 75.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<75.0 to 50.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<50.0 to 25.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<25.0 to 10\^9/L. Leukocytes Gr 1:\<LLN to 3.0 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 2; \<3.0 to 2.0 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 3: \<2.0 to 1.0 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 4: \<1.0 \*10\^3 c/µL.
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsFrom first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days (Assessed up to July 2016, approximately 54 months)NCI CTCAE, version 3.0 was used to measure toxicity scale. Lower Limits of Normal (LLN). Upper Limits of Normal (ULN). Alanine transaminase (ALT); Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alkaline phosphatase (ALP). ALT Grade (Gr)1:\>1.0 to 2.5\*ULN; Gr 2: \>2.5 to 5.0\*ULN; Gr 3: \>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>20.0\*ULN. AST Gr 1: \>1.0 to 2.5\*ULN; Gr 2: \>2.5 to 5.0\*ULN; Gr 3: \>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>20.0\*ULN. Total bilirubin Gr 1: \>1.0 to 1.5\*ULN; Gr 2: \>1.5 to 3.0\*ULN; Gr 3: \>3.0 to 10..0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>10.0.0\*ULN. ALP (U/L) Gr1:\>1.0 to 2.5\*ULN, Gr2:\>2.5 to 5.0\*ULN, Gr3:\>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN, Gr4:\>20.0\*ULN. Albumin (low) Gr 1:\<LLN to 3 grams per deciliter (g/dL); Gr 2: \<3.0 - 2.0 g/L; Gr 3: \< 2 g/dL. Creatinine Gr 1: \>1 - 1.5\*baseline (BL)to \>ULN - 1.5\*ULN; Gr 2: \>1.5 - 3.0\*BL to \> 1.5 - 3.0\*ULN; Gr 3: \>3.0\*BL to \> 3.0 - 6.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>6.0\*ULN.
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsFrom first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days (Assessed up to July 2016, approximately 54 months)Sodium high (H) Gr 1:\>ULN - 150; Gr 2: \>150 - 155; Gr 3: \>155 - 160; Gr 4: \>160 mmol/L; Sodium low(L) Gr 1:\<LLN - 130; Gr 3: \<130 - 120; Gr 4: \<120 mmol/L. Potassium (H) Gr 1: \>ULN - 5.5; Gr 2: \>5.5 - 6.0; Gr 3: \> 6.0 - 7.0; Gr 4: \>7.0 mmol/L; Potassium (L) Gr 1: \<LLN - 3.0; Gr 2: \<LLN - 3.0; Gr 3: \< 3.0 - 2.5; Gr 4: \<2.5 mmol/L. Bicarbonate Gr1: 16-\<LLN, Gr2: 11-16, Gr3, 8-11, Gr4: \<8 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L). Phosphorus Gr 1: 2.5 - \<LLN, Gr2 2.0-\<2.5, Gr3: 1.0-\<2.0, Gr4: \<1.0. Calcium (L) Gr 1: \<LLN to 8.0; Gr2: 7.0 - 8.0; Gr3: 6.0-7.0; Gr 4: \<6.0 mg/dL; calcium (H) Gr1:\>ULN - 11.5, Gr2:\>11.5 - 12.5, Gr3: 12.5 - 13.5, Gr4: \>13.5.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geometric Mean Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance MethodDay 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post doseThe quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. Vz was measured in mL per kilogram body weight (mL/kg). PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.
Geometric Mean Total Body Clearance (CLT) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance MethodDay 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post doseThe quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. CLT was measured in mL per hour per kilogram body weight (mL/h/kg). PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.
Mean Terminal-phase Elimination Half-life (T-Half) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance MethodDay 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post doseThe quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. T-Half was measured in hours (h). PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.
Median Time to Maximal Concentration (Tmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance MethodDay 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post doseThe quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. Tmax was measured in hours (h). PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

35 participants were enrolled; 9 did not enter into the treatment period. Reasons for not entering treatment period: 8 no longer met criteria, 1 other.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) Participants
Treatment was administered in 28 day cycles: Elotuzumab 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV) was administered on Day 1 only for Cycle 1, weekly for Cycles 2 and 3, and every 2 weeks (Q2W) beginning with Cycle 4 and thereafter. Lenalidomide dosing was based on creatinine clearance (CrCl) calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) formula based on Day 1 creatinine and Day 1 weight measured at each cycle. Dexamethasone was administered weekly as a 40mg oral dose (po) on weeks without elotuzumab; and as a split dose of 28 mg po 3 to 24 hours before and 8 mg IV at least 45 minutes before the start of the elotuzumab infusion on weeks with elotuzumab. C-G Creatinine Clearance CrCl Method was used to determine renal function. NRF =CrCl ≥ 90 milliliters per minute (mL/min).
8
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) Participants
Treatment was administered in 28 day cycles: Elotuzumab 10 mg/kg IV was administered on Day 1 only for Cycle 1, weekly for Cycles 2 and 3, and Q2W beginning with Cycle 4 and thereafter. Lenalidomide dosing was based on CrCl calculated using the C-G formula based on Day 1 creatinine and Day 1 weight measured at each cycle. Dexamethasone was administered weekly PO as 40mg dose on weeks without elotuzumab; and as a split dose of 28 mg PO 3 to 24 hours before and 8 mg IV at least 45 minutes before the start of the elotuzumab infusion on weeks with elotuzumab. C-G CrCl Method was used to determine renal function. SRI= estimated CrCl \< 30 ml/min but no dialysis.
9
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Participants
Treatment was administered in 28 day cycles: Elotuzumab 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV) was administered on Day 1 only for Cycle 1, weekly for Cycles 2 and 3, Q2W beginning with Cycle 4 and thereafter. Lenalidomide dosing was based on CrCl calculated using the C-G formula based on Day 1 creatinine and Day 1 weight measured at each cycle. Dexamethasone was administered weekly as a 40mg PO dose on weeks without elotuzumab; and as a split dose of 28 mg PO 3 to 24 hours before and 8 mg IV at least 45 minutes before the start of the elotuzumab infusion on weeks with elotuzumab. C-G CrCl Method was used to determine renal function. ESRD= requires hemodialysis.
9
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse event unrelated to study drug030
Overall StudyDisease Progression435
Overall StudyInvestigator removed subject from study010
Overall StudyStudy drug toxicity100
Overall StudySubject converted to roll-over study010
Overall StudySubject decided to move to transplant100
Overall StudySubject plateaued in terms of effect100
Overall StudySubject request stop study treatment010
Overall StudySubject switched to commercial supply102
Overall StudySubject to receive non-protocol therapy001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsElotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsElotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsTotal
Age, Continuous75.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.05
63.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.02
Age, Customized
>=65 and < 75 years
3 participants0 participants1 participants4 participants
Age, Customized
< 65 years
1 participants8 participants7 participants16 participants
Age, Customized
>= 75 years
5 participants1 participants0 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants9 participants8 participants26 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants5 Participants5 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 89 / 99 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 85 / 97 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Geometric Mean Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration AUC(0-T) and From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time AUC(INF) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 - Grouping by C-G CrCl Method

The quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD participants had 2 additional sample times: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. AUC was measured in µg\*h/mL. PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post dose

Population: The analyses of primary endpoint of PK parameters were conducted by renal functions as determined by CrCl C-G method in those participants who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable pre- and post-treatment values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration AUC(0-T) and From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time AUC(INF) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 - Grouping by C-G CrCl MethodAUC (0-T)39559 µg*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration AUC(0-T) and From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time AUC(INF) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 - Grouping by C-G CrCl MethodAUC (INF)46401 µg*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration AUC(0-T) and From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time AUC(INF) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 - Grouping by C-G CrCl MethodAUC (0-T)50080 µg*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration AUC(0-T) and From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time AUC(INF) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 - Grouping by C-G CrCl MethodAUC (INF)60255 µg*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration AUC(0-T) and From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time AUC(INF) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 - Grouping by C-G CrCl MethodAUC (0-T)45937 µg*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration AUC(0-T) and From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time AUC(INF) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 - Grouping by C-G CrCl MethodAUC (INF)51227 µg*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39
Comparison: AUC(0-T). The reference arm is NRF participants.p-value: 0.16490% CI: [95.52, 167.783]ANOVA
Comparison: AUC(0-T). The reference arm is NRF participants.p-value: 0.35590% CI: [88.458, 152.439]ANOVA
Comparison: AUC (INF). The reference arm is NRF participants.p-value: 0.22890% CI: [90.366, 186.609]ANOVA
Comparison: AUC(INF). The reference arm is NRF participants.p-value: 0.64290% CI: [76.825, 158.647]ANOVA
Primary

Geometric Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method

The quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using a validated Enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. Cmax was measured in micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL). Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post dose

Population: The analyses of primary endpoint of PK parameters were conducted by renal functions as determined by CrCl C-G method in those participants who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable pre- and post-treatment values.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method217 µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 24
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method226 µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 10
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method218 µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21
Comparison: The reference arm is NRF participants.p-value: 0.70490% CI: [86.983, 124.576]ANOVA
Comparison: The reference arm is NRF participants.p-value: 0.96590% CI: [84.453, 119.488]ANOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.

Serum samples were evaluated for the presence of ADAs using a validated bridging electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassay. Samples in: Cycle 1, Day 1 0 h (pre-dose), Cycle 2, Day 1(Study Day 29), 0 h (pre-dose; 672 h post-dose), Cycle 3, Day 1, 0 h and in cycle thereafter, at end of study/discontinuation, and at 30 and 60 day follow up visits post treatment. ADA Positive Participant: baseline negative with at least one ADA positive sample at any time after initiation of treatment or baseline positive with at least one ADA positive sample at any time after initiation of treatment with a titer 9-fold greater than the baseline; Persistent Positive: ADA positive at 2 or more sequential timepoints at least 12 weeks apart; Last Sample Positive: Not persistent positive and ADA Positive Sample in the last sampling timepoint; Other Positive: not persistent positive with ADA negative sample in the last sampling; ADA Negative: no ADA positive sample after the initiation of treatment.

Time frame: From first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days, up to Primary Endpoint (June 2014), approximately 2 years

Population: All participants with baseline ADA result and at least one on-treatment ADA result.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.On-Study ADA Positive2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Last Sample Positive1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Persistent Positive0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Baseline ADA Positive1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.On-Study ADA Negative4 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Other Positive1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Positive at Cycle 2 pre-dose2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Persistent Positive0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Baseline ADA Positive0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.On-Study ADA Positive1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Positive at Cycle 2 pre-dose0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Last Sample Positive0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Other Positive1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.On-Study ADA Negative3 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Last Sample Positive1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.On-Study ADA Positive1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.On-Study ADA Negative5 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Other Positive0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Persistent Positive0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Positive at Cycle 2 pre-dose1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Persistent Elotuzumab Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) and Number of Participants ADA Positive at Cycle 2 Pre-dose.Baseline ADA Positive0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who Died

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.

Time frame: From first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days (Assessed up to July 2016, approximately 54 months)

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (at least one dose of any drug) were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedDeaths0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedAny SAE3 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedAny SAE5 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedAEs Leading to Discontinuation4 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedDeaths0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedAny SAE7 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedAEs Leading to Discontinuation1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Who DiedDeaths0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory Tests

Sodium high (H) Gr 1:\>ULN - 150; Gr 2: \>150 - 155; Gr 3: \>155 - 160; Gr 4: \>160 mmol/L; Sodium low(L) Gr 1:\<LLN - 130; Gr 3: \<130 - 120; Gr 4: \<120 mmol/L. Potassium (H) Gr 1: \>ULN - 5.5; Gr 2: \>5.5 - 6.0; Gr 3: \> 6.0 - 7.0; Gr 4: \>7.0 mmol/L; Potassium (L) Gr 1: \<LLN - 3.0; Gr 2: \<LLN - 3.0; Gr 3: \< 3.0 - 2.5; Gr 4: \<2.5 mmol/L. Bicarbonate Gr1: 16-\<LLN, Gr2: 11-16, Gr3, 8-11, Gr4: \<8 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L). Phosphorus Gr 1: 2.5 - \<LLN, Gr2 2.0-\<2.5, Gr3: 1.0-\<2.0, Gr4: \<1.0. Calcium (L) Gr 1: \<LLN to 8.0; Gr2: 7.0 - 8.0; Gr3: 6.0-7.0; Gr 4: \<6.0 mg/dL; calcium (H) Gr1:\>ULN - 11.5, Gr2:\>11.5 - 12.5, Gr3: 12.5 - 13.5, Gr4: \>13.5.

Time frame: From first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days (Assessed up to July 2016, approximately 54 months)

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (at least one dose of any drug) were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium High Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium High Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium Low Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium Low Grade 3-41 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium High Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium High Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium Low Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium Low Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsBicarbonate Any Grade5 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsBicarbonate Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium High Any Grade1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium High Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium Low Any Grade4 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium Low Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose High Any Grade7 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose High Grade 3-43 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose Low Any Grade1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose Low Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose Low Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium High Any Grade3 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsBicarbonate Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium Low Any Grade6 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium High Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose High Any Grade9 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose High Grade 3-44 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium Low Any Grade6 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium High Any Grade0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose Low Any Grade0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium Low Grade 3-41 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsBicarbonate Any Grade8 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium Low Grade 3-41 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium High Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium Low Grade 3-42 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium High Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium High Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium Low Any Grade5 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium High Grade 3-43 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium Low Any Grade6 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium Low Grade 3-41 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose High Any Grade7 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsBicarbonate Any Grade6 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose Low Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsBicarbonate Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium High Any Grade3 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose High Grade 3-43 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium High Grade 3-41 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium High Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium High Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium Low Any Grade8 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium Low Any Grade5 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsSodium Low Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsPotassium High Any Grade4 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsCalcium Low Grade 3-42 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Chemistry Laboratory TestsGlucose Low Any Grade1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory Tests

National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0 was used to measure toxicity scale. Lower Limits of Normal (LLN). Hemoglobin Gr 1:\<LLN to 10.0 g/dL, Gr 2:\<10.0 to 8.0 g/dL, Gr 3:\<8.0 to 6.5 g/dL, Gr 4:\<6.5 g/dL. Lymphocytes absolute (abs) Gr 1: \<1.5 to 0.8 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 2 \<0.8 to 0.5 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 3: \<0.5 to 0.2 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 4: \<0.2\*10\^3 c/µL. Neutrophils abs: Gr 1:\<LLN to 1.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<1.5 to 1.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<1.0 to 0.5\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<0.5\*10\^9/L. Platelet count Gr 1:LLN to 75.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 2:\<75.0 to 50.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 3:\<50.0 to 25.0\*10\^9/L, Gr 4:\<25.0 to 10\^9/L. Leukocytes Gr 1:\<LLN to 3.0 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 2; \<3.0 to 2.0 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 3: \<2.0 to 1.0 \*10\^3 c/µL, Gr 4: \<1.0 \*10\^3 c/µL.

Time frame: From first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days (Assessed up to July 2016, approximately 54 months)

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (at least one dose of any drug) were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsHemoglobin Any Grade8 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsHemoglobin Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsPlatelet Count Any Grade7 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsPlatelet Count Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLeukocytes Any Grade8 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLymphocytes (Abs) Any Grade8 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLymphocytes (Abs) Grade 3-46 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsNeutrophil Count (Abs) Any Grade6 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsNeutrophil Count (Abs) Grade 3-43 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLeukocytes Grade 3-43 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsPlatelet Count Grade 3-42 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsNeutrophil Count (Abs) Any Grade5 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLeukocytes Any Grade8 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLeukocytes Grade 3-41 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLymphocytes (Abs) Any Grade9 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsHemoglobin Any Grade9 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLymphocytes (Abs) Grade 3-49 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsHemoglobin Grade 3-42 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsPlatelet Count Any Grade8 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsNeutrophil Count (Abs) Grade 3-41 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsNeutrophil Count (Abs) Grade 3-42 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsPlatelet Count Grade 3-42 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsHemoglobin Grade 3-46 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsHemoglobin Any Grade9 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLeukocytes Any Grade6 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLymphocytes (Abs) Grade 3-45 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLeukocytes Grade 3-42 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsNeutrophil Count (Abs) Any Grade6 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsPlatelet Count Any Grade8 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Hematology Laboratory TestsLymphocytes (Abs) Any Grade9 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory Tests

NCI CTCAE, version 3.0 was used to measure toxicity scale. Lower Limits of Normal (LLN). Upper Limits of Normal (ULN). Alanine transaminase (ALT); Aspartate aminotransferase (AST); Alkaline phosphatase (ALP). ALT Grade (Gr)1:\>1.0 to 2.5\*ULN; Gr 2: \>2.5 to 5.0\*ULN; Gr 3: \>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>20.0\*ULN. AST Gr 1: \>1.0 to 2.5\*ULN; Gr 2: \>2.5 to 5.0\*ULN; Gr 3: \>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>20.0\*ULN. Total bilirubin Gr 1: \>1.0 to 1.5\*ULN; Gr 2: \>1.5 to 3.0\*ULN; Gr 3: \>3.0 to 10..0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>10.0.0\*ULN. ALP (U/L) Gr1:\>1.0 to 2.5\*ULN, Gr2:\>2.5 to 5.0\*ULN, Gr3:\>5.0 to 20.0\*ULN, Gr4:\>20.0\*ULN. Albumin (low) Gr 1:\<LLN to 3 grams per deciliter (g/dL); Gr 2: \<3.0 - 2.0 g/L; Gr 3: \< 2 g/dL. Creatinine Gr 1: \>1 - 1.5\*baseline (BL)to \>ULN - 1.5\*ULN; Gr 2: \>1.5 - 3.0\*BL to \> 1.5 - 3.0\*ULN; Gr 3: \>3.0\*BL to \> 3.0 - 6.0\*ULN; Gr 4: \>6.0\*ULN.

Time frame: From first dose (Day 1) to last dose plus 60 days (Assessed up to July 2016, approximately 54 months)

Population: All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (at least one dose of any drug) were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALP Any Grade0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALP Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAST Any Grade3 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAST Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALT Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALT Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsBilirubin Any Grade1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsBilirubin Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsCreatinine Any Grade0 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsCreatinine Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAlbumin Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAlbumin Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsBilirubin Any Grade1 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALP Any Grade3 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALT Any Grade5 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsCreatinine Any Grade9 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALP Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAlbumin Any Grade7 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsBilirubin Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAST Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALT Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAlbumin Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAST Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsCreatinine Grade 3-42 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAST Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALT Any Grade5 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAlbumin Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALT Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsCreatinine Grade 3-49 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsBilirubin Any Grade2 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsBilirubin Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAlbumin Any Grade7 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALP Any Grade7 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsALP Grade 3-40 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsCreatinine Any Grade9 participants
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Renal and Liver Function Laboratory TestsAST Any Grade5 participants
Other Pre-specified

Geometric Mean Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method

The quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. Vz was measured in mL per kilogram body weight (mL/kg). PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post dose

Population: The analyses of PK parameters were conducted by renal functions as determined by CrCl C-G method in those participants who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable pre- and post-treatment values.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method59.4 mL/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 30
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method54.6 mL/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method61.2 mL/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43
Other Pre-specified

Geometric Mean Total Body Clearance (CLT) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method

The quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. CLT was measured in mL per hour per kilogram body weight (mL/h/kg). PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post dose

Population: The analyses of PK parameters were conducted by renal functions as determined by CrCl C-G method in those participants who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable pre- and post-treatment values.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Total Body Clearance (CLT) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method0.215 mL/h/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Total Body Clearance (CLT) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method0.166 mL/h/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsGeometric Mean Total Body Clearance (CLT) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method0.195 mL/h/kgGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54
Other Pre-specified

Mean Terminal-phase Elimination Half-life (T-Half) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method

The quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. T-Half was measured in hours (h). PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post dose

Population: The analyses of PK parameters were conducted by renal functions as determined by CrCl C-G method in those participants who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable pre- and post-treatment values.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsMean Terminal-phase Elimination Half-life (T-Half) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method204 hStandard Deviation 134.11
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsMean Terminal-phase Elimination Half-life (T-Half) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method237 hStandard Deviation 107.88
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsMean Terminal-phase Elimination Half-life (T-Half) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method218 hStandard Deviation 98.87
Other Pre-specified

Median Time to Maximal Concentration (Tmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method

The quantification of elotuzumab in human serum was performed using validated ELISA. Cycle 1, day 1 sample times for all participants: 0 hour (h) pre-dose, end of infusion, 30 minutes (min) post end of infusion, 2 h, 4 h , and 24 h post end of infusion. Trough samples were obtained in subsequent cycles and at 30 day and 60 day follow-up visits at end of treatment. ESRD had 2 additional samples: immediately prior to and immediately after dialysis. Tmax was measured in hours (h). PK parameter renal function group assignment criteria differed slightly from the criteria for safety and efficacy analyses (specifically for the SRI group). PK criteria: All participants with at least one pretreatment value ≥ 90 mL/min were assigned to the NRF group. All those with at least one pretreatment value \< 30 mL/min were assigned to the SRI group. All those with a screening diagnosis of ESRD, were assigned to the ESRD group.

Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 to 28 days post dose

Population: The analyses of PK parameters were conducted by renal functions as determined by CrCl C-G method in those participants who were treated with at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable pre- and post-treatment values.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Elotuzumab + LD in Normal Renal Function (NRF) ParticipantsMedian Time to Maximal Concentration (Tmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method3.23 h
Elotuzumab + LD in Severe Renal Impairment (SRI) ParticipantsMedian Time to Maximal Concentration (Tmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method3.87 h
Elotuzumab + LD in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) ParticipantsMedian Time to Maximal Concentration (Tmax) of Elotuzumab Following Cycle 1, Day 1 Dose Administration - Grouping by Cockcroft-Gault Creatinine Clearance Method3.33 h

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026